Privacy Mistakes that Keep Security Experts Always Cautious

A lock icon, signifying an encrypted Internet connection, is seen on an Internet Explorer browser in a photo illustration in Paris. REUTERS/Mal Langsdon
A lock icon, signifying an encrypted Internet connection, is seen on an Internet Explorer browser in a photo illustration in Paris. REUTERS/Mal Langsdon
TT

Privacy Mistakes that Keep Security Experts Always Cautious

A lock icon, signifying an encrypted Internet connection, is seen on an Internet Explorer browser in a photo illustration in Paris. REUTERS/Mal Langsdon
A lock icon, signifying an encrypted Internet connection, is seen on an Internet Explorer browser in a photo illustration in Paris. REUTERS/Mal Langsdon

When it comes to privacy, it's the little things that can lead to big mishaps.

Privacy and security are often thought of as one and the same. While they are related, privacy has become its own discipline, which means security experts need to become more familiar with the subtle types of mistakes that can lead to some dangerous privacy snafus.

- Privacy System

With General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) going live last spring in Europe and the California privacy law becoming effective in 2020, companies should expect privacy to become more of an issue in the years ahead. Colorado and Vermont have passed privacy laws, as has Brazil, and India is well on its way to passing one of its own.

Mark Bower, general manager and chief revenue officer at Egress Software Technologies, says that first and foremost, companies have to think of privacy by design.

Privacy by design requires companies to ask the following questions: What type of data are we storing? For what business purposes? Does the data need to be encrypted? How will the data be destroyed when it becomes obsolete, and how long a period will that be? Are there compliance regulations that stipulate data destruction requirements? How will the company protect personally identifiable information for credit cards and medical information?

- Emails mishaps

1. The Accidental email: Egress Software's Bower told the Dark Readings website that many misdirected emails are sent because users type in the first couple of letters of a name and go with what pops up first. While training users to check the To: field twice before hitting "send" can help, new machine-learning and AI technologies can track patterns of who users typically send emails to and have them double check they are sending them to the right people. For salespeople or reporters in the media who deal with lots of new contacts, the system can flag that this is the first time they are connecting with this person and ask whether they really want to send that attachment.

2. Somebody forwards a corporate email to a friend, spouse, or personal account: companies need to rethink how they want to control corporate information they send to their staffs, Egress Software’s Bower adds. The emails could be about something seemingly innocuous, like holiday plans, or inside information about a new product. Either way, companies have to decide whether they're going to let people forward them to people outside of the company or restrict or block people from sending them.

3. A user adds a new person to an email string who shouldn't have access: emails can get into the wrong hands when someone adds a person to a thread to keep him in the loop, but then somebody else includes confidential information that the added person shouldn't have access to, Bower points out. Once again, people need to be trained on how to be more sensitive to email strings and who really needs to see the information being sent. Technologies that use AI and machine learning can help, he says, and they can be used to block access if it's discovered that information has been sent to somebody who does not have proper access rights.

- Sync and Share

4. A 'Sync and Share' causes a potential data breach: Chuck Holland, director of product management at Vera Security sees that companies have to rethink their BYOD policies because every time an employee syncs a mobile device, she is syncing data to her personal cloud. Similarly, and maybe worse for the employee, she could be syncing her information to the corporate network.

5. Companies don't practice good off-boarding routines: Holland says companies have to do a better job off-boarding when an employee leaves for another job or for performance reasons. Too often, companies leave old accounts open, and sensitive information could be stored on the hard drives of their computers or in emails. Companies need to understand that hackers look for those types of accounts for information they can sell or to launch widespread attacks.

6. Companies don't encrypt email and data transfers: companies should never send unencrypted data or emails over the corporate network, a BigID's official says. Specific departments that should think extra carefully about privacy and taking care of sensitive personal and corporate information include human resources, marketing, advertising, and accounting, she adds.

7. During M&As, companies use privacy as a bargaining chip: while companies take privacy into account during a merger or acquisition, very often they will use it to have the other company reduce the purchase price, BigID's Farber says. However, after the merger, instead of taking money saved and investing it in privacy and security, it will just move it to the bottom line.



Nvidia, Joining Big Tech Deal Spree, to License Groq Technology, Hire Executives

The Nvidia logo is seen on a graphic card package in this illustration created on August 19, 2025. (Reuters)
The Nvidia logo is seen on a graphic card package in this illustration created on August 19, 2025. (Reuters)
TT

Nvidia, Joining Big Tech Deal Spree, to License Groq Technology, Hire Executives

The Nvidia logo is seen on a graphic card package in this illustration created on August 19, 2025. (Reuters)
The Nvidia logo is seen on a graphic card package in this illustration created on August 19, 2025. (Reuters)

Nvidia has agreed to license chip technology from startup Groq and hire away its CEO, a veteran of Alphabet's Google, Groq said in a blog post on Wednesday.

The deal follows a familiar pattern in recent years where the world's biggest technology firms pay large sums in deals with promising startups to take their technology and talent but stop short of formally acquiring the target.

Groq specializes in what is known as inference, where artificial intelligence models that have already been trained respond to requests from users. While Nvidia dominates the market for training AI models, it faces much more competition in inference, where traditional rivals such as Advanced Micro Devices have aimed ‌to challenge it ‌as well as startups such as Groq and Cerebras Systems.

Nvidia ‌has ⁠agreed to a "non-exclusive" ‌license to Groq's technology, Groq said. It said its founder Jonathan Ross, who helped Google start its AI chip program, as well as Groq President Sunny Madra and other members of its engineering team, will join Nvidia.

A person close to Nvidia confirmed the licensing agreement.

Groq did not disclose financial details of the deal. CNBC reported that Nvidia had agreed to acquire Groq for $20 billion in cash, but neither Nvidia nor Groq commented on the report. Groq said in its blog post that it will continue to ⁠operate as an independent company with Simon Edwards as CEO and that its cloud business will continue operating.

In similar recent deals, Microsoft's ‌top AI executive came through a $650 million deal with a startup ‍that was billed as a licensing fee, and ‍Meta spent $15 billion to hire Scale AI's CEO without acquiring the entire firm. Amazon hired ‍away founders from Adept AI, and Nvidia did a similar deal this year. The deals have faced scrutiny by regulators, though none has yet been unwound.

"Antitrust would seem to be the primary risk here, though structuring the deal as a non-exclusive license may keep the fiction of competition alive (even as Groq’s leadership and, we would presume, technical talent move over to Nvidia)," Bernstein analyst Stacy Rasgon wrote in a note to clients on Wednesday after Groq's announcement. And Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang's "relationship with ⁠the Trump administration appears among the strongest of the key US tech companies."

Groq more than doubled its valuation to $6.9 billion from $2.8 billion in August last year, following a $750 million funding round in September.

Groq is one of a number of upstarts that do not use external high-bandwidth memory chips, freeing them from the memory crunch affecting the global chip industry. The approach, which uses a form of on-chip memory called SRAM, helps speed up interactions with chatbots and other AI models but also limits the size of the model that can be served.

Groq's primary rival in the approach is Cerebras Systems, which Reuters this month reported plans to go public as soon as next year. Groq and Cerebras have signed large deals in the Middle East.

Nvidia's Huang spent much of his biggest keynote speech of 2025 arguing that ‌Nvidia would be able to maintain its lead as AI markets shift from training to inference.


Italy Watchdog Orders Meta to Halt WhatsApp Terms Barring Rival AI Chatbots

The logo of Meta is seen at Porte de Versailles exhibition center in Paris, France, June 11, 2025. (Reuters)
The logo of Meta is seen at Porte de Versailles exhibition center in Paris, France, June 11, 2025. (Reuters)
TT

Italy Watchdog Orders Meta to Halt WhatsApp Terms Barring Rival AI Chatbots

The logo of Meta is seen at Porte de Versailles exhibition center in Paris, France, June 11, 2025. (Reuters)
The logo of Meta is seen at Porte de Versailles exhibition center in Paris, France, June 11, 2025. (Reuters)

Italy's antitrust authority (AGCM) on Wednesday ordered Meta Platforms to suspend contractual terms ​that could shut rival AI chatbots out of WhatsApp, as it investigates the US tech group for suspected abuse of a dominant position.

A spokesperson for Meta called the decision "fundamentally flawed," and said the emergence of AI chatbots "put a strain on our systems that ‌they were ‌not designed to support".

"We ‌will ⁠appeal," ​the ‌spokesperson added.

The move is the latest in a string by European regulators against Big Tech firms, as the EU seeks to balance support for the sector with efforts to curb its expanding influence.

Meta's conduct appeared capable of restricting "output, market ⁠access or technical development in the AI chatbot services market", ‌potentially harming consumers, AGCM ‍said.

In July, the ‍Italian regulator opened the investigation into Meta over ‍the suspected abuse of a dominant position related to WhatsApp. It widened the probe in November to cover updated terms for the messaging app's business ​platform.

"These contractual conditions completely exclude Meta AI's competitors in the AI chatbot services ⁠market from the WhatsApp platform," the watchdog said.

EU antitrust regulators launched a parallel investigation into Meta last month over the same allegations.

Europe's tough stance - a marked contrast to more lenient US regulation - has sparked industry pushback, particularly by US tech titans, and led to criticism from the administration of US President Donald Trump.

The Italian watchdog said it was coordinating with the European ‌Commission to ensure Meta's conduct was addressed "in the most effective manner".


Amazon Says Blocked 1,800 North Koreans from Applying for Jobs

Amazon logo (Reuters)
Amazon logo (Reuters)
TT

Amazon Says Blocked 1,800 North Koreans from Applying for Jobs

Amazon logo (Reuters)
Amazon logo (Reuters)

US tech giant Amazon said it has blocked over 1,800 North Koreans from joining the company, as Pyongyang sends large numbers of IT workers overseas to earn and launder funds.

In a post on LinkedIn, Amazon's Chief Security Officer Stephen Schmidt said last week that North Korean workers had been "attempting to secure remote IT jobs with companies worldwide, particularly in the US".

He said the firm had seen nearly a one-third rise in applications by North Koreans in the past year, reported AFP.

The North Koreans typically use "laptop farms" -- a computer in the United States operated remotely from outside the country, he said.

He warned the problem wasn't specific to Amazon and "is likely happening at scale across the industry".

Tell-tale signs of North Korean workers, Schmidt said, included wrongly formatted phone numbers and dodgy academic credentials.

In July, a woman in Arizona was sentenced to more than eight years in prison for running a laptop farm helping North Korean IT workers secure remote jobs at more than 300 US companies.

The scheme generated more than $17 million in revenue for her and North Korea, officials said.

Last year, Seoul's intelligence agency warned that North Korean operatives had used LinkedIn to pose as recruiters and approach South Koreans working at defense firms to obtain information on their technologies.

"North Korea is actively training cyber personnel and infiltrating key locations worldwide," Hong Min, an analyst at the Korea Institute for National Unification, told AFP.

"Given Amazon's business nature, the motive seems largely economic, with a high likelihood that the operation was planned to steal financial assets," he added.

North Korea's cyber-warfare program dates back to at least the mid-1990s.

It has since grown into a 6,000-strong cyber unit known as Bureau 121, which operates from several countries, according to a 2020 US military report.

In November, Washington announced sanctions on eight individuals accused of being "state-sponsored hackers", whose illicit operations were conducted "to fund the regime's nuclear weapons program" by stealing and laundering money.

The US Department of the Treasury has accused North Korea-affiliated cybercriminals of stealing over $3 billion over the past three years, primarily in cryptocurrency.