Marco Silva Is Losing His Swashbuckler Lustre as Everton’s Shine Fades

An Everton fan shows his frustration to a Marco Silva sign after Everton lost at home against Sheffield United in the Premier League. Photograph: Nathan Stirk/Getty Images
An Everton fan shows his frustration to a Marco Silva sign after Everton lost at home against Sheffield United in the Premier League. Photograph: Nathan Stirk/Getty Images
TT

Marco Silva Is Losing His Swashbuckler Lustre as Everton’s Shine Fades

An Everton fan shows his frustration to a Marco Silva sign after Everton lost at home against Sheffield United in the Premier League. Photograph: Nathan Stirk/Getty Images
An Everton fan shows his frustration to a Marco Silva sign after Everton lost at home against Sheffield United in the Premier League. Photograph: Nathan Stirk/Getty Images

Not too long ago Everton were able to boast a decent record against Manchester City. They were never reliable enough to be regarded as a bogey team but they caused a few problems during Roberto Mancini’s time at the Etihad Stadium and as recently as Pep Guardiola’s first season in England they were responsible for a 4-0 victory at Goodison that still stands as the manager’s biggest and most inexplicable Premier League defeat.

Everton were not quite as potent a force once Ronald Koeman and Romelu Lukaku had departed, yet a Wayne Rooney goal was still enough to claim a draw at the Etihad Stadium at the start of City’s record‑breaking 2017-18 title campaign. That was only a little over two years ago, yet so much has happened in Manchester and Merseyside since that it seems much longer. While City were winning back-to-back titles Everton had to endure a spell under Sam Allardyce, a low point in the eyes of most fans from which they are still struggling to recover. The past three meetings between the clubs have all gone City’s way and, given the manner in which Everton lost at home against Sheffield United last week, there can be little enthusiasm for the visit of a side that could easily have reached double figures against Watford on the same day.

While practically any new manager would have been welcomed as an antidote to Allardyce’s unappealing and unnecessary functionalism, not everyone around Goodison viewed Marco Silva as the swashbuckling savior the club were keen to promote. It was noted at the time of his appointment that after the initial periods of success at Hull and Watford that first got him noticed there was a leveling-off in terms of results. Here was a bright young manager who could point out a few things a club might have been doing badly or wrong, but one who did not necessarily have the answers when it came to sustaining improvement or driving a club forward.

Those first impressions have not exactly been dispelled by Silva’s first year and a bit on Merseyside. To put it as politely as possible Everton have been wildly inconsistent. Indeed many would argue there has been no discernible initial improvement of any note apart from a giddy 4-0 win against Manchester United towards the end of last season when Ole Gunnar Solskjær’s team were on the slide. In six matches this season they have already been beaten three times and two of those defeats were at the hands of newly promoted sides.

Yes, it is fair to point out that City, too, were beaten at Norwich a couple of weeks ago but, unlike Silva, Guardiola does not currently find himself among the bookies’ favorites to lose his job. Despite losing against Daniel Farke’s newcomers, despite conceding a five-point advantage to Liverpool at this early stage, City are still chugging along quite sweetly, averaging four goals a game. No one else is doing that and, even when Guardiola changes the team for midweek cup games, City still have enough core strength for 3-0 wins away against decent opponents in Shakhtar Donetsk and Preston North End.

Granted not everyone can boast City’s wealth of riches, with Guardiola giving Kevin De Bruyne a rest one week and Raheem Sterling the next. Yet Everton were not inactive in the transfer market over the summer and a club with a stated ambition of breaking into the European elite must be disappointed with a return of five goals in six matches. Only Crystal Palace, Newcastle and Watford have scored fewer and on Saturday a side averaging less than a goal a game has to face opponents who were five goals up after 18 minutes in their last league outing.

To an extent Everton have been unlucky with injuries. André Gomes has been out with a rib complaint while little has been seen of the £25m signing Jean-Philippe Gbamin. Yet to a greater extent it is still hard to work out how Silva wants his side to play. From a defensive point of view it is not clear that Idrissa Gueye has been satisfactorily replaced and far from certain that Yerry Mina is an ideal partner for Michael Keane, while up front there is still no obvious strategy despite a confusing selection of somewhat similar players.

Koeman complained that Everton needed to sign another 25-goal-a-season player when they lost Lukaku and, while there are not that many around – still fewer within Everton’s price range – the gap has not been filled. Koeman’s own idea was Olivier Giroud, who might not have reproduced Lukaku’s figures but would have scored a few and helped to bring others into the game.

Everton are still waiting for someone to perform that function. Richarlison is not doing it, at least not consistently, Moise Kean has yet to live up to his publicity and Dominic Calvert-Lewin is in and out of the team. The lack of clarity in Everton’s forward thinking was amply demonstrated last weekend when chasing the game against Sheffield United. Silva kept raiding his supply of attacking nearly men to try to come up with an equalizer so that in the end he had Alex Iwobi, Cenk Tosun and Theo Walcott on the pitch in addition to Richarlison, Kean and Gylfi Sigurdsson, yet this profusion of would-be matchwinners had the predictable result of leaving the midfield and defense exposed so that it was John Lundstram and Lys Mousset who came up with an almost casual clinching goal for the visitors.

All of which means that Silva is under pressure, as they say, with the season barely a month old and another international break looming. While he could probably do without meeting City at this precise moment, it might be harsh for anyone to jump to kneejerk conclusions against opponents capable of dismantling most teams in Europe. The majority of managers would be out of a job were their input to be solely assessed on results against the champions but Silva needs an upturn from somewhere, and soon.

(The Guardian)



Algeria and Austria Clash Revives Memories of the ‘Disgrace of Gijon’

Algeria face Austria on Saturday, 44 years on from the "Disgrace of Gijon". (Getty Images/AFP)
Algeria face Austria on Saturday, 44 years on from the "Disgrace of Gijon". (Getty Images/AFP)
TT

Algeria and Austria Clash Revives Memories of the ‘Disgrace of Gijon’

Algeria face Austria on Saturday, 44 years on from the "Disgrace of Gijon". (Getty Images/AFP)
Algeria face Austria on Saturday, 44 years on from the "Disgrace of Gijon". (Getty Images/AFP)

When Algeria and Austria meet in their last group game in Kansas City on Saturday, it will not only be key to both countries’ hopes of progressing at the World Cup but will also revive memories of one of the tournament’s darkest moments.

The only previous time the sides shared a group, Austria were accused of conniving with West Germany to ensure both teams advanced in the tournament and Algeria were eliminated.

The game was later dubbed the "Disgrace of Gijon" after the Spanish city where the 1982 World Cup proved an eventful debut for the North Africans, who upset West Germany in their first match with a shock 2-1 victory.

There were 24 teams in the tournament for the first time in ‌1982, divided into ‌six groups of four with the top two advancing to a second ‌round ⁠of group matches.

Algeria ⁠lost their second group game to Austria and beat Chile 3-2, leaving them with four points from their three games at a time when two points were awarded for a win.

NEIGHBORS CONTRIVED RESULT TO BOTH GO THROUGH

The group concluded 24 hours later in Gijon with Austria playing neighbors West Germany and a 1-0 win for the Germans would send both sides through.

West Germany went ahead after 10 minutes through Horst Hrubesch, after which both teams passed the ball around with no intention of adding to the score and contrived a ⁠result that squeezed Algeria out on goal difference.

“Even though we had somewhat ‌expected it, we were all angry, outraged and stunned,” said ‌Rabah Madjer, Algeria’s former African Footballer of the Year.

“That two major football nations could agree to eliminate a small ‌country like Algeria, playing in its first World Cup and just emerging on the international stage, ‌was shocking.”

German sports magazine Kicker described the proceedings as “after about 20 minutes, the attacking intensity faded”.

“The Austrians, for their part, made no effort to exploit the additional space going forward. Suddenly, nobody seemed interested in playing serious football anymore. What followed was an endless exchange of passes, with few challenges and almost no urgency. Possession was ‌lost mainly through misplaced passes.”

French daily L’Equipe said there should have been 22 red cards shown to the players of both sides.

SPECTATORS WAVED WHITE ⁠SCARVES TO PROTEST

Spanish spectators ⁠waved white scarves in a traditional sign of disapproval while on Austrian television, commentator Robert Seeger told his viewers: "Turn it off!"

German defender Paul Breitner, a World Cup winner in 1974, saw little wrong.

"The public is stupid if it doesn't understand that qualification was all that mattered here,” he said, and FIFA ruled the teams were within their rights to play as passively as they did, in response to an Algerian protest.

The Germans won their three-team second-round group, ahead of England and hosts Spain, and advanced to the semi-finals, where they beat France on penalties before losing to Italy in the final. Austria finished behind France in their second group.

A direct result of the "Disgrace of Gijon" was FIFA changing the rule to ensure the final matches in World Cup group stages are played simultaneously to prevent teams having advance knowledge of what they require to advance and the possibility of manufacturing the outcome of games.

“Many people apologized afterwards. It's good to acknowledge the harm you've caused, but it didn’t change anything for us,” Madjer said.


Ghana Draw Cools England Hype and Revives Familiar Questions

 England head coach Thomas Tuchel listens to the national anthem ahead the World Cup Group L soccer match between England and Ghana in Foxborough, Mass., near Boston, Tuesday, June 23, 2026. (AP)
England head coach Thomas Tuchel listens to the national anthem ahead the World Cup Group L soccer match between England and Ghana in Foxborough, Mass., near Boston, Tuesday, June 23, 2026. (AP)
TT

Ghana Draw Cools England Hype and Revives Familiar Questions

 England head coach Thomas Tuchel listens to the national anthem ahead the World Cup Group L soccer match between England and Ghana in Foxborough, Mass., near Boston, Tuesday, June 23, 2026. (AP)
England head coach Thomas Tuchel listens to the national anthem ahead the World Cup Group L soccer match between England and Ghana in Foxborough, Mass., near Boston, Tuesday, June 23, 2026. (AP)

Thomas Tuchel's England were riding a wave of optimism at the World Cup after their opening 4-2 demolition of Croatia, but Tuesday's 0-0 draw against Ghana served as a reminder that progress at major tournaments is not always straightforward.

The victory over Croatia had showcased England at their best, with fluid attacking football, goals and a sense that Tuchel's methods were taking hold.

Against Ghana, however, they encountered an entirely different challenge. Carlos Queiroz's side defended deep, remained organized and physical, and frustrated England for much of the ‌night as they ‌emerged with a valuable point.

England remain top of Group L ‌and ⁠are still firmly ⁠on course for the knockout stages, but the stalemate raised fresh questions about whether Tuchel's side possess the creativity and variety required to break down stubborn opponents.

Ghana appeared content to sit back and absorb pressure, surrendering possession but denying England space in dangerous areas.

"It is difficult to find a way through when someone plays a 4-5-1 and completely deep and is committed to it," Tuchel said afterwards. "They celebrated a 0-0 like a win. You cannot ⁠lose your head about it."

For all of England's dominance on the ‌ball, the Three Lions struggled to create clear ‌chances. Harry Kane, who scored twice in the opening victory over Croatia, was largely isolated and ‌tightly marked.

His frustration was summed up in stoppage time when he blazed his shot ‌over the bar from six yards after Nico O'Reilly's header had struck the crossbar.

The performance also reignited debate about England's attacking options. Anthony Gordon again struggled before being replaced by Bukayo Saka, whose introduction injected some urgency and unpredictability into England's play, forcing a save from Ghana goalkeeper ‌Benjamin Asare late on.

Marcus Rashford may also be pushing for greater involvement after England's lack of penetration against a compact defense.

Declan ⁠Rice and Elliot Anderson ⁠provided control but little creativity in midfield, allowing Ghana to remain comfortable for long stretches.

Rice insisted there was no cause for concern.

"We have one more group game to top the group, so we have to be positive," he said.

England's emphatic win over Croatia had sparked talk of momentum, belief and the possibility that Tuchel's new-look side might be finding its stride early.

Ninety minutes against Ghana quickly cooled that enthusiasm.

For the fourth major tournament in succession, England failed to win their second group game, exchanging the exhilaration of a four-goal display for a frustrating stalemate.

The surge of optimism generated by the Croatia victory has been checked, at least temporarily.

And while England remain well-placed to reach the knockout stages, the sense of optimism that followed their opening performance has been replaced by familiar questions about flare, consistency and whether they can break down organized opposition when space is at a premium.


Infantino: World Cup Hydration Breaks Purely Sporting, Not Commercial

Soccer Football - FIFA World Cup 2026 - Group K - Colombia v DR Congo - Estadio Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Mexico - June 23, 2026 Colombia coach Nestor Lorenzo gives instructions to his players during a hydration break REUTERS/Raquel Cunha
Soccer Football - FIFA World Cup 2026 - Group K - Colombia v DR Congo - Estadio Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Mexico - June 23, 2026 Colombia coach Nestor Lorenzo gives instructions to his players during a hydration break REUTERS/Raquel Cunha
TT

Infantino: World Cup Hydration Breaks Purely Sporting, Not Commercial

Soccer Football - FIFA World Cup 2026 - Group K - Colombia v DR Congo - Estadio Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Mexico - June 23, 2026 Colombia coach Nestor Lorenzo gives instructions to his players during a hydration break REUTERS/Raquel Cunha
Soccer Football - FIFA World Cup 2026 - Group K - Colombia v DR Congo - Estadio Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Mexico - June 23, 2026 Colombia coach Nestor Lorenzo gives instructions to his players during a hydration break REUTERS/Raquel Cunha

FIFA president Gianni Infantino has defended the introduction of hydration breaks at the World Cup, insisting that for football's governing body they are driven purely by sporting considerations and not commercial interests.

Mandatory three-minute breaks, introduced in the 22nd and 67th minutes of every match at the tournament, have drawn criticism from players, coaches and fans since the opening round of fixtures.

The breaks, introduced to help players cope with high temperatures across North America, have opened up additional advertising windows for broadcasters, Reuters reported.

This has fueled debate over their impact on the game, with some viewers complaining about being exposed to commercials during the three-minute stoppages.

"There is no ⁠additional revenue for ⁠FIFA, as all commercial agreements were signed well in advance. So, this is not a financial issue for us. For us, it is purely a sporting matter," Infantino said in a statement on Wednesday.

The breaks allow coaching staff to give in-game tactical instructions, a shift critics say disrupts match momentum and fundamentally alters the nature ⁠of the game.

England manager Thomas Tuchel said the additional break "interrupts and changes the identity of the football match,” while Uruguay coach Marcelo Bielsa said dividing matches into shorter segments takes away the fundamental characteristic of the game.

Spain coach Luis de la Fuente and Netherlands captain Virgil van Dijk have supported the intent behind the rule in extreme heat, but questioned the need for it in cooler conditions and at covered venues.

"The main reason is the heat, but we also have to understand that in a competition like the (FIFA) ⁠World Cup, played ⁠over 39 days, with teams potentially playing eight matches in those 39 days, having a moment to rest is extremely important,” Infantino said.

"What matters even more to us is ensuring that all teams, in every match, are playing under the same conditions.

"It's very difficult to accept that a coach might have the opportunity to influence a match by making adjustments simply because it's hotter, while in another match, where the temperature is slightly lower, the same coach doesn’t have the same opportunity."

Infantino added that the breaks had not reduced the intensity of matches, suggesting players were able to maintain a high level of performance throughout games.