Israel's Netanyahu Down but Not out after Failing to Form Government

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. (Reuters)
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. (Reuters)
TT

Israel's Netanyahu Down but Not out after Failing to Form Government

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. (Reuters)
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. (Reuters)

For the first time in a decade, someone other than Benjamin Netanyahu will be asked to form a government in Israel.

The 70-year-old prime minister has called two elections this year, has twice been given the chance by the president to put together a ruling coalition, and has twice failed.

The fact that President Reuven Rivlin will now turn to someone else leaves Netanyahu even more vulnerable in his fight for political survival.

But although he has failed, the man now set to try his hand, centrist general-turned-politician Benny Gantz, also has no clear path to success.

Reuters looks at some of the possible scenarios, including even a third parliamentary election in less than a year, following two inconclusive elections in April and September.

Why is Israeli politics in deadlock?

Shortly after the September 17 election ended in stalemate, Rivlin gave Netanyahu 28 days to put together a governing coalition.

During that period, which expires on Wednesday, Israel’s longest-serving prime minister persuaded only 55 of parliament’s 120 members, including his traditional far-right and ultra-Orthodox Jewish allies, to join his right-wing Likud Party in a government.

Having fallen six seats short of a ruling majority, Netanyahu “returned” his mandate to the president on Tuesday, and a spokesman for Rivlin said Gantz would now get his chance.

One way out of the stalemate would be for the two largest parties, Likud and Gantz’s new Blue and White party, to form a “national unity” government.

Early talks centered on the possibility of a rotating premiership but led nowhere. Gantz, a former armed forces chief, refused to join a government led by Netanyahu, citing looming indictments against the prime minister in three corruption cases in which Netanyahu has denied any wrongdoing.

Gantz also said he wants a “liberal” government, shorthand for one that does not include Netanyahu’s religious partners.

Has this happened before?

The last time anyone other than Netanyahu was asked to form a government in Israel was in 2008 when Tzipi Livni, of the now-defunct Kadima party, was given the chance and failed.

That led to an election in 2009 which was won by Netanyahu. Livni never returned to front-line politics, a precedent that is not lost on Netanyahu.

What happens next?

After receiving the formal nomination from Rivlin, on Wednesday or Thursday, Gantz will have 28 days to build a coalition. As things stand now, he has the endorsement of 54 lawmakers, seven short of a parliamentary majority.

But 10 of those 54 legislators belong to a four-party Arab alliance. No party drawn from Israel’s 21 percent Arab minority has ever been invited to join an Israeli government or has sought to serve in one.

Without a deal with Netanyahu, Gantz could seek to form a minority government, with Arab lawmakers’ backing from the sidelines. But that is a big political risk in a country where Arab citizens’ loyalty has been hotly debated.

Arab lawmakers would be likely to face criticism from within their own community for propping up an Israeli government’s policies toward what many regard as their fellow Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza.

And if Gantz also comes up short?

A three-week period would ensue in which 61 lawmakers can ask the president to assign the coalition-building task to any legislator — Netanyahu, Gantz or another. If no such request is made in that time, parliament dissolves itself and an election is called — political pundits say March 17 is a possible date.

That could give Netanyahu another chance at the ballot box, barring a Likud rebellion against him.

What about Netanyahu’s legal troubles?

The deck could be reshuffled once Attorney-General Avichai Mandelblit announces whether he will follow through with his plan to indict Netanyahu in three graft investigations. His final decision is widely expected by the end of the year.

Netanyahu faces no legal requirement to leave government if indicted, but criminal charges against him - and their degree of severity - could further weaken him politically.

Netanyahu could face fraud and breach of trust charges in all three cases, and bribery charges in one.

Are there any wildcards?

Avigdor Lieberman, a former Netanyahu ally and ex-defense minister, heads the ultranationalist Yisrael Beitenu which won eight parliamentary seats in last month’s election. He has remained on the fence so far, citing policy differences with Likud’s ultra-Orthodox backers and Blue and White’s left-wing allies.

He effectively prevented Netanyahu from building a ruling coalition after this year’s first election, boosted his standing in the second and could be a kingmaker in the third.



Jailed Istanbul Mayor Dares Erdogan to Call Early Elections Now

The protest demonstrations in Türkiye against the arrest of İmamoğlu have been ongoing since March 2025 (account of the Republican People's Party on X)
The protest demonstrations in Türkiye against the arrest of İmamoğlu have been ongoing since March 2025 (account of the Republican People's Party on X)
TT

Jailed Istanbul Mayor Dares Erdogan to Call Early Elections Now

The protest demonstrations in Türkiye against the arrest of İmamoğlu have been ongoing since March 2025 (account of the Republican People's Party on X)
The protest demonstrations in Türkiye against the arrest of İmamoğlu have been ongoing since March 2025 (account of the Republican People's Party on X)

Almost one year after he was jailed, Istanbul mayor Ekrem Imamoglu has told Reuters that Tayyip Erdogan should call elections "now" and predicted that the president would lose if he ran again.

Imamoglu has emerged in recent years as Erdogan’s main rival, with polls suggesting he could indeed defeat Türkiye's leader of more than two decades if he is able to run.

But he has been the focus of a crackdown on the main opposition party that rights groups and foreign observers say has undermined the democratic credentials of EU candidate and NATO member Türkiye.

Having defeated Erdogan's ruling AK Party in three Istanbul elections, Imamoglu, 55, remains a powerful figurehead for the opposition despite being in prison since March 2025, pending trial on corruption charges that he denies.

MAYOR SAYS ERDOGAN KNOWS HE WILL LOSE ELECTION

"We want early elections now. But the current president sees the coming defeat and shies away from elections," a defiant Imamoglu ‌said in his ‌responses to Reuters' questions conveyed by his legal team from the prison at Silivri, west ‌of ⁠Istanbul.

"He will run ⁠and he will lose. And Türkiye will be the winner," Imamoglu said.

His Republican People's Party (CHP) has been calling for months for a snap vote. If elected, it says it would restore rule-of-law governance, revive stalled EU accession talks, and pursue a more social-democratic economic model.

A presidential election is not scheduled until 2028 but if Erdogan, 71, wishes to seek a third term he is obliged to hold it early, unless the constitutional term limits are changed.

Erdogan, who has led Türkiye as prime minister or president since 2003, would need three-fifths of lawmakers to vote for holding early elections, meaning he would also need support from outside his governing alliance.

Most analysts think Erdogan will call ⁠elections next year.

The CHP has sought to keep Imamoglu in the public eye by holding ‌weekly rallies in Istanbul. The latest opinion polls suggest a neck-and-neck race between the ‌CHP and Erdogan's AKP.

Imamoglu, the CHP's formal presidential candidate despite being behind bars, said he maintains a roughly 18-hour working day, toiling with ‌his lawyers on more than 10 cases and investigations, reading letters from supporters and continuing his municipal responsibilities.

He also exercises daily ‌within a 24-square-meter courtyard with high walls, he said in seven pages of responses.

TRIAL BEGINS IN MARCH

But Imamoglu's hopes of contesting the election are looking bleak as he faces a judicial onslaught that will peak next month when he goes on trial.

"As the day of their defeat approaches, the government is increasing the level of pressure and hostility directed towards us," he said.

The main prosecutor in his cases, Akin Gurlek, sought a ‌jail sentence of more than 2,000 years for Imamoglu on charges of running a criminal organization at the Istanbul municipality involved in corruption.

Gurlek was appointed justice minister on Wednesday, sparking CHP criticism ⁠that exploded into a brawl ⁠in parliament with AKP lawmakers. Erdogan accused the CHP of "displaying every kind of thuggery" in the incident.

"The CHP's job will now become even more difficult," said political commentator Murat Yetkin, adding that Erdogan's choice of Gurlek was not just about sidelining Imamoglu but was related to restructuring the justice ministry and judicial mechanisms.

Imamoglu, whose comments to Reuters came before Gurlek's appointment, decried the barrage of court cases against him as a politically driven campaign to block his presidential bid.

"Those in power, having realized they would lose, see their remedy in keeping me in prison on false allegations and by ordering the judiciary around," he said.

The government denies exerting influence over the judiciary, which it says is independent. Erdogan has largely avoided commenting on Imamoglu's case, saying the investigations have "nothing to do with me".

In another blow to Imamoglu's presidential ambitions, a court last month rejected his lawsuit challenging the cancellation of his university degree – a qualification required of any presidential candidate.

Nacho Sanchez Amor, the European Parliament's Türkiye rapporteur, said that ruling made the judiciary appear "ridiculously biased".

Asked if he thought he would be able to run in the next election, Imamoglu said he maintained his faith in justice and would exercise his legal rights to the fullest.

"No pressure and no obstacle will keep me from working to make this country more just, freer, and more prosperous," he said.


Iran Announces Enquiry Team to Investigate Deadly Protests 

Iranians walk on a street in Tehran on February 7, 2026. (AFP)
Iranians walk on a street in Tehran on February 7, 2026. (AFP)
TT

Iran Announces Enquiry Team to Investigate Deadly Protests 

Iranians walk on a street in Tehran on February 7, 2026. (AFP)
Iranians walk on a street in Tehran on February 7, 2026. (AFP)

The Iranian government announced on Friday the establishment of a commission of enquiry to look into protests against the high cost of living that turned into anti-government rallies that left thousands dead.

"A fact-finding committee has been formed with representatives from relevant institutions and is collecting documents and hearing statements," Iranian government spokeswoman Fatemeh Mohajerani told the local news agency ISNA.

The spokeswoman did not specify whether the commission would only focus on the economic demands that triggered the protests, or whether it would also investigate deaths during the protests.

"The final report will be published for public information and further legal action after the process is completed," she stated.

On Thursday, the government website published comments by President Masoud Pezeskhian as saying: "We have assigned teams to investigate the causes (of the unrest)." He did not provide further details.

The protests, which began in late December before escalating on January 8, left more than 3,000 dead, according to the official count.

Iranian authorities claim that the vast majority of victims were security forces or bystanders killed by "terrorists" working for Israel and the United States.

Human rights advocacy groups based outside Iran, however, accuse the security forces of targeting protesters.

The US-based Human Rights Activists News Agency (HRANA) reports that at least 7,005 people were killed during the peak of the protests.

"We are ashamed that such unfortunate events have occurred," Pezeshkian said, according to the report published on the government website.


London's High Court: UK Terror Ban on Pro-Palestine group Unlawful

People protest outside the High Court as judges prepare to rule on a legal challenge to the British government’s decision to designate pro‑Palestinian group Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation, in London, Britain, February 13, 2026. REUTERS/Jaimi Joy
People protest outside the High Court as judges prepare to rule on a legal challenge to the British government’s decision to designate pro‑Palestinian group Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation, in London, Britain, February 13, 2026. REUTERS/Jaimi Joy
TT

London's High Court: UK Terror Ban on Pro-Palestine group Unlawful

People protest outside the High Court as judges prepare to rule on a legal challenge to the British government’s decision to designate pro‑Palestinian group Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation, in London, Britain, February 13, 2026. REUTERS/Jaimi Joy
People protest outside the High Court as judges prepare to rule on a legal challenge to the British government’s decision to designate pro‑Palestinian group Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation, in London, Britain, February 13, 2026. REUTERS/Jaimi Joy

The British government's ban on pro-Palestinian campaign group Palestine Action as a terrorist organization is unlawful, London's High Court ‌ruled on Friday ‌after a ‌legal ⁠challenge by the ⁠group's co-founder.

Palestine Action was proscribed in July, having increasingly targeted Israel-linked ⁠defense companies in ‌Britain ‌with "direct action", often ‌blocking entrances, or ‌spraying red paint.

The High Court upheld two grounds ‌of challenge, with Judge Victoria Sharp saying: "Proscription ⁠did ⁠result in a significant interference with the right to freedom of speech and the right to freedom of assembly."

Sharp added that the ban would remain in place to give the parties' lawyers time to address the court on ​the ​next steps.

Earlier this month, six British Palestine Action activists were acquitted of aggravated burglary over a 2024 raid on Israeli defense firm Elbit's factory, with a jury returning no guilty verdicts at all in a blow for prosecutors.