Adrian Chiles: My Obsession With West Brom Has Gone Too Far

 West Brom players and staff celebrate promotion to the Premier League at the end of their match with QPR. Photograph: Adam Fradgley - AMA/West Bromwich Albion FC/Getty Images
West Brom players and staff celebrate promotion to the Premier League at the end of their match with QPR. Photograph: Adam Fradgley - AMA/West Bromwich Albion FC/Getty Images
TT

Adrian Chiles: My Obsession With West Brom Has Gone Too Far

 West Brom players and staff celebrate promotion to the Premier League at the end of their match with QPR. Photograph: Adam Fradgley - AMA/West Bromwich Albion FC/Getty Images
West Brom players and staff celebrate promotion to the Premier League at the end of their match with QPR. Photograph: Adam Fradgley - AMA/West Bromwich Albion FC/Getty Images

My grandad took me to my first football match, on 27 April 1974. West Bromwich Albion drew with Luton Town 1-1. I have been a West Brom supporter ever since. As a kid, it caused me so much pain when we lost that I vividly recall looking forward to growing up, when it surely would not feel as bad. To my shame and discredit, it has got worse, reaching some kind of psychological nadir last week when we were promoted to the Premier League. That is how screwed up the whole thing has become in my head.

If you are not into football you will be as baffled at this nonsense as you will be utterly uninterested in the details of the situation, but please bear with me. I will try to keep it simple: the teams finishing first and second in the Championship are promoted to the Premier League. For most of the season, West Brom were in first or second place. Then, with nine games to play, football stopped for lockdown. It was generally assumed (although not by me) that, if and when it resumed, we would remain in the top two and get promoted.

However, Brentford FC went on an unbelievable run of eight consecutive wins, eventually, inexorably, whittling the gap between them in third, and us in second place, to one miserable point. So, in the 46th and final game of this 11-month season, we had to better Brentford’s score. We were playing QPR; Brentford were playing Barnsley.

The tension became so unbearable that I entered a dead-eyed, near-catatonic state, to the extent that the friend I was with occasionally prodded me to check that I was alive. Disastrously, QPR scored against us; she looked at me in horror, but I registered no emotion. Neither did I register any emotion when Brentford also went a goal down, or when we equalised against QPR, or when we went ahead, or when QPR equalised to make it 2-2, or when Brentford then equalised against Barnsley. If Brentford had then scored again, as seemed inevitable, and we did not, which also seemed inevitable, we would be dropping out of the top two in the final minutes of the final game. I sank lower and lower into a real torpor. Then, incredibly, Barnsley scored and, to the joy of West Brom fans the world over, it was all going to be OK. But I remained emotionless. Seriously, I could not move.

I have a close friend who likes football, but had never really had a team. As he had just moved to Brentford, he adopted them. By the end of the season, this became a problem for us. He attempted some friendly joshing by text, but I was having none of that from anyone, least of all a johnny-come-lately football fan like him. He then sent me a goading text at the final whistle of a critical defeat of my team. I sent him something back so vicious that I can’t share it here. When his team subsequently lost, I did not text him but, before long, he texted me: “I’m done with football. No more. Just look foolish.”

In a matter of a few months he had gone from not being a fan, to a fan, to an emotionally committed fan, to an ex-fan. But setting that aside, I kept looking at the word “foolish”. After 46 years of becoming more and more obsessed with the fortunes of my team, I realised foolish is the right word. Whether winning or losing, I look foolish. It is not foolish to support a football team, but it is decidedly foolish to be so – as psychologists express it – fused with them. It is foolish, and somewhat shaming.

My grocer, Richard, is a passionate Brentford fan of 30 years’ standing. I was worried about him, but when I dropped by to see him, he just smiled and shrugged and said: “That’s football.” He puts me to shame. I want to be more like Richard.

The Guardian Sport



Olympics in India a ‘Dream’ Facing Many Hurdles

A laborer fixes the Olympic signage at the entrance of a venue ahead of the upcoming 141st International Olympic Committee (IOC) session in Mumbai on October 11, 2023. (AFP)
A laborer fixes the Olympic signage at the entrance of a venue ahead of the upcoming 141st International Olympic Committee (IOC) session in Mumbai on October 11, 2023. (AFP)
TT

Olympics in India a ‘Dream’ Facing Many Hurdles

A laborer fixes the Olympic signage at the entrance of a venue ahead of the upcoming 141st International Olympic Committee (IOC) session in Mumbai on October 11, 2023. (AFP)
A laborer fixes the Olympic signage at the entrance of a venue ahead of the upcoming 141st International Olympic Committee (IOC) session in Mumbai on October 11, 2023. (AFP)

India says it wants the 2036 Olympics in what is seen as an attempt by Narendra Modi to cement his legacy, but the country faces numerous challenges to host the biggest show on earth.

The prime minister says staging the Games in a nation where cricket is the only sport that really matters is the "dream and aspiration" of 1.4 billion people.

Experts say it is more about Modi's personal ambitions and leaving his mark on the world stage, while also sending a message about India's political and economic rise.

Modi, who is also pushing for a permanent seat on the UN Security Council, will be 86 in 2036.

"Hosting the Olympics will, in a way, burnish India's credentials as a global power," said academic Ronojoy Sen, author of "Nation at Play", a history of sport in India.

"The current government wants to showcase India's rise and its place on the global high table, and hosting the Olympic Games is one way to do it."

Already the most populous nation, India is on track to become the world's third-biggest economy long before the planned Olympics.

- Olympics in 50-degree heat? -

India submitted a formal letter of intent to the International Olympic Committee in October, but has not said where it wants to hold the Games.

Local media are tipping Ahmedabad in Modi's home state of Gujarat, a semi-arid region where temperatures surge above 50 degrees Celsius (122F) in summer.

Gujarat state has already floated a company, the Gujarat Olympic Planning and Infrastructure Corporation, with a $710 million budget.

Ahmedabad has about six million people, its heart boasting a UNESCO-listed 15th-century wall which sprawls out into a rapidly growing metropolis.

The city is home to a 130,000-seater arena, the world's biggest cricket stadium, named after Modi. It staged the 2023 Cricket World Cup final.

The city is also the headquarters of the Adani Group conglomerate, headed by billionaire tycoon and Modi's close friend Gautam Adani.

Adani was the principal sponsor for the Indian team at this summer's Paris Olympics, where the country's athletes won one silver and five bronze medals.

- 'Window of opportunity' -

Despite its vast population India's record at the Olympics is poor for a country of its size, winning only 10 gold medals in its history.

Sports lawyer Nandan Kamath said hosting an Olympics was an "unprecedented window of opportunity" to strengthen Indian sport.

"I'd like to see the Olympics as a two-week-long wedding event," he said.

"A wedding is a gateway to a marriage. The work you do before the event, and all that follows, solidifies the relationship."

Outside cricket, which will be played at the Los Angeles Games in 2028, Indian strengths traditionally include hockey and wrestling.

New Delhi is reported to be pushing for the inclusion at the Olympics of Indian sports including kabaddi and kho kho -- tag team sports -- and yoga.

Retired tennis pro Manisha Malhotra, a former Olympian and now talent scout, agreed that global sporting events can boost grassroots sports but worries India might deploy a "top-down" approach.

"Big money will come in for the elite athletes, the 2036 medal hopefuls, but it will probably end at that," said Malhotra, president of the privately funded training center, the Inspire Institute of Sport.

Veteran sports journalist Sharda Ugra said India's underwhelming sports record -- apart from cricket -- was "because of its governance structure, sporting administrations and paucity of events".

"So then, is it viable for us to be building large stadiums just because we are going to be holding the Olympics?

"The answer is definitely no."

The Indian Olympic Association is split between two rival factions, with its president P.T. Usha admitting to "internal challenges" to any bid.

- 'Poor reputation' -

After Los Angeles, Brisbane will stage the 2032 Games.

The United States and Australia both have deep experience of hosting major sporting events, including previous Olympics.

India has staged World Cups for cricket and the Asian Games twice, the last time in 1982, but it has never had an event the size of an Olympics.

Many are skeptical it can successfully pull it off.

The 2010 Commonwealth Games in New Delhi were marked by construction delays, substandard infrastructure and accusations of corruption.

Many venues today are in a poor state.

"India will need serious repairing of its poor reputation on punctuality and cleanliness," The Indian Express daily wrote in an editorial.

"While stadium aesthetics look pretty in PowerPoint presentations and 3D printing, leaking roofs or sub-par sustainability goals in construction won't help in India making the cut."