Arsenal Take Firm Transfer Dealings Action With Exit of Raul Sanllehi

 From left: Raul Sanllehi, next to Mikel Arteta, Edu and Vinai Venkatesham last December. Photograph: Stuart MacFarlane/Arsenal FC via Getty Images
From left: Raul Sanllehi, next to Mikel Arteta, Edu and Vinai Venkatesham last December. Photograph: Stuart MacFarlane/Arsenal FC via Getty Images
TT

Arsenal Take Firm Transfer Dealings Action With Exit of Raul Sanllehi

 From left: Raul Sanllehi, next to Mikel Arteta, Edu and Vinai Venkatesham last December. Photograph: Stuart MacFarlane/Arsenal FC via Getty Images
From left: Raul Sanllehi, next to Mikel Arteta, Edu and Vinai Venkatesham last December. Photograph: Stuart MacFarlane/Arsenal FC via Getty Images

Arsenal’s summer cull continues with its highest-profile casualty yet. Raul Sanllehi finds himself faced with an extended holiday and the club are left to shapeshift once again, hoping their latest attempt to land upon an effective, competent executive operation for the post-Wenger era bears fruit.

It is no surprise to see Sanllehi depart. There are no two ways about it: since his arrival in November 2017, initially as head of football relations before the latter word was cut 10 months later, Arsenal’s standing has deteriorated considerably. Nobody would dream of laying that entirely at the Spaniard’s door, because the roots of decline had set in long before he was appointed. The Kroenkes bear ultimate responsibility for several botched attempts to reverse that direction of travel but it is significant that they have chosen to take action now.

Under Sanllehi, Arsenal’s dealings had quickly become flabby and wasteful. The list of failures, or at least serious question marks, is extensive for such a short period. Sanllehi was influential in the decision to appoint Unai Emery and the manner in which that tenure nosedived towards disaster has been thoroughly raked over. Within that, too many of the transfers he oversaw did not provide the returns expected of a club that instead sits in its lowest league position for 25 years.

Was Nicolas Pépé really worth the club record £72m fee approved by its executive committee in July 2019? Nobody doubts the Ivorian is a decent player but you would be hard pressed to find anyone, among those in the game who had followed his progress closely, who does not believe Arsenal paid around 50% over the odds. Could they have found a better deal six months previously than a loan fee to Barcelona for Denis Suárez, who played 95 minutes in half a season? Was it good business to sign David Luiz on to a lavish salary and then, shortly after the Covid-19 shutdown, allow the 33-year-old an extra year? Did the deputy right-back Cédric Soares, injured for his first five months at the club, merit a four-year contract at the end of his loan from Southampton? Should an operation that knows its onions require the agency run by Kia Joorabchian – who represents David Luiz, Soares and a more recent signing, Willian – to assist at its end of Alex Iwobi’s sale to Everton?

There is no suggestion of any wrongdoing or malpractice. It is more that Sanllehi’s Arsenal did not make enough pennies count at a time when, with their most recent spell in the Champions League receding in the rear view mirror, their margin for error was decreasing each year. There have been successful acquisitions under his watch, too. Kieran Tierney may yet prove a bargain at £25m, while Gabriel Martinelli – unearthed by the departed head of recruitment Francis Cagigao – is on track for stardom if he recovers fully from a knee injury. Hopes are high for William Saliba, who has returned from his loan back to Saint-Etienne. Perhaps Pablo Marí will, when he is fit in the late autumn, prove worth the long-term contract he was awarded after two-and-a-bit perfectly reasonable showings on loan from Flamengo. But there remain far more maybes than sure-fire successes, and Arsenal cannot afford that.

On 1 July, Arsenal appointed Tim Lewis to the board as a non-executive director. Lewis, a corporate lawyer, can be fairly described as the Kroenkes’ man on the ground. One figure familiar with his remit recently told the Guardian that Lewis had in effect “come in and read the riot act” in reviewing the club’s process; another suggests such a quick reshuffle in their hierarchy is little coincidence. Arsenal stress Sanllehi’s departure was mutually agreed and no reflection on his work, the bulk of their rationale being that they simply required a leaner management framework.

The managing director, Vinai Venkatesham, will now be a lone figurehead while the technical director, Edu, will work with Mikel Arteta on football-specific matters such as transfers. How the latter arrangement works will be of particular interest given the predilection, during Sanllehi’s time, for working through agents such as Joorabchian while the recently torched scouting department felt sidelined.

Something had to change at Arsenal and the sense is that, in parting with Sanllehi, they have made the right choice. That can only be made certain, though, if they take the right steps from here. Arteta’s appointment at the second time of asking in December is arguably the only high-level decision since the succession plan to Wenger began that looks bulletproof. Sanllehi, previously of Barcelona, was appointed as part of a drive to – in the words of the then-chief executive Ivan Gazidis – build “top-class expertise across every aspect of our football operations”. It did not work out and, in some ways, they find themselves back where they started. There is one less voice in the boardroom, but this most fraught of elite clubs might profit handsomely from a little more simplicity.

The Guardian Sport



Egyptian Teenager Abdelkarim to Extend Barca Deal to 2030

Hamza Abdelkarim of FC Barcelona salutes fans during presentation the Joan Gamper Trophy, football match played between FC Barcelona and Al-Ahly FC at Spotify Camp Nou stadium on August 19, 2026, in Barcelona, Spain. (Europa Press via Getty Images)
Hamza Abdelkarim of FC Barcelona salutes fans during presentation the Joan Gamper Trophy, football match played between FC Barcelona and Al-Ahly FC at Spotify Camp Nou stadium on August 19, 2026, in Barcelona, Spain. (Europa Press via Getty Images)
TT

Egyptian Teenager Abdelkarim to Extend Barca Deal to 2030

Hamza Abdelkarim of FC Barcelona salutes fans during presentation the Joan Gamper Trophy, football match played between FC Barcelona and Al-Ahly FC at Spotify Camp Nou stadium on August 19, 2026, in Barcelona, Spain. (Europa Press via Getty Images)
Hamza Abdelkarim of FC Barcelona salutes fans during presentation the Joan Gamper Trophy, football match played between FC Barcelona and Al-Ahly FC at Spotify Camp Nou stadium on August 19, 2026, in Barcelona, Spain. (Europa Press via Getty Images)

Egyptian teenager Hamza Abdelkarim will sign a new contract with Barcelona next week that runs until 2030, the club said on Friday.

The 18-year-old joined Barcelona on loan from Cairo giants Al Ahly in February before making a permanent switch in the summer, having featured at the World Cup.

He became the youngest player to represent Egypt at the World Cup, where he appeared in four of the team's five games.

Abdelkarim impressed in pre-season for Barca with four goals in five matches and made his competitive debut for the Spanish champions as a late substitute in last month's 5-2 win over Rayo Vallecano in La Liga.

He is due to sign his contract extension on Tuesday, the club said.


FIFA Bans for Life 2 Officials for Financial Wrongdoing when Presidents of Soccer Federations

(FILES) The logo of FIFA (Federation Internationale de Football Association) is seen through a net on October 13, 2016 at the world football's governing body headquarters in Zurich.  (Photo by FABRICE COFFRINI / AFP)
(FILES) The logo of FIFA (Federation Internationale de Football Association) is seen through a net on October 13, 2016 at the world football's governing body headquarters in Zurich. (Photo by FABRICE COFFRINI / AFP)
TT

FIFA Bans for Life 2 Officials for Financial Wrongdoing when Presidents of Soccer Federations

(FILES) The logo of FIFA (Federation Internationale de Football Association) is seen through a net on October 13, 2016 at the world football's governing body headquarters in Zurich.  (Photo by FABRICE COFFRINI / AFP)
(FILES) The logo of FIFA (Federation Internationale de Football Association) is seen through a net on October 13, 2016 at the world football's governing body headquarters in Zurich. (Photo by FABRICE COFFRINI / AFP)

FIFA judges imposed life bans on two former soccer federation presidents for financial misconduct, including one who stayed in office since being sanctioned in 2011 as part of a notorious election bribery scandal in the Caribbean.

Montserrat’s long-time soccer leader Vincent Cassell was charged with “abuse of position, systemic conflicts of interest” and misuse of FIFA and federation funds, FIFA said in a statement on Friday.

The former president of the Maldives soccer federation, Bassam Adeel Jaleel, was expelled from the sport for “misusing FIFA Covid-19 Relief Plan funds for his personal benefit,” FIFA said.

Maldives media reported this year that Jaleel was sentenced to 23 years in prison for embezzling $1.2 million from FIFA. The money was intended for local soccer clubs and was reportedly used to buy apartments.

Cassell and his federation’s long-time general secretary, Tandica Hughes, pleaded guilty in a Montserrat court in April to tax evasion charges, The AP news reported.

Cassell and Hughes continued to run the Montserrat soccer body, which is currently entitled to get at least $2 million each year from FIFA’s World Cup profits. FIFA installed an emergency management team last February this year after they left.

The decision to oversee Montserrat's day-to-day management was due to “exceptional crisis and institutional paralysis,” FIFA cited in February.

Hughes was banned by FIFA judges for 15 years for “benefiting from and facilitating improper transactions,” abuse of position and misuse of funds.

Cassell also faced FIFA charges of “conduct affecting the physical and mental integrity of (federation) staff members,” and was fined 1 million Swiss francs ($1.23 million). It is unclear what authority FIFA has to get the money.

Hughes was ordered to pay 150,000 Swiss francs ($184,000), FIFA said.

Jaleel from the Maldives also was ordered by FIFA to pay 1 million Swiss francs.

The Maldives federation’s former finance director, Mohamed Ageel, was banned from soccer for 10 years and fined 100,000 Swiss francs ($184,000).

FIFA said Ageel’s charges related to “facilitating and concealing misuse of FIFA funds, using falsified documentation and failing to cooperate” with the ethics investigation.

FIFA president Gianni Infantino visited the Maldives last year and acknowledged in a news release “the challenges that football in the Maldives has faced in recent years.”


UEFA Urges US Court to Deny FIFA Subsidiaries' Bid to Join Infantino Discovery Fight

FILE PHOTO: Soccer Football - FIFA President Gianni Infantino arrives at the stadium before a FIFA Under-20 Women's World Cup match on September 5, 2026. REUTERS/Kacper Pempel/File Photo
FILE PHOTO: Soccer Football - FIFA President Gianni Infantino arrives at the stadium before a FIFA Under-20 Women's World Cup match on September 5, 2026. REUTERS/Kacper Pempel/File Photo
TT

UEFA Urges US Court to Deny FIFA Subsidiaries' Bid to Join Infantino Discovery Fight

FILE PHOTO: Soccer Football - FIFA President Gianni Infantino arrives at the stadium before a FIFA Under-20 Women's World Cup match on September 5, 2026. REUTERS/Kacper Pempel/File Photo
FILE PHOTO: Soccer Football - FIFA President Gianni Infantino arrives at the stadium before a FIFA Under-20 Women's World Cup match on September 5, 2026. REUTERS/Kacper Pempel/File Photo

UEFA urged a US court on Thursday to reject an attempt by FIFA's American subsidiaries to intervene in its bid to obtain evidence for a potential Swiss criminal case against FIFA President Gianni Infantino over his abandoned World Cup commercial-rights plan.

In a filing in Manhattan federal court, European soccer's governing body said FIFA (Americas) Inc and FWC2026 US Inc were improperly trying to act as stand-ins for FIFA and Infantino, neither of whom has sought to join the case.

UEFA said its request under a US discovery law seeks documents and testimony from Thrive Capital Management and its founder Joshua Kushner, who it says may hold information about the proposed FIFA Forward Enterprise transaction.

The plan, which Infantino withdrew on August 1 after a backlash from soccer bodies and other critics, envisaged selling a permanent stake in commercial and operational rights connected to the World Cup and other FIFA events to private investors.

UEFA CONSIDERING CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST INFANTINO

UEFA has said it is considering filing a criminal complaint in Switzerland alleging criminal mismanagement by Infantino and potentially other FIFA officials. Infantino and FIFA have not been charged with wrongdoing.

FIFA accused UEFA last week of running a "smear campaign" and characterized the discovery applications as a fishing expedition intended to damage FIFA and its leadership.

FIFA did not immediately respond to a request for comment, and Infantino has denied doing anything wrong.

In Thursday's response, UEFA said the subsidiaries had no direct legal interest in the New York proceeding because they were not targets of the contemplated Swiss case and were not recipients of the proposed subpoenas.

It said the confidentiality concerns cited by the US subsidiaries belonged, if to anyone, to their Swiss parent, FIFA. UEFA also argued that Thrive and Kushner already have lawyers who can challenge any subpoenas after they are served.

Thrive did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Thrive founder Kushner is the brother of Jared Kushner, son-in-law of US President Donald Trump.

UEFA said granting the subsidiaries a role before the court rules would depart from the usual process for requests under Section 1782, which are commonly granted initially without opposition and then tested through motions to quash.

The European body argued that the subsidiaries' intervention would create unnecessary delay by adding another round of merits briefing before UEFA could seek the records.

The court has not yet ruled on either UEFA's discovery application or the intervention motion.