Rushing Clean Energy Could Stifle Everyone

Traffic at a gas station in central Paris (AFP)
Traffic at a gas station in central Paris (AFP)
TT

Rushing Clean Energy Could Stifle Everyone

Traffic at a gas station in central Paris (AFP)
Traffic at a gas station in central Paris (AFP)

In December 2021, the Saudi Energy Minister Prince Abdulaziz bin Salman al-Saud warned that the world is heading towards an energy crisis if investments in the oil sector continue to decrease.

Prince Abdulaziz touted investment as the only way to preserve energy supplies and meet market needs.

Last week, the price of an oil barrel shot up to $140 per barrel. The price hike can be traced back to an increase in demand and a drop in supplies as well as political events the world is experiencing today, the most important of which is the Russian-Ukrainian war and the Iranian nuclear talks.

Prince Abdulaziz’s warning came in response to an international drive towards reducing investment in fossil fuels, gas and oil, which led to a decrease in direct and indirect investments in the energy sector, estimated at hundreds of billions of dollars from 2014 until 2021.

Companies Roll back Investments

A report issued by CleanTechnica – a US-based website specializing in clean energy - indicated that multinational companies’ volume of investments taken out of fossil fuels in 2014 amounted to about $52 billion. In 2018, it amounted to more than $125 billion.

In 2019, 1110 institutions with assets of more than 11 trillion dollars committed to getting rid of fossil fuels. The once strong industry started witnessing a steady decline in its position. Because of the decrease in the number of institutional investors, lower profits, and weak expectations, companies such as BP, Equinor and Repsol wrote off a total of more than $11 billion in North American shale oil assets.

In 2020, 42 investment institutions from 14 countries announced the withdrawal of their investments from fossil fuels, and BlackRock, the world’s largest investment management company, announced that environmental sustainability would be a key and decisive factor in future investment decisions.

Moreover, the New York State Pension Fund decided to phase out oil and gas companies by 2024 and completely decarbonize its portfolio, estimated to be worth more than $500 billion, by 2040.

Increasing Taxes, Selling Assets

Mazen Al-Sudairy, head of research at Al-Rajhi Capital, said that the most important problems facing companies investing in fossil fuels include the increase in the cost of taxes in exchange for subsidizing renewable energy, and some countries, especially in Europe, adopting strict policies to get companies to invest in renewable energy.

Al-Sudairy noted that the decision by EU leaders to impose a “carbon tax” to reduce the use of fossil fuels had an evident impact on oil companies, especially considering current crises.

These policies prompted some companies to sell part of their assets, such as Shell and the Italian Eni, Al-Sudairy told Asharq Al-Awsat.

Moreover, BP is currently selling its stake in the Russian company, Rosneft, which constitutes 15% of the company’s production.

The London-based multinational oil and gas company has also exited fossil fuel investments in the US and is expected to pull the plug faster on its fossil fuel investments in the near future.

This puts pressure on the oil industry.

Al-Sudairy added that BP announced its intentions to sell its fossil fuel assets at a value of $25 billion by 2025, which is equivalent to about 13% of the company’s total fixed assets. The research expert said the move would “make matters worse,” especially with the increase in global demand for fossil fuels.

The structural lack of investments and insufficient capital spending will have major impacts on global production of fossil fuels, stressed Al-Sudairy.

He pointed out that in the event of continued reluctance to invest in the sector, the market would lose about 16 million oil barrels by 2030.

There is a need for investments in fossil fuels to exceed 450 billion dollars annually, emphasized Al-Sudairy.

The world’s largest international oil companies, or IOCs, sold over $198 billion of assets between 2015 and 2020, over four times the amount they invested into clean energy technologies, said a Bloomberg New Energy Finance report.

European IOCs notably diverged from their US peers. Equinor was the only IOC to see clean energy investment outstrip divestment proceeds.

Despite high levels of divestment from ExxonMobil, Chevron, and ConocoPhillips, they collectively invested just $757 million in clean energy, only 1% of the divestment proceeds.

Paris Agreement Battle

The Paris Climate Accords, signed in Paris in 2015, had entered into force in November 2016. The international climate treaty focuses on facing the problem of greenhouse gas emissions and finding solutions to adapt and mitigate their damage to the environment.

It also looks seriously at the obvious effects of climate change and seeks to launch initiatives that contribute to reducing emissions to get rid of dependence on fossil fuels.

One of the architects of this agreement is former US Secretary of State John Kerry, who is now the presidential envoy on climate affairs.

The Paris agreement was followed by calls from international institutions to get rid of investment in fossil fuels to access renewable energy, with the International Energy Agency leading a campaign of warnings against investors for not financing new oil, gas and coal projects.

Saudi Warnings

Prince Abdulaziz renewed his warning of challenges emerging to policymakers due to the rise in prices, describing the campaign against investments in the oil and gas sectors as “short-sighted and will have an impact on global welfare.”

The energy minister stressed that the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia would continue to invest in the oil and gas sectors as well as renewable energy.

He explained that the world is going through a stage of energy transition, “and it is wrong to focus on one aspect such as renewable energy because the world economy requires various sources of energy to develop.”

Prince Abdulaziz said that sustainability, which is the result of the circular economy of carbon, will be dependent on technology capable of ensuring a rise in the demand for fossil fuels while addressing emissions through technology.

It is noteworthy that G20 countries had agreed to adopt the circular economy approach to carbon, which was proposed by Saudi Arabia at the G20 Riyadh Summit in 2020.

For its part, the International Energy Agency said it expected a decline in demand to coincide with an increase in supplies during the coming period, expecting a decrease in oil demand by about 100,000 barrels per day in 2021 and 2022.

“Supplies may rise by 6.4 million barrels per day next year, compared to an increase of 1.5 million barrels in 2021,” said the agency in its December 2021 report.

“Continuing to retreat from the cuts may lead to a surplus of about two million barrels in the second quarter of 2022,” the report added.

On the other hand, a report issued by OPEC in 2020 predicted that global demand for crude oil will grow by 2025 to 103.7 million barrels per day, and by 2030 it will rise to 107.2 million barrels per day, then to 108.9 million barrels per day by 2035.

According to the report, global oil demands will grow to 109.3 million barrels per day by 2040.



Iraq Oil Output Exceeds 5 million bpd

Majnoon oil field near the Iraqi city of Basra (Reuters)
Majnoon oil field near the Iraqi city of Basra (Reuters)
TT

Iraq Oil Output Exceeds 5 million bpd

Majnoon oil field near the Iraqi city of Basra (Reuters)
Majnoon oil field near the Iraqi city of Basra (Reuters)

Iraq produces more than 5 million barrels of oil per day (bpd), Oil Minister Basim Mohammed told state news agency INA on Saturday.

According to Reuters, Iraq is pushing for a higher OPEC production quota as the economic fallout from the Iran war and new investment by oil majors increase pressure on Baghdad to boost output, potentially putting it at odds with the producer group.

The conflict has hit Iraq particularly hard, forcing major export cuts and depriving the state of oil revenue, which accounted for 88% of government income last year.


IMF: Any Slowdown in AI-driven Growth Would be Factor for Central Banks

IMF Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva speaks during the Annual Meetings Plenary at the Annual Meetings of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank Group (WBG) at the Queen Sirikit National Convention Center (QSNCC) in Bangkok on October 16, 2026. (Photo by Lillian SUWANRUMPHA / AFP)
IMF Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva speaks during the Annual Meetings Plenary at the Annual Meetings of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank Group (WBG) at the Queen Sirikit National Convention Center (QSNCC) in Bangkok on October 16, 2026. (Photo by Lillian SUWANRUMPHA / AFP)
TT

IMF: Any Slowdown in AI-driven Growth Would be Factor for Central Banks

IMF Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva speaks during the Annual Meetings Plenary at the Annual Meetings of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank Group (WBG) at the Queen Sirikit National Convention Center (QSNCC) in Bangkok on October 16, 2026. (Photo by Lillian SUWANRUMPHA / AFP)
IMF Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva speaks during the Annual Meetings Plenary at the Annual Meetings of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank Group (WBG) at the Queen Sirikit National Convention Center (QSNCC) in Bangkok on October 16, 2026. (Photo by Lillian SUWANRUMPHA / AFP)

Central bankers around the world would need to consider any slowdown in AI-driven growth as they assess steps in their fight against inflation, International Monetary Fund Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva said on Friday.

Georgieva said concerns about dependence on the AI investment boom and high valuations were impacting markets around the world.

"Things are going up and down, and this is likely to continue," she told an audience at IMF headquarters in Washington, adding that the volatility would complicate the job of central banks at a time when risks to price stability had been growing.

A steep rout in technology stocks on Thursday rippled through markets on fears that ⁠the Democrats' victory ⁠in the US midterm elections would increase regulatory scrutiny of AI and slow the data center build-out, sending investors to the safety of bonds.

The political jitters are hitting an AI trade already on shaky footing due to worry about return on massive spending on AI-related infrastructure, with the meltdown spurring margin calls and spooking retail investors and hedge ⁠funds alike.

Georgieva said the AI investment boom was lifting growth in some countries, helping to offset a negative oil-supply shock triggered by the war in the Middle East, but it was also adding to inflationary pressures and financial stability concerns.

The IMF last month flagged significant growth and financial stability risks from a potential ending of the AI investment boom, among other factors, including a prolonged Middle East war. At the time, it warned that a steep drop in AI investment could lead to a sharp fall in asset prices, ultimately cutting global GDP ⁠by 1.1% ⁠by 2028, including a 1.8% drop in US output.

Georgieva did not repeat the downside forecast on Friday, but acknowledged the recent market volatility.

"Should there be a slowdown in the AI-driven growth impulse, it would need to be factored in as central banks assess the necessary steps in the fight against stubborn inflation," she said.

Democrats are planning to unleash a flood of new legislation targeting artificial intelligence systems and data-center development when they take control of the US Congress in January, Reuters reported on Friday, citing congressional aides and advocates.

That would mark a sharp shift from the Republican-led Congress, where lawmakers largely focused on promoting AI development and declined to pass legislation restricting the technology.


World Food Prices Dip in October, but Remain Higher Than a Year Ago

A worker carries loaves of bread for sale at a bakery in the capital city of Cairo, Egypt November 4, 2026. (Reuters)
A worker carries loaves of bread for sale at a bakery in the capital city of Cairo, Egypt November 4, 2026. (Reuters)
TT

World Food Prices Dip in October, but Remain Higher Than a Year Ago

A worker carries loaves of bread for sale at a bakery in the capital city of Cairo, Egypt November 4, 2026. (Reuters)
A worker carries loaves of bread for sale at a bakery in the capital city of Cairo, Egypt November 4, 2026. (Reuters)

World food prices edged lower in October as weaker import demand contributed to monthly declines in cereal, dairy and meat prices, but were still nearly 6% higher than a year earlier, the United Nations' Food and Agriculture Organization said on Friday.

The FAO Food Price Index, which tracks monthly changes in international prices for a basket of food commodities, ‌averaged 133.9 points ‌in October, down from a revised ‌135.6 ⁠in September.

The index ⁠was 5.9% higher than a year earlier, but remained 16.4% below its March 2022 peak.

FAO's cereal price index fell 4.5% from September and was 12.6% lower than a year ago, as wheat and maize quotations declined. Wheat prices eased on weak import demand ⁠and improved production prospects, especially in Argentina.

"Expectations of ‌easing constraints on Black ‌Sea export flows added to the downward pressure on prices, ‌although continued disruptions to Black Sea logistics limited the decline," ‌FAO said in a statement.

Maize prices also eased after reaching a three-year high in September, pressured by the US harvest, expectations of ample supplies in South America and renewed ‌prospects of easing tensions in the Black Sea region.

Vegetable oil prices edged up 0.3%, ⁠as ⁠higher soybean and sunflower oil prices more than offset a fall in rapeseed oil prices.

Sugar prices rose 6.6%, their fourth straight monthly increase, to the highest level since December 2024, after rainfall disrupted harvesting in Brazil. They were now 28.8% above a year ago.

The dairy index fell 1.1%, as lower butter and cheese prices linked to ample supplies and subdued demand outweighed gains in milk powder.

The meat index declined 1.2%, while still slightly above its year-earlier level, as ovine and bovine meat prices fell.