Palestine: US Position Against Settlements is Insufficient

Palestinians carry an injured person during clashes with Israeli soldiers near Jenin in the West Bank (AP)
Palestinians carry an injured person during clashes with Israeli soldiers near Jenin in the West Bank (AP)
TT

Palestine: US Position Against Settlements is Insufficient

Palestinians carry an injured person during clashes with Israeli soldiers near Jenin in the West Bank (AP)
Palestinians carry an injured person during clashes with Israeli soldiers near Jenin in the West Bank (AP)

Palestine has welcomed the position of the US administration's opposition to settlement establishment in the West Bank, but said it was not enough, demanding real pressure to stop all Israeli violations in the Palestinian territories.

Member of the Executive Committee of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) Minister Hussein al-Sheikh welcomed the US State Department's rejection of Israeli settlement expansion and the construction of new units in the West Bank.

He also lauded the position of the US ambassador to Israel on the matter.

"We hope that this position will turn into serious pressure to stop all Israeli escalatory measures that destroy the very foundation of the two-state solution," said Sheikh.

The Palestinian Foreign Ministry also welcomed the US position but said it was insufficient and did not rise to the level of the settlement crime.

Israeli authorities approved the establishment of 4,000 new settlement units in the West Bank, which will require the demolition of 12 villages in Masafer Yatta, south of Hebron Governorate, and the seizure of 22,000 dunams in the Jordan Valley.

"These plans are a flagrant violation of international law and the Geneva Conventions, a coup against signed agreements. [They] inflame tension and undermine trust and the two-state solution," the ministry said.

The Foreign Ministry said the Israeli government is fully and directly responsible for these expansionist colonial plans and their impact on achieving peace, noting that they are considered a war crime and a crime against humanity.

The US State Department rejected Israeli plans to expand settlements in the West Bank and said it damages the prospects of a two-state solution.

In a telephone briefing, US State Department Deputy Spokesperson Jalina Porter said that the Biden administration has been clear from the outset.

"We strongly oppose the expansion of settlements which exacerbates tensions and undermines trust between the parties. Israel's program of expanding settlements deeply damages the prospect for a two-state solution."

The Israeli announcement came when arrangements were made for Biden's visit to the region.

Israeli media said that the US urged Tel Aviv to refrain from taking unilateral steps, including pushing for settlement projects, before Biden's visit.

Palestinian presidential spokesman Nabil Abu Rudaineh said the Israeli plan "amounts to forced displacement and ethnic cleansing, in violation of international law and relevant UN Security Council resolutions."

He warned that it is "dangerous, condemned and rejected," and "all of the Israeli demolitions, evictions, and settlements fall within the framework of the apartheid regime that the occupation applies to the Palestinians and their lands amid international silence."

The PA official stressed that "this will have serious consequences on the ground," attributing full responsibility for the consequences to the Israeli government.

PM Mohammad Shtayyeh also warned of the "serious consequences" that would result from the approval of the plan, saying it constitutes a "threat to security and peace in the region, which is in a state of tension due to the policies and practices of persecution, racism and ethnic cleansing pursued by the occupation government against the Palestinian people."

He too called on the US administration "to intervene urgently to stop these violations."

Hamas also pledged to confront Israeli decisions with "more steadfastness and comprehensive confrontation."

The Arab League warned of the repercussions of the Israeli occupation government's approval to construct 4,000 new settlement units, saying they impact international security and stability.

The General Secretariat stressed that these plans are discriminatory and are added to a long series of Israeli crimes amid international silence.

The statement described the settlement plans as war crimes and crimes against humanity under the provisions of international law, stressing the need to implement international legitimacy resolutions, provide international protection for the Palestinian people, and end the occupation.



EU Chief Salutes Lebanon-Israel Deal

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen speaks at the opening session of the Ukraine Recovery Conference 2026 at the European Solidarity Center in Gdansk, Poland, 25 June 2026. (EPA)
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen speaks at the opening session of the Ukraine Recovery Conference 2026 at the European Solidarity Center in Gdansk, Poland, 25 June 2026. (EPA)
TT

EU Chief Salutes Lebanon-Israel Deal

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen speaks at the opening session of the Ukraine Recovery Conference 2026 at the European Solidarity Center in Gdansk, Poland, 25 June 2026. (EPA)
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen speaks at the opening session of the Ukraine Recovery Conference 2026 at the European Solidarity Center in Gdansk, Poland, 25 June 2026. (EPA)

EU chief Ursula von der Leyen on Saturday welcomed the US-Lebanon-Israel framework agreement as a "critical step" away from conflict in the Middle East.

"I welcome the agreement between Israel and Lebanon. This is a critical step away from escalation. Because there can be no peace in the Middle East with Lebanon in flames," she said in a statement posted on X, thanking Washington for its mediation role.

"Key next steps are the disarmament of non-state groups and preserving Lebanese sovereignty and territorial integrity," she stressed.

Von der Leyen added that "the EU stands ready to support this path to lasting regional stability, also with the continued delivery of much needed humanitarian aid with EUR100 million mobilized for the displaced."


Israeli Drone Strike Kills Palestinian Siblings in a Gaza Tent Camp

Palestinians inspect their destroyed tents on Al-Jalaa Street following an Israeli airstrike in Gaza City, Gaza Strip, 27 June 2026. (EPA)
Palestinians inspect their destroyed tents on Al-Jalaa Street following an Israeli airstrike in Gaza City, Gaza Strip, 27 June 2026. (EPA)
TT

Israeli Drone Strike Kills Palestinian Siblings in a Gaza Tent Camp

Palestinians inspect their destroyed tents on Al-Jalaa Street following an Israeli airstrike in Gaza City, Gaza Strip, 27 June 2026. (EPA)
Palestinians inspect their destroyed tents on Al-Jalaa Street following an Israeli airstrike in Gaza City, Gaza Strip, 27 June 2026. (EPA)

An Israeli drone strike on Saturday killed two Palestinian siblings, including a 15-year-old girl, in southern Gaza and wounded at least seven others, according to Nasser hospital, where the casualties were taken.

The strike targeted tents sheltering displaced Palestinians in the sprawling camp of Muwasi, killing 15-year-old Islam Moussa and her 30-year-old brother, Abdullah Moussa.

The Israeli military acknowledged it had struck the area of Muwasi, saying it had targeted a Hamas fighter but did not immediately provide more information.

In the hospital's courtyard, relatives wept over the bodies covered in white burial shrouds.

Also on Saturday, Palestinians reported hearing a loud boom in Gaza City.

The Israeli military struck a tent sheltering displaced Palestinians in western Gaza City, wounding at least 12 people, according to Shifa hospital. The ambulance service of the Palestinian Red Crescent Society said two people were critically wounded and the majority of those hurt were women.

The Israeli military did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the strike, and it was not immediately clear what the target was.

Despite a fragile ceasefire reached in October that paused the heaviest fighting between Israel and the Hamas group, Israel continues to carry out near-daily strikes and shelling across the coastal enclave. Israel and Hamas continue to trade accusations of violating the ceasefire. Israel says it is targeting Hamas and other fighters who pose a threat and in response to ceasefire violations.

Since the ceasefire went into effect, Israel has killed more than 1,030 people in Gaza, according to Gaza’s Health Ministry, part of the Hamas-led government. The ministry maintains detailed casualty records that are seen as generally reliable by United Nations agencies and independent experts. But it does not give a breakdown of civilians and fighters.

The ministry last week said Israel has killed over 250 children in Gaza since the ceasefire took effect.

A team of independent experts commissioned by the United Nations has accused Israel of deliberately shooting children in Gaza, and repeated an accusation that Israel has committed genocide in the territory. Israel denies the claim that it committed genocide in Gaza during the two-year war.

The Israel-Hamas war broke out on Oct. 7, 2023, with a Hamas-led attack on southern Israel that killed some 1,200 people and saw 251 taken hostage. Israel’s retaliatory offensive in Gaza has killed more than 73,050 Palestinians, including those killed since the ceasefire, Gaza’s Health Ministry said.


What Challenges Lie Ahead for the US-Lebanon-Israel Agreement?

 Israeli tanks maneuver in Lebanon, after Lebanon and Israel signed a framework agreement following US-mediated talks, as seen from northern Israel, June 27, 2026. (Reuters)
Israeli tanks maneuver in Lebanon, after Lebanon and Israel signed a framework agreement following US-mediated talks, as seen from northern Israel, June 27, 2026. (Reuters)
TT

What Challenges Lie Ahead for the US-Lebanon-Israel Agreement?

 Israeli tanks maneuver in Lebanon, after Lebanon and Israel signed a framework agreement following US-mediated talks, as seen from northern Israel, June 27, 2026. (Reuters)
Israeli tanks maneuver in Lebanon, after Lebanon and Israel signed a framework agreement following US-mediated talks, as seen from northern Israel, June 27, 2026. (Reuters)

Lebanon and Israel, under US sponsorship, signed an agreement on Friday hoping to end hostilities between them, but experts say it does not guarantee Israeli withdrawal from Lebanon and its implementation depends on Hezbollah and its backer Iran.

Lebanon took the historic step of negotiating directly with Israel despite them having no diplomatic relations, as a reaction to Tehran-backed Hezbollah drawing the country into the Middle East war on March 2.

But with Israel saying it will not leave occupied Lebanese territory unless the group is disarmed, what traps and challenges lie ahead for the agreement?

- Will Israel withdraw? -

Although the framework agreement officially mentions Israeli "redeployment" from Lebanon, where its troops occupy swathes of the south, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu immediately set the tone on Friday, saying his soldiers will remain in the self-declared "security zone" stretching 10 kilometers from the border, "as long as Hezbollah has not disarmed".

Imad Salamey, head of the Political and International Studies Department at the Lebanese American University, told AFP that one of the agreement's shortcomings was that it made "no guarantee that Israel will fully withdraw from occupied areas or significantly restrict its military operations in southern Lebanon".

"Without firm Israeli commitments, many residents of the south may continue to face insecurity, delayed reconstruction."

Netanyahu said Friday that displaced Lebanese civilians will not be allowed to return home to occupied areas.

The agreement merely mentions "pilot zones", where the Lebanese military will take control after an Israeli "redeployment".

An initial two zones have been agreed to by the two sides, and future pilot zones are supposed to be determined by mutual consent.

However, the Lebanese army would only assume full security responsibility for these zones upon external "confirmation" that non-state armed groups, most notably Hezbollah, are disarmed there.

- Where does Hezbollah stand? -

From the moment Lebanese authorities announced direct talks with Israel in April, Hezbollah branded the move a "sin".

The group's leader Naim Qassem on Saturday called the framework agreement a "grave blunder" that is "legitimizing" Israeli occupation, urging the government to withdraw from it.

Hezbollah lawmaker Hassan Fadlallah said that the government will not be able to implement it "unless they go, with American support, to civil war" inside Lebanon.

Supporters of the group took to the streets of Beirut on Friday night to protest the framework.

Lebanese Parliament Speaker and Hezbollah ally Nabih Berri warned on Saturday against internal "strife".

In the capital's Hamra street, Ahmad Shamas, a 48-year-old taxi driver, told AFP the agreement was "an agreement of humiliation and shame"

"Never in the history of the Lebanese Republic has anyone made an agreement like this one."

Husam al-Beiruti, 43, was "neutral".

"What is the other solution? Is there any solution? Give us a solution we can follow."

Salamey said that while Hezbollah's rejection of the agreement was expected, "the real question is whether opposition remains political or evolves into direct confrontation with the Lebanese army, particularly if the state receives expanded military and financial support from the United States and its partners".

In the agreement, Lebanon requested international and Arab support to achieve "the complete and verified disarmament of all non-state armed groups," hinting at Hezbollah.

- What about Iran? -

According to experts, the implementation of the agreement will depend in large part on Hezbollah's backer, Iran.

Iran has used Lebanon as a key bargaining chip in its negotiations with the US, sometimes closing the Strait of Hormuz and threatening to walk away from talks over continued Israeli attacks on the country.

Heiko Wimmen, researcher at the International Crisis Group told AFP that while the government may be able to "take control of the process" after the latest agreement, "Iranian influence in Lebanon is still alive and kicking".

According to Salamey, the implementation "will depend primarily on Iran's strategic calculations".

"Tehran must decide whether the benefits of continued engagement with Washington and sanctions relief outweigh the costs of preserving its military leverage in Lebanon, which has become increasingly expensive".