Syria: Small Wars, Big Battles

Boys look at opposition fighters in the countryside of Aleppo, northern Syria (AFP)
Boys look at opposition fighters in the countryside of Aleppo, northern Syria (AFP)
TT
20

Syria: Small Wars, Big Battles

Boys look at opposition fighters in the countryside of Aleppo, northern Syria (AFP)
Boys look at opposition fighters in the countryside of Aleppo, northern Syria (AFP)

Can “small wars” in the near or immediate future shake the stalemate in Syria? What are the priorities of acting states in the Syrian file? Where do the concerns of Syrians lie within their war-torn country and the three micro-states existing there? How are Syrians dealing with the “big battles” that have to do with living conditions?

A War of Drafts

Millions of Syrians turned their attention to the diplomatic confrontation in the UN Security Council in New York between the West and Russia.

World powers are in dispute over the extension of the international resolution to deliver aid across the Turkish border and “contact lines” inside Syria, with the current resolution’s mandate coming to an end tomorrow.

Moscow wants to renew the mandate for a period of six months instead of a whole year. It wants to drag Western countries to negotiations twice a year for many reasons, including the Ukraine war.

Russia also is looking to change the language of the international resolution and add electricity financing to “early recovery” projects. By this, it hopes to bring the world closer to contributing to the Syrian reconstruction file, a matter on which Western countries impose political conditions.

Moreover, Russia is trying to increase aid delivery through Syria to push for expanding relations with Damascus.

Other proposals include deleting any reference to the International Committee of the Red Cross and its efforts. This comes with the intention to “punish” the relief organization for several positions, including its support for an international plan to establish an international mechanism to follow up on the file of missing persons in Syria.

Raids and Tests

Russia has at least three times bombed positions near US forces at Al-Tanf base, southeast Syria, and elsewhere.

Moscow did not give Washington's army sufficient time under the MoU they signed in 2017 for preventing conflict between them.

Clearly, this will be repeated frequently with Ukraine entering a Western-Russian “war of attrition.”

Such a situation raises worry about pivotal military frictions between the major powers in Syria.

New Lines

For the first time, Israel bombed areas south of Tartus, near the Russian base and north of the Lebanese border. Israel said that its targeting had hit military assets for Hezbollah.

Before that, Tel Aviv bombed Damascus International Airport and put it out of business for days.

Russia has partially restricted Israel's movement in Syria, due to Tel Aviv's position on the Ukraine war.

Multiple military friction may occur in Syria (or Lebanon), if the overt war in Ukraine and the “shadow war” in Iran escalate.

Turkish Incursions

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan is relying on his improved negotiating position after the Ukraine war, to brandish the “largest” military operation in northern Syria.

However, Erdogan’s threats were met with US rejection and warnings against destabilizing present contact lines in Syria. Also, Turkish plans were met with Russian mediation. Indeed, Moscow intensified its overt and secret contacts between Damascus and Ankara to “abort the military operation.”

Even Iran had its foreign minister perform shuttle diplomacy between Damascus and Ankara, but the last word was for Russia. The Turkish military operation has been frozen, but Erdogan's intentions are present and open the door to a possible escalation, and a minor war.

Safe Zone

Jordan talked years ago about a “safe zone” north of its border in southern Syria.

The plan was not implemented, as Russia assigned a military role to provide stability in the governorates of Daraa, Quneitra and As-Suwayda.

A few months ago, Oman initiated normalization with Damascus, proposing a “step for step” approach.

Reports indicate a Jordanian complaint about the flow of drugs and smuggling across the border, and the escalation of assassinations and chaos in the countryside of southern Syria.

What is new is that Amman has warned of a possible escalation and has threatened to re-introduce the “safe zone” plan to put pressure on Damascus and motivate Moscow to move.

This coincided with a qualitative US arming of opposition factions residing at the Al-Tanf base near borders with Jordan.

Arab Normalization of Ties with Damascus

Bilateral normalization steps between Arab capitals and Damascus continue at a slow pace.

There are those who are linking the normalization of ties with the amnesty issued by President Bashar al-Assad for those accused of “terror crimes.”

Despite the measured normalization of ties with Damascus, there still is no consensus on its return to the Arab League at the Algiers Summit next November.

What's new? There is an Algerian proposal for Syrian Foreign Minister Faisal Miqdad to come to Algeria for bilateral talks in conjunction with the summit, or to invite Syria with Turkey and others as an “observer.”

However, Algeria’s proposals remain tied to developments and wars in the months preceding the summit.

Economic War

Nothing new can be mentioned about the economic crisis in Syria and the struggles people are facing to live there. The crisis is exacerbated by hiking poverty rates and the lack of root solutions.

Iranian oil tankers had arrived in the war-torn country, and part of a power station in Aleppo resumed operations.

There is also a resumption of talks about an Arab gas pipeline.

Nevertheless, there is a spike in young people and artisans migrating abroad and regime loyalists complaining that conditions in their strongholds have not improved.

What is also worth mentioning is the huge gap between “war profiteers” and “victims of war” in Syria.

There is no doubt that change will happen sooner or later at one point or another.

A “minor war” will evolve in one arena or another and victories and defeats will be measured against each other.

The “battle for living” has settled on collapses and equations that need years to be resolved and dismantled.

It will take years of steps and understandings to get Syria out of a “long dark night.”



What to Know about the Tensions between Iran and the US before Their Third Round of Talks

The flags of US and Iran are displayed in Muscat, Oman, 25 April 2025. Iran and US will hold third round of nuclear talks on 26 April 2025, in Muscat. (EPA)
The flags of US and Iran are displayed in Muscat, Oman, 25 April 2025. Iran and US will hold third round of nuclear talks on 26 April 2025, in Muscat. (EPA)
TT
20

What to Know about the Tensions between Iran and the US before Their Third Round of Talks

The flags of US and Iran are displayed in Muscat, Oman, 25 April 2025. Iran and US will hold third round of nuclear talks on 26 April 2025, in Muscat. (EPA)
The flags of US and Iran are displayed in Muscat, Oman, 25 April 2025. Iran and US will hold third round of nuclear talks on 26 April 2025, in Muscat. (EPA)

Iran and the United States will hold talks Saturday in Oman, their third round of negotiations over Tehran’s rapidly advancing nuclear program.

The talks follow a first round held in Muscat, Oman, where the two sides spoke face to face. They then met again in Rome last weekend before this scheduled meeting again in Muscat.

Trump has imposed new sanctions on Iran as part of his “maximum pressure” campaign targeting the country. He has repeatedly suggested military action against Iran remained a possibility, while emphasizing he still believed a new deal could be reached by writing a letter to Iran’s 85-year-old Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei to jumpstart these talks.

Khamenei has warned Iran would respond to any attack with an attack of its own.

Here’s what to know about the letter, Iran’s nuclear program and the tensions that have stalked relations between Tehran and Washington since the 1979 revolution.

Why did Trump write the letter? Trump dispatched the letter to Khamenei on March 5, then gave a television interview the next day in which he acknowledged sending it. He said: “I’ve written them a letter saying, ‘I hope you’re going to negotiate because if we have to go in militarily, it’s going to be a terrible thing.’”

Since returning to the White House, the president has been pushing for talks while ratcheting up sanctions and suggesting a military strike by Israel or the US could target Iranian nuclear sites.

A previous letter from Trump during his first term drew an angry retort from the supreme leader.

But Trump’s letters to North Korean leader Kim Jong Un in his first term led to face-to-face meetings, though no deals to limit Pyongyang’s atomic bombs and a missile program capable of reaching the continental US.

How did the first round go? Oman, a sultanate on the eastern edge of the Arabian Peninsula, hosted the first round of talks between Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi and US Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff. The two men met face to face after indirect talks and immediately agreed to this second round in Rome.

Witkoff later made a television appearance in which he suggested 3.67% enrichment for Iran could be something the countries could agree on. But that’s exactly the terms set by the 2015 nuclear deal struck under US President Barack Obama, from which Trump unilaterally withdrew America.

Witkoff hours later issued a statement underlining something: “A deal with Iran will only be completed if it is a Trump deal.” Araghchi and Iranian officials have latched onto Witkoff’s comments in recent days as a sign that America was sending it mixed signals about the negotiations.

Yet the Rome talks ended up with the two sides agreeing to starting expert-level talks this Saturday. Analysts described that as a positive sign, though much likely remains to be agreed before reaching a tentative deal.

Why does Iran’s nuclear program worry the West? Iran has insisted for decades that its nuclear program is peaceful. However, its officials increasingly threaten to pursue a nuclear weapon. Iran now enriches uranium to near weapons-grade levels of 60%, the only country in the world without a nuclear weapons program to do so.

Under the original 2015 nuclear deal, Iran was allowed to enrich uranium up to 3.67% purity and to maintain a uranium stockpile of 300 kilograms (661 pounds). The last report by the International Atomic Energy Agency on Iran’s program put its stockpile at 8,294.4 kilograms (18,286 pounds) as it enriches a fraction of it to 60% purity.

US intelligence agencies assess that Iran has yet to begin a weapons program, but has “undertaken activities that better position it to produce a nuclear device, if it chooses to do so.”

Ali Larijani, an adviser to Iran’s supreme leader, has warned in a televised interview that his country has the capability to build nuclear weapons, but it is not pursuing it and has no problem with the International Atomic Energy Agency’s inspections. However, he said if the US or Israel were to attack Iran over the issue, the country would have no choice but to move toward nuclear weapon development.

“If you make a mistake regarding Iran’s nuclear issue, you will force Iran to take that path, because it must defend itself,” he said.

Why are relations so bad between Iran and the US? Iran was once one of the US’s top allies in the Middle East under Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, who purchased American military weapons and allowed CIA technicians to run secret listening posts monitoring the neighboring Soviet Union. The CIA had fomented a 1953 coup that cemented the shah’s rule.

But in January 1979, the shah, fatally ill with cancer, fled Iran as mass demonstrations swelled against his rule. The revolution followed, led by Khomeini, and created Iran’s theocratic government.

Later that year, university students overran the US Embassy in Tehran, seeking the shah’s extradition and sparking the 444-day hostage crisis that saw diplomatic relations between Iran and the US severed. The Iran-Iraq war of the 1980s saw the US back Saddam Hussein. The “Tanker War” during that conflict saw the US launch a one-day assault that crippled Iran at sea, while the US later shot down an Iranian commercial airliner that the American military said it mistook for a warplane.

Iran and the US have see-sawed between enmity and grudging diplomacy in the years since, with relations peaking when Tehran made the 2015 nuclear deal with world powers. But Trump unilaterally withdrew America from the accord in 2018, sparking tensions in the Middle East that persist today.