China Halts Climate, Military Ties over Pelosi Taiwan Visit

Taiwan newspapers with the front page photos of the meeting between US House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Taiwan president Tsai Ing-wen are displayed, in Taipei, Taiwan, 04 August 2022. (EPA)
Taiwan newspapers with the front page photos of the meeting between US House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Taiwan president Tsai Ing-wen are displayed, in Taipei, Taiwan, 04 August 2022. (EPA)
TT

China Halts Climate, Military Ties over Pelosi Taiwan Visit

Taiwan newspapers with the front page photos of the meeting between US House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Taiwan president Tsai Ing-wen are displayed, in Taipei, Taiwan, 04 August 2022. (EPA)
Taiwan newspapers with the front page photos of the meeting between US House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Taiwan president Tsai Ing-wen are displayed, in Taipei, Taiwan, 04 August 2022. (EPA)

China on Friday said it is canceling or suspending dialogue with the United States on a range of issues from climate change to military relations and anti-drug efforts in retaliation for a visit this week to Taiwan by US House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

The measures, which come amid cratering relations between Beijing and Washington, are the latest in a promised series of steps intended to punish the US for allowing the visit to the island it claims as its own territory, to be annexed by force if necessary. China on Thursday launched threatening military exercises in six zones just off Taiwan's coasts that it says will run through Sunday.

Missiles have also been fired over Taiwan, defense officials told state media. China opposes the self-governing island having its own contacts with foreign governments, but its response to the Pelosi visit has been unusually vociferous.

The Foreign Ministry said dialogue between US and Chinese regional commanders and defense department heads would be canceled, along with talks on military maritime safety.

Cooperation on returning illegal immigrants, criminal investigations, transnational crime, illegal drugs and climate change will be suspended, the ministry said.

China said Friday that more than 100 warplanes and 10 warships have taken part in the live-fire military drills surrounding Taiwan over the past two days, while announcing mainly symbolic sanctions against Pelosi and her family over her visit to Taiwan earlier this week.

The official Xinhua News Agency said Friday that fighters, bombers, destroyers and frigates were all used in what it called "joint blockage operations."

The military’s Eastern Theater Command also fired new versions of missiles it said hit unidentified targets in the Taiwan Strait "with precision."

The Rocket Force also fired projectiles over Taiwan into the Pacific, military officers told state media, in a major ratcheting up of China’s threats to attack and invade the island.

The drills, which Xinhua described as being held on an "unprecedented scale," are China's most strident response to Pelosi's visit. The speaker is the highest-ranking US politician to visit Taiwan in 25 years.

Dialogue and exchanges between China and the US, particularly on military matters and economic exchanges, have generally been halting at best. Climate change and fighting trade in illegal drugs such as fentanyl were, however, areas where they had found common cause, and Beijing's suspension of cooperation could have significant implications for efforts to achieve progress in those issues.

China and the United States are the world’s No. 1 and No. 2 climate polluters, together producing nearly 40% of all fossil-fuel emissions. Their top climate diplomats, John Kerry and Xie Zhenhua, maintained a cordial relationship that dated back to the Paris climate accord, which was made possible by a breakthrough negotiated among the two and others.

China under Kerry’s prodding committed at last year’s UN global climate summit in Glasgow to working with the US "with urgency" to cut climate-wrecking emissions, but Kerry was unable to persuade it to significantly speed up China’s move away from coal.

On the Chinese coast across from Taiwan, tourists gathered Friday to try to catch a glimpse of any military aircraft heading toward the exercise area.

Fighter jets could be heard flying overhead and tourists taking photos chanted, "Let’s take Taiwan back," looking out into the blue waters of the Taiwan Strait from Pingtan island, a popular scenic spot in Fujian province.

Pelosi's visit stirred emotions among the Chinese public, and the government's response "makes us feel our motherland is very powerful and gives us confidence that the return of Taiwan is the irresistible trend," said Wang Lu, a tourist from neighboring Zhejiang province.

China is a "powerful country and it will not allow anyone to offend its own territory," said Liu Bolin, a high school student visiting the island.

His mother, Zheng Zhidan, was somewhat more circumspect.

"We are compatriots and we hope to live in peace," Zheng said. "We should live peacefully with each other."

China's insistence that Taiwan is its territory and its threat to use force to bring it under its control have featured highly in ruling Communist Party propaganda, the education system and the entirely state-controlled media for more than seven decades since the sides were divided amid civil war in 1949.

Taiwan residents overwhelmingly favor maintaining the status quo of de facto independence and reject China's demands that the island unify with the mainland under Communist control.

On Friday morning, China sent military ships and war planes across the mid-line of the Taiwan Strait, the Taiwanese Defense Ministry said, crossing what had for decades been an unofficial buffer zone between China and Taiwan.

Five of the missiles fired by China since the military exercises began Thursday landed in Japan’s Exclusive Economic Zone off Hateruma, an island far south of Japan’s main islands, Japanese Defense Minister Nobuo Kishi said. He said Japan protested the missile landings to China as "serious threats to Japan’s national security and the safety of the Japanese people."

Japan's Defense Ministry later said they believe four other missiles fired from China’s southeastern coast of Fujian flew over Taiwan.

Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida said Friday that China’s military exercises aimed at Taiwan represent a "grave problem" that threatens regional peace and security.

Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Hua Chunying said China's actions were in line with "international law and international practices," though she provided no evidence.

"As for the Exclusive Economic Zone, China and Japan have not carried out maritime delimitation in relevant waters, so there is no such thing as an EEZ of Japan," Hua told reporters at a daily briefing.

In Tokyo, where Pelosi is winding up her Asia trip, she said China cannot stop US officials from visiting Taiwan. Kishida, speaking after breakfast with Pelosi and her congressional delegation, said the missile launches need to be "stopped immediately."

China said it summoned European diplomats in the country to protest statements issued by the Group of Seven industrialized nations and the European Union criticizing the Chinese military exercises surrounding Taiwan.

Its Foreign Ministry on Friday said Vice Minister Deng Li made "solemn representations" over what he called "wanton interference in China’s internal affairs."

Deng said China would "prevent the country from splitting with the strongest determination, using all means and at any cost."

The ministry said the meeting was held Thursday night but gave no information on which countries participated. Earlier Thursday, China canceled a foreign ministers’ meeting with Japan to protest the G-7 statement that there was no justification for the exercises.

Both ministers were attending a meeting of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations in Cambodia.

China has promoted the overseas support it has received for its response to Pelosi’s visit, mainly from fellow authoritarian states such as Russia, Syria and North Korea.

China had earlier summoned US Ambassador Nicholas Burns to protest Pelosi's visit. The speaker left Taiwan on Wednesday after meeting with President Tsai Ing-wen and holding other public events. She traveled on to South Korea and then Japan. Both countries host US military bases and could be drawn into a conflict involving Taiwan.

The Chinese exercises involve troops from the navy, air force, rocket force, strategic support force and logistic support force, according to Xinhua.

They are believed to be the largest held near Taiwan in geographical terms and the closest in proximity — within 20 kilometers (12 miles) of the island.

US Secretary of State Antony Blinken on Friday called the drills a "significant escalation" and said he has urged Beijing to back down.

US law requires the government to treat threats to Taiwan, including blockades, as matters of "grave concern."

The drills are an echo of the last major Chinese military drills aimed at intimidating Taiwan’s leaders and voters in 1995 and 1996.

Taiwan has put its military on alert and staged civil defense drills, but the overall mood remained calm on Friday. Flights have been canceled or diverted and fishermen have remained in port to avoid the Chinese drills.

In the northern port of Keelung, Lu Chuan-hsiong, 63, was enjoying his morning swim Thursday, saying he wasn’t worried.

"Everyone should want money, not bullets," Lu said.



US Considers Hitting Iran with 'Mother of All Bombs'

An undated handout photo of the “Mother of All Bombs” at Eglin Air Force Base in Florida, US (Reuters)
An undated handout photo of the “Mother of All Bombs” at Eglin Air Force Base in Florida, US (Reuters)
TT

US Considers Hitting Iran with 'Mother of All Bombs'

An undated handout photo of the “Mother of All Bombs” at Eglin Air Force Base in Florida, US (Reuters)
An undated handout photo of the “Mother of All Bombs” at Eglin Air Force Base in Florida, US (Reuters)

The United States is considering using its biggest non-nuclear bomb against Iran if President Donald Trump should decide to renew combat in the war that has hit a deadlock, CNN reported Thursday.

The military is planning for the potential use of the GBU-43/B Massive Ordnance Air Blast (MOAB) bomb -- better known by its nickname, the "Mother Of All Bombs" -- to target Iranian energy infrastructure and nuclear sites, according to the news outlet, which quoted officials familiar with the matter.

Trump is trying to boost his low approval ratings ahead of November's midterm elections, with polls showing the unpopular war in Iran and fuel and other price rises it has caused are hurting his Republican Party.

Diplomatic efforts to end the conflict, which erupted with US-Israeli strikes on Iran in February, have been at an impasse since the summer.

But officials have raised doubts over the efficacy of the bomb if it were deployed, particularly its ability to destroy suspected underground nuclear sites in Iran.

"The MOAB is a massive information operation type weapon that is great for huge area clearance but not much else," a source familiar with the plans told CNN.

"It is definitely not designed as a deep penetration warhead."

The United States and Israel have said the war was necessary to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons -- a goal Tehran has long denied pursuing.

There are also concerns over the possibility of civilian casualties from such a huge weapon, according to AFP.

Washington has in recent weeks dialled back military operations in favour of economic pressure.

In 2017, the US military in Afghanistan dropped the "MOAB" to target ISIS group hideouts in a complex of tunnels and bunkers, killing more than 90 militants.


Pezeshkian: Iran is Facing its Most Intense Blockade since 1979

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian visits an exhibition that showcases the defense ministry's latest advancements in defense and space in Tehran. Photo: -/Iranian Presidency/dpa
Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian visits an exhibition that showcases the defense ministry's latest advancements in defense and space in Tehran. Photo: -/Iranian Presidency/dpa
TT

Pezeshkian: Iran is Facing its Most Intense Blockade since 1979

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian visits an exhibition that showcases the defense ministry's latest advancements in defense and space in Tehran. Photo: -/Iranian Presidency/dpa
Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian visits an exhibition that showcases the defense ministry's latest advancements in defense and space in Tehran. Photo: -/Iranian Presidency/dpa

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian said Tuesday that the country was facing its most intense blockade since the 1979 Islamic Revolution, accusing the United States of seeking to provoke public protests.

Iran and the United States have been at war since February 28, when US and Israeli strikes killed Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

"Over the 48 years since the Revolution, we have never faced such intense blockade, war and difficulties as we are facing now," Pezeshkian said in a speech broadcast by state television.

He accused Washington of seeking to make life difficult for Iranians in order to fuel public anger and trigger unrest.

Pezeshkian said the US was focusing its efforts on making "the people become upset and face difficulties, and then for social protests to emerge so that they can achieve their sinister objectives".

The US imposed a blockade on Iranian ports in response to Tehran's closure of the strategic Strait of Hormuz, diverting or stopping vessels travelling to and from Iranian ports.

Iran has repeatedly accused the US and Israel of fomenting unrest inside the country, and in recent months has executed several Iranians accused of collaborating with its foes.

In late December last year, protests over the cost of living erupted in Iran, spreading nationwide and evolving into a wider anti-government movement.

Iran's rulers blamed the US and Israel for the unrest.


Why Are More Women Leaving Trump's Administration?

(FILES) Kimberly Guilfoyle, President Trump's nominee to be the US ambassador to Greece, speaks alongside US President Donald Trump, during a Greek Independence Day celebration in the East Room of the White House in Washington, DC, on March 24, 2025.  (Photo by Brendan SMIALOWSKI / AFP)
(FILES) Kimberly Guilfoyle, President Trump's nominee to be the US ambassador to Greece, speaks alongside US President Donald Trump, during a Greek Independence Day celebration in the East Room of the White House in Washington, DC, on March 24, 2025. (Photo by Brendan SMIALOWSKI / AFP)
TT

Why Are More Women Leaving Trump's Administration?

(FILES) Kimberly Guilfoyle, President Trump's nominee to be the US ambassador to Greece, speaks alongside US President Donald Trump, during a Greek Independence Day celebration in the East Room of the White House in Washington, DC, on March 24, 2025.  (Photo by Brendan SMIALOWSKI / AFP)
(FILES) Kimberly Guilfoyle, President Trump's nominee to be the US ambassador to Greece, speaks alongside US President Donald Trump, during a Greek Independence Day celebration in the East Room of the White House in Washington, DC, on March 24, 2025. (Photo by Brendan SMIALOWSKI / AFP)

A wave of departures by female officials from US President Donald Trump's second administration has raised questions about whether women and men are being treated equally. Four of the eight women holding Cabinet-level positions left within just three months, while several male officials remained in their posts despite facing criticism and allegations that sparked widespread controversy.

According to The New York Times, the latest development came with the forced resignation of Kimberly Guilfoyle, the US ambassador to Greece, after a news report alleged that she had asked a Trump donor to pay a $100,000 credit card bill shortly before her confirmation hearing, promising him access to administration officials in return.

Guilfoyle denied the allegations, while Trump said he was unhappy with what he had read about her, despite acknowledging that she had performed well in the role. He also downplayed any substantial personal connection to Guilfoyle, one of his most ardent supporters, who was once engaged to his eldest son, Donald Trump Jr.

Four Female Officials Leave Their Posts

The past three months have seen the departure of four prominent female officials: Attorney General Pam Bondi, Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard.

They left for different reasons, but all four were replaced by men.

Bondi's departure followed criticism of her handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files, her failure to meet Trump's demands to pursue his political adversaries, and his dissatisfaction with her performance during congressional hearings and television appearances.

Noem, meanwhile, was dismissed following her congressional testimony about government advertising campaigns worth millions of dollars in which she featured prominently. She said Trump had approved the spending, an account the president denied.

Gabbard announced her resignation to care for her ailing husband, but the decision came amid tensions with the White House after she declined to affirm that Iran had posed an imminent threat, a claim Trump had used to justify the war against the country. The president described her position as less hardline than his own.

Chavez-DeRemer left her post amid allegations of dysfunction and a toxic workplace environment within the Labor Department, as well as claims of abuse of power, an inappropriate relationship with a staff member and the use of public funds for personal purposes.

Male Officials Face Allegations but Remain in Office

While female officials departed, several male members of the administration faced criticism and allegations of their own.

FBI Director Kash Patel faced questions over allegations of excessive drinking, assigning an armed tactical team to protect his girlfriend and using a government aircraft for personal purposes. Patel denied the allegations.

Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick was named in files released by the Justice Department as having visited the private island owned by convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth also faced criticism after disclosing secret military plans in a conversation on a private messaging application to which Jeffrey Goldberg, editor-in-chief of The Atlantic, had been added by mistake.

Trump did penalize his former national security adviser, Mike Waltz, for adding the journalist to the conversation. However, Waltz was subsequently appointed US ambassador to the United Nations, a position Trump had previously promised to his Republican congressional ally Elise Stefanik.

Stefanik ultimately found herself politically sidelined before resigning from Congress.

Political Criticism Over Unequal Accountability

According to The New York Times report, the apparent disparity has drawn criticism from several Democrats, who argue that women are being dismissed more quickly than men when controversies or allegations emerge.

Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York questioned the pattern after Bondi and Noem left their posts. Asked by a reporter whom the president should fire next, she responded: "Is he out of women?" She suggested that Trump appeared capable of dismissing only female Cabinet secretaries.

Democratic Rep. Jasmine Crockett of Texas, a frequent target of Trump's mockery, wrote on social media that Hegseth should be the next to leave the administration.

"I see a theme," she wrote, arguing that Trump was much quicker to dismiss incompetent women than incompetent men.

During a congressional hearing in April, Rep. Madeleine Dean confronted Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick over what she described as a double standard, citing his previous ties to Epstein.

Dean asked whether Trump was concerned about Lutnick's past relationship with Epstein. Lutnick replied that he would not discuss his conversations with the president.

Dean pointed out that Trump had dismissed three Cabinet secretaries, all women. She argued that if the president were genuinely concerned about holding those who enabled Epstein accountable, he would dismiss Lutnick as well.

Kathryn Dunn Tenpas, a nonresident fellow at the Brookings Institution who has studied diversity in presidential administrations since the Reagan era, described the pattern as highly unusual.

She said she had never witnessed a situation in which the first wave of Cabinet departures involved only members of one gender, namely women.

White House Defends Trump's Appointments

The White House, meanwhile, defended Trump's approach to selecting members of his administration, insisting that the president based his appointments on their ability to deliver results for the American people.

White House spokesperson Taylor Rogers said Trump had assembled what she described as the greatest administration in history, choosing members of his team according to a single criterion: their ability to serve the American people effectively.

She contrasted that approach with what she characterized as the Democrats' obsession with identity politics, saying Trump judged individuals according to their qualifications and abilities rather than personal characteristics.

During a Women's History Month celebration last year, Trump expressed satisfaction that his Cabinet included more women than any previous Republican administration. The number of women remaining in Cabinet-level positions, however, subsequently fell to four.

Nevertheless, May Mailman, director of the Independent Women's Law Center and a former White House official in both Trump administrations, rejected the suggestion that the departures demonstrated the marginalization of women.

She pointed to women who continued to hold prominent leadership positions, including White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles, Erica Schwartz, who had been confirmed to lead the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and Harmeet Dhillon, head of the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division.

Mailman argued that conservative women were not isolated within the Trump administration but were empowered to exercise influence.

She maintained that women were essential members of the administration because of their competence and qualifications, rather than their gender.