Ali Saleh to Saddam: War is Happening... Goal is to Destroy the Iraqi Army

Asharq Al-Awsat Releases Excerpts from the Memoirs of Former Iraqi Minister of Trade Muhammad Al-Rawi

Al-Rawi with Iraqi and Jordanian officials in Baghdad in 2000 (Getty Images)
Al-Rawi with Iraqi and Jordanian officials in Baghdad in 2000 (Getty Images)
TT

Ali Saleh to Saddam: War is Happening... Goal is to Destroy the Iraqi Army

Al-Rawi with Iraqi and Jordanian officials in Baghdad in 2000 (Getty Images)
Al-Rawi with Iraqi and Jordanian officials in Baghdad in 2000 (Getty Images)

Dr. Muhammad Mahdi Salih Al-Rawi, former Iraqi Minister of Trade, presents in his new book - “Preventing Famine in Iraq - My Memoirs of the Years of the Siege 1990-2003” (to be published soon by Al-Maaref Forum) a detailed account of the efforts he made at the head of his ministry to address the sanctions imposed on Iraq in the wake of its invasion of Kuwait in 1990, which continued until the US invasion of the country in 2003.

The author talks with remarkable frankness about the differences that were plaguing Saddam Hussein’s regime, part of which is related to Lieutenant-General Hussein Kamel, the son-in-law of the Iraqi president before he split with his uncle in 1995.

Al-Rawi has worked in the Iraqi presidential office since 1982, and was, as he says, in “direct contact” with Saddam Hussein for seven years, until his appointment as Minister of Trade in 1987.

After the US invasion in 2003, Al-Rawi was arrested in Camp Cropper and was on the most wanted list of the leaders of the collapsed regime. He was detained until 2012 and is currently living in Jordan.

Asharq Al-Awsat publishes, in two episodes, excerpts from Al-Rawi’s book before its publication.

He recounts that during the rule of the late President Abdel-Rahman Aref, relations with the United States of America were severed for its support of the Israeli aggression in 1967… The rupture remained after the revolution of July 1968, until 1982, when Donald Rumsfeld visited Baghdad, as an envoy of US President Ronald Reagan.

Diplomatic relations were already restored in 1986, but soon collapsed after the end of the Iran-Iraq war.

Al-Rawi says: “In the midst of the Iraqi people’s celebrations of victory over Iran, the US House of Representatives, under pressure from the anti-Iraq Zionist lobby, agreed to impose sanctions on Iraq on Sept. 22, 1988, forty-five days after the war stopped.”

Al-Rawi talks about Iraq’s oil power before and after the war with Iran. He says: “Iraq did not need loans and credit facilities in the seventies, especially after the nationalization of oil… Oil revenues increased from one billion dollars annually to USD 26.4 billion in 1980...”

However, he explains: “The increased military spending throughout the eight-year period of the Iraq-Iran war was not the only reason for the accumulation of debts, which began in mid-1984. It was also due to the significant decline in oil revenues due to the cessation of oil trades through the southern port that Iraq used for nearly two-thirds of its exports specified by OPEC.”

He noted that the mentioned port became within the target of daily Iranian bombing. Moreover, in 1982, Syria halted its export activity through the pipeline passing through its territory to the Mediterranean, in support of Iran.

These developments have contributed to the accumulation of half of Iraq’s debts of USD 42 billion (excluding Gulf debt) at the end of the war in 1988, leaving only the Turkish oil pipeline with a capacity of half a million barrels per day.

He added that the drop in oil prices in the mid-1980s had a “significant impact on the economic situation”, as “austerity measures” were taken in many sectors with the aim of ensuring that “food and medicine insurance plans and expenditures to support the war effort were not affected.”

He continued that the Military Industrialization Command, represented by Lieutenant-General Hussein Kamel, adopted a policy of expanding the military industrial base…

“These numerous, large and ambitious goals (…) required not a few financial resources,” Al-Rawi said.

He explained: “Oil revenues did not meet the previously mentioned goals. A sharp competition emerged between the Military Industrialization Authority, and the rest of the ministries... Lieutenant-General Hussein Kamel had the last say in the state, due to the reputation he gained in developing military production in the last years of the war with Iran, and his relationship of kinship and affinity with the late president…”

The invasion of Kuwait and the sanctions

The author talked about the period after the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait in 1990:

He said that when President Georges Bush imposed a comprehensive American embargo on Iraq and froze its assets and properties in the United States, he went on the morning of Aug. 3, 1990 to the Central Bank to look at Iraq’s hard currency assets in foreign banks and central bank reserves, in his capacity as minister of Trade and acting Finance minister.

Al-Rawi noted that he asked the Central Bank governor to ​​immediately begin transferring Iraq’s foreign deposits to the Central Bank of Jordan, but he refrained, saying that the Central Bank did not report to the Minister of Finance, but to the Presidential Diwan.

On the Iraqi preparations for the war to liberate Kuwait in 1991, the author said that the needs of all governorates to prevent any food shortage during the war.

“The strategic storage was focused on the governorates of Karbala and Najaf, because they are two religious governorates that are unlikely to be subjected to aerial bombardment. The same is true for the autonomous provinces, which are also considered safe provinces. In addition, the owners of mills and kilns in Baghdad and the governorates were informed to secure sufficient storage of fuel to continue their work if the oil installations were targeted by bombing (…)”

“A week before the expiry of the deadline set by the Security Council, I traveled to Amman, and from there to Yemen to meet the late President Ali Abdullah Saleh…

Al-Rawi said that during a lunch invitation, the Yemeni leadership told him that the war would take place, and that the coalition’s military had a main goal to destroy the Iraqi army.

Al-Rawi talked about the start of the US strikes in January 1991, saying: “The aerial attack of the coalition forces has exceeded the goal of removing the Iraqi forces from Kuwait to bear a destructive plan for Iraq and to undermine all the achievements that the country has made and which have nothing to do with the war.”



Gaza's Rafah Crossing Reopens, Allowing Limited Travel as Palestinians Claim Delays, Mistreatment

Ayada Al-Sheikh is welcomed by his sister, Nisreen, upon his arrival in Khan Younis in the southern Gaza Strip after returning to Gaza following the long-awaited reopening of the Rafah border crossing, early Thursday, Feb. 5, 2026. (AP Photo/Abdel Kareem Hana)
Ayada Al-Sheikh is welcomed by his sister, Nisreen, upon his arrival in Khan Younis in the southern Gaza Strip after returning to Gaza following the long-awaited reopening of the Rafah border crossing, early Thursday, Feb. 5, 2026. (AP Photo/Abdel Kareem Hana)
TT

Gaza's Rafah Crossing Reopens, Allowing Limited Travel as Palestinians Claim Delays, Mistreatment

Ayada Al-Sheikh is welcomed by his sister, Nisreen, upon his arrival in Khan Younis in the southern Gaza Strip after returning to Gaza following the long-awaited reopening of the Rafah border crossing, early Thursday, Feb. 5, 2026. (AP Photo/Abdel Kareem Hana)
Ayada Al-Sheikh is welcomed by his sister, Nisreen, upon his arrival in Khan Younis in the southern Gaza Strip after returning to Gaza following the long-awaited reopening of the Rafah border crossing, early Thursday, Feb. 5, 2026. (AP Photo/Abdel Kareem Hana)

A limited number of Palestinians were able to travel between Gaza and Egypt on Sunday, after Gaza's Rafah crossing reopened after a two-day closure, Egyptian state media reported.

The vital border point opened last week for the first time since 2024, one of the main requirements for the US-backed ceasefire. The crossing was closed Friday and Saturday because of confusion about reopening operations.

Egypt's Al Qahera television station said that Palestinians began crossing in both directions around noon on Sunday. Israel didn't immediately confirm the information, according to The AP news.

Meanwhile, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is expected to travel to Washington this week, though the major subject of discussion will be Iran, his office said.

Over the first four days of the crossing's opening, just 36 Palestinians requiring medical care were allowed to leave for Egypt, plus 62 companions, according to UN data, after Israel retrieved the body of the last hostage held in Gaza and several American officials visited Israel to press for the opening.

Palestinian officials say nearly 20,000 people in Gaza are seeking to leave for medical care that isn't available in the territory. Those who have succeeded in crossing described delays and allegations of mistreatment by Israeli forces and other groups involved in the crossing, including an Israeli-backed Palestinian armed group, Abu Shabab.

A group of Palestinian patients and wounded gathered Sunday morning in the courtyard of a Red Crescent hospital in Gaza’s southern city of Khan Younis, before making their way to the Rafah crossing with Egypt for treatment abroad, family members told The Associated Press.

Amjad Abu Jedian, who was injured in the war, was scheduled to leave Gaza for medical treatment on the first day of the crossing’s reopening, but only five patients were allowed to travel that day, his mother, Raja Abu Jedian, said. Abu Jedian was shot by an Israeli sniper while he doing building work in the central Bureij refugee camp in July 2024, she said.

On Saturday, his family received a call from the World Health Organization notifying them that he is included in the group that will travel on Sunday, she said.

“We want them to take care of the patients (during their evacuation),” she said. “We want the Israeli military not to burden them.”

The Israeli defense branch that oversees the operation of the crossing didn't immediately confirm the opening.

Heading back to Gaza A group of Palestinians also arrived Sunday morning at the Egyptian side of the Rafah crossing to return to the Gaza Strip, Egypt’s state-run Al-Qahera News satellite television reported.

Palestinians who returned to Gaza in the first few days of the crossing's operation described hours of delays and invasive searches by Israeli authorities and Abu Shabab. A European Union mission and Palestinian officials run the border crossing, and Israel has its screening facility some distance away.

The crossing was reopened on Feb. 2 as part of a fragile ceasefire deal to halt the Israel-Hamas war.

The Rafah crossing, an essential lifeline for Palestinians in Gaza, was the only one in the Palestinian territory not controlled by Israel before the war. Israel seized the Palestinian side of Rafah in May 2024, though traffic through the crossing was heavily restricted even before that.

Restrictions negotiated by Israeli, Egyptian, Palestinian and international officials meant that only 50 people would be allowed to return to Gaza each day and 50 medical patients — along with two companions for each — would be allowed to leave, but far fewer people have so far crossed in both directions.

A senior Hamas official, Khaled Mashaal, said the militant group is open to discuss the future of its arms as part of a “balanced approach” that includes the reconstruction of Gaza and protecting the Palestinian enclave from Israel.

Mashaal said the group has offered multiple options, including a long-term truce, as part of its ongoing negotiations with Egyptian, Qatari and Turkish mediators.

Hamas plans to agree to a number of “guarantees,” including a 10-year period of disarmament and an international peacekeeping force on the borders, “to maintain peace and prevent any clashes,” between the militants and Israel, Mashaal said at a forum in Qatar’s capital, Doha.

Israel has repeatedly demanded a complete disarmament and destruction of Hamas and its infrastructure, both military and civil.

Mashaal accused Israel of financing and arming militias, like the Abu Shabab group which operates in Israeli military-controlled areas in Gaza, “to create chaos” in the enclave.

In the forum, Mashaal was asked about Hamas’ position from US President Donald Trump’s Board of Peace. He didn’t offer a specific answer, but said that the group won’t accept “foreign intervention” in Palestinian affairs.

“Gaza is for the people of Gaza. Palestinians are for the people of Palestine,” he said. “We will not accept foreign rule.”


Three Deadly Attacks on Health Centers in Sudan's South Kordofan in Past Week, Says WHO

Sudanese families prepare to ride on trucks while on their way to Egypt through the Qustul border, after the crisis in Sudan's capital Khartoum, in the Sudanese city of Wadi Halfa, Sudan May 1, 2023. (Reuters)
Sudanese families prepare to ride on trucks while on their way to Egypt through the Qustul border, after the crisis in Sudan's capital Khartoum, in the Sudanese city of Wadi Halfa, Sudan May 1, 2023. (Reuters)
TT

Three Deadly Attacks on Health Centers in Sudan's South Kordofan in Past Week, Says WHO

Sudanese families prepare to ride on trucks while on their way to Egypt through the Qustul border, after the crisis in Sudan's capital Khartoum, in the Sudanese city of Wadi Halfa, Sudan May 1, 2023. (Reuters)
Sudanese families prepare to ride on trucks while on their way to Egypt through the Qustul border, after the crisis in Sudan's capital Khartoum, in the Sudanese city of Wadi Halfa, Sudan May 1, 2023. (Reuters)

Sudan's South Kordofan region has seen attacks on three health facilities in the past week alone, leaving more than 30 dead, the World Health Organization said Sunday, AFP reported.

"Sudan's health system is under attack again," WHO chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said on X, pointing out that, since February 3, "three health facilities were attacked in South Kordofan, in a region already suffering acute malnutrition".


Killing of Seif al-Islam al-Gadhafi Raises Succession Questions in September Current

Seif al-Islam al-Gadhafi (file photo, Reuters)
Seif al-Islam al-Gadhafi (file photo, Reuters)
TT

Killing of Seif al-Islam al-Gadhafi Raises Succession Questions in September Current

Seif al-Islam al-Gadhafi (file photo, Reuters)
Seif al-Islam al-Gadhafi (file photo, Reuters)

Since the killing of Seif al-Islam al-Gadhafi, son of Libya’s late leader Moammar Gadhafi, in the western Libyan city of Zintan last Tuesday, urgent questions have surfaced over who might succeed him in leading the political current he represented.

The questions reflect Seif al-Islam’s symbolic status among supporters of the former regime, known as the September Current, a reference to backers of the September 1 Revolution led by Moammar Gadhafi in 1969.

Search for new leadership

Othman Barka, a leading figure in the National Current that backed Seif al-Islam al-Gadhafi, said supporters of the former regime had yet to agree on a new leader but retained the organizational and political capacity to overcome the current phase and later move toward an alternative leadership framework.

Barka told Asharq Al-Awsat that ties to Gadhafi and his sons had been both emotional and political, but said that what he described as national work would continue. He said organized efforts would be made to reach a new leadership after the repercussions of the killing were overcome.

It remains unclear how Ahmed Gaddaf al-Dam, the political official in the Libyan National Struggle Front and one of the most prominent figures of the former regime, views the future leadership of the September Current following Seif al-Islam’s killing.

Sources close to him told Asharq Al-Awsat it was too early to speak of a new leadership while mourning ceremonies continued in Bani Walid.

Gaddaf al-Dam limited his public response to reposting a statement by those describing themselves as supporters of the Jamahiriya system on his Facebook page. He stressed unity, saying the killing would not lead to the fragmentation of the current and that September supporters remained a single, solid bloc.

In Bani Walid in western Libya, where Seif al-Islam was buried on Friday, shock was evident in the tone of Libyan activist Hamid Gadhafi, a member of the late leader’s tribe. He told Asharq Al-Awsat that clarity over the future leadership would emerge after about 10 days.

Possible successors

Libyan social media pages circulated the names of potential successors, including Seif al-Islam’s sister, Aisha, and his brother, Saadi. Libyan political analyst Ibrahim Belqasem rejected that view, telling Asharq Al-Awsat that the only remaining driver for supporters of the former regime would be the emergence of an unexpected, nonpolitical figure, describing it as an attempt to rescue the current.

After the fall of Gadhafi’s rule in 2011, following 42 years in power since the 1969 revolution, his supporters reemerged under the banner of the September Current. They are popularly known as the Greens, a reference to the Green Book.

Fragmented components and the absence of unified leadership mark the September Current. Seif al-Islam was widely seen as a central symbol among supporters, as well as among political figures and groups calling for the reintegration of former regime supporters into political life and for the recognition of their rights.

Nasser Saeed, spokesman for the Libyan Popular National Movement, one of the political arms of former regime supporters, said he expected a national political leadership to take shape in the coming phase to continue what he described as national work until the country stabilizes. Libyans can determine their future.

He said the emergence of a new leader or symbol was a matter for a later stage, stressing that the project was ideological rather than tied to individuals.

Saeed told Asharq Al-Awsat that Seif al-Islam al-Gadhafi’s legacy lay in a unifying national project that rejected foreign intervention and sought to restore sovereignty and stability. He said Seif al-Islam had represented hope for overcoming the crisis and that his project extended the path of the September Revolution as a liberation choice that still retained supporters.

Structural challenges

Organizationally, the former regime cannot be confined to a single political framework. Its structures and leadership are diverse, including independent organizations and figures.

Among the most prominent are the Libyan Popular National Movement, founded in 2012, and the Popular Front for the Liberation of Libya, formed in 2016 by politicians and tribal leaders in support of Seif al-Islam al-Gadhafi.

Their representatives increased their presence after 2020, whether in the Geneva forum that led to the formation of the Government of National Unity or in UN-sponsored structured dialogue tracks, before suspending participation following Seif al-Islam’s killing.

Voices within the September Current believe the killing marked a decisive turning point that cast heavy shadows over the ability of former regime supporters to forge unified leadership, citing structural difficulties rooted in historical disagreements between what is known as the old guard and supporters of change led by Seif al-Islam.

Khaled al-Hijazi, a prominent political activist in the September Current, agreed with that assessment, saying Seif al-Islam’s symbolic role had helped balance internal disputes due to his reformist project before the February 17 uprising.

Al-Hijazi told Asharq Al-Awsat that the loss of that symbolism could revive old divisions and complicate efforts to recreate an inclusive leadership, amid internal and external factors that make unification highly complex in the foreseeable future.

Barka said differences were natural, stressing that the current was not a closed party and believed in democracy and pluralism. He said generational competition did not amount to conflict and noted there had been no violent clashes between supporters of different paths within the September Current.

He concluded by saying that the diversity of approaches served a single goal: the freedom and prosperity of Libyan citizens and the building of a sovereign state capable of overcoming the crisis that has persisted since 2011.