The Iranian Feminist Movement... Why and How?

High school students remove the veil and raise the victory sign in Tehran last October (Twitter)
High school students remove the veil and raise the victory sign in Tehran last October (Twitter)
TT

The Iranian Feminist Movement... Why and How?

High school students remove the veil and raise the victory sign in Tehran last October (Twitter)
High school students remove the veil and raise the victory sign in Tehran last October (Twitter)

In September, a girl named Mahsa was murdered by government agents. Her death was like throwing a lit match into a petrol tank. People took to the streets in more than a hundred Iranian cities and demanded the overthrow of the Islamic Republic.

Did all the protesters know Mahsa? No, she was not a well-known figure for her murder to cause such outrage.

The people’s anger was triggered by the many demands that had not been met for years. Their needs had been met with imprisonment and bullets. In the past three decades, some have been calling for reforms within the government, but since demands have gone unachieved, they uniformly chose to try overthrowing the regime this time.

The Origins of the Movement

Iranian women were the pioneers of this movement. Their discontent with the government began in the first month of the revolution when Khomeini ordered making the hijab compulsory - although the implementation of the mandatory hijab took nearly a year, it formed the seeds of the feminist movement in 2022.

In the early years of the revolution, women were alone. Civil society, parties, political groups, and men did not join them. The passage of time, however, has proven that oppression and discrimination in society are like a “virus.” If it is not fought at the beginning, it will infect others.

Massive embezzlement, partisan gangs, discrimination against ethnic and religious minorities, strict censorship, lack of freedom of expression, rampant human rights violations, and a huge class gap made Iranian men realize their mistake and motivated them to make up for ignoring gender discrimination…This time, like a few years ago, Iranian men stood with women and strengthened the voice of the movement.

Differences Between the Current Movement, Previous Protests

Large-scale protests that took place in Iran in the past 43 years were mainly “demand protests.” In 2009, Iranians protested fraud in presidential elections. At least 130 people were killed, and several people were executed.

Protests also erupted in 2019 over a hike in petrol prices. Those demonstrations resulted in the death of at least 1,500 people.

But this time around, the people’s demands are different than ever before. They are targeting the basis of government and demanding the overthrow of an oppressive regime.

Previous protests did not last more than a week as they were silenced by government repression. Discontented people left the streets and returned to their homes.

The style of people’s protests in Iran has changed. In contrast to the past, people did not gather in one place or one city. Rather, they took to the streets on a large scale and dispersed in different places, protesting and chanting slogans.

This called for repressive forces to be sent everywhere. As a result, the troops became weak and exhausted, forcing the government to recruit several outworkers in exchange for payments.

Similarities between previous protests and demonstrations now included people not having a single demand and not resisting oppression uniformly.

This time, however, under the guidance of Iranian legal experts, protesters are using the “right of self-defense” to fend off the onslaught of the oppressive forces.

Nevertheless, people are not armed. They continue to hit and run with sticks and stones only. As a result, several members of the suppression force were injured.

Moreover, if security officers wanted to arrest a protester, other demonstrators would attack authorities to prevent the detention of their comrades. Therefore, most arrests take place past midnight or by storming the houses of demonstrators.

The Outcomes of the 2022 Protests?

The September 2022 protests are the “beginning” of the “end” of the Islamic Republic and will lead to the fall of the regime in Iran. But let us not forget that the “fall” is a process that must take its course.

For this reason, protests are normal to fade on some days and be more severe and accelerate on others. However, the situation will undoubtedly return to normal once the regime is overthrown.

What is important is what kind of government the people want after the regime’s fall. People’s desires can be well understood from the slogans they choose. The demonstrators chanted with one heart and one voice, “Woman, Life, Freedom.”

This motto has two sides: its negative side is the denial of the religious tyranny ruling Iran.

In Iran, authorities believe their own interpretation of religion and do not tolerate any other method or religion. Rather, it is the enemy of “freedom of religion and belief.” On this basis, it interferes with all people’s personal and family affairs and even with their way of worship. Many have been arrested or executed for this reason.

The positive aspect of the slogan is that it calls for the establishment of a democratic and secular state. Only in such a government can the slogan “Woman, Life, Freedom” be realized.

In such a state, there is no discrimination because the people decide their own destiny through the free election of representatives. No one is punished for their religious beliefs, and there is no vast difference in class division.

Women will have an equal share of freedom as men, and the human dignity of all will be recognized.

The Price of Reaching Dreamland

The Iranian people know that freedom and democracy have a price. These principles will only be achieved if the nation is willing to pay the price, and the Iranian people have shown that they can bear the cost of democracy.

Over the past 43 years, many Iranian people have lost their lives for opposing the rulers.

The death toll in multiple protests is unknown. Because the government never releases statistics. Statistics are made public only through informing the families, and after verification by human rights institutions.

In recent protests, at least 510 people have been killed by the regime, at least 68 of them minors, prompting UNICEF, on November 8, to protest this unbridled violence.

The exact number of those arrested is also unknown, but I firmly declare that more than 19,000 people have been arrested. At least 300 of them are high school students.

Due to overcrowded prisons and the lack of available space, the detainees are kept in unsanitary and irregular conditions in barracks and government buildings that have been vacated for this purpose.

So far, the trial of several detainees has begun, and 18 people have been sentenced to death, and two of them have been executed.

One of the people on death row is Hamid Ghareh Hassanlou, a well-known physician who built several schools in deprived areas and served in the Iran-Iraq war for six years.

Hassanlou was arrested at his home and tortured to the point where his rib bone was broken. Because he was not treated in time, his lung was punctured.

At the hospital, he was informed that the death sentence had been issued against him. This doctor’s wife, a radiologist, was sentenced to 25 years in prison. Another person was arrested and sentenced to death for singing some rap songs.

Government violence has even spilled over into hospitals, where government officials identify and detain injured people at protest rallies. If the medical staff resists, they are arrested as well.

In one case, tear gas was fired in the hospital yard.

On December 17, the body of a young female doctor named Aida was found. Traces of torture were visible on her corpse.

According to her friends and colleagues, she used to go to their homes and treat wounded people who did not want to go to medical facilities. Now it is widely believed, given the government’s record, that she was tortured and then killed by government agents.

All this is a small summary of the suffering of my bereaved country. The important point is that we all believe in the light that we will reach at the end of the tunnel of terror of the Islamic Republic, and then we will live with our neighbors in kindness and tranquility.



UN Shipping Agency Opposes Fees for Any Strait, More Details Sought on Trump Post on Cargo Charge

This picture shows ships sailing near the Strait of Hormuz off the eastern coast of the United Arab Emirates at Khor Fakkan on July 13, 2026. (AFP)
This picture shows ships sailing near the Strait of Hormuz off the eastern coast of the United Arab Emirates at Khor Fakkan on July 13, 2026. (AFP)
TT

UN Shipping Agency Opposes Fees for Any Strait, More Details Sought on Trump Post on Cargo Charge

This picture shows ships sailing near the Strait of Hormuz off the eastern coast of the United Arab Emirates at Khor Fakkan on July 13, 2026. (AFP)
This picture shows ships sailing near the Strait of Hormuz off the eastern coast of the United Arab Emirates at Khor Fakkan on July 13, 2026. (AFP)

More details are awaited after US President Donald Trump said in a post that Washington was reinstating a naval blockade on Iran and would be reimbursed 20% on ‌all cargo ‌shipped through ‌the ⁠Strait of Hormuz, ⁠the UN's shipping agency said on Monday.

"We are aware of the post and awaiting more details," ⁠a spokesperson with the ‌UN's ‌International Maritime Organization said.

"We have ‌always been consistent ‌on our stance on fees – IMO stands firmly against charging fees for passage ‌through straits used for international navigation. There ⁠is ⁠no legal basis through which to introduce mandatory tolls simply to transit through a strait."

Trump said in a Truth Social post the process would begin immediately, but did not elaborate.


US Citizen Is Found Guilty of Helping Export Tech to Iran in Violation of Sanctions

People walk near an anti-US mural in Tehran, Iran, July 13, 2026. Majid Asgaripour/WANA (West Asia News Agency) via Reuters
People walk near an anti-US mural in Tehran, Iran, July 13, 2026. Majid Asgaripour/WANA (West Asia News Agency) via Reuters
TT

US Citizen Is Found Guilty of Helping Export Tech to Iran in Violation of Sanctions

People walk near an anti-US mural in Tehran, Iran, July 13, 2026. Majid Asgaripour/WANA (West Asia News Agency) via Reuters
People walk near an anti-US mural in Tehran, Iran, July 13, 2026. Majid Asgaripour/WANA (West Asia News Agency) via Reuters

A Massachusetts man was found guilty Monday of conspiring to unlawfully export electronic components to Iran in violation of US sanctions.

Mahdi Mohammad Sadeghi, who worked at the global electronics company Analog Devices, was accused of helping an Iranian business associate get around American export control laws. US prosecutors say the business associate’s Tehran-based company makes navigation systems for the military drone program of Iran’s Revolutionary Guard. Authorities say the scheme included the creation of a front company in Switzerland.

The second defendant, Mohammad Abedininajafabadi, called Abedini in court documents, was not on trial. He is believed to be in Iran after an apparent prisoner exchange for an Italian journalist.

Sadeghi was found guilty on three of the five charges. He showed no visible reaction to the verdict, which came early in the fourth day of jury deliberations. He and his lawyers did not comment as they left court, and he will remain free until sentencing Oct. 13.

Sadeghi, a 43-year-old naturalized US citizen, chose not to testify. A father of two, he lost his job at Analog Devices due to the charges. Although he was arrested in December 2024, long before the current war with Iran, his trial has unfolded during the conflict.

“At its core, this case is straightforward. You cannot send goods, especially the goods at issue in this case, to Iran. Period. Full stop,” Assistant US Attorney Alathea Porter told the jury. “The defendant knew that, and conspired with Mr. Abedini to do that.”

Assistant U.S. Attorney Jared Dolan, in his closing remarks, said documents, text messages and photos proved that the illegal acts were the “fruits of this relationship” between Sadeghi and Abedini.

“The evidence established that he knew what Abedini was doing because he told him in writing,” Dolan said. “He helped him anyway.”

Sadeghi's attorney, William Fick, told jurors that the scheme laid out by the prosecution “makes no sense” and was full of holes. He said Sadeghi was only offering advice to a longtime friend about how to get business with the semiconductor company, and wasn’t responsible for procuring the parts for Abedini.

Fick said there was no proof the parts ended up in Iran, and he disputed that the Swiss company was a front.

“If you look at the world through dirty glasses, everything looks dirty,” Fick said. “That is fundamentally what the prosecution is asking you to do here.”

Fick also said prosecutors hadn't shown Sadeghi gained anything from the alleged plan — although the prosecution pointed out that they didn't need to prove a motive.

“He had nothing to gain and everything to lose,” Fick said. “He has lived in the country for decades. He was a well-regarded, respected employee on his way up in the company.”

Prosecutors had hoped to introduce evidence during the trial related to an Iranian drone used in a 2024 attack that killed three US troops at a remote base in Jordan.

However, before the trial, defense attorneys sought to exclude any evidence related to Abedini’s role in drone manufacturing or attacks on American troops.

The judge agreed, ruling that prosecutors could only give general evidence about Abedini’s Iranian company and how its technology had potential military applications, including for drones. During a hearing in February, prosecutors acknowledged they didn’t have evidence that Sadeghi “knew anything” about the technology he was accused of exporting was allegedly used on the drone involved in the Jordan attack.

Both defendants have been charged with export control violations. Abedini is separately charged with conspiring to provide material support to a foreign terrorist organization that resulted in the deaths of three service members.

Abedini was arrested at an airport in Italy on a US warrant in December 2024, but was released a month later and returned to Iran. Three days after his arrest, Italian journalist Cecilia Sala was detained while reporting in Iran. Sala, who was believed held as a bargaining chip for Abedini’s release, returned home in January 2025.


US Vows Campaign to End ICC ‘Threat’ to Americans

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio attends a trilateral meeting with Japanese Foreign Minister Motegi Toshimitsu and South Korean Foreign Minister Cho Hyun (not pictured) on the sidelines of the NATO Summit in Ankara on July 7, 2026. (AFP)
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio attends a trilateral meeting with Japanese Foreign Minister Motegi Toshimitsu and South Korean Foreign Minister Cho Hyun (not pictured) on the sidelines of the NATO Summit in Ankara on July 7, 2026. (AFP)
TT

US Vows Campaign to End ICC ‘Threat’ to Americans

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio attends a trilateral meeting with Japanese Foreign Minister Motegi Toshimitsu and South Korean Foreign Minister Cho Hyun (not pictured) on the sidelines of the NATO Summit in Ankara on July 7, 2026. (AFP)
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio attends a trilateral meeting with Japanese Foreign Minister Motegi Toshimitsu and South Korean Foreign Minister Cho Hyun (not pictured) on the sidelines of the NATO Summit in Ankara on July 7, 2026. (AFP)

The United States on Monday announced a campaign against the Hague-based International Criminal Court (ICC), accusing the tribunal of posing "an intolerable threat to US sovereignty" and threatening sanctions.

"The ICC and its friends are waging a war against our country, not with bullets or missiles, but with statutes, compacts and the force of so-called international law," Secretary of State Marco Rubio said in a video statement.

The State Department said in a statement the campaign will "systematically disable the ICC's ability to operate, target American servicemen or officials, or otherwise threaten American sovereignty."

Relations between the government of Donald Trump and the ICC have been extremely poor, with several court officials, including its chief prosecutor, already under US sanctions.

The sanctions bar the officials from entering the United States and block property and financial transactions involving them in the world's largest economy.

The measures have often focused on ICC investigations involving Israel, a US ally. The court issued arrest warrants in 2024 for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and others.

However, in its statement, the State Department focused on what it called the ICC's "intolerable threat to US sovereignty," saying the court "claims the authority to prosecute and even imprison American servicemen and officials operating on behalf of America's national interest."

"Americans never signed up for this, and all American presidents since the ICC's ratification have maintained that the ICC does not have jurisdiction over Americans," the State Department said.

The department listed a range of measures it was considering against the court, including having American diplomats call other nations to urge withdrawal from the body, as well as travel bans and sanctions against ICC officials.

Established in 2002, the ICC prosecutes individuals accused of the gravest atrocities, including war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide.

Neither Israel nor the United States is a party to the international treaty that established the ICC. Russia is also not a member, and its President Vladimir Putin has been the subject of an ICC arrest warrant since March 2023.