Senate Passes Bill to Repeal Iraq War Authorizations

The first US soldiers to enter southern Iraq on March 21, 2003 (File photo: Reuters)
The first US soldiers to enter southern Iraq on March 21, 2003 (File photo: Reuters)
TT

Senate Passes Bill to Repeal Iraq War Authorizations

The first US soldiers to enter southern Iraq on March 21, 2003 (File photo: Reuters)
The first US soldiers to enter southern Iraq on March 21, 2003 (File photo: Reuters)

The US Senate voted Wednesday to repeal the 2002 Iraq war Authorizations for the Use of Military Force (AUMF) against Iraq.

Senators voted 66-30 to repeal the 2002 AUMF and the 1991 authorization, and the legislation now goes to the House of Representatives for a vote, after which it will be sent to President Joe Biden for approval.

The Congress is close to revoking the authorization for a war it approved in October 2002 after former President George W. Bush resorted to Congress to obtain his approval to launch military operations against Saddam Hussein's regime. The Democrats pushed hard to cancel the authorization and celebrated its approval.

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer said the US, Iraq, and the entire world had changed dramatically since 2002, and it's time the laws on the books catch up with those changes.

"These AUMFs have outlived their use," added Schumer.

Opponents of the repeal argued that it could project weakness as the US faces conflict in the Middle East.

Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnel said, "Our terrorist enemies aren't sunsetting their war against us."

"When we deploy our servicemembers in harm's way, we need to supply them with all the support and legal authorities that we can," he said, adding: "The 2002 AUMF bears directly on the threats we face today in Iraq and Syria from Iran-backed terrorists."

The Republicans sought to pass a series of amendments within the framework of canceling the mandate to address the Iranian threat, especially in light of the repeated attacks on US forces in Syria and Iraq.

The White House supported the Senate passage of the 2002 AUMF, adding that the US conducts no ongoing military activities that rely on the authorization.

"Repeal of these authorizations would have no impact on current US military operations and would support this Administration's commitment to a strong and comprehensive relationship with our Iraqi partners."

The statement said: "That partnership, which includes cooperation with the Iraqi Security Forces, continues at the invitation of the Government of Iraq in an advise, assist, and enable role."

Supporters of the repeal say that the administration has the necessary powers in the war against terrorism, following another authorization approved by Congress in 2001, after the 9/11 attacks, which the lawmakers are not seeking to rescind.

Congress approved it to give Bush broad authority to invade Afghanistan as part of the war against terrorism. Unlike the authorization for the war in Iraq, it does not explicitly mention any country. Instead, it approves using force against any nation, organization, or person that has planned or assisted in an attack against the United States.

The legislation now goes to the House of Representatives for a vote. Speaker Kevin McCarthy has signaled support for it and said it would likely be brought to the floor.

McCarthy said he supports keeping the 2001 authorization for the global war on terror in place.

"I support keeping the worldwide AUMF, so action can be taken if there's a terrorist anywhere in the world. But Iraq, we're 20 years into it, I don't have a problem repealing that," McCarthy said.

The US law gives the president the right to launch military strikes for reasons related to US national security but obliges him to inform Congress within 48 hours of launching any strike, and it also bans any US forces from remaining on the battlefield for more than sixty days without authorization.

The president cannot officially declare war without the consent of Congress.



Baghdad Urges Washington to Prevent ‘Imminent’ Israeli Strikes

Sudani visiting a market in Baghdad on Thursday (Government media)
Sudani visiting a market in Baghdad on Thursday (Government media)
TT

Baghdad Urges Washington to Prevent ‘Imminent’ Israeli Strikes

Sudani visiting a market in Baghdad on Thursday (Government media)
Sudani visiting a market in Baghdad on Thursday (Government media)

Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammed Shia Al-Sudani on Thursday called on major powers to “exert greater efforts to end the war in Palestine and Lebanon.” Meanwhile, an Iraqi government official urged the United States to “prevent any attacks on the country,” referring to potential Israeli strikes.
During a phone conversation with Russian President Vladimir Putin, Al-Sudani stressed the importance of ensuring the conflict does not escalate “to a level that threatens regional and global stability.”
The Iraqi prime minister’s appeal comes amid reports suggesting that Israel may launch strikes on Iraq in retaliation for attacks by Iraqi armed factions targeting Israeli positions.
The Iraqi government is striving to assert its exclusive authority over weapons and war-related decisions. However, armed factions affiliated with the Axis of Resistance openly claim responsibility for near-daily rocket attacks on Israel. This has provided Israel with a justification for potentially targeting Iraqi territory, especially after it filed a complaint with the UN Security Council against six Iraqi factions and held Baghdad responsible for the attacks.
These factions have also openly declared their involvement in the ongoing conflict with Israel in Lebanon and Gaza. The Iraqi government has been unable to take decisive action to halt the activities of these factions, which many believe could soon expose Iraq to an Israeli strike.
According to media reports, Washington has warned Baghdad that Israeli airstrikes on Iraq are “imminent” unless the Iraqi government curtails attacks by Iranian-backed factions on Israel. The Times of Israel cited sources indicating that the United States has “exhausted all means of pressure on Israel” and urged Iraq to act swiftly to prevent such attacks.
Despite repeated assurances from the Iraqi government—including its recent adoption of 12 measures by the National Security Council to counter Israeli threats and complaints—the situation remains tense. These measures include monitoring Iraq’s western borders, preventing factions from launching attacks, and maintaining Iraq’s neutrality in the ongoing conflict.
On Wednesday, Abu Hussein Al-Hamidawi, Secretary-General of Kata’ib Hezbollah, made a striking statement on the role of resistance factions in the war and their commitment to the Unity of Fronts doctrine frequently mentioned by Axis of Resistance groups.
In an interview published by the faction’s media arm, Al-Hamidawi said: “The continuity of the Unity of Fronts concept depends on what the Lebanese Hezbollah decides.”
Al-Hamidawi also emphasized that resistance factions are constantly coordinating internally and with external partners such as Hezbollah, the Houthis, and Palestinian resistance leaders.
“We aim to ensure that the Palestinian people are not left alone and that the Unity of Fronts remains intact,” he stated.
Fadi Al-Shammari, a political advisor to Sudani, reiterated that Israel’s threats “are not new,” citing the recent complaint filed by Israel with the UN Security Council as part of its pattern of issuing threats.
In media statements, Al-Shammari reaffirmed the Iraqi government’s long-standing position: “The decision of war and peace lies solely with the Iraqi government.”
He noted that the factions’ attacks are being launched from areas outside Iraq’s borders, specifically from Syria. However, he stressed that the Iraqi government is working through its security and military agencies to prevent Iraq from becoming a battlefield for external or internal parties.
Al-Shammari also called on the United States to fulfill its responsibilities under the Strategic Framework Agreement and security pact with Iraq, emphasizing the need to deter and respond to any external attacks that threaten Iraq’s internal security.