Senate Passes Bill to Repeal Iraq War Authorizations

The first US soldiers to enter southern Iraq on March 21, 2003 (File photo: Reuters)
The first US soldiers to enter southern Iraq on March 21, 2003 (File photo: Reuters)
TT

Senate Passes Bill to Repeal Iraq War Authorizations

The first US soldiers to enter southern Iraq on March 21, 2003 (File photo: Reuters)
The first US soldiers to enter southern Iraq on March 21, 2003 (File photo: Reuters)

The US Senate voted Wednesday to repeal the 2002 Iraq war Authorizations for the Use of Military Force (AUMF) against Iraq.

Senators voted 66-30 to repeal the 2002 AUMF and the 1991 authorization, and the legislation now goes to the House of Representatives for a vote, after which it will be sent to President Joe Biden for approval.

The Congress is close to revoking the authorization for a war it approved in October 2002 after former President George W. Bush resorted to Congress to obtain his approval to launch military operations against Saddam Hussein's regime. The Democrats pushed hard to cancel the authorization and celebrated its approval.

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer said the US, Iraq, and the entire world had changed dramatically since 2002, and it's time the laws on the books catch up with those changes.

"These AUMFs have outlived their use," added Schumer.

Opponents of the repeal argued that it could project weakness as the US faces conflict in the Middle East.

Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnel said, "Our terrorist enemies aren't sunsetting their war against us."

"When we deploy our servicemembers in harm's way, we need to supply them with all the support and legal authorities that we can," he said, adding: "The 2002 AUMF bears directly on the threats we face today in Iraq and Syria from Iran-backed terrorists."

The Republicans sought to pass a series of amendments within the framework of canceling the mandate to address the Iranian threat, especially in light of the repeated attacks on US forces in Syria and Iraq.

The White House supported the Senate passage of the 2002 AUMF, adding that the US conducts no ongoing military activities that rely on the authorization.

"Repeal of these authorizations would have no impact on current US military operations and would support this Administration's commitment to a strong and comprehensive relationship with our Iraqi partners."

The statement said: "That partnership, which includes cooperation with the Iraqi Security Forces, continues at the invitation of the Government of Iraq in an advise, assist, and enable role."

Supporters of the repeal say that the administration has the necessary powers in the war against terrorism, following another authorization approved by Congress in 2001, after the 9/11 attacks, which the lawmakers are not seeking to rescind.

Congress approved it to give Bush broad authority to invade Afghanistan as part of the war against terrorism. Unlike the authorization for the war in Iraq, it does not explicitly mention any country. Instead, it approves using force against any nation, organization, or person that has planned or assisted in an attack against the United States.

The legislation now goes to the House of Representatives for a vote. Speaker Kevin McCarthy has signaled support for it and said it would likely be brought to the floor.

McCarthy said he supports keeping the 2001 authorization for the global war on terror in place.

"I support keeping the worldwide AUMF, so action can be taken if there's a terrorist anywhere in the world. But Iraq, we're 20 years into it, I don't have a problem repealing that," McCarthy said.

The US law gives the president the right to launch military strikes for reasons related to US national security but obliges him to inform Congress within 48 hours of launching any strike, and it also bans any US forces from remaining on the battlefield for more than sixty days without authorization.

The president cannot officially declare war without the consent of Congress.



Rescue Teams Search for Survivors in Building Collapse that Killed at Least 2 in Northern Lebanon

A Lebanese flag is pictured, in the aftermath of a massive explosion, in Beirut's damaged port area, Lebanon August 17, 2020. REUTERS/Hannah McKay
A Lebanese flag is pictured, in the aftermath of a massive explosion, in Beirut's damaged port area, Lebanon August 17, 2020. REUTERS/Hannah McKay
TT

Rescue Teams Search for Survivors in Building Collapse that Killed at Least 2 in Northern Lebanon

A Lebanese flag is pictured, in the aftermath of a massive explosion, in Beirut's damaged port area, Lebanon August 17, 2020. REUTERS/Hannah McKay
A Lebanese flag is pictured, in the aftermath of a massive explosion, in Beirut's damaged port area, Lebanon August 17, 2020. REUTERS/Hannah McKay

At least two people were killed and four rescued from the rubble of a multistory apartment building that collapsed Sunday in the city of Tripoli in northern Lebanon, state media reported.

Rescue teams were continuing to dig through the rubble. It was not immediately clear how many people were in the building when it fell.

The bodies pulled out were of a child and a woman, the state-run National News Agency reported.

Dozens of people crowded around the site of the crater left by the collapsed building, with some shooting in the air.

The building was in the neighborhood of Bab Tabbaneh, one of the poorest areas in Lebanon’s second largest city, where residents have long complained of government neglect and shoddy infrastructure. Building collapses are not uncommon in Tripoli due to poor building standards, according to The AP news.

Lebanon’s Health Ministry announced that those injured in the collapse would receive treatment at the state’s expense.

The national syndicate for property owners in a statement called the collapse the result of “blatant negligence and shortcomings of the Lebanese state toward the safety of citizens and their housing security,” and said it is “not an isolated incident.”

The syndicate called for the government to launch a comprehensive national survey of buildings at risk of collapse.


Israel to Take More West Bank Powers and Relax Settler Land Buys

A view of Israeli settlement of Maale Adumim, in the West Bank, Sunday, June 18, 2023. (AP)
A view of Israeli settlement of Maale Adumim, in the West Bank, Sunday, June 18, 2023. (AP)
TT

Israel to Take More West Bank Powers and Relax Settler Land Buys

A view of Israeli settlement of Maale Adumim, in the West Bank, Sunday, June 18, 2023. (AP)
A view of Israeli settlement of Maale Adumim, in the West Bank, Sunday, June 18, 2023. (AP)

Israel's security cabinet approved a series of steps on Sunday that would make it easier for settlers in the occupied West Bank to buy land while granting Israeli authorities more enforcement powers over Palestinians, Israeli media reported.

The West Bank is among the territories that the Palestinians seek for a future independent state. Much of it is under Israeli military control, with limited Palestinian self-rule in some areas run by the Western-backed Palestinian Authority (PA).

Citing statements by Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich and Defense Minister Israel Katz, Israeli news sites Ynet and Haaretz said the measures included scrapping decades-old regulations that prevent Jewish private citizens buying land in the West Bank, The AP news reported.

They were also reported to include allowing Israeli authorities to administer some religious sites, and expand supervision and enforcement in areas under PA administration in matters of environmental hazards, water offences and damage to archaeological sites.

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas said the new measures were dangerous, illegal and tantamount to de-facto annexation.

The Israeli ministers did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

The new measures come three days before Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is scheduled to meet in Washington with US President Donald Trump.

Trump has ruled out Israeli annexation of the West Bank but his administration has not sought to curb Israel's accelerated settlement building, which the Palestinians say denies them a potential state by eating away at its territory.

Netanyahu, who is facing an election later this year, deems the establishment of any Palestinian state a security threat.

His ruling coalition includes many pro-settler members who want Israel to annex the West Bank, land captured in the 1967 Middle East war to which Israel cites biblical and historical ties.

The United Nations' highest court said in a non-binding advisory opinion in 2024 that Israel's occupation of Palestinian territories and settlements there is illegal and should be ended as soon as possible. Israel disputes this view.


Arab League Condemns Attack on Aid Convoys in Sudan

A general view shows the opening session of the meeting of Arab foreign ministers at the Arab League Headquarters (Reuters)
A general view shows the opening session of the meeting of Arab foreign ministers at the Arab League Headquarters (Reuters)
TT

Arab League Condemns Attack on Aid Convoys in Sudan

A general view shows the opening session of the meeting of Arab foreign ministers at the Arab League Headquarters (Reuters)
A general view shows the opening session of the meeting of Arab foreign ministers at the Arab League Headquarters (Reuters)

Arab League Secretary-General Ahmed Aboul Gheit strongly condemned the attack by the Rapid Support Forces on humanitarian aid convoys and relief workers in North Kordofan State, Sudan.

In a statement reported by SPA, secretary-general's spokesperson Jamal Rushdi quoted Aboul Gheit as saying the attack constitutes a war crime under international humanitarian law, which prohibits the deliberate targeting of civilians and depriving them of their means of survival.

Aboul Gheit stressed the need to hold those responsible accountable, end impunity, and ensure the full protection of civilians, humanitarian workers, and relief facilities in Sudan.