Carlos Ghosn to Asharq Al-Awsat: I Will Seize Nissan’s Properties in Lebanon, the World

Carlos Ghosn speaks to Asharq Al-Awsat
Carlos Ghosn speaks to Asharq Al-Awsat
TT

Carlos Ghosn to Asharq Al-Awsat: I Will Seize Nissan’s Properties in Lebanon, the World

Carlos Ghosn speaks to Asharq Al-Awsat
Carlos Ghosn speaks to Asharq Al-Awsat

Former Chairman of the Board of Nissan Carlos Ghosn said he was serious in suing the company “to compensate for the moral and physical abuse he suffered as a result of his arrest in Japan,” hinting at seeking to seize Nissan’s property in Lebanon and the world.

In an interview with Asharq Al-Awsat, Ghosn denied local “political support” or an intention to work in politics.

Ghosn maintains the theory of a “conspiracy” plotted against him, which he said was prepared a year before his arrest.

“On the same day, they stripped me of everything, prevented me from accessing information, entered my house... and took all the information they wanted,” he stated.

Recounting how he was arrested in Japan on charges of not declaring money that he did not receive in the first place, he said that when the authorities discovered that the case was groundless, plots began against him.

The former Nissan CEO justifies the reason for waiting so long to file the lawsuit, by saying: “It took a long time to re-investigate what happened and go into the details... because they stripped me of everything.”

He added that he assigned a team of lawyers to collect files and evidence that back his case.

According to Ghosn, the one billion dollars, which he is requesting as compensation from Nissan, is not a large amount compared to the damage and losses he has incurred.

He stressed that the company has distorted his reputation and future, because of the accusations launched against him.

“A billion dollars is a small compensation,” he underlined.

Ghosn said, however, that he was not surprised by the skeptical questions.

“Everyone is wondering: Can Japan do such a thing? Yes, in Japan there are many good things, but on the other hand there are bad things,” he told Asharq Al-Awsat, saying that the country “does not care about human rights.”

He explained that he chose Lebanon to file a lawsuit against Nissan, as he had to resort either to a Lebanese or a Japanese court.

“There must be a relationship between the crime and the country, and the two countries are either Japan or Lebanon, and I can only file a lawsuit in Lebanon,” he remarked.

Ghosn added that he would have preferred to resort to a court in the United States, should he have this option.

“I would have asked for $10 billion. These things do not happen in America. No one can behave with another person in this way in America... A billion dollars does not affect Nissan ... but $10 billion surely does.”

Ghosn stressed that if he won the case in Lebanon, he could seize Nissan’s properties in the country and elsewhere.

He explained that by virtue of international conventions, a foreign ruling can be enforceable in other countries.

“You can seize factories in America, for example, and the same applies in England, Spain, Egypt, Dubai and Brazil... The company cannot escape,” he said.

Ghosn ridiculed accusations against him of taking refuge in Lebanon “to escape justice.”

He affirmed that he came to Lebanon because he has interests, a home, and a family. He added that Lebanon was not the only country in the world that does not extradite its citizens, citing France and Brazil as an example.

“I did not run away, I fight because I have a right,” he told Asharq Al-Awsat.

The former CEO of Nissan strongly refuses to link his current lawsuit with an Interpol red notice for his arrest at France’s request, in a case of bribery involving a French minister.

He stressed that the accusations were unfounded, saying that they were politically-driven. He also expressed confidence that the French minister would win the lawsuit.

On a different note, Ghosn said he had no intention to work in politics in Lebanon, “but I can help politicians if needed.”

He added that he was moving freely in his country, “without fear”, as he does not feel threatened, noting that he was only taking some security precautions at the request of his children.

Ghosn stressed that he was currently focusing on the lawsuit against Nissan, as well as managing his business in Lebanon, especially after his property and investments were seized by the French authorities.

“The French put their hands on all my property, but the Japanese did not lay their hands on anything. My investments are only in Lebanon,” he stated.



Mashhadani to Asharq Al-Awsat: Regional Coordination Needed to Prevent Syria’s Division

Mashhadani during a parliamentary session (Iraqi Parliament website)
Mashhadani during a parliamentary session (Iraqi Parliament website)
TT

Mashhadani to Asharq Al-Awsat: Regional Coordination Needed to Prevent Syria’s Division

Mashhadani during a parliamentary session (Iraqi Parliament website)
Mashhadani during a parliamentary session (Iraqi Parliament website)

Iraqi Parliament Speaker Mahmoud al-Mashhadani has called for high-level coordination among key regional players—including Iraq, Saudi Arabia, and other nations—to avert one of the most dangerous scenarios facing Syria: the threat of division, which he described as “one of Israel’s objectives.”

In an interview with Asharq Al-Awsat, Mashhadani discussed the Syrian crisis and its impact on Iraq and the broader region. He explained that the current Syrian situation has unfolded with unforeseen tools, timing, and external support, yet remains controlled and deliberate.

According to the Iraqi official, Syria faces three possible outcomes: stability, chaos, or division.

“Who supports the division of Syria?” he asked, saying “Israel alone, while key nations in the region—such as Iran, Türkiye, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, and Jordan—oppose it.”

He urged these nations to overcome their differences and coordinate to prevent Syria’s fragmentation and maintain its stability, saying: “We must prioritize the unity of Syria over our disputes.”

Mashhadani emphasized Iraq’s efforts to mediate and foster understanding among these countries, saying “Iraq has a unique historical opportunity to reclaim its regional role.”

He explained that Iraq’s strategic position as a crossroads between major nations enables it to facilitate dialogue and cooperation. He also stressed the importance of high-level security coordination, citing shared concerns over threats such as the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) and ISIS.

“We all share common fears regarding the spread of extremist groups,” he said, “and Iraq can act as a coordinator to address these concerns.”

Additionally, he called for Iraq to collaborate with Gulf countries to address legitimate fears regarding Syria’s future governance and potential domination by extremist groups.

“We must ask: who will govern Syria, and how do we prevent the rise of radical forces like the Muslim Brotherhood?”

Mashhadani highlighted the unified rejection by Iraq, Jordan, Egypt, and Saudi Arabia of plans to forcibly relocate Palestinians from the West Bank to Sinai, Jordan, or Iraq.

“This displacement scheme is unacceptable to us and to the region,” he affirmed.

On Iraq, Mashhadani confirmed that the parliamentary elections are set to take place in October, in line with agreements among political blocs. He also emphasized the need for national unity, saying: “Iraq needs a leadership umbrella that represents the entire nation, and parliament is best suited to fulfill this role.”

He further stated that his political agenda centers on rebuilding and uniting Iraq’s Sunni community, which has faced significant challenges since 2014.

“My mission is to bring together the different Sunni factions, despite their rivalries and conflicting interests,” he said. “I aim to serve as an umbrella figure—a stabilizing presence to guide them toward cohesion and cooperation.”

Revisiting his 2014 proposal for “national reconciliation,” Mashhadani stressed the importance of transitioning Iraq from a system based on sectarian divisions to one grounded in citizenship, where merit and competence prevail.

“We asked ourselves: what kind of Iraq do we want?” he recalled. “The answer was clear—an Iraq that transitions from a state of components to a state of citizenship.” However, the initiative was sidelined due to political events, including the 2018 protests. “The need for reconciliation is more urgent than ever,” he concluded.

Mashhadani dismissed recurring calls for the creation of a Sunni federal region as “political immaturity.” Reflecting on a similar proposal for a nine-province Shiite federal region in 2006, he reiterated his opposition to dividing Iraq.

He distinguished between federalism and division, saying: “Federalism is a promising concept, but it requires deep understanding and experience. Division, on the other hand, would be disastrous.”

“Iraq’s diversity makes unity our only viable path forward. Citizenship must be the foundation of our state," he added.