Paul McCartney’s Rediscovered Photos Show Beatlemania from the Inside

A visitor looks at pictures during a preview of Paul McCartney Photographs 1963-64: Eyes of the Storm exhibition at the National Portrait Gallery in London, Britain, Tuesday, June 27, 2023. (AP)
A visitor looks at pictures during a preview of Paul McCartney Photographs 1963-64: Eyes of the Storm exhibition at the National Portrait Gallery in London, Britain, Tuesday, June 27, 2023. (AP)
TT

Paul McCartney’s Rediscovered Photos Show Beatlemania from the Inside

A visitor looks at pictures during a preview of Paul McCartney Photographs 1963-64: Eyes of the Storm exhibition at the National Portrait Gallery in London, Britain, Tuesday, June 27, 2023. (AP)
A visitor looks at pictures during a preview of Paul McCartney Photographs 1963-64: Eyes of the Storm exhibition at the National Portrait Gallery in London, Britain, Tuesday, June 27, 2023. (AP)

Is there really a new way to look at The Beatles, one of the most filmed and photographed bands in history?

Yes, says Britain’s National Portrait Gallery, which is providing a fresh perspective with an exhibition of band’s-eye-view images that Paul McCartney captured as the group shot to global fame.

Gallery director Nicholas Cullinan said the exhibit, subtitled "Eyes of the Storm," is a chance "to see, for the very first time, Beatlemania from the inside out."

The seed for the exhibit was sown in 2020, that year of lockdown projects, when McCartney dug out 1,000 forgotten photos he’d taken in 1963 and 1964, as the Fab Four went from emerging British celebrities to world megastars. He and his team asked if the National Portrait Gallery was interested in displaying them.

"I think you can probably guess our response," Cullinan said as he introduced the exhibition to journalists in London on Tuesday.

The show includes 250 photos taken in England, France and the United States that illustrate The Beatles’ journey from cramped dressing rooms in provincial British theaters to stadium shows and luxury hotels.

"It was a crazy whirlwind that we were living through," McCartney writes in a note present at the start of the exhibit. "We were just wondering at the world, excited about all these little things that were making up our lives."

Rosie Broadley, who curated the show, said the gallery soon realized the trove "wasn’t just interesting pictures by a famous person."

"It’s actually telling an important story about cultural history — British cultural history and international cultural history," she said. "This is a moment when British culture took over the world for a while."

The display begins in late 1963, shortly after McCartney acquired a Pentax 35mm camera. The early black-and-white images include portraits of The Beatles, their parents, girlfriends, crew and colleagues, including manager Brian Epstein.

Broadley said these images depict "a parochial postwar British celebrity" -- concerts in provincial cinemas alongside now-obscure bands like Peter Jay and the Jaywalkers, 16-night variety-style Christmas shows at London’s Finsbury Park Astoria.

Cullinan said the photos convey a "sense of intimacy" missing from professional photos of the band.

"This wasn’t The Beatles being photographed by press photographers of paparazzi but peer-to-peer," he said. "So there’s a real tenderness and vulnerability to these images."

In January 1964, McCartney took his camera with the band to Paris, capturing the city at the height of its French New Wave cool. While there, The Beatles learned that "I Want to Hold Your Hand" was a No. 1 hit in the United States.

Within days, they were on a plane to New York, where their Feb. 9 performance on "The Ed Sullivan Show" was watched by 73 million people, and nothing was ever the same again.

The US section of the exhibit shows the band’s increasingly frenetic life. Many of the shots were taken from planes, trains and chauffeur-driven automobiles and show crowds of screaming fans and rows of police. Sometimes, McCartney turned his lens back on the newspaper and magazine photographers looking at him.

One striking shot was taken through the back window of a car as a crowd chased the band down a Manhattan street, a scene echoed in the band’s first feature film, "A Hard Day’s Night," made later that year.

McCartney also took pictures of strangers – a girl seen through a train window, ground crew at Miami airport goofing around.

The band’s final stop was Miami, where McCartney switched to color film. The results, Broadley said, "look like a Technicolor movie, like an Elvis film." The photos show John, Paul, George and Ringo swimming, sunbathing, water skiing, even fishing. From a hotel window, McCartney photographed fans writing "I love Paul" in giant letters in the sand.

McCartney, 81, spent hours talking to curators about the photos and his memories as they prepared the exhibit, one of the shows reopening the National Portrait Gallery after a three-year renovation.

The images were preserved for decades on undeveloped negatives or contact sheets, and McCartney had never seen them in large format until the gallery had them printed.

The project was not without risks. McCartney acknowledges he’s not a professional photographer – though his late wife, Linda McCartney, was, as is their daughter Mary McCartney. Some of the photos are blurry or hastily composed. But what they lack in technique they make up for in spontaneity.

Broadley said McCartney "was nervous about showing some of the less formally composed ones or the less in-focus ones."

"But I think we persuaded him that we liked those because of the story that they tell," she said. "It’s quite nice to have those ones where they’re sitting around with a cup of tea before the event."



South Korean TV Drama Industry Seeks $746 Million in Support as Output Declines

Shin Mina as Empress Navier in Disney+/Hulu's new K-drama “The Remarried Empress”. (Disney+/Hulu)
Shin Mina as Empress Navier in Disney+/Hulu's new K-drama “The Remarried Empress”. (Disney+/Hulu)
TT

South Korean TV Drama Industry Seeks $746 Million in Support as Output Declines

Shin Mina as Empress Navier in Disney+/Hulu's new K-drama “The Remarried Empress”. (Disney+/Hulu)
Shin Mina as Empress Navier in Disney+/Hulu's new K-drama “The Remarried Empress”. (Disney+/Hulu)

Twelve South Korean industry groups warned on Wednesday that the country's television drama production base was at risk and called on the government to set up a 1 trillion won ($746 million) investment fund to support production of Korean dramas, known as K-dramas.

K-dramas have been hugely popular globally, ‌but the number produced ‌has fallen from 141 titles in 2022 ‌to ⁠about 115 in 2025, ⁠according to research by Korea IR Service.

Three domestic broadcast networks cut drama output from 91 titles in 2012 to 32 in 2023, and some channels have stopped airing weekday dramas altogether, the groups said.

Such an environment makes it difficult for "a new writer's second work, a supporting actor's first lead role and an assistant ⁠crew member's directing debut", said Song Byeong-joon, chairman ‌of the Korea Drama Production Association.

The ‌groups, which represent industry workers including TV drama producers, directors, writers, ‌actors, cinematographers and crew, attributed the decline in long-form drama production to ‌rising production costs, which they linked to competition with global streaming platforms such as Netflix, and broadcasters' reduced capacity to invest.

They also cited competition from short-form content and AI for audiences and production.

Pay for top-billed ‌stars was the main driver of production costs, Korea IR Service said in a 2025 report, ⁠with pay ⁠climbing as streaming services competed for audience-drawing talent.

Kim Yong-hee, a professor of business administration at Sun Moon University, said the difficulties the groups cited largely reflected the decline of terrestrial broadcasting rather than the sector as a whole.

Official data showed employment across the content industry edged up to 693,090 in 2025 from 688,122 a year earlier, according to the Korea Creative Content Agency.

Broadcasting employment, however, fell 2.3% in 2024, according to a government survey.

A Netflix Korea spokesperson was reached but did not have an immediate comment.

Netflix launched in South Korea in 2016 and in 2023 pledged to invest $2.5 billion in the market over four years.


Movie Review: ‘The Cat in the Hat’ Ridiculously Builds the Stakes So High, the Universe Could Die

This image released by Warner Bros. Pictures shows, from left, Sebastian, voiced by Tiago Martinez, Waffles, voiced by Matt Berry, and The Cat in the Hat, voiced by Bill Hader, in a scene from "The Cat in the Hat." (Warner Bros. Pictures via AP)
This image released by Warner Bros. Pictures shows, from left, Sebastian, voiced by Tiago Martinez, Waffles, voiced by Matt Berry, and The Cat in the Hat, voiced by Bill Hader, in a scene from "The Cat in the Hat." (Warner Bros. Pictures via AP)
TT

Movie Review: ‘The Cat in the Hat’ Ridiculously Builds the Stakes So High, the Universe Could Die

This image released by Warner Bros. Pictures shows, from left, Sebastian, voiced by Tiago Martinez, Waffles, voiced by Matt Berry, and The Cat in the Hat, voiced by Bill Hader, in a scene from "The Cat in the Hat." (Warner Bros. Pictures via AP)
This image released by Warner Bros. Pictures shows, from left, Sebastian, voiced by Tiago Martinez, Waffles, voiced by Matt Berry, and The Cat in the Hat, voiced by Bill Hader, in a scene from "The Cat in the Hat." (Warner Bros. Pictures via AP)

The folks behind the new animated “The Cat in the Hat” are pretty confident they've got the cat in the bag. It hasn't even opened yet and there are onscreen references to possible movie spinoffs for the jet-powered magical couch and The Things. As the credits roll, the titular feline even gets into the act: “Let's go sequel!”

He's probably right about that, though — an inevitable franchise born on the back of whimsical, beloved IP that now gets the Marvel Cinematic Universe treatment: Put the fate of the world in the balance, insert a horrific enemy and add lots of things — in this case dozens of Things — until we just want it to end. To quote the book's glum goldfish: “No, I do not like it/Not one little bit.”

Directed by Erica Rivinoja and Alessandro Carloni, who also wrote the screenplay, “The Cat in the Hat” is what happens when lots and lots of money gets thrown at a movie with middling returns. (We're talking Taylor Swift cash, courtesy of using her “Shake It Off.”)

At least it distances itself from the live-action approach of the underperforming and creepy 2003 film starring Mike Myers, instead using stylized and varied computer animation. Bill Hader now voices the Cat, with his trademark sarcastic, demented and oily approach. The Cat is portrayed with teeth, though, and that's unsettling.

We meet the Cat after he's bombed his latest assignment. It turns out he works for a gleaming corporate conglomerate that sends out envoys to cheer up kids at their homes. There's even a human resources department and white-collar cubicles — our anarchic Cat as office drone.

Missions here are evaluated on two measures: A hopeful uptick in clients' happiness and the level of destruction left behind. The Cat is good at thing one, but bad at thing two. He faces being fired unless he succeeds at his next task — cheering up two depressed kids whose single mom recently moved them to the city.

When he appears, he's quickly pepper-sprayed by the oldest, Gabby, a marching band nerd with huge glasses and a “creative, artistic soul.” She thinks it's a home invasion and wants to call the cops. This reaction is not canon.

The Cat has to convince Gabby and her younger brother, Sebastian, to have fun, and if there's any damage, he's stolen a device from office supplies — a clocklike “gobacker” — that can undo the past. They soon lose it. “I can't believe this and I'm a talking cat,” says our hero.

Now things click into operatic levels, with a mysterious nefarious creature with gleaming eyes — a cross between a massive bat and a toothy pterodactyl — that is also hunting the device. If it finds it, the “fabric of the universe will be distorted forever.” Yeesh. What happened to: “I know it is wet and the sun is not sunny, but we can have lots of good fun that is funny?”

The goldfish is here — Matt Berry, hijacking the movie — as an English-accented, pseudo-Shakespearean actor-y type fish named Waffles. Waffles? And there are Things galore — during the climactic battle scene — yes, there's a battle scene — there must be thousands of Things. But not one rhyme, a shame.

The animation is handled wonderfully, with three distinct styles for different worlds. (As the book would say: “My tricks are not bad.”) And the voices are perfectly cast: Giancarlo Esposito as Cat's evil boss, Bowen Yang as an intern and Paula Pell as a landlady all stand out.

The messaging is muddled. One is that you should always stand up for a friend. Another is that your parents were, shockingly, once cool. A third is that home is wherever you want it to be. And fourth is making a mess is the best part of childhood.

Making a mess of “The Cat in the Hat” didn't have to happen. It didn't have to have a possible rip in the time-space continuum. It didn't have to flood the zone with Things. And it doesn't need a sequel, please.


Martha Stewart Sorry for ‘Insensitive’ Homeless Halloween Costume

Martha Stewart. (AFP/Getty Images)
Martha Stewart. (AFP/Getty Images)
TT

Martha Stewart Sorry for ‘Insensitive’ Homeless Halloween Costume

Martha Stewart. (AFP/Getty Images)
Martha Stewart. (AFP/Getty Images)

American lifestyle guru Martha Stewart apologized late Sunday for an "insensitive and not funny" Halloween costume after she appeared to dress up as a homeless person.

"It's hard to admit when you've really screwed up," the billionaire, 85, wrote on Instagram after she deleted a photo of herself in ripped jeans, a torn sweater and a dirtied face.

Stewart also held a clipboard that read "I Am Hungry Help Me!!" Social media users quickly slammed her as out of touch.

"I know many people are suffering economically. Wearing a costume like I did was insensitive and not funny. I am very sorry," Stewart said in a statement.

She also acknowledged that an earlier explanation to US media, claiming she had intended to raise awareness of homelessness through her costume, "didn't go far enough."

Stewart built her success in the homemaking and lifestyle industries.

Through her cookbooks, magazines, television shows and retail housewares, Stewart became the personification of gracious living and America's most high-profile lifestyle expert.