Lebanese Ex-FM to Asharq Al-Awsat: With Western Support, Hafez Assad Ended Aoun’s Mutiny 

Michel Aoun is seen at the presidential palace in 1989. (Getty Images)
Michel Aoun is seen at the presidential palace in 1989. (Getty Images)
TT

Lebanese Ex-FM to Asharq Al-Awsat: With Western Support, Hafez Assad Ended Aoun’s Mutiny 

Michel Aoun is seen at the presidential palace in 1989. (Getty Images)
Michel Aoun is seen at the presidential palace in 1989. (Getty Images)

Lebanese former Foreign Minister Farez Boueiz recalled to Asharq Al-Awsat the hectic period towards the end of the 1975-90 Lebanese civil war over Elias Hrawi’s election as president and the ouster of Michel Aoun from the presidential palace and Syria’s role in both affairs.

Hrawi, like most Maronite politicians in Lebanon, dreamed of becoming president. Boueiz, Hrawi’s son-in-law, detailed to Asharq Al-Awsat the events that led up to his election.

During the civil war, Syria was entrusted by the whole world, including the United States, Vatican and Europe, to tackle the situation in Lebanon, said Boueiz. They had all acknowledged their inability to tackle the file. No one was willing to become involved militarily, so Syria was brought in to manage the situation, he explained.

Syria was still sore from the time when it was tasked in 1976 to rein in the Palestinian Liberation Organization, he went on to say. It chose Elias Sarkis to become president at the time and waged a real war in order to ensure his election.

“I believe that several Syrian soldiers were killed by Palestinian fighters during the ensuing battles,” Boueiz said.

Sarkis’ term was overshadowed by the rise of Bashir Gemayel in Lebanon and ended with Israel’s invasion of Lebanon. Gemayel was elected as his successor. Syria was also sore about this and didn’t want a repeat of that scenario, Boueiz added.

“So, it sought a Maronite president from beyond the Mount Lebanon region so that he wouldn’t be influenced by Maronites in that region,” he remarked. Damascus believed that the Maronites there were opposed to Syria.

Moreover, it sought a president who had no ties to the Lebanese Forces and would have preferred the election of a head of state who would confront it head-on if the need arose. Syria wanted a president who would not have yielded to the LF the way Sarkis did to Gemayel.

Boueiz believed that Syria had considered the election of Mikhael al-Daher, Rene Mouawad, Hrawi and Jean Obeid.

President or minister?

Ahead of the presidential elections, then minister Hrawi approached Boueiz for advice on how to handle an interview with LBC television that was then affiliated with the LF. Boueiz told him that if he harbored presidential ambitions, then he should make the message clear during the interview and add that an understanding with Syria was necessary to resolve the Lebanese crisis, which Hrawi did.

“I warned him that I would not be responsible for his security once he made such a declaration,” Boueiz recalled. “We were at war after all.” Hrawi, who had voted for Gemayel’s election as president and who had friends among the LF, believed that they would protect him from any harm.

When he finished his interview and returned home, he encountered some LF members, who told him that they wouldn’t be able to protect him. They advised him to take his family away to their house in the city of Zahle.

Hrawi had left his Zahle home eight years earlier, around the time Gemayel was elected president. Now, he was supposed to head to it without advance planning. His home had long since been occupied by local forces.

“It seemed that Syrian checkpoints had monitored his journey to Zahle. As soon as he arrived, he was greeted by [head of Syrian intelligence in Lebanon] Ghazi Kanaan. Hrawi was uncertain that he would be allowed into his house, but Kanaan delivered a presidential salute to him with a greeting: ‘Welcome, Mr. President,’” revealed Boueiz.

“Hrawi replied: ‘What president? A president who doesn’t know where he will sleep the night?’ Kanaan responded: ‘Welcome to your house. If there is even an ashtray that is out of place, I will know what to do.’” Indeed, the Hrawis entered the house and found that everything appeared untouched.

It seemed that Kanaan was made aware of Hrawi’s journey to Zahle. He sent orders to the occupiers to clean the house immediately even as the Hrawis returned late at night.

Moreover, he informed Hrawi that Syrian President Hafez al-Assad was waiting for him at the late hour. Kanaan and Hrawi headed to Syria, and he was informed by Assad that he had Damascus’ support in his bid for the presidency.

Soon after his return to Lebanon, Hrawi telephoned Boueiz to inform him, without giving away too much information over line, that his visit to Damascus was “very positive”. Hrawi’s presidency was decided at that moment, but hit a setback after the emergence of a Saudi-Syrian settlement over the election of Mouawad as president.

Mouawad enjoyed strong ties with Lebanese businessmen in Saudi Arabia, which had favored his election. The Kingdom believed that the next president must be entrusted with Lebanon’s reconstruction and garnering aid and Mouawad had the necessary connections to do that.

So, he was elected president even though Assad had favored Hrawi. Mouawad’s tenure was short-lived. He was assassinated on November 22, 1989, days after his election. Hrawi was again the frontrunner in the race.

Election

Assad favored Hrawi’s election even though some powers in Syria were opposed to his choice, but in the end, he was elected president at the Park Hotel Chtaura. He then lived in a small modest apartment in a military barracks in Ablah in the eastern Bekaa region. The presidential palace at the time was controlled by army commander Michel Aoun, who was leading a mutiny.

Boueiz recalled that Hrawi felt ineffectual and weak as president during his time at the apartment because he was disconnected from the capital, telephone lines were not operational, and it was a four-hour journey for officials to visit him. At one point, Hrawi threatened to quit, declaring: “I am not a puppet.” He grew even more defeated when he saw footage on television of throngs of Aoun supporters at the presidential palace.

Deciding to assume control of the situation, Hrawi tasked Boueiz to visit Syria to find out what will happen in Lebanon. After much resistance, Boueiz, who had never been to Syria, relented. Effectively, he became Hrawi’s unofficial advisor. He assumed the role of responding to correspondence from the Pope and the French and American presidents.

“Lebanon was without a state. Hrawi had no one to help him. The presidential guard were made up of Jamil al-Sayyed's relatives. (...) Due to the circumstances, I was forced to do everything, especially when it came to diplomacy and foreign communication,” Boueiz revealed.

Meeting Assad

Boueiz informed Hrawi that he would agree to becoming his envoy to Syria on condition that he communicate directly with Assad, not his officers or any other official. So, he was tasked in an official capacity to visit Assad. Boueiz also demanded that his visits be made public, refusing to head to Damascus in secret.

Hrawi agreed and soon after, Boueiz was invited to visit Damascus to meet with Assad.

Boueiz described the meeting as “pivotal”. He explained that the Syrian leader was expecting to meet a traditional Maronite politician, who are normally opposed to or fearful of Arabism. Boueiz surprised Assad by embracing Arabism and highlighting Christian figures who championed that way of thought. He also surprised him with his criticism of the United States, whom he described as opportunistic.

Effectively, Boueiz passed Assad’s test and their relationship was formed from that point. He later confided in him that Hrawi was on the verge of resigning if the situation with Aoun was not resolved.

“Assad informed me that it was important to avert a military operation,” Boueiz said. He then returned to Beirut for consultations with French Ambassador Rene Ala and the Vatican’s Ambassador Pablo Puente. “I met with them regularly and they would meet with Aoun for negotiations,” he added.

At the same time, Syria feared the emergence of Samir Geagea as the most powerful Christian figure after Aoun’s ouster. They feared that he would hold sway over the president the same way Gemayel did over Sarkis. So, Assad sought guarantees from Geagea over this issue. He wanted Geagea to approve of the Taif Accord, which would help end the war. Geagea had yet to declare his support because he was worried it would impact his support among Christians. Assad also wanted Geagea to recognize Hrawi’s authority as president, take a clear stance from the dismantling of militias and the deployment of the army throughout Lebanon.

Boueiz recalled his shuttle diplomacy during that time between Paris, Washington and the Vatican. He also revealed how he would move by boat under cover of darkness from Beirut’s Saint Georges Bay to Jounieh Bay and from there to visit Geagea in Keserwan to avoid Aoun’s artillery fire. His visits to Geagea would stretch long into the night.

“Geagea would dispatch a boat to transport me from the Saint Georges area. This happened over a period of six or seven months, until the West finally informed Assad that it was time to put an end to Aoun’s munity, meaning it approved of Syria’s military operation,” Boueiz said.

Aoun's ouster

Aoun rejected all proposals for him to abandon his mutiny, even from the US and France.

France, said Boueiz, was invested in the issue because of Aoun’s ties with French intelligence. French Ambassador Ala tried to defend Aoun through all possible means and was genuinely concerned over his fate.

Boueiz met with the envoy prior to the military operation. He told Asharq Al-Awsat that he criticized Ala for allowing his emotions to influence his actions. He also believed that he was not sincere in the negotiations to persuade Aoun to end his mutiny, rather, he actually encouraged him to stay at the presidential palace.

“We began to discuss how Aoun would be removed safely from the palace and moved to the French embassy, where he would have immunity,” Boueiz said. He pledged that the army would escort him to a French vessel that would sail him to France.

After much concern over his safety, Aoun managed to leave the palace swiftly and without incident and headed to embassy. “I was shocked to learn that he had arrived alone without his family,” Boueiz revealed. In the midst of the battle, “we had to find a way to bring his family to safety,” he went on to say.

Elie Hobeika, a senior LF official with connections to Syria and a debt to Aoun, who had saved his life during a past battle, agreed to transport the family from the palace to the house of the French ambassador.



Morocco’s King Names El Mansouri First Woman Head of Gov’t

Fatima Ezzahra El Mansouri, Morocco’s newly appointed head of government. (AFP)
Fatima Ezzahra El Mansouri, Morocco’s newly appointed head of government. (AFP)
TT

Morocco’s King Names El Mansouri First Woman Head of Gov’t

Fatima Ezzahra El Mansouri, Morocco’s newly appointed head of government. (AFP)
Fatima Ezzahra El Mansouri, Morocco’s newly appointed head of government. (AFP)

King Mohammed VI has appointed Fatima Ezzahra El Mansouri, a leader of the Authenticity and Modernity Party (PAM), as Morocco’s head of government, making her the first woman named to the post. She has been tasked with forming a government.

The appointment places El Mansouri at the center of a demanding political period. Her government will face expectations over social policy and regional inequality as Morocco prepares to co-host the 2030 World Cup.

Early life and political background

El Mansouri was born in Marrakech on Jan. 3, 1976, and is 50. Her family comes from the Rehamna region near the city.

Her late father, Abderrahmane El Mansouri, served as pasha of Marrakech for three decades and was Morocco’s ambassador to the United Arab Emirates.

Growing up close to public administration, politics and diplomacy shaped her early interest in law and public service.

Education

El Mansouri attended French schools in Marrakech and earned her baccalaureate at Lycée Victor Hugo. She later studied law in France, obtaining a postgraduate diploma in business contract law from the University of Montpellier.

She also earned a diploma in Anglo-American business law from New York University and a degree in private law from Mohammed V University in Rabat, according to the supplied account.

From law to politics

After completing her studies, El Mansouri established a law practice in Marrakech specializing in property and commercial transactions.

She joined PAM when it was founded in 2008. A year later, at 33, she was elected mayor of Marrakech, becoming the first woman to lead the city’s municipal council. The supplied account describes her as the second woman to become a mayor in Morocco.

Government and party leadership

El Mansouri went on to serve in parliament. She returned to the Marrakech mayoralty in September 2021 and was appointed minister of national territory planning, urban planning, housing and city policy the following month.

In February 2024, she became coordinator of PAM’s collective leadership, strengthening her position within the party before her appointment to form a government.

The challenges ahead

El Mansouri’s appointment is a milestone for women in Moroccan politics.

Her government will also be judged on its response to demands for improved living standards, efforts to narrow the gap between cities and less-developed areas, and preparations for the 2030 World Cup.


Israel Kills Commander of Hamas Armed Wing’s Northern Brigade

Palestinians attend the funeral of Izz al-Din al-Beik and his aide, Mohannad Abu Foul, in Gaza City on Tuesday. (EPA)
Palestinians attend the funeral of Izz al-Din al-Beik and his aide, Mohannad Abu Foul, in Gaza City on Tuesday. (EPA)
TT

Israel Kills Commander of Hamas Armed Wing’s Northern Brigade

Palestinians attend the funeral of Izz al-Din al-Beik and his aide, Mohannad Abu Foul, in Gaza City on Tuesday. (EPA)
Palestinians attend the funeral of Izz al-Din al-Beik and his aide, Mohannad Abu Foul, in Gaza City on Tuesday. (EPA)

Israel killed Izz al-Din al-Beik, commander of Hamas’s Qassam Brigades Northern Brigade, in a dawn strike on an apartment in northwestern Gaza City yesterday, four Hamas sources told Asharq Al-Awsat. Israeli officials also announced his killing.

The sources said al-Beik, known as “Ashmawi,” died immediately when three missiles struck the apartment in the Al-Nasr neighborhood. They said the missiles were probably fired by warplanes to ensure he was killed.

The body of his personal aide, Mohannad Abu Foul of Jabalia refugee camp, was found that morning.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Israel Katz announced the operation. The Israeli military later said it had killed al-Beik, accusing him of planning attacks and trying to rebuild the Northern Brigade after it suffered heavy losses in the war.

The strike hit at 3:30 a.m., an Asharq Al-Awsat correspondent reported. Fire engulfed the apartment and burned for more than half an hour before civil defense crews put it out.

The Israeli military appeared to have used missiles that caused intense fires, which could kill a target through either the blast or the toxic smoke they produced.

Israel’s Channel 12 gave a different account of the number of missiles fired. It said two struck the room where al-Beik was sleeping, followed by three more in case he had been in another room and to ensure he was dead.

The building stands beside another hit in a similar daylight strike about two months ago. That attack killed Adham Nasman, the Qassam Brigades’ Gaza Brigade operations commander, who had played a prominent role in the Oct. 7, 2023, attack.

Previous attempt

Al-Beik survived an assassination attempt in late May, days after the killings of Izz al-Din al-Haddad and Mohammed Odeh. The two had led the Qassam Brigades in Gaza in succession after Mohammed Sinwar.

That strike killed Imad Aslim, deputy commander of the Gaza Brigade and commander of its Zeitoun Battalion. Sources told Asharq Al-Awsat at the time that Aslim had been due to meet al-Beik and the brigade’s new commander, Mohannad Rajab. Neither al-Beik nor Rajab had arrived when the strike hit.

Al-Beik’s killing came about two weeks after Israel killed Mohammed al-Yazouri, commander of the Qassam Brigades’ Khan Younis Brigade, and Nail Abu Obeid, commander of its Rafah Brigade. Both had replaced commanders killed by Israel in similar operations.

The Qassam Brigades have lost most of their longtime leaders and military council members. The latest strikes indicate that Israel is targeting members appointed to its new military council to replace them.

Hamas sources have previously told Asharq Al-Awsat that the group’s structure is flexible and that it quickly replaces commanders who are killed.

Who Was Al-Beik?

Al-Beik, 48, was from the Falouja area of Jabalia refugee camp, a major Hamas stronghold. A prominent member of the group for years, he joined in the late 1990s after becoming active in mosques.

He began working with the Qassam Brigades when the second intifada broke out and became heavily involved in resisting Israeli incursions into Jabalia camp and the nearby town of Beit Lahiya. He was among the first to use Yassin anti-armor projectiles against a major Israeli operation in Jabalia in 2004.

Hamas sources told Asharq Al-Awsat that al-Beik led one of the Qassam Brigades’ first special units in Jabalia, now known as the Nukhba.

He then commanded the camp’s Imad Aqel, or western, Battalion for many years before becoming the Northern Brigade’s intelligence chief. He took command of the brigade after Ahmed al-Ghandour was killed in November 2023.

As intelligence chief, al-Beik was regarded as a favorite of Mohammed Odeh, then the Qassam Brigades’ intelligence chief for Gaza, the sources said. The two were close and both came from Jabalia camp.

The sources said al-Beik led efforts to thwart what became known during the war as the “Generals’ Plan,” which they said aimed to displace residents of northern Gaza. He stayed with his fighters in direct battles against Israeli forces, they said.

One Hamas source who knew him well described al-Beik as a skilled sniper and a popular figure who had also overseen Northern Brigade operations for a time. He survived several attempts on his life before and during the war.

In one attempt inside Jabalia camp during the latter half of the war, his aide was killed but al-Beik escaped.


Abbas Calls For Unified Arms, End to ‘Coup’ in Seven-Point Palestinian Reconciliation Plan

 An Israeli soldier stands inside a Palestinian-owned home in the West Bank after Israeli settlers attacked and set it on fire on Tuesday. (Reuters)
An Israeli soldier stands inside a Palestinian-owned home in the West Bank after Israeli settlers attacked and set it on fire on Tuesday. (Reuters)
TT

Abbas Calls For Unified Arms, End to ‘Coup’ in Seven-Point Palestinian Reconciliation Plan

 An Israeli soldier stands inside a Palestinian-owned home in the West Bank after Israeli settlers attacked and set it on fire on Tuesday. (Reuters)
An Israeli soldier stands inside a Palestinian-owned home in the West Bank after Israeli settlers attacked and set it on fire on Tuesday. (Reuters)

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas has set out seven principles for reconciliation talks expected to be held in Cairo, including an end to the fallout from what his document calls the “coup in Gaza,” four sources from Palestinian factions told Asharq Al-Awsat.

Fatah and Hamas delegations began preparing for the talks yesterday. The sources, including one from each movement, said Abbas’s document, titled “The Palestinian-Palestinian Path to Palestinian Reconciliation,” calls for “one system, one law and one legitimate armed force.”

It also calls for adherence to the Palestine Liberation Organization and its platform, recognizing the PLO as the Palestinians’ sole legitimate representative.

The document calls for peaceful popular resistance and a political settlement based on a two-state solution and international resolutions.

It proposes a technocratic government appointed by Abbas to govern the West Bank, East Jerusalem and the Gaza Strip, and assigns responsibility for negotiating a comprehensive peace agreement to the PLO.

Hamas’s position on the principles is not yet known. A senior Hamas source said the movement was open to talks that would serve what he called the “broader Palestinian interest” and achieve “a genuine partnership aimed at changing the status quo.”

Preparations for Palestinian talks

Delegations from Palestinian factions are preparing to arrive in Cairo in stages for bilateral meetings that could lead to a broader national dialogue.

Fatah is expected to participate after previously declining such a dialogue and refusing to meet with Hamas bilaterally.

No arrival dates or dates for the broader dialogue have been finalized.

Six sources from different Palestinian factions told Asharq Al-Awsat separately that, under Palestinian and Egyptian arrangements, a Hamas leadership delegation would arrive in Cairo, followed by a Fatah delegation headed by Jibril Rajoub.

Other figures already in Cairo, including Azzam al-Ahmad, would join them. Delegations from other factions are also expected, with some of their leaders already in the Egyptian capital.

A Fatah source said al-Ahmad had met Palestinian figures in recent days to discuss elections to the Palestinian National Council.

He may join the delegation coming from Ramallah for the factional meetings, the source said. Egypt has reservations about holding council elections now without a consensus, the source added.

On Abbas’s instructions, Fatah’s Central Committee recently formed a committee to take part in the national dialogue. Rajoub will chair it, with Mohammad Shtayyeh and Majed Faraj as members.

Election delay grows more likely

The bilateral meetings and any broader dialogue would address Palestinian affairs and internal unity, including legislative elections scheduled for November, the sources said.

Their accounts indicated an increasing likelihood of a delay.

One source said that, although no decision had been announced, “Israel is likely not to allow the elections to take place.”

The source said Israel would seek to block voting in East Jerusalem and carry out military operations in the West Bank to disrupt the elections, while conditions in Gaza were also difficult.

Two sources from different factions, one of them left-wing, said the factions recognized the difficulties and saw a need to postpone the vote.