Lebanese Ex-FM to Asharq Al-Awsat: With Western Support, Hafez Assad Ended Aoun’s Mutiny 

Michel Aoun is seen at the presidential palace in 1989. (Getty Images)
Michel Aoun is seen at the presidential palace in 1989. (Getty Images)
TT

Lebanese Ex-FM to Asharq Al-Awsat: With Western Support, Hafez Assad Ended Aoun’s Mutiny 

Michel Aoun is seen at the presidential palace in 1989. (Getty Images)
Michel Aoun is seen at the presidential palace in 1989. (Getty Images)

Lebanese former Foreign Minister Farez Boueiz recalled to Asharq Al-Awsat the hectic period towards the end of the 1975-90 Lebanese civil war over Elias Hrawi’s election as president and the ouster of Michel Aoun from the presidential palace and Syria’s role in both affairs.

Hrawi, like most Maronite politicians in Lebanon, dreamed of becoming president. Boueiz, Hrawi’s son-in-law, detailed to Asharq Al-Awsat the events that led up to his election.

During the civil war, Syria was entrusted by the whole world, including the United States, Vatican and Europe, to tackle the situation in Lebanon, said Boueiz. They had all acknowledged their inability to tackle the file. No one was willing to become involved militarily, so Syria was brought in to manage the situation, he explained.

Syria was still sore from the time when it was tasked in 1976 to rein in the Palestinian Liberation Organization, he went on to say. It chose Elias Sarkis to become president at the time and waged a real war in order to ensure his election.

“I believe that several Syrian soldiers were killed by Palestinian fighters during the ensuing battles,” Boueiz said.

Sarkis’ term was overshadowed by the rise of Bashir Gemayel in Lebanon and ended with Israel’s invasion of Lebanon. Gemayel was elected as his successor. Syria was also sore about this and didn’t want a repeat of that scenario, Boueiz added.

“So, it sought a Maronite president from beyond the Mount Lebanon region so that he wouldn’t be influenced by Maronites in that region,” he remarked. Damascus believed that the Maronites there were opposed to Syria.

Moreover, it sought a president who had no ties to the Lebanese Forces and would have preferred the election of a head of state who would confront it head-on if the need arose. Syria wanted a president who would not have yielded to the LF the way Sarkis did to Gemayel.

Boueiz believed that Syria had considered the election of Mikhael al-Daher, Rene Mouawad, Hrawi and Jean Obeid.

President or minister?

Ahead of the presidential elections, then minister Hrawi approached Boueiz for advice on how to handle an interview with LBC television that was then affiliated with the LF. Boueiz told him that if he harbored presidential ambitions, then he should make the message clear during the interview and add that an understanding with Syria was necessary to resolve the Lebanese crisis, which Hrawi did.

“I warned him that I would not be responsible for his security once he made such a declaration,” Boueiz recalled. “We were at war after all.” Hrawi, who had voted for Gemayel’s election as president and who had friends among the LF, believed that they would protect him from any harm.

When he finished his interview and returned home, he encountered some LF members, who told him that they wouldn’t be able to protect him. They advised him to take his family away to their house in the city of Zahle.

Hrawi had left his Zahle home eight years earlier, around the time Gemayel was elected president. Now, he was supposed to head to it without advance planning. His home had long since been occupied by local forces.

“It seemed that Syrian checkpoints had monitored his journey to Zahle. As soon as he arrived, he was greeted by [head of Syrian intelligence in Lebanon] Ghazi Kanaan. Hrawi was uncertain that he would be allowed into his house, but Kanaan delivered a presidential salute to him with a greeting: ‘Welcome, Mr. President,’” revealed Boueiz.

“Hrawi replied: ‘What president? A president who doesn’t know where he will sleep the night?’ Kanaan responded: ‘Welcome to your house. If there is even an ashtray that is out of place, I will know what to do.’” Indeed, the Hrawis entered the house and found that everything appeared untouched.

It seemed that Kanaan was made aware of Hrawi’s journey to Zahle. He sent orders to the occupiers to clean the house immediately even as the Hrawis returned late at night.

Moreover, he informed Hrawi that Syrian President Hafez al-Assad was waiting for him at the late hour. Kanaan and Hrawi headed to Syria, and he was informed by Assad that he had Damascus’ support in his bid for the presidency.

Soon after his return to Lebanon, Hrawi telephoned Boueiz to inform him, without giving away too much information over line, that his visit to Damascus was “very positive”. Hrawi’s presidency was decided at that moment, but hit a setback after the emergence of a Saudi-Syrian settlement over the election of Mouawad as president.

Mouawad enjoyed strong ties with Lebanese businessmen in Saudi Arabia, which had favored his election. The Kingdom believed that the next president must be entrusted with Lebanon’s reconstruction and garnering aid and Mouawad had the necessary connections to do that.

So, he was elected president even though Assad had favored Hrawi. Mouawad’s tenure was short-lived. He was assassinated on November 22, 1989, days after his election. Hrawi was again the frontrunner in the race.

Election

Assad favored Hrawi’s election even though some powers in Syria were opposed to his choice, but in the end, he was elected president at the Park Hotel Chtaura. He then lived in a small modest apartment in a military barracks in Ablah in the eastern Bekaa region. The presidential palace at the time was controlled by army commander Michel Aoun, who was leading a mutiny.

Boueiz recalled that Hrawi felt ineffectual and weak as president during his time at the apartment because he was disconnected from the capital, telephone lines were not operational, and it was a four-hour journey for officials to visit him. At one point, Hrawi threatened to quit, declaring: “I am not a puppet.” He grew even more defeated when he saw footage on television of throngs of Aoun supporters at the presidential palace.

Deciding to assume control of the situation, Hrawi tasked Boueiz to visit Syria to find out what will happen in Lebanon. After much resistance, Boueiz, who had never been to Syria, relented. Effectively, he became Hrawi’s unofficial advisor. He assumed the role of responding to correspondence from the Pope and the French and American presidents.

“Lebanon was without a state. Hrawi had no one to help him. The presidential guard were made up of Jamil al-Sayyed's relatives. (...) Due to the circumstances, I was forced to do everything, especially when it came to diplomacy and foreign communication,” Boueiz revealed.

Meeting Assad

Boueiz informed Hrawi that he would agree to becoming his envoy to Syria on condition that he communicate directly with Assad, not his officers or any other official. So, he was tasked in an official capacity to visit Assad. Boueiz also demanded that his visits be made public, refusing to head to Damascus in secret.

Hrawi agreed and soon after, Boueiz was invited to visit Damascus to meet with Assad.

Boueiz described the meeting as “pivotal”. He explained that the Syrian leader was expecting to meet a traditional Maronite politician, who are normally opposed to or fearful of Arabism. Boueiz surprised Assad by embracing Arabism and highlighting Christian figures who championed that way of thought. He also surprised him with his criticism of the United States, whom he described as opportunistic.

Effectively, Boueiz passed Assad’s test and their relationship was formed from that point. He later confided in him that Hrawi was on the verge of resigning if the situation with Aoun was not resolved.

“Assad informed me that it was important to avert a military operation,” Boueiz said. He then returned to Beirut for consultations with French Ambassador Rene Ala and the Vatican’s Ambassador Pablo Puente. “I met with them regularly and they would meet with Aoun for negotiations,” he added.

At the same time, Syria feared the emergence of Samir Geagea as the most powerful Christian figure after Aoun’s ouster. They feared that he would hold sway over the president the same way Gemayel did over Sarkis. So, Assad sought guarantees from Geagea over this issue. He wanted Geagea to approve of the Taif Accord, which would help end the war. Geagea had yet to declare his support because he was worried it would impact his support among Christians. Assad also wanted Geagea to recognize Hrawi’s authority as president, take a clear stance from the dismantling of militias and the deployment of the army throughout Lebanon.

Boueiz recalled his shuttle diplomacy during that time between Paris, Washington and the Vatican. He also revealed how he would move by boat under cover of darkness from Beirut’s Saint Georges Bay to Jounieh Bay and from there to visit Geagea in Keserwan to avoid Aoun’s artillery fire. His visits to Geagea would stretch long into the night.

“Geagea would dispatch a boat to transport me from the Saint Georges area. This happened over a period of six or seven months, until the West finally informed Assad that it was time to put an end to Aoun’s munity, meaning it approved of Syria’s military operation,” Boueiz said.

Aoun's ouster

Aoun rejected all proposals for him to abandon his mutiny, even from the US and France.

France, said Boueiz, was invested in the issue because of Aoun’s ties with French intelligence. French Ambassador Ala tried to defend Aoun through all possible means and was genuinely concerned over his fate.

Boueiz met with the envoy prior to the military operation. He told Asharq Al-Awsat that he criticized Ala for allowing his emotions to influence his actions. He also believed that he was not sincere in the negotiations to persuade Aoun to end his mutiny, rather, he actually encouraged him to stay at the presidential palace.

“We began to discuss how Aoun would be removed safely from the palace and moved to the French embassy, where he would have immunity,” Boueiz said. He pledged that the army would escort him to a French vessel that would sail him to France.

After much concern over his safety, Aoun managed to leave the palace swiftly and without incident and headed to embassy. “I was shocked to learn that he had arrived alone without his family,” Boueiz revealed. In the midst of the battle, “we had to find a way to bring his family to safety,” he went on to say.

Elie Hobeika, a senior LF official with connections to Syria and a debt to Aoun, who had saved his life during a past battle, agreed to transport the family from the palace to the house of the French ambassador.



Desperate Gazans Pull Iron Bars from Rubble to Construct Tents and Scratch Out a Living

A Palestinian worker breaks concrete to extract steel bars from destroyed homes, using only simple hand tools amid a severe shortage of construction materials caused by long-standing restrictions on the entry of cement and iron, in Khan Younis, southern Gaza Strip, December 9, 2025. REUTERS/Haseeb Alwazeer
A Palestinian worker breaks concrete to extract steel bars from destroyed homes, using only simple hand tools amid a severe shortage of construction materials caused by long-standing restrictions on the entry of cement and iron, in Khan Younis, southern Gaza Strip, December 9, 2025. REUTERS/Haseeb Alwazeer
TT

Desperate Gazans Pull Iron Bars from Rubble to Construct Tents and Scratch Out a Living

A Palestinian worker breaks concrete to extract steel bars from destroyed homes, using only simple hand tools amid a severe shortage of construction materials caused by long-standing restrictions on the entry of cement and iron, in Khan Younis, southern Gaza Strip, December 9, 2025. REUTERS/Haseeb Alwazeer
A Palestinian worker breaks concrete to extract steel bars from destroyed homes, using only simple hand tools amid a severe shortage of construction materials caused by long-standing restrictions on the entry of cement and iron, in Khan Younis, southern Gaza Strip, December 9, 2025. REUTERS/Haseeb Alwazeer

As winter bites in Gaza, displaced Palestinians set out every day to homes destroyed by Israel. There they rip out iron rods from the walls and use them to prop up their flimsy tents or sell to scratch out a living in an enclave that will take years to recover from war.

The rods have become a hot item in Gaza, where they are twisted up in the wreckage left by an Israeli military campaign that spared few homes. Some residents spend days pounding away at thick cement to extract them, others do the back-breaking work for a week or more, Reuters.

With only rudimentary tools such as shovels, pickaxes and hammers, work proceeds at a snail's pace.

UN SAYS WAR GENERATED 61 MILLION TONS OF RUBBLE

Once the bars helped hold up cement walls in family homes, today they are destined for urgently-needed tents as temperatures at night fall. Heavy rainstorms have already submerged many Gazans' meagre belongings, adding to their misery.

Palestinian father-of-six Wael al-Jabra, 53, was putting together a makeshift tent, trying to hammer together two steel bars.

"I don’t have money to buy wood, of course. So, I had to extract this iron from the house. The house is made of five floors. We don’t have anything apart from God and this house that was sheltering us," he said.

In November, the UN Development Program said that the war in Gaza had generated 61 million tons of rubble, citing estimates based on satellite imagery.

Most of it can be cleared within seven years under the right conditions, it said.

A ROD CAN COST $15

A 10-meter metal rod costs displaced families $15 - a steep amount because many barely have cash.

The Palestinian group Hamas triggered the conflict after attacking Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, killing 1,200 people and taking 251 back to Gaza as hostages, according to Israeli calculations. Israel responded with a military campaign that killed over 70,000 people and laid waste to Gaza.

Carrying heavy buckets of rubble and pushing a wheelbarrow, Suleiman al-Arja, 19, described a typical day in the quest for iron rods.

"We pass by destroyed houses and agree with the house owner. He gives us a choice, whether to clean the house (clear the rubble) in exchange for iron or clean the house for money. We tell him that we want the iron and we start breaking the iron. As you can see, we spend a week, sometimes a week and a half," he said.

FOCUS IS ON DAILY STRUGGLE TO LIVE

US President Donald Trump promised to put together an international stabilization force and an economic development plan to rebuild and energize Gaza, which was impoverished even before the war. Palestinians in Gaza can't look so far ahead even though a ceasefire was reached in October. Every day is a struggle for Palestinians who have seen peace plans come and go over many decades.

Their minds are focused on finding ways to survive, every single day.

"We do this work to get our food and drink, to cover our living expenses and not need anyone, so we earn a living through halal (legitimate) means and effort. These are my hands," said Haitham Arbiea, 29.

Palestinians accuse Israel of depriving Gaza of the iron bars.

An Israeli official told Reuters that construction materials are considered dual use items - items for civilian but also potential military use - and will not be allowed into Gaza until the second phase of the US-led peace plan. The official cited concerns that the materials could be used for the building of tunnels, which have been used by Hamas.


Washington’s Opening Toward Damascus Clashes with Israel’s Ground Strategy

A meeting between Trump and Netanyahu at the White House, July 2025 (AFP). 
A meeting between Trump and Netanyahu at the White House, July 2025 (AFP). 
TT

Washington’s Opening Toward Damascus Clashes with Israel’s Ground Strategy

A meeting between Trump and Netanyahu at the White House, July 2025 (AFP). 
A meeting between Trump and Netanyahu at the White House, July 2025 (AFP). 

Washington’s recent openness toward Damascus is increasingly colliding with Israel’s assertive on-the-ground approach, highlighting a widening rift between the two traditional allies over the future of Syria following the fall of Bashar al-Assad’s regime.

The United States now appears to be pushing for expanded security cooperation with the new Syrian government led by President Ahmed al-Sharaa, aiming to confront shared security threats and stabilize the country.

At a conference convened to assess the new phase in Syria, Admiral Brad Cooper, commander of US Central Command (CENTCOM), placed future cooperation with Damascus at the center of discussions about US policy toward “post-Assad Syria.”

Cooper stressed that Washington is working “increasingly” with the Syrian army to counter common security threats, asserting that integrating the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) into the national army would enhance internal stability, improve border control, and strengthen Syria’s ability to pursue Daesh.

Cooper added that since last October, US forces have provided advice, assistance, and enablement to Syrian authorities in more than twenty operations against Daesh and in thwarting weapons shipments bound for Hezbollah, noting that such gains are only possible through close coordination with Syrian government forces.

This American trajectory, however, now overlaps with an expanding disagreement between Washington and Tel Aviv over the contours of a “new Syria,” according to the Wall Street Journal. The paper reported an unusually sharp divergence between the two allies over Syria’s future one year after Assad’s fall, as President Donald Trump pushes a more open approach toward Damascus with Saudi and Turkish backing.

Trump has lifted sanctions on al-Sharaa, praising him as a “young, attractive, tough guy" with a “real shot at doing a good job", which signaled Washington’s readiness for a major policy shift.

In contrast, Israel quickly moved after the regime’s collapse to establish a military presence in southern Syria, taking control of an estimated 250 square kilometers.

The area became a launchpad for an expanded Israeli security posture that has included arrests, weapons seizures, airstrikes deep inside Syrian territory, and even a strike on the military command headquarters in Damascus, actions justified as protection of the Druze community.

The WSJ attributes this assertive field strategy to a shift in Israel’s security mindset after the Oct. 7, 2023 attacks, noting that Israeli decision-makers now believe any security concession could open a dangerous breach.

Former Israeli national security adviser Yaakov Amidror remarked that making decisions from Washington is far easier than making them from the Golan Heights, reflecting Israel’s preference to secure its interests unilaterally.

While the US administration works to broker security negotiations between Damascus and Tel Aviv - parallel to de-escalation efforts in Gaza and Ukraine - Trump is urging Israel to engage in a “strong, honest dialogue” with Syria. Yet these efforts face obstacles, chief among them al-Sharaa’s rejection of Israel’s proposal for a demilitarized zone stretching from southern Damascus to the border, which he argues would create a dangerous security vacuum.

Within Israel, influential voices warn against overreliance on force, fearing conflict with Washington’s desire to rehabilitate the new Syrian state and potentially integrate it into the Abraham Accords framework.

Some Israeli experts propose allowing Syrian army deployment near the border while banning heavy weapons and Turkish forces, shifting from displaying military power to building diplomatic power. Diplomats predict any future agreement may resemble the 1974 disengagement framework, albeit updated for current realities.

The Wall Street Journal concluded that the US–Israeli dispute over Syria is no passing episode but a test of the resilience of their longstanding alliance amid a reshaped regional landscape.

“The new Syria” has become an open arena for redefining Middle Eastern power balances, as Washington attempts to merge counterterrorism efforts with rebuilding the Syrian state and crafting a new security formula between Damascus and Tel Aviv.

 

 


Lebanese Foreign Minister Declines Invitation to Tehran, Proposes Meeting in Neutral Country

Lebanese Foreign Minister Youssef Raji receives his Iranian counterpart Abbas Araghchi in Beirut in June 2025 (File – IRNA)
Lebanese Foreign Minister Youssef Raji receives his Iranian counterpart Abbas Araghchi in Beirut in June 2025 (File – IRNA)
TT

Lebanese Foreign Minister Declines Invitation to Tehran, Proposes Meeting in Neutral Country

Lebanese Foreign Minister Youssef Raji receives his Iranian counterpart Abbas Araghchi in Beirut in June 2025 (File – IRNA)
Lebanese Foreign Minister Youssef Raji receives his Iranian counterpart Abbas Araghchi in Beirut in June 2025 (File – IRNA)

Lebanese Foreign Minister Youssef Raji has declined an invitation from his Iranian counterpart Abbas Araghchi to visit Tehran, proposing instead that the two meet in a mutually agreed-upon neutral country.

In a post on X on Wednesday, Raji said he was “unable to accept” the invitation at this time, citing unspecified “current circumstances.”

He stressed that his reply “does not mean rejecting dialogue,” rather “the proper atmosphere is not appropriate.”

He added that any renewed engagement with Iran must rest on clear principles, including respect for Lebanon’s sovereignty, non-interference in its internal affairs, and adherence to international norms governing state-to-state relations.

Araghchi had recently invited Raji to Tehran for talks on bilateral relations.

Official Lebanese sources told Asharq Al-Awsat that the invitation was sent personally to the minister, not to the Lebanese state, and that Raji’s response “expresses his own position.”

Lebanon and Iran continue diplomatic engagement despite Beirut’s repeated warnings - conveyed directly to visiting Iranian officials - that Lebanon rejects any foreign meddling in its internal affairs.

Tensions between Raji and Tehran were visible during the August visit of Ali Larijani, secretary-general of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council.

Larijani said he lacked the time to meet Raji; the minister replied: “Even if I had the time, I would not have met him.”

Former Lebanese foreign minister Fares Boueiz said Raji’s latest stance is a clear diplomatic message that relations between Beirut and Tehran are “incomplete.”

When differences arise, Boueiz noted, first meetings are often held in a third country to establish a framework for resolving disputes.

Boueiz added that a foreign minister rarely deviates from the official position of the state. He argued that Raji’s move reflects the views of President Joseph Aoun and Prime Minister Nawaf Salam, and implicitly signal that Iran should halt its support for a particular Lebanese faction and stop its interference.

Lebanon has repeatedly accused Iran of meddling in its internal affairs. During his meeting with Larijani in August, Aoun reiterated that no group in Lebanon may carry weapons or rely on external backing.

While open to cooperation with Iran, Lebanon insists such engagement remains within the limits of sovereignty and mutual respect.

Boueiz recalled that Lebanese-Iranian diplomatic relations stabilized after 1990, when he restored protocol-based engagement in line with the Vienna Convention. During the civil war, Iranian delegations routinely entered Lebanon via Syria without coordinating with the Lebanese government and met directly with Hezbollah.

After Boueiz confronted Tehran’s ambassador in 1990, then-foreign minister Ali Akbar Velayati agreed to normalize diplomatic procedures, leading to formal exchanges and signed agreements.

Some Lebanese observers view Raji’s stance as evidence of diminishing Iranian influence in Lebanon, long bolstered by Tehran’s support for Hezbollah.

Boueiz, however, argues that Iran’s role is closely tied to its evolving relationship with Washington. US-Iran dynamics, including ongoing discussions over sanctions relief and frozen assets, inevitably ripple into Lebanon: “Whenever US-Iran negotiations worsen, tensions rise in Lebanon; when talks calm down, Lebanon feels the relief.”