Polls: Majority of Israelis Want New Elections

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. (Reuters)
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. (Reuters)
TT
20

Polls: Majority of Israelis Want New Elections

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. (Reuters)
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. (Reuters)

Israeli polls over the past five months have shown that holding early elections will lead to the fall of the right-wing rule of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

His close associates, however, have tried to convince him that the elections are the best solution to the strained political situation. They will allow him to return to power through a national unity government without extremists.

The polls showed that the chances will be tipped in his favor if the Supreme Court annuls any of the laws that the current Knesset (parliament) has enacted.

His associates believe that the Supreme Court’s move will anger the right, which will seek to unify its ranks and reclaim support and votes it has lost in recent months, especially if Netanyahu announces a return to negotiations with the opposition.

They have told the PM that the opposition was not serious about the negotiations.  

They believe that if a dead end is reached, large segments of the public will accuse the opposition of being responsible for the political and social failure, which will impact their performance in the elections.  

The Maariv newspaper quoted a senior source in the coalition as saying that many were sure Netanyahu was secretly praying for a court decision to cancel the pretext of “reasonableness.”  

If the law is annulled, the right will unite, it said.

It added if the law is revoked, Netanyahu will be able to call for new elections in the absence of a natural partner for dialogue.

Netanyahu will be able to form a broad unity government after the elections.  

According to the sources, Netanyahu will turn to Benny Gantz or Yair Lapid to help him form a broad government without the extremists; otherwise, he would return to establish a right-wing-religious government.  

According to the newspaper, most of the polls in recent months indicated that a majority of opposition party voters support the formation of a broad unity government.   

A recent poll by the Center for the Promotion of Justice in Israel showed that 54 percent of the respondents believe the government should stop the judicial plan and seek “judicial reform” through elections.  

About 57 percent of all respondents believed this would not be done through elections but rather through a popular referendum supervised by an unbiased body.  

Fifty-one percent of the respondents demanded that the government halt the legislation of the judicial plan and hold a conference with representatives of all groups in Israel to formulate a constitution that defines the systems of government and the judiciary.  

More than a third of the respondents, who said they voted for the Likud party, believe that legislation should be halted and head to new elections.   

Maariv’s weekly poll indicated that the opposition camp maintains its electoral strength and could win the majority of 66 seats, compared to 54 seats for the right-wing base led by Netanyahu.   

However, there are two Arab parties with 11 seats: the United Arab List of the Islamic Movement, led by MP Mansour Abbas (4 seats), and the Democratic Front for Peace and Equality and the Arab Movement for Change, led by MK Ayman Odeh and Ahmed Tibi (6 seats).  

Tibi and Odeh support the formation of a bloc against the far right, preventing it from forming a government.



Gabbard Calls Signal Chats a ‘Mistake’ as Trump Officials Face Grilling over Leaked Military Plan

(L-R) Director of the National Security Agency, Gen. Timothy Haugh; FBI Director, Kash Patel; Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard; CIA Director, John Ratcliffe; and Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, Lt. Gen. Jeffrey Kruse testify before a House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence hearing on "Worldwide Threats," on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC, on March 26, 2025. (AFP)
(L-R) Director of the National Security Agency, Gen. Timothy Haugh; FBI Director, Kash Patel; Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard; CIA Director, John Ratcliffe; and Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, Lt. Gen. Jeffrey Kruse testify before a House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence hearing on "Worldwide Threats," on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC, on March 26, 2025. (AFP)
TT
20

Gabbard Calls Signal Chats a ‘Mistake’ as Trump Officials Face Grilling over Leaked Military Plan

(L-R) Director of the National Security Agency, Gen. Timothy Haugh; FBI Director, Kash Patel; Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard; CIA Director, John Ratcliffe; and Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, Lt. Gen. Jeffrey Kruse testify before a House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence hearing on "Worldwide Threats," on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC, on March 26, 2025. (AFP)
(L-R) Director of the National Security Agency, Gen. Timothy Haugh; FBI Director, Kash Patel; Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard; CIA Director, John Ratcliffe; and Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, Lt. Gen. Jeffrey Kruse testify before a House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence hearing on "Worldwide Threats," on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC, on March 26, 2025. (AFP)

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard said Wednesday it was a "mistake" for national security officials to discuss sensitive military plans on a group text chain that also included a journalist — a leak that has roiled President Donald Trump's national security leadership.

Speaking before the House Intelligence Committee, Gabbard said the conversation included "candid and sensitive" information about military strikes against Houthi rebels in Yemen. But as she told senators during testimony on Tuesday, she said the texts did not contain any classified information.

"It was a mistake that a reporter was inadvertently added," Gabbard said.

Wednesday's hearing was called to discuss an updated report on national security threats facing the US Instead, much of the focus was on the text chain, which included Gabbard, CIA Director John Ratcliffe, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, Vice President JD Vance and other top officials.

Jeffrey Goldberg, the editor-in-chief of The Atlantic, was also added, and on Wednesday his publication released more details from the chats, showing the level of detail they offered about the strikes.

Democrats have demanded an investigation into the sloppy communication, saying it may have exposed sensitive military information that could have jeopardized the mission or put US service members at risk.

The National Security Council has said it will investigate the matter, which Trump on Tuesday downplayed as a "glitch." Goldberg said he received the Signal invitation from Mike Waltz, Trump’s national security adviser, who was in the group chat and has taken responsibility for the lapse.

Even though the texts contained detailed information on military actions, Gabbard, Ratcliffe and the White House have all said none of the information was classified — an assertion Democrats flatly rejected on Wednesday.

"You all know that's a lie," Rep. Joaquin Castro, D-Texas, told Ratcliffe and Gabbard, who said that any decisions to classify or declassify military information falls to the secretary of defense.

Several Democrats on the panel said Hegseth should resign because of the leak.

"This is classified information. It’s a weapon system, as well as a sequence of strikes, as well as details of the operations," said Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi, a Democrat from Illinois. "He needs to resign immediately."

Ratcliffe defended his use of Signal as "appropriate" and said questions over the Signal leak have overshadowed the military operation targeting the Houthis.

"What is most important is that the mission was a remarkable success," he told lawmakers. "That’s what did happen, not what possibly could have happened."

The discussion at times grew heated as Ratcliffe and Democratic lawmakers spoke over one another. At one point, Rep. Jimmy Gomez, an Illinois Democrat, asked whether he knew whether Hegseth was drinking alcohol when he participated in the chat.

"I think that’s an offensive line of questioning," Ratcliffe angrily replied. "The answer is no."

Ratcliffe and Gomez then began shouting over each other as Gomez sought to ask a follow-up question. "We want to know if his performance is compromised," Gomez said.

Wednesday's hearing was called to discuss the intelligence community's annual report on threats to American national security. The report lists China, Russia, Iran and North Korea as strategic adversaries, and notes that drug cartels and transnational criminal organizations pose other threats to Americans.

The presentations from top Trump appointees reflect Trump's foreign policy priorities, including a focus on combating the flow of fentanyl, illegal immigration and human trafficking, and are taking place as Trump attempts to work out a ceasefire between Russia and Ukraine three years after Russia's invasion.