Sadr Warns against Holding Another ‘Immoral’ Festival in Iraq

Sadr supporters are seen at a protest in Baghdad’s Sadr City in April. (AP)
Sadr supporters are seen at a protest in Baghdad’s Sadr City in April. (AP)
TT

Sadr Warns against Holding Another ‘Immoral’ Festival in Iraq

Sadr supporters are seen at a protest in Baghdad’s Sadr City in April. (AP)
Sadr supporters are seen at a protest in Baghdad’s Sadr City in April. (AP)

For the second time in less than a month, head of the Sadrist movement in Iraq cleric Moqtada al-Sadr described the current government as that of “Bani Abbas”, recalling the historic dispute between the Abbasids and Alawites after the collapse of the Umayyad Caliphate.

Sadr made his remarks in criticism of the Iraq International Festival that was held in Baghdad earlier this week and that had sparked great controversy.

Sadr described the festival as “immoral”, warning “Islamic states against greater openness and hateful liberalism that only serve normalization [with Israel] and spread homosexuality.”

“This was demonstrated at the festival that violated Arab and Islamic societal norms that is being ruled by the Bani Abbas state,” he added.

The current government was formed through an agreement by the pro-Iran Shiite Coordination Framework, rivals of Sadr.

“I am certain that the Iraqi people are of a pure ummah and they reject corruption and perversions. I am certain that should such festivals be held again, the people will collectively reject excessive liberalism, normalization and the LGBT community,” continued Sadr.

The cleric also attacked American Ambassador to Baghdad Alina Romanowski, who had praised the festival and Iraqi artist Shatha Hassoun who had organized it.

He remarked that the festival was directly overseen by Romanowski, whom he said comes from the “nation of homosexuals.”

Sadr’s comments stirred debate in Iraq. Some political observers and activists speculated that his statement may spark street protests should such events be held again, while others discussed the limits of freedoms and going beyond them.

Some observers tied his comments to the challenges in Iraq, such as the dollar crisis and the upcoming provincial council elections.

Advisor to the prime minister for Cultural Affairs Aref al-Saadi issued a clarification over the festival. He said Hassoun had requested that a festival be held to honor Iraqi and Arab artists. Her suggestion was supported by the premiership and Ministry of Culture, but she did not receive any financial support from them because the offer was made through a private company.

The only support offered by the state authorities was preparing the square where the festival was held, he added. “The government was in no way involved in organizing the event.”

The festival went on to honor several Iraqi and Arab artists.

Saadi acknowledged that “several errors had taken place at the event”, such as the attendance of bloggers and fashionistas, whose presence he said was “inappropriate”.

Should the government have “ordered that women be inspected at the entrance of the festival? Should a dress code have been imposed?” he wondered. “Had we done so, we would have been criticized immensely and had the festival been banned, Baghdad would have been compared to Kandahar.”

The festival was initially set to be held on September 29, but the al-Hamdaniya tragedy and the ensuing days of mourning forced organizers to postpone it to October 3, which coincided with National Day.



Palestinians Receptive to Lebanon’s Call to Limit Possession of Weapons in Refugee Camps

The Lebanese-Palestinian Dialogue Committee meets at the government headquarters. (Dialogue committee)
The Lebanese-Palestinian Dialogue Committee meets at the government headquarters. (Dialogue committee)
TT

Palestinians Receptive to Lebanon’s Call to Limit Possession of Weapons in Refugee Camps

The Lebanese-Palestinian Dialogue Committee meets at the government headquarters. (Dialogue committee)
The Lebanese-Palestinian Dialogue Committee meets at the government headquarters. (Dialogue committee)

Lebanon has started to exert serious efforts to restrict the possession of weapons inside Palestinian refugee camps in the country in line with President Joseph Aoun’s inaugural speech.

The president had demanded that the possession of weapons in the country and the camps be limited to the state.

The Lebanese-Palestinian Dialogue Committee met at the government headquarters in Beirut three days ago to discuss the issue.

All Palestinian factions attended the meeting, and the gatherers agreed to “completely” resolve the Palestinian possession of arms outside the camps. They also agreed to outline how to restrict weapons inside the camps in line with the president’s speech.

The Lebanese state has yet to come up with the mechanism to confiscate the weapons inside the camps.

A Lebanese security source told Asharq Al-Awsat that the arms will be tackled through a political approach drawn up by the government. “It will be carried out by the army with the security agencies and in coordination with the Palestinian factions in the camp, led by the Fatah movement, which is the official representative of the Palestinian people,” it added.

The Palestinians have expressed their “complete understanding” of the issue, it remarked.

The laying down of weapons by Palestinian factions is a step towards all illegal weapons throughout the country being turned over to the Lebanese state, it went on to say.

“There are no longer any excuses for weapons to remain in possession of any organization,” stressed the source.

Lebanese groups will be demanded to lay down their arms after the Palestinian ones do, it added.

In a first, the Palestinian factions have been very receptive to a Lebanese head of state’s demand to cooperate in limiting the possession of weapons in the refugee camps.

Member of the Palestinian National and Central Councils Haitham Zaiter said that the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO) recognizes that the camps are part of Lebanese territories, so they come under the authority of the state and its laws.

He told Asharq Al-Awsat that “complete coordination” is ongoing between the Lebanese security agencies and PLO inside the camps where several wanted Lebanese and Palestinian suspects and others from other nationalities have been turned over to the authorities.

The suspects had sought refuge in the camps to avoid justice in the crimes they have committed, he acknowledged.

“The PLO is the sole representative of the Palestinian people inside Palestine and in the diaspora,” he stated.

Moreover, Zaiter explained that Palestinian weapons in Lebanon are either carried by the Palestinian Front for the Liberation of Palestine – General Command (PFLP-GC) outside the camps or by non-partisan individuals inside the camps.

The PFLP-GC laid down its weapons as soon as the Syrian regime of Bashar al-Assad collapsed in December.

Heavy weapons inside the camps had been previously brought in with the aim to undermine the PLO, he added.

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas “has constantly called for coordination with Lebanese authorities to limit the possession of these weapons,” Zaiter said.