Al-Mahdi to Asharq Al-Awsat: Bashir’s Supporters Ignited the War in Sudan

Member of the central council of Sudan’s Forces of Freedom and Change (FFC) alliance and aide to Chairman of the National Umma Party Al-Siddiq Sadiq al-Mahdi. (Asharq Al-Awsat)
Member of the central council of Sudan’s Forces of Freedom and Change (FFC) alliance and aide to Chairman of the National Umma Party Al-Siddiq Sadiq al-Mahdi. (Asharq Al-Awsat)
TT

Al-Mahdi to Asharq Al-Awsat: Bashir’s Supporters Ignited the War in Sudan

Member of the central council of Sudan’s Forces of Freedom and Change (FFC) alliance and aide to Chairman of the National Umma Party Al-Siddiq Sadiq al-Mahdi. (Asharq Al-Awsat)
Member of the central council of Sudan’s Forces of Freedom and Change (FFC) alliance and aide to Chairman of the National Umma Party Al-Siddiq Sadiq al-Mahdi. (Asharq Al-Awsat)

Member of the central council of Sudan’s Forces of Freedom and Change (FFC) alliance and aide to Chairman of the National Umma Party Al-Siddiq Sadiq al-Mahdi accused the critics of those who advocate ending the war of continuously holding onto it “out of fear of jeopardizing their interests.”

He said these critics are also looking to absolve themselves of responsibility for the war by attributing it to “the civil forces working on instituting structural reforms in the state.”

In an interview with Asharq Al-Awsat, al-Mahdi revealed that the Sudanese civil forces are nearing the formation of a broad civil front working to end the war, composed of civil and political forces, resistance committees, professionals, and independent figures.

An agreement has been reached to establish a communication committee to carry out necessary talks for announcing the convening of a conference in the Ethiopian capital, Addis Ababa.

Al-Mahdi explained that the ousted regime and its supporters “ignited the war and are working to perpetuate it, standing against any cessation of hostilities, all in an effort to return to power and open new avenues for corruption.”

“This is why they engineered and supported the October 25, 2021, coup and, subsequently, brought about the catastrophic event of the mid-April war, to obstruct any civil democratic transformation that goes against their interests,” added al-Mahdi.

He described the accusations leveled by the supporters of ousted former President Omar al-Bashir's regime against the civil forces as “treachery” and “illogical”.

He emphasized that those advocating for the continuation of the war are individuals whose interests have been harmed by its cessation, adding that “the supporters of the National Congress Party, and Islamists in general, along with the former figures in power are the ones who ignited the war and hope it continues.”

Al-Mahdi denied the existence of a major problem between the National Congress Party (the ruling party during Bashir’s era) and the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), saying instead that their real issue lies with the political forces advocating for reform.

They aim to preserve their questionable interests, maintain their empowerment, and continue the plundering of the country’s resources, he charged.

According to al-Mahdi, they intend to continue with their corrupt ways and that is why they ignited the war and insist on its continuation. This is why the remnants of the regime have attacked the civilian forces.

Moreover, he emphasized that the primary battle of the National Congress Party and its supporters “is not with the RSF.”

He accused the supporters of the ousted regime and their loyal military forces of “wasting vast sums of money, ranging from $6 billion - $9 billion annually.”

“Sudan produces between 120 and 200 tons of gold annually, but the state only receives about 20 to 30 tons from it, with the rest being lost through smuggling,” revealed al-Mahdi.

He explained that elements from the ousted regime want to preserve these interests. Their involvement in the October 25 coup aimed to obstruct the path to reforming the economic and military state institutions.

“They exacerbated the situation by igniting the senseless war and working to perpetuate it, all driven by their hostility toward the civil forces advocating for a civil democratic transition and institutional reform in the state,” he further explained.

Al-Mahdi firmly stated that “the possibility of establishing a new partnership between civilians and the military in the upcoming phase is unattainable.”

“They have acknowledged that they will not be a part of the political scene,” he commented.

He believed that the continuation of the war “threatens to push the country towards the abyss of a civil war, turning Sudan into a hotspot and a source of disasters in the world and the region.”

He emphasized that “the right path to end the war lies in amplifying the voice of Sudan's interests and isolating the claims of those who sparked the war and are benefiting from its continuation.”

He noted that the war “has caused immense suffering for civilians in Darfur, especially in its western regions, forcing many to seek refuge in neighboring countries under extremely tragic circumstances.”

“Those who remained in Khartoum also endure the harsh realities of life, with scarce means for survival,” he added.

Al-Mahdi further described the decision of the Human Rights Council to establish a fact-finding committee regarding violations in Sudan as “a commendable decision.”

At the same time, he emphasized that the consequences of the war are borne by civilians, and the military leaders continue their conflict without regard for the destruction of the country, the killing of civilians, and humanitarian workers.

This has resulted in Sudan being classified as the second most dangerous country for humanitarian workers, with 19 aid workers killed in a single year, according to a United Nations official.



Sudan's RSF Denies Reports of Abu Lulu's Release

This handout picture released by the Sudanese Rapid Support Forces (RSF) on October 30, 2025, shows RSF members reportedly detaining a fighter known as Abu Lulu (L) in al-Fashir in war-torn Sudan's western Darfur region. (RSF / AFP)
This handout picture released by the Sudanese Rapid Support Forces (RSF) on October 30, 2025, shows RSF members reportedly detaining a fighter known as Abu Lulu (L) in al-Fashir in war-torn Sudan's western Darfur region. (RSF / AFP)
TT

Sudan's RSF Denies Reports of Abu Lulu's Release

This handout picture released by the Sudanese Rapid Support Forces (RSF) on October 30, 2025, shows RSF members reportedly detaining a fighter known as Abu Lulu (L) in al-Fashir in war-torn Sudan's western Darfur region. (RSF / AFP)
This handout picture released by the Sudanese Rapid Support Forces (RSF) on October 30, 2025, shows RSF members reportedly detaining a fighter known as Abu Lulu (L) in al-Fashir in war-torn Sudan's western Darfur region. (RSF / AFP)

Sudan’s paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF) denied on Tuesday reports about the release of RSF Brigadier General al-Fateh Abdullah Idris, known as Abu Lulu, who was arrested late last year following global outrage over videos of him executing unarmed people in al-Fashir.

In a statement, the RSF “categorically” denied the reports, slamming them as “baseless” and being part of a “campaigns of incitement.”

Two sources – a Sudanese intelligence official and a commander with the RSF – said they personally saw Abu Lulu on the battlefield in Kordofan in March, said a Reuters report on Monday.

The RSF stressed that Abu Lulu and a number of individuals, accused of violations against civilians in al-Fashir, have been detained since their arrest in October.

“They remain in prison and have never left,” it added.

RSF officers had pleaded for Abu Lulu to be returned to the field to boost the morale of forces engulfed in heavy fighting there, a Chadian military officer told Reuters.

Reuters spoke with 13 sources who said they knew of Abu Lulu’s release. They include three RSF commanders, an RSF officer, a relative of Abu Lulu, a Chadian military officer close to RSF command and seven other sources with contacts in RSF leadership or access to intelligence on RSF field operations.

The RSF-led coalition government, in response to questions from Reuters, issued a statement on Monday denying the group had released Abu Lulu.

A special court will try him and others accused of violations during the al-Fashir offensive, according to the statement from Ahmed Tugud Lisan, spokesman for the RSF-led Tasis government.

The RSF imprisoned Abu Lulu in late October 2025, a few days after its bloody takeover of al-Fashir, a large city in North Darfur.

Multiple videos had surfaced of him executing unarmed people during the offensive. His actions earned him the nickname “the butcher of al-Fashir,” a moniker noted by the UN Security Council when sanctioning him on February 24 for human rights abuses.

The three-year civil war between the Sudanese army and the RSF is a brutal power struggle to control the country and its financial resources. It has created what aid groups say is the world's largest humanitarian ‌crisis.


Blank Ballots Impede Vote for New Hamas Leader

Hamas leaders, from right: Rawhi Mushtaha, Saleh al-Arouri and Ismail Haniyeh, all of whom were assassinated, Khaled Meshaal and Khalil al-Hayya. Hamas media)
Hamas leaders, from right: Rawhi Mushtaha, Saleh al-Arouri and Ismail Haniyeh, all of whom were assassinated, Khaled Meshaal and Khalil al-Hayya. Hamas media)
TT

Blank Ballots Impede Vote for New Hamas Leader

Hamas leaders, from right: Rawhi Mushtaha, Saleh al-Arouri and Ismail Haniyeh, all of whom were assassinated, Khaled Meshaal and Khalil al-Hayya. Hamas media)
Hamas leaders, from right: Rawhi Mushtaha, Saleh al-Arouri and Ismail Haniyeh, all of whom were assassinated, Khaled Meshaal and Khalil al-Hayya. Hamas media)

While many were waiting to learn who would become the new head of Hamas’s political bureau, the movement issued a rare and surprising statement last Saturday saying the result could not be decided in the first round and that a second would be held.

Asharq Al-Awsat asked Hamas sources inside and outside Gaza why the process of electing a new leader had stalled.

Speaking separately, they cited several factors, including “blank ballots” cast by some voters to show they were not backing either of the two contenders, Khalil al-Hayya, head of Hamas’s office in Gaza, and Khaled Meshaal, his counterpart abroad.

Hamas is facing its worst crisis since it was founded in 1987. Israeli strikes that began after the October 7, 2023, attack have hit its various wings and leaderships.

Israel assassinated its political bureau chief Ismail Haniyeh in Tehran in July 2024. He was succeeded by Yahya al-Sinwar in Gaza in October of the same year.

For about a year and a half, a “leadership council” has been running Hamas’s affairs. At the start of this year, a new push began to elect a chief to lead the movement for the remaining period of the current political bureau’s term. The term had been due to end in 2025 but was extended by one year, pending general elections at the end of this year or the beginning of next year.

Two options

Three Hamas sources, including two outside Gaza, told Asharq Al-Awsat that since the result was not decided in favor of either al-Hayya or Meshaal, the movement’s internal regulations offer “two options: either the candidate with fewer votes withdraws in favor of the one with more, or a second round is held within 20 days of the first.”

The vote to elect the head of the political bureau is conducted through the 71-member Shura Council.

The two sources outside Gaza said many voters submitted blank votes, meaning they did not name any candidate. This prevented either contender from winning the first round.

Both sources, who are senior leaders in the movement, said this was “the first time” they had seen such a situation in a vote for the head of the bureau.

One source said the situation suggested “dissatisfaction with the two competing figures, and perhaps a protest against the movement’s policies and an attempt to push toward a younger leadership.”

The other source said: “This is not necessarily a protest against the contenders, as much as it indicates that there is real rejection of some policies on several files, or a desire to postpone the idea of electing an interim chief, wait until comprehensive elections are held, and keep the current leadership council in place.”

Hard-fought contest

Assessments inside and outside Hamas suggest that the competition between al-Hayya and Meshaal reflects diverging trends between two camps within the movement.

Al-Hayya is believed to be closer to support from the Qassam Brigades, Hamas’s military wing, and to advocates of closer ties with Iran.

Meshaal is seen as representing a current that is more independent from tying the movement’s path to Tehran, as reflected in his dispute over the events of the Syrian revolution and in distancing the movement from involvement in it.

One source outside Gaza described the election as a very tight contest between Meshaal and al-Hayya, saying Hamas’s leadership in Gaza had controlled the movement’s most important files over the past two election cycles.

The source inside Gaza said only that “decisions within the movement are made by consensus, regardless of the standing or historical role of whoever leads Hamas.”

Previous elections

In previous years, elections for the head of Hamas’s political bureau were held as part of broader elections for the entire bureau and its various bodies.

In the last comprehensive elections, held in 2021, Haniyeh secured the leadership of the political bureau for a second term. His closest rivals were Saleh al-Arouri and Mohammed Nazzal, respectively.

In his first term as head of the movement in 2017, Haniyeh ran for the leadership with relative ease after Meshaal, who led Hamas’s political bureau between 2013 and 2017, was unable to run.

In the last election, held in Gaza, there was a fierce contest between Sinwar and Nizar Awadallah. It was heading for a second round before Awadallah withdrew in favor of Sinwar.


Israeli Strikes on Southern Lebanon Kill 19, Including Children and Women

Smoke rises from the site of an Israeli airstrike that targeted the village of Deir Qanoun al-Nahr in southern Lebanon on May 19, 2026. (AFP)
Smoke rises from the site of an Israeli airstrike that targeted the village of Deir Qanoun al-Nahr in southern Lebanon on May 19, 2026. (AFP)
TT

Israeli Strikes on Southern Lebanon Kill 19, Including Children and Women

Smoke rises from the site of an Israeli airstrike that targeted the village of Deir Qanoun al-Nahr in southern Lebanon on May 19, 2026. (AFP)
Smoke rises from the site of an Israeli airstrike that targeted the village of Deir Qanoun al-Nahr in southern Lebanon on May 19, 2026. (AFP)

Israeli airstrikes on southern Lebanon on Tuesday killed at least 19 people, including four women and three children, Lebanon’s Health Ministry said, the latest in near-daily attacks from both sides that have not stopped despite the fragile, US-brokered ceasefire in the Israel-Hezbollah war.

Israel’s military did not immediately comment on the casualties or specific incidents, but said that between Monday afternoon and Tuesday afternoon, it had targeted more than 25 sites of Hezbollah infrastructure in southern Lebanon.

The Israel-Hezbollah latest fighting began on March 2 with the Lebanese militant Hezbollah group firing rockets at Israel, two days after the United States and Israel attacked Iran.

In Beirut, the government said a single strike on the village of Deir Qanoun al-Nahr in the coastal Tyre province killed 10 people, including three children and three women. Three were wounded, including a child.

The ministry provided no further details about the strike, but state-run National News Agency said it destroyed a house, leaving several people under the rubble. Their bodies were pulled out later in the day.

According to the ministry, another airstrike — this one on the southern city of Nabatieh — killed four people and wounded 10 others, including two women. A third strike in the nearby village of Kfar Sir killed five people, including one woman.

The latest deaths came a day after the death toll in the latest round of fighting between Israel and Hezbollah surpassed 3,000, and two days after the US-brokered truce that has been in place since April 17, was extended for 45 days.

Israel has since invaded southern Lebanon and bombarded its capital, Beirut, and other areas, saying it is targeting Hezbollah infrastructure. Hezbollah has resisted pressure to disarm, including by the Lebanese government.

More than a million people have been displaced in Lebanon by the fighting, with some sheltering in tents along roads and the Mediterranean Sea in Beirut.

Israel, meanwhile, has struggled to halt frequent Hezbollah drone attacks targeting its troops on Lebanese soil and northern Israeli border towns.

Israel's military said one of its soldiers was killed on Tuesday in battle in southern Lebanon, raising the Israeli troops' death toll to 21 since the latest conflict started.