Troops Hurt after Three Drones Attack US Bases in Iraq

American army soldiers at the K1 Air Base northwest of Kirkuk in northern Iraq before a planned US pullout on March 29, 2020. (AFP)
American army soldiers at the K1 Air Base northwest of Kirkuk in northern Iraq before a planned US pullout on March 29, 2020. (AFP)
TT

Troops Hurt after Three Drones Attack US Bases in Iraq

American army soldiers at the K1 Air Base northwest of Kirkuk in northern Iraq before a planned US pullout on March 29, 2020. (AFP)
American army soldiers at the K1 Air Base northwest of Kirkuk in northern Iraq before a planned US pullout on March 29, 2020. (AFP)

Coalition forces were slightly injured in Iraq in a spate of drone attacks over the last 24 hours at US bases in Iraq as regional tensions flare following the deadly explosion at a hospital in Gaza.
Two drones targeted the al Asad airbase in western Iraq used by US forces and one drone targeted a base in northern Iraq, a US official told The Associated Press. US forces intercepted all three, destroying two but only damaging the third, which led to minor injuries among coalition forces at the western base, according to a statement Wednesday by US Central Command.
The US official were not authorized to speak publicly on the attacks and spoke on the condition of anonymity.
“In this moment of heightened alert, we are vigilantly monitoring the situation in Iraq and the region. US forces will defend US and coalition forces against any threat,” Central Command said in the release.
Iranian-backed militias in Iraq have threatened to attack US facilities there because of American support for Israel.
The Islamic Resistance in Iraq, an umbrella group of Iranian-backed militias, issued a statement afterward claiming responsibility for the two attacks and saying it “heralds more operations” against the “American occupation.”
The salvos came at a time of increasing tension and fears of a broader regional conflict in the wake of the latest Hamas-Israel war.
Since the beginning of the war on Oct. 7, much attention has been focused on Hezbollah, the powerful Hamas ally across Israel’s northern border in Lebanon, and its formidable arsenal. The group has traded so-far limited strikes with Israel on the border in recent days.
But Iranian-backed militias in Iraq have also threatened to attack US facilities over American support for Israel.
“Our missiles, drones, and special forces are ready to direct qualitative strikes at the American enemy in its bases and disrupt its interests if it intervenes in this battle,” Ahmad “Abu Hussein” al-Hamidawi, head of the Kataib Hezbollah militia, said in a statement last Wednesday. He also threatened to launch missiles at Israeli targets.
Following Tuesday night’s blast that killed hundreds at a hospital in Gaza, the group issued another statement in which it blamed the US and its support for Israel for the catastrophe and called for an end to the US presence in Iraq. Hamas has said the explosion in Gaza was from an Israeli airstrike, while Israel has blamed a misfired rocket by Palestinian militants.
“These evil people must leave the country. Otherwise, they will taste the fire of hell in this world before the afterlife,” the statement said.
A US defense official, who wasn't authorized to comment to the media and spoke on condition of anonymity, confirmed the attack on the al-Asad military base in western Iraq.
Tashkil al-Waritheen, one of the Iranian-backed militias making up the larger group, claimed responsibility in a statement for a second drone attack, which it said had targeted the al-Harir airbase in northern Iraq. US officials did not immediately comment on the claim of a second attack.
The government of the semi-autonomous Kurdish region in northern Iraq said an intercepted drone crashed in an open area near the village of Batas.
Also on Wednesday, Iran-allied groups in Iraq announced that they had formed a “joint operations room” to help Hamas in its war effort.
Two officials with Iranian-backed militias in Iraq, who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly about the issue, confirmed the attacks on the two bases Wednesday. They said the armed groups were on alert and prepared to join the wider battle against Israel, but that Iran had not yet given approval for them to open a new front. Leaders from some of the factions are now in Lebanon and Syria in case they get orders to proceed, one of the officials said.
Officials with the US Embassy in Baghdad declined to comment.
Lahib Higel, a senior analyst for Iraq at the International Crisis Group, said in the short term, the Iraqi groups allied with Iran and Hamas are not likely to open a new front in the war, but that could change if the Hamas-Israel war escalates or becomes protracted.
“Geographically, obviously, they are several steps removed, so they’re not going to be the first to react” and are likely to serve in a supporting role, she said.
Renad Mansour, a senior research fellow at the Chatham House, said the Iran-backed groups in Iraq are split between those that are also political parties and have a stake in the Iraqi political system and the “vanguard” groups that are purely militant and tend to be more tightly controlled by Iran.
The latter, he said, have been used in the past as foot soldiers in regional conflicts, including in Yemen and Syria.
“This is what they’re designed to do,” Mansour said. “The question is more, will Iran and some of the leaders of these groups decide it’s in their interest to escalate?”



Iran’s Araqchi to Visit Beirut After Lebanese FM Declines Trip to Tehran

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqhchi looks on during a press conference in Istanbul, Türkiye, June 22, 2025. REUTERS/Umit Bektas/File Photo
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqhchi looks on during a press conference in Istanbul, Türkiye, June 22, 2025. REUTERS/Umit Bektas/File Photo
TT

Iran’s Araqchi to Visit Beirut After Lebanese FM Declines Trip to Tehran

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqhchi looks on during a press conference in Istanbul, Türkiye, June 22, 2025. REUTERS/Umit Bektas/File Photo
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqhchi looks on during a press conference in Istanbul, Türkiye, June 22, 2025. REUTERS/Umit Bektas/File Photo

Iran's foreign minister, Abbas Araqchi, said on Thursday he would travel to Beirut for talks after receiving a formal invitation from his Lebanese counterpart, who a day earlier had declined to visit Tehran for direct talks.

On Wednesday, Lebanese Foreign Minister Youssef Raji said "current conditions" prevented him from travelling to Tehran, but stressed that the move did not mean rejection of dialogue with Iran.

Raji told Reuters late on Wednesday that he had invited Araqchi "in a formal diplomatic letter to come to Beirut to hold talks."

Araqchi said on X that he would "gladly accept the invitation to come to Beirut," although he said he found Raji's position "bemusing." He said foreign ministers of countries with "full diplomatic relations" did not need a neutral venue to meet.

"Subjected to Israeli occupation and blatant 'ceasefire' violations, I fully understand why my esteemed Lebanese counterpart is not prepared to visit Tehran," Araqchi added.

Raji said on Wednesday that Lebanon was ready to open a new phase of relations with Iran based on mutual respect, sovereignty and non-interference.

He added that no strong state could be built unless the government held the exclusive right to bear arms, in an apparent reference to calls to disarm Hezbollah, the Iran-aligned Lebanese armed group.


Berri Rejects Threats to Lebanese, Stands Firm on ‘Constants’ in Israel Talks

Lebanon Speaker Berri Receives United States Ambassador Michel Issa (Parliament)
Lebanon Speaker Berri Receives United States Ambassador Michel Issa (Parliament)
TT

Berri Rejects Threats to Lebanese, Stands Firm on ‘Constants’ in Israel Talks

Lebanon Speaker Berri Receives United States Ambassador Michel Issa (Parliament)
Lebanon Speaker Berri Receives United States Ambassador Michel Issa (Parliament)

Lebanon’s Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri dismissed what he called efforts to intimidate the Lebanese and underscored the "fundamental constants” that he says anchor negotiations with Israel via the Mechanism Committee.

He insisted that the May parliamentary elections will go ahead as scheduled and described his personal relationship with Saudi Arabia as “very good”, adding that ties between Lebanon and the kingdom were “good”.

Berri made the remarks during a meeting with senior Lebanese journalists from the Press Syndicate headed by Aouni Al-Kaaki.

His comments coincided with his second meeting in 24 hours with the United States ambassador to Beirut, Michel Issa.

According to a statement from the Speaker’s office, the talks reviewed “developments in the general situation and the latest events, as well as bilateral relations”.

Barrack’s “mistake”

Responding to a question from the syndicate on “threats voiced by some diplomats, especially repeated remarks by United States envoy Tom Barrack about joining Lebanon to Syria”, Berri said: “No one threatens the Lebanese."

"It is inconceivable to address the Lebanese in such language, especially from diplomats, let alone from someone like Ambassador Tom Barrack. What he said about annexing Lebanon to Syria is a big mistake that is completely unacceptable,” he added.

Berri said the Lebanese have “no alternative and no escape” from facing risks, repercussions and threats from any side except through unity, adding, “With unity we can liberate the land.”

Turning to the ceasefire agreement and negotiations, Berri asked, “Is the Mechanism Committee not a negotiating framework?”

“There are constants we negotiate through this committee, namely Israeli withdrawal, deployment of the Lebanese Army, and limiting weapons in the area south of the Litani to the hands of the Lebanese Army,” he explained, adding that the committee operates under American, French and United Nations sponsorship.

He added, “I have said more than once that there is no objection to bringing in any civilian or technical figure if needed, provided the agreement is implemented.”

Berri said Lebanon has fulfilled all required steps since November 2024. He said the Lebanese Army has deployed more than 9,300 officers and soldiers with the support of UNIFIL, which confirmed in its latest reports Lebanon’s compliance with all its obligations.

He added that Israel has violated the agreement with about 11,000 breaches.

Berri said the Lebanese Army has implemented 90 percent of the ceasefire provisions south of the Litani and will fully complete the remaining steps by the end of the year.

He said this was confirmed by UNIFIL, the Mechanism Committee and Army Commander General Rodolf Haykal.

“It is unfortunate that no one is asking whether Israel has complied with even a single clause of the ceasefire agreement. Instead, it has expanded its occupation of Lebanese territory,” he said.

No cancellation of parliamentary elections

On calls by some parliamentary blocs to amend the electoral law regarding expatriate voting, Berri said the existing law is in force and the elections will be held according to it.

“There will be no cancellation and no postponement. Everyone wants elections,” he said.

He added that he remains open to any formula leading to consensus on outstanding issues that divide political forces, especially the question of expatriates.

“No one wants to exclude expatriates. Even so, I have said and will repeat that we should implement the Taif Agreement in its provisions related to the electoral law and the establishment of a Senate. But are they willing?” he asked.

Berri reiterated that Lebanese bank deposits are “sacred rights” and warned that these rights must not be compromised, surrendered or accepted as lost.

 


Talks Fail on Transfer Mechanism for Syrian Prisoners in Lebanon

Prisoners stroll through a yard inside Roumieh prison, northeast of Beirut, on April 7, 2006. AFP
Prisoners stroll through a yard inside Roumieh prison, northeast of Beirut, on April 7, 2006. AFP
TT

Talks Fail on Transfer Mechanism for Syrian Prisoners in Lebanon

Prisoners stroll through a yard inside Roumieh prison, northeast of Beirut, on April 7, 2006. AFP
Prisoners stroll through a yard inside Roumieh prison, northeast of Beirut, on April 7, 2006. AFP

A Lebanese judicial delegation has returned from Damascus empty-handed, failing to secure the breakthrough it sought on a new treaty governing the transfer of Syrian prisoners held in Lebanon.

The talks instead laid bare deep rifts between the two sides, with Syria rejecting most of the proposed text and arguing that it fell short of even the minimum required to ensure the return of its nationals.

No agreement on all points

Even so, the Lebanese delegation sought to play down the gaps. A source close to the team said the atmosphere was positive but that there was no agreement on all points.

The source told Asharq Al-Awsat that Lebanon was cooperating with Damascus on the Syrian detainee file and appreciated Syria’s desire to complete the trials of those held in Lebanon or allow convicts to serve their sentences on Syrian territory.

The source acknowledged that the draft treaty applied only to convicts and did not include those still on trial, since handing over detainees requires a law issued by the Lebanese parliament, which is not currently possible.

Lebanon’s efforts to show flexibility did not receive a similar response in Damascus. Sources familiar with the meeting held in the Syrian capital described the draft agreement as loaded with problematic provisions and said it was unacceptable.

They said the two sides remained locked in disputes over two articles that Damascus viewed as attempts by Lebanon to sidestep understandings reached during talks in Damascus last month.

One article states that the transferring state, Lebanon, may refuse to hand over any convict or detainee without providing justification, based on considerations specific to it.

The sources said this effectively gave Lebanon the right to refuse the transfer of any Syrian prisoner without being required to present legal grounds.

The second, more sensitive, provision for the Syrians concerned what they saw as interference in the powers of Syrian authorities.

The sources said Article 10 of the treaty, which Lebanon intended to model after its agreement with Pakistan, stipulated that Syria, as the receiving state, may not grant amnesty to any convict or detainee handed over by Lebanon.

The agreement with Pakistan does not prohibit Islamabad from granting amnesty to its nationals returned from Lebanon.

The sources said Syria had already discussed all aspects of the agreement during its delegation’s visit to Beirut and had expressed a desire for Lebanon to facilitate the transfer of convicts and detainees under a clear mechanism that respects Lebanese sovereignty and applicable laws.

This mechanism would ban any Syrian who had been detained or convicted in Lebanon from reentering the country, and would allow Lebanese authorities to arrest and prosecute anyone who violates the ban.

Syrian dissatisfaction

Sources who followed Wednesday’s meeting in Damascus said the Syrian side was deeply dissatisfied with what it saw as Lebanese intransigence and a lack of flexibility, particularly since some of the convicts covered by the treaty have spent more than 11 years in Lebanese prisons.

Others remained in pretrial detention for years before their sentences were issued.

Damascus also informed the Lebanese delegation that it would not request the return of anyone proven to have killed Lebanese soldiers or carried out bombings that caused civilian casualties.

Tensions around the file heightened after the Lebanese delegation left Damascus without setting a date for another round of negotiations.

The sources expressed concern that Syria’s rejection of the draft could halt the dialogue altogether and strain bilateral relations.

Damascus has repeatedly said that establishing stable and strong ties requires a final resolution to the Syrian prisoners’ file in Lebanon, especially since most Syrians detained or convicted on terrorism charges had been part of the Syrian uprising, and their arrest and prosecution in Lebanon stemmed from their political choices.