Israel and South Africa face off at the UN’s top court from Thursday, after Pretoria accused Israel of “genocidal acts” in Gaza, charges the Israelis have dismissed as “blood libel.”
In an 84-page submission to the International Court of Justice (ICJ), South Africa urged judges to order Israel to “immediately suspend its military operations” in Gaza, according to AFP.
South Africa says Israel “has engaged in, is engaging in, and risks further engaging in genocidal acts against the Palestinian people in Gaza.”
Israel has angrily hit back at the accusations, with government spokesman Eylon Levy vowing to fight the South African case he described as “absurd blood libel.”
“How tragic that the rainbow nation that prides itself on fighting racism will be fighting pro bono for anti-Jewish racists,” Levy added.
Israel pledged to destroy Hamas after the movement's unprecedented attack on October 7, which resulted in the deaths of around 1,140 people, according to an AFP tally based on official Israeli figures.
In response, Israel launched a military campaign that killed at least 23,210 people mostly women and children, according to the Hamas-run Gaza health ministry.
The ICJ rules on disputes between states and while its decisions are legally binding, it has limited power to enforce them.
In March 2022, the ICJ ordered Russia to “immediately suspend” its invasion of Ukraine — a directive Moscow has ignored.
Johann Soufi, a lawyer and international justice expert, told AFP there would be an “extremely significant symbolic impact” if the court ruled against Israel.
“Of course there is the problem of implementing the decision. But at the end of the day, international justice is all there is left,” said Soufi, who worked for the UN agency for Palestinian refugees in Gaza.
South Africa has filed the case against Israel because both countries have signed the UN Genocide Convention, created in 1948 as a response to the Holocaust.
Any country that has signed the convention can sue another at the ICJ if they disagree on the “interpretation, application or fulfilment” of the rules designed to prevent genocide.
South Africa said it was “acutely aware of the particular weight of responsibility in initiating proceedings against Israel for violations of the Genocide Convention.”
It also “unequivocally” condemned the Hamas attack but said "no armed attack... no matter how serious... can provide any possible justification for breaches" of the Genocide Convention.
Pretoria's case is that Israeli action in Gaza is "intended to bring about the destruction of a substantial part of the Palestinian national, racial and ethnical group.”
It says Israel's “genocidal act” stems from the killing of thousands of Palestinians in Gaza, forced displacement, and preventing adequate aid access, resulting in starvation.
South Africa wants the ICJ to impose so-called “provisional measures,” or emergency actions, while the broader case is being considered -- which would probably take years.
The circumstances could not be more urgent, argues Pretoria, describing an “exceptionally brutal military campaign by Israel in Gaza, which is extensive and ongoing.”
Other measures requested by South Africa include reparations and reconstruction of Gaza, plus the safe return of displaced Palestinian refugees.
The case has been dismissed in Washington as “meritless, counterproductive and completely without any basis in fact whatsoever.”
Levy, the Israeli government spokesman, said South Africa was giving “political and legal cover” to the Hamas attacks and was “criminally complicit with Hamas's campaign of genocide against our people.”
“History will judge South Africa for abetting the modern heirs of the Nazis,” Levy added.
