Iran Attacks Unify American Position in Support of Israel

Former CENTCOM Commander to Asharq Al-Awsat: I am concerned about a broader regional conflict.

Israeli defenses intercept Iranian drones and missiles. (Reuters)
Israeli defenses intercept Iranian drones and missiles. (Reuters)
TT

Iran Attacks Unify American Position in Support of Israel

Israeli defenses intercept Iranian drones and missiles. (Reuters)
Israeli defenses intercept Iranian drones and missiles. (Reuters)

The American administration and Congressmen are anticipating a potential Israeli response to the rocket and drone attack launched against it by Iran overnight on Saturday.

In remarks to Asharq Al-Awsat, former American officials agreed on the need to avert a broader military escalation in the region.

The attack managed to unify the ranks of Democratic and Republican legislators in support of Israel, with voices that were critical of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s handling of the war against Hamas in Gaza dying down.

Concern and anticipation

Former US Central Command (CENTCOM) Commander General Joseph Votel expressed his deep concern over Iran waging attacks against Israel from its own territory.

In remarks to Asharq Al-Awsat, he said: “It is very concerning that Iran appears to have launched attacks from their own territory. I now believe that Israel feels, given the size and scope of the attack launched against them, that they must respond.”

“I am concerned, as others are, that this will lead to another round of escalation and a broader regional conflict - leading to more instability,” he added.

“I think the US reaction is appropriate at this point - strong support in defending Israel but emphasizing the need not to expand the conflict and get this situation back into the diplomatic channels,” Votel went on to say.

Former Assistant Secretary of State for political-military affairs General Mark Kimmitt told Asharq Al-Awsat: “I am hoping that President Joe Biden and the Israeli War Cabinet can prevent Prime Minister Netanyahu from escalating the situation further.”

Former strategy and policy director for Qatar and Kuwait in the Pentagon Adam Clements said: ““The level of sophistication and volume of drones and missiles in a direct Iranian response sets a new precedent in the current shadow war between it and Israel.”

“Israel must have known Iran would need to respond in a way to ‘save face’ in response to the bombing of its diplomatic facilities in Syria. It is telling that Iran has already publicly signaled its intention to not escalate the situation further,” he told Asharq Al-Awsat.

On the American stance on the situation, he warned: “An escalation in the conflict is detrimental to the security and economic development of the entire region.”

“The US response should be viewed as not only its commitment to helping Israel defend itself, but to also to protect the wider region from further conflict,” he stressed.

Former advisor for Iran to ex-Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, Gabriel Noronha said Iran's launching over 300 drones and missiles against Israel was a significant escalation and since the drones and missiles originated from Iranian territory.

“The attack is estimated to have cost Israel over a billion US dollars in defensive weapons used to intercept the incoming munitions. But Iran doesn't appear to have actually killed any Israelis or hit any significant targets,” he noted to Asharq Al-Awsat.

“This remains a tactical win for Israel who demonstrated the vast superiority of their defensive infrastructure and demonstrates the limits of Iranian capabilities to actually hold Israel at risk,” he stated.

Moreover, Noronha added that “the Biden administration doesn't feel any need for the United States to respond kinetically to the attack considering that it did not directly harm US personnel or infrastructure, but also is trying to have Israel limit its response to Iran.”

“Israel, however, still feels the need to respond to this attack because it cannot leave the impression that Iran can launch such a massive attack without repercussions. Ideally, Israel will find a way to demonstrate its determination in a way that continues to keep pressure and diplomatic scrutiny on Iran,” he said.

Vottel and other former officials contacted by Asharq Al-Awsat agreed that the current phase will be marked by anticipation of the Israeli response. This uncertainty, however, was not reflected at Congress, where reactions were firmly in support of Israel.

Unified stances

There can be no doubt that the Iranian attack unified Democratic and Republican ranks in support of Tel Aviv, erasing any criticism or calls to limit assistance to Israel over the war in Gaza that has killed over 33,000 people in six months.

No sooner had news of the attack broken out than calls poured in at Congress to approve the frozen package of aid worth around 17 billion dollars.

Majority Leader of the US House of Representatives Steve Scalise was quick to announce a change the House’s schedule to consider legislation that supports Israel.

In a statement, he said: “In light of Iran’s unjustified attack on Israel, the House will move from its previously announced legislative schedule next week to instead consider legislation that supports our ally Israel and holds Iran and its terrorist proxies accountable.

The Iranian regime must know “there will be consequences for these attacks,” he added.

Biden in the crossfire

House of Representatives Speaker Mike Johnson called on the White House to deliver a “proper response”.

“The Biden administration’s undermining of Israel and appeasement of Iran have contributed to these terrible developments,” he said in a post on the X platform.

Republican Senator Lindsey Graham said such an attack by Iran would not have happened were former President Donald Trump still at the White House, accusing the Biden administration of lacking a policy of deterrence against Iran.

Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell urged Congress to approve the aid package as soon as possible, adding: “Tehran and its proxies are emboldened when they see divisions between the US and Israel.”

Meanwhile, Democrat Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, who had made scathing criticism against Netanyahu over the war on Gaza, was quick to change his tone and express his unwavering support to Israel and its people in wake of Iran’s attack.

“As Israel is under attack from Iran, we stand with Israel and its people, and the United States will do everything we can to support Israel’s defense against Iran,” he declared.

Firm American support

Democratic Senator Chris Coons, who had previously said he was open to imposing restrictions on military aid to Israel, changed tone over the weekend, and urged the House to “promptly pass this coming week the long delayed national security supplemental to ensure that our Israeli allies have everything they need to defend themselves from attacks by Iran and its proxies.”

Another Democrat, Senator Chris Van Hollen, said he condemned the Iranian attack on Israel and “supports Israel's right to defend itself against this aggression. I also stand with Biden in seeking to prevent an even wider conflict that engulfs the people of the entire region.”

The calls for restraint were not supported by everyone. John Bolton, National Security Adviser under Trump, told CNN the said the Biden administration and Israel must reestablish deterrence against Iran and urged Tel Aviv to respond to the attack.

“I think Israel should be looking at this as an opportunity to destroy Iran's nuclear weapons program,” he added, hoping that Biden would not persuade Netanyahu against making such a move.



Lavrov Says Russia Ready to Resume Talks with Ukraine from Point Where They Left Off

 Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov attends a joint press conference with Madagascar's Foreign Minister following their talks in Moscow on June 19, 2026. (Sergei Ilnitsky / Pool / AFP)
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov attends a joint press conference with Madagascar's Foreign Minister following their talks in Moscow on June 19, 2026. (Sergei Ilnitsky / Pool / AFP)
TT

Lavrov Says Russia Ready to Resume Talks with Ukraine from Point Where They Left Off

 Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov attends a joint press conference with Madagascar's Foreign Minister following their talks in Moscow on June 19, 2026. (Sergei Ilnitsky / Pool / AFP)
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov attends a joint press conference with Madagascar's Foreign Minister following their talks in Moscow on June 19, 2026. (Sergei Ilnitsky / Pool / AFP)

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said on Tuesday that Russia was ready to resume peace negotiations with Ukraine from the point where they left off.

"We are ready ‌to talk ‌with Kyiv, ‌as ⁠we have always ⁠been," Lavrov told reporters, referring to talks that took place in Istanbul soon after the start ⁠of the war in ‌2022 ‌and were resumed in 2025.

However, ‌he did not ‌signal any shift in Moscow's demand, rejected by Kyiv, for Ukraine to ‌surrender the remaining part of the Donbas region ⁠that ⁠it has successfully defended from Russian forces.

The last US-mediated peace talks took place in February, before the United States and Israel launched a war against Iran.


Armed Group in Nigeria Kills at Least 20 People and Exchanges Gunfire with Police

Security personnel stand guard near Eagle Square during a Democracy Day protest in Abuja, Nigeria, June 12, 2026. REUTERS/ Marvellous Durowaiye
Security personnel stand guard near Eagle Square during a Democracy Day protest in Abuja, Nigeria, June 12, 2026. REUTERS/ Marvellous Durowaiye
TT

Armed Group in Nigeria Kills at Least 20 People and Exchanges Gunfire with Police

Security personnel stand guard near Eagle Square during a Democracy Day protest in Abuja, Nigeria, June 12, 2026. REUTERS/ Marvellous Durowaiye
Security personnel stand guard near Eagle Square during a Democracy Day protest in Abuja, Nigeria, June 12, 2026. REUTERS/ Marvellous Durowaiye

An armed group killed at least 20 people in a community located in the north-central region of Nigeria, police said Monday.

The attack occurred Sunday in the Kawel community located in the Bokkos area of Plateau State, The Associated Press quoted police spokesman Alfred Alabo as saying in a statement.

Police officers quickly arrived at the scene and exchanged gunfire with the assailants, forcing them to retreat, Alabo said. No arrests were reported.

No group immediately claimed responsibility for the attack in a region that has experienced a recurring pattern of violence.

“The remains of the victims have since been released to their families for burial, as the families declined autopsy,” Alabo said.

Plateau State Gov. Caleb Mutfwang instructed the government's emergency management and humanitarian agencies to provide immediate relief and support to victims and families, spokesperson Joyce Ramnap said in a statement.

An insurgency in northeastern Nigeria has killed thousands of people and displaced millions over the years, according to the United Nations. Armed gangs are also active in the northwest and north-central parts of the country.

A nighttime attack in March, killed 20 people in Gari Ya Waye community in Plateau.


Afghan Taliban to Hold Rare, Closed-door Talks with EU Officials on Deportations

Taliban administrative staff use feature phones at the Department of Information and Culture building in Kandahar on June 22, 2026. (Photo by Sanaullah SEIAM / AFP)
Taliban administrative staff use feature phones at the Department of Information and Culture building in Kandahar on June 22, 2026. (Photo by Sanaullah SEIAM / AFP)
TT

Afghan Taliban to Hold Rare, Closed-door Talks with EU Officials on Deportations

Taliban administrative staff use feature phones at the Department of Information and Culture building in Kandahar on June 22, 2026. (Photo by Sanaullah SEIAM / AFP)
Taliban administrative staff use feature phones at the Department of Information and Culture building in Kandahar on June 22, 2026. (Photo by Sanaullah SEIAM / AFP)

A delegation from the Afghan Taliban is traveling to Brussels on Tuesday for closed-door talks with European Union staff, expected to focus on deportations, said a Taliban official. 

Afghans make up one of the largest groups of migrants seeking asylum in the European Union, but a growing number of governments in the 27-nation bloc want to speed up and increase deportations for those whose claims are rejected or who commit crimes in their host countries. 

Afghan authorities have imposed draconian restrictions on rights, particularly for women and girls, since the Taliban seized power in the country in 2021 in the wake of the withdrawal of US-led forces. 

Rights groups said Tuesday's meeting undercuts the EU’s human rights obligations and could endanger people in Europe and Afghanistan. 

“Any engagement with the Taliban needs to prioritize protecting human rights and accountability — not deporting people to danger there,” said Fereshta Abbasi, a researcher at Human Rights Watch. “EU countries are undermining their credibility by condemning Taliban abuses and pursuing accountability on one hand, while cooperating with the Taliban to forcibly return Afghans on the other.” 

With not a single EU nation recognizing the Taliban, the meeting in Brussels symbolizes a small crack in the group’s diplomatic isolation since seizing power five years ago. 

The five-person delegation in Brussels from the Taliban — a government that none of 27 EU nations recognizes — includes Abdul Qahar Balkhi, a New Zealand-born spokesperson for the Taliban’s foreign ministry, said a Taliban official speaking on condition of anonymity. 

Belgian Foreign Minister Maxime Prévot said that while Belgium doesn’t recognize the Taliban, it would comply with EU requests to grant the Taliban visas. 

“Belgium cannot confer legitimacy on a regime accused of serious human rights violations,” he said in a statement referring to Belgium’s hosting of the EU institutions. “Making a meeting possible in the framework of our host-state policy does not amount to recognition, does not amount to legitimacy, and does not constitute an invitation by the Belgian government.” 

Members of the Taliban delegation were issued visas after security screening with limited territorial validity, giving them 24 hours in Belgium and no access to other countries in the Schengen border-free travel zone. 

Since neither Belgium nor the EU officially recognizes the Taliban government, the meeting will not take place on official buildings or sites belonging to either. The European Commission has declined repeated requests to provide additional information. 

Drive to increase deportations  

A spokesperson for the European Commission said Monday that the meeting is in response to pressure from a clear majority of the 27 EU nations – 20 of whom signed a letter in October calling for stronger migration policies including a ramping up of deportations. 

“They had asked the Commission to coordinate such technical contacts on returns,” said spokesperson Markus Lammert. “Member states are looking into ways to return persons who have committed serious crimes and who are possibly a security threat.” 

The first EU-Taliban meeting was held in Afghanistan in January when the Commission sent a mission to Kabul. It also maintains staff there. 

The October letter was drafted in part by Belgian Migration Minister Anneleen Van Bossuyt, who said then that “we have sent a clear and powerful message to the European Commission: we can no longer afford a standstill. It is high time for a firm and joint approach, so that Europe can regain control over migration and security.” 

Bossuyt said that across the EU, only 2% of the 22,870 Afghans told to return had done so. 

Another Commission spokesperson said the meeting “does not mean by any means recognition.” 

Deteriorating situation in Afghanistan  

Afghanistan has been dealing with the return of about 3 million Afghans from Pakistan and Iran in the past year alone, all of whom have pretty much been forcibly repatriated from those two countries, exacerbating a humanitarian disaster in Afghanistan, already reeling from food and economic crises including biting sanctions. 

Afghan Taliban authorities have imposed draconian restrictions on women and girls, including bans on education beyond primary school and on working in all but very few professions, as well as strict regulations on what women are allowed to wear in public. 

“The desperate scenes of people — including EU staff — fleeing Afghanistan are a recent memory. It is unconscionable that the EU would now try and deport people to Afghanistan, which has only become more dangerous in the meantime,” said Eve Geddie, Director of Amnesty International’s European Institutions Office. 

Facing political pressure to toughen migration policies across the 27-nation bloc, the EU has recently passed deep reforms to its collective rules aiming to ramp up deportations -- including allowing the setting up of so-called “return hubs,” increased domestic surveillance capabilities, tighter border controls, and engagement with the Taliban government which it does not recognize because of human rights abuse allegations. 

With Afghanistan facing food shortages and economic collapse, the Taliban government is in need of humanitarian aid and hopes to lessen its international economic and political isolation.