Erdogan, Barzani Discuss Critical Files in Ankara

Erdogan and Barzani during their talks in Ankara on Wednesday (Turkish Presidency)
Erdogan and Barzani during their talks in Ankara on Wednesday (Turkish Presidency)
TT

Erdogan, Barzani Discuss Critical Files in Ankara

Erdogan and Barzani during their talks in Ankara on Wednesday (Turkish Presidency)
Erdogan and Barzani during their talks in Ankara on Wednesday (Turkish Presidency)

The President of Iraq’s Kurdistan Region, Nechirvan Barzani, visited Türkiye at a critical time for both Ankara and Erbil, amid regional tensions, particularly with Israel expanding the scope of war in the region.
Before meeting with Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, Barzani held discussions with Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan and intelligence chief Ibrahim Kalin.
According to a statement from the Turkish Presidency’s Directorate of Communications, the meeting between Erdogan and Barzani at the presidential palace on Wednesday covered relations between Ankara and Erbil, regional security issues, and energy concerns.
Discussions also touched on Türkiye’s relations with Baghdad and Erbil, as well as regional developments amid the Israeli escalation and the potential impact of the war between Israel and Hezbollah in Lebanon on Iraq and other countries.
Barzani’s visit to the Turkish capital also comes amid growing signals of a new initiative to resolve the Kurdish issue in Türkiye. The visit precedes the upcoming parliamentary elections in Iraq’s Kurdistan Region, scheduled for this Sunday, after being postponed for two years.
The Turkish presidency’s statement indicated that Erdogan expressed hope for peaceful and inclusive elections and, in discussing the Israel-Hamas war in Gaza and its spillover into Lebanon, warned of the risk that Israeli aggression could lead to a broader regional war. He emphasized his country’s commitment to regional stability and security and praised the Iraqi authorities’ efforts to keep the country out of the conflict.
Türkiye views Iraq’s stability as crucial for the future of the region and aims to improve relations with Baghdad. Ankara places great importance on resolving issues between the central government in Baghdad and the Erbil government, with which it has built close ties, particularly in security, economy, and energy.
According to Turkish sources speaking to Asharq Al-Awsat, these matters were thoroughly discussed during Barzani’s meetings with Turkish foreign and intelligence officials, as well as in his meeting with Erdogan. Security cooperation, particularly in combating the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK), was a priority during Barzani’s talks in Ankara.
Ankara and Baghdad have taken significant steps in their “war on terrorism” over the past year through rounds of security and economic talks, culminating in Erdogan’s visit to Baghdad in April. They agreed to collaborate against PKK elements in northern Iraq. This cooperation evolved in August into an agreement to establish a military coordination center in Baghdad and use the Bashiqa base, long controlled by Turkish forces, as a joint Turkish-Iraqi training center.
One of the key agenda items in talks between Ankara, Erbil, and Baghdad over the past 18 months has been the resumption of the Kirkuk-Ceyhan oil pipeline. The latest developments in this issue were discussed during Erdogan and Barzani’s meeting. Türkiye had previously informed Iraq of its readiness to resume the pipeline’s operations, but ongoing disputes between Baghdad and Erbil have delayed this step.

Barzani’s visit to Ankara also coincided with internal Turkish political signals suggesting the government might initiate a new “peace process” to address the Kurdish issue. These indicators have gained momentum following a historic handshake between the leader of the Nationalist Movement Party (MHP), Devlet Bahceli, and members of the pro-Kurdish Peoples’ Democratic Party (HDP) during the opening of the new legislative year in early October. Erdogan expressed support for this gesture by his coalition partner.
Political analyst Murat Yetkin noted that Barzani’s visit might be linked to this new peace initiative. He pointed out that, on the day Barzani’s visit was announced, Bahceli delivered a message in parliament to the imprisoned PKK leader Abdullah Ocalan, urging him to call on his organization to lay down its arms. This was followed by demands from the HDP co-chair for an end to Ocalan’s 43-month isolation in his prison in western Türkiye.



Iran’s Revolutionary Guards Media Accuse Rouhani of ‘Serving Israel’

03 December 2025, Iran, Teheran: View of the smog-ridden metropolis of Tehran. Photo: Aref Taherkenareh/dpa
03 December 2025, Iran, Teheran: View of the smog-ridden metropolis of Tehran. Photo: Aref Taherkenareh/dpa
TT

Iran’s Revolutionary Guards Media Accuse Rouhani of ‘Serving Israel’

03 December 2025, Iran, Teheran: View of the smog-ridden metropolis of Tehran. Photo: Aref Taherkenareh/dpa
03 December 2025, Iran, Teheran: View of the smog-ridden metropolis of Tehran. Photo: Aref Taherkenareh/dpa

Media outlets aligned with Iran’s Revolutionary Guards have accused former president Hassan Rouhani and his associates of “doing Israel a service,” escalating a political backlash triggered by Rouhani’s recent criticism of Iran’s ability to defend its airspace if last June’s 12-day war with Israel were to resume.

Tasnim, the Guards’ main media arm, protested sharply against Rouhani’s latest speech and the recommendations he offered to prevent a repeat of the conflict.

The media attack coincided with rising political tensions inside Iran as Rouhani’s name resurfaced in the debate over who might succeed Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, a succession file that has deepened domestic polarization.

Tasnim opened its weekly analytical supplement with the headline “Working for Israel,” placing Rouhani’s photograph on the cover. It accused him of offering “narcissistic, arrogance-filled interpretations” about his claims that he prevented a war on Iran through diplomacy during his past government roles.

The agency questioned whether Rouhani was suggesting that Iran had no deterrent other than his negotiations, and whether the United States and Israel were at full strength at the time while Iran lacked defensive capability.

It further asked why Rouhani’s diplomacy failed to prevent the US withdrawal from the nuclear agreement under Donald Trump or avert the assassinations of General Qassem Soleimani and Mohsen Fakhrizadeh, the senior nuclear official killed in late 2020 in an attack attributed to Israel.

Rouhani last week criticized the country’s tightened security climate, saying Iran needed “an atmosphere of safety, not an atmosphere of securitization.”

He warned that Iran could not remain in a state of “no war and no peace,” citing Khamenei’s own remarks, and urged efforts to rebuild deterrence across multiple fields to confront what he called “the conspiracies of enemies.”

He argued that Iran today lacks “broad regional deterrence,” noting that the airspace of neighboring countries, including Iraq, Syria, Lebanon and Jordan, had fallen under US and Israeli influence, making hostile aerial movement near Iran “safe and free of obstacles.”

Rouhani insisted continuation of the nuclear deal would have prevented the 12-day conflict, calling the nuclear file a pretext for the attacks and blaming subsequent governments for failing to revive the accord.

Tasnim said Rouhani’s positions “practically serve Israel” because they place responsibility on internal actors while removing Israel from the circle of blame. It portrayed his comments as a political act against “sacred unity,” adding that presenting such views “even within a realistic and careful framework” ultimately benefits Israel.

Tasnim also revived long-standing criticism that Rouhani’s government did not sufficiently support Iran’s intervention in Syria in 2013 and 2014, arguing that such reluctance approached “the level of treason.” It claimed one of General Soleimani’s biggest grievances was the administration’s lack of cooperation on the Syrian front.

Responding to Rouhani’s remarks on “securitization,” Tasnim said his own administration had been among the most security-dominated of the Islamic Republic era. The agency pointed to Rouhani’s intelligence background and argued that his current counsel contradicted his record in office.

Rouhani’s comments were also interpreted as an indirect response to Khamenei’s November 27 televised speech, in which the Supreme Leader warned against internal division, repeated his narrative that the US and Israel had “failed” to achieve their war aims and urged Iranians to maintain “national alignment.”

The renewed criticism comes as Rouhani has faced months of attacks from rivals, including parliamentarians, who accuse him of positioning himself to assume the role of Supreme Leader should Khamenei become unable to carry out his duties, including in the event of an Israeli assassination attempt.

Last month, parliament speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf accused Rouhani and former foreign minister Mohammad Javad Zarif of damaging Iran’s strategic ties with Russia.

Hardline lawmakers revived the chant “Death to Fereydoun,” using Rouhani’s birth family name. One conservative MP said the judiciary should address Rouhani’s “misconduct” so that anyone aspiring to senior posts would “return to his rightful place behind bars.”

After Rouhani’s latest remarks circulated, discussion of his possible leadership prospects reemerged, this time in reformist media.

Reformist theorist Sadegh Zibakalam said Rouhani believes he lacks nothing compared to other succession candidates, including Mojtaba Khamenei, arguing that Rouhani’s executive experience makes him “more qualified than others.”

At the same time, businessman Babak Zanjani, who was sentenced to death for corruption during Rouhani’s presidency but released last year, made a harsh post on X rejecting any future political role for Rouhani.

Iran, he wrote, needed a “young, educated and effective” force, “not holders of fake degrees,” warning that “we will cleanse Iran of incompetence.”


Iran Holds Massive Drills in Gulf

A handout photo made available on 05 December 2025 by the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) shows a missile being launched during a military drill in the waters off southern Iran coast. EPA/IRGC HANDOUT
A handout photo made available on 05 December 2025 by the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) shows a missile being launched during a military drill in the waters off southern Iran coast. EPA/IRGC HANDOUT
TT

Iran Holds Massive Drills in Gulf

A handout photo made available on 05 December 2025 by the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) shows a missile being launched during a military drill in the waters off southern Iran coast. EPA/IRGC HANDOUT
A handout photo made available on 05 December 2025 by the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) shows a missile being launched during a military drill in the waters off southern Iran coast. EPA/IRGC HANDOUT

Iran launched massive missiles in the Sea of Oman and near the strategic Strait of Hormuz during the second day of a naval drill, state TV reported Friday.

The report said the Revolutionary Guard launched the missiles from the depth of Iran's mainland, hitting targets in the Oman Sea and neighboring area near Strait of Hormuz in a drill that began on Thursday.

It identified the missiles as cruise Qadr-110, Qadr-380 and Ghadir that have a range of up to 2,000 kilometers. It said the Guard also launched a ballistic missile identified as 303, without elaborating.

The drill is the second one following the Israel-Iran war in June that killed nearly 1,100 people in Iran, including military commanders and nuclear scientists. Missile attacks by Iran killed 28 in Israel.

Earlier, Iran hosted an anti-terrorism drill in its northwestern province of East Azerbaijan with members of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, which, according to state Press TV, was intended to signal both “peace and friendship” to neighboring states and warn enemies that “any miscalculation would meet a decisive response.”

The SCO, a Eurasian security and economic bloc founded in 2001 to combat terrorism, separatism and extremism, often conducts joint military exercises among its members.

The organization includes China, Russia, India, Pakistan, and several Central Asian countries, with observer and dialogue partners such as Iran, Saudi Arabia and others participating in selected operations.


Taiwan Says China Deploys Warships in ‘Military Operations’

A Chinese PLA navy ship monitors an area during a maritime cooperative activity between the Philippines, Australia and Canadian navy near Scarborough Shoal in the disputed South China Sea on Sep 3, 2025. (AFP)
A Chinese PLA navy ship monitors an area during a maritime cooperative activity between the Philippines, Australia and Canadian navy near Scarborough Shoal in the disputed South China Sea on Sep 3, 2025. (AFP)
TT

Taiwan Says China Deploys Warships in ‘Military Operations’

A Chinese PLA navy ship monitors an area during a maritime cooperative activity between the Philippines, Australia and Canadian navy near Scarborough Shoal in the disputed South China Sea on Sep 3, 2025. (AFP)
A Chinese PLA navy ship monitors an area during a maritime cooperative activity between the Philippines, Australia and Canadian navy near Scarborough Shoal in the disputed South China Sea on Sep 3, 2025. (AFP)

Taiwan said Friday that China had deployed warships for “military operations” stretching hundreds of kilometers from the Yellow Sea to the South China Sea, posing a “threat” to the region.

Beijing, which claims self-ruled Taiwan as part of its territory, neither confirmed nor denied the maneuvers.

Taiwan’s defense ministry and other security agencies were monitoring China’s activities and had a “complete grasp of the situation,” presidential office spokeswoman Karen Kuo told reporters.

She did not say how many Chinese ships were involved in the deployment, but a security source told AFP the number was “significant.” The source spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak to the media.

The operations were not limited to the Taiwan Strait, but extended from the southern Yellow Sea, to the East China Sea near the disputed Diaoyu Islands and on into the South China Sea and even the Western Pacific, Kuo said.

“This indeed poses a threat and impact on the Indo-Pacific and the entire region,” she said.

Taiwan urged China to “exercise restraint,” Kuo said, adding: “We are also confident that we can handle this matter well.”

Neither China’s armed forces nor state media have announced any increased military activity in the region where Taiwan said Chinese ships had been detected.

Beijing’s defense ministry spokesman Jiang Bin said Friday that the navy’s training on the high seas complies with international law and “is not directed at any specific country or target.”

He was responding to a question about a Chinese naval flotilla that reportedly may be heading toward Australia.

A spokesman for China’s foreign ministry said Beijing “has consistently followed a defensive policy” and urged “relevant parties” not to “overreact or... engage in groundless hype.”

China has refused to rule out using force to take Taiwan, and also contentiously claims sovereignty over nearly all of the South China Sea.

Taiwan’s intelligence chief Tsai Ming-yen said Wednesday that October to December was the “peak season” for China’s “annual evaluation exercises.”

There was a possibility that China’s ruling Communist Party could turn seemingly routine military activities into drills targeting Taiwan, Tsai warned.

Last December, Taiwan said about 90 Chinese warships and coast guard vessels took part in vast exercises including simulating attacks on foreign ships and practicing blockading sea routes in Beijing’s biggest maritime drills in years.

Beijing did not confirm the drills at that time.

The United States has historically been Taiwan’s main security backer.

But President Donald Trump’s administration signaled a potential shift in that policy on Friday, saying in a strategy document that its Asian allies Japan and South Korea should take on more of the burden of defending the region.