How the Trump Administration's Move Will Affect Harvard's International Students

File photo: Demonstrators with signs stand around the John Harvard Statue in Harvard Yard following a rally against President Donald Trump's attacks on Harvard University at Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts on April 17, 2025. (Photo by Joseph Prezioso / AFP)
File photo: Demonstrators with signs stand around the John Harvard Statue in Harvard Yard following a rally against President Donald Trump's attacks on Harvard University at Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts on April 17, 2025. (Photo by Joseph Prezioso / AFP)
TT

How the Trump Administration's Move Will Affect Harvard's International Students

File photo: Demonstrators with signs stand around the John Harvard Statue in Harvard Yard following a rally against President Donald Trump's attacks on Harvard University at Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts on April 17, 2025. (Photo by Joseph Prezioso / AFP)
File photo: Demonstrators with signs stand around the John Harvard Statue in Harvard Yard following a rally against President Donald Trump's attacks on Harvard University at Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts on April 17, 2025. (Photo by Joseph Prezioso / AFP)

President Donald Trump's administration escalated its standoff with Harvard University on Thursday, revoking the school's ability to enroll international students.

The government told Harvard's thousands of current foreign students that they must transfer to other schools or they will lose their legal permission to be in the US, The Associated Press said.

The move could significantly affect the university, which enrolls nearly 6,800 international students, most of them in graduate programs. Those students may now have to scramble to figure out their next steps.

The Department of Homeland Security took this latest step because Harvard failed to comply fully with requests to produce records about its foreign students, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said in a letter. Noem accused Harvard of “perpetuating an unsafe campus environment that is hostile to Jewish students, promotes pro-Hamas sympathies and employs racist ‘diversity, equity and inclusion’ policies.’”

Harvard said the action is unlawful and undermines the school’s research mission.

Here's what to know about how this decision affects international students and what legal authority Noem has to take the step.

Does the government have authority over Harvard's enrollment? The US government has authority over who comes into the country. The Department of Homeland Security oversees which colleges are part of the Student Exchange and Visitor Program. On Thursday, DHS said it would remove Harvard. The program gives colleges the ability to issue documentation to foreign students admitted to their schools. Then, the students apply to obtain visas to study in the United States.

Will Harvard's current international students be allowed to graduate? Students who completed their degrees this semester will be allowed to graduate. Noem's letter said the changes would take effect for the 2025-2026 school year. Harvard's Class of 2025 is expected to graduate next week.

However, students who have yet to complete their degree need to transfer to another university, Noem said, or they'll lose their legal permission to remain in the US.

Will admitted students be able to enroll at Harvard in the fall? No, not unless the government changes its decision or a court steps in. For now, Noem said Harvard could restore its status as a host institution for foreign students if it complied with a list of demands within 72 hours. Those demands include requests for a range of records, such as disciplinary records for international students, plus any audio and video recordings of protest activity.

Harvard previously had failed to provide those records, Noem said. The university said Thursday it was working to provide guidance to affected students.

Has the government ever done this before? The government can and does remove colleges from the Student Exchange and Visitor Program, making them ineligible to host foreign students on their campus. However, it's usually for administrative reasons outlined in law, such as failing to maintain accreditation, lacking proper facilities for classes, failing to employ qualified professional personnel — even failing to “operate as a bona fide institution of learning.” Other colleges are removed when they close.

“I've never seen it revoked for any reason besides the administrative issues listed in the statute,” said Sarah Spreitzer, vice president of government relations at the American Council on Education, an association of universities. “This is unprecedented.”

How else has the Trump administration targeted Harvard? Harvard's battle with the Trump administration dates to early April. The storied institution became the first elite college to refuse to comply with the government's demands to limit pro-Palestinian protests and eliminate diversity, equity and inclusion policies. That kicked off a series of escalating actions against Harvard. Various federal agencies, including DHS and the National Institutes of Health, have cut their grant funding to Harvard, significantly impacting research projects conducted by faculty. Harvard has sued the administration, seeking to end the grant freeze.

The administration first threatened to revoke Harvard's ability to host international students back in April. Trump also has said Harvard should lose its tax-exempt status. Doing so would strike at the school's ability to fundraise, as wealthy donors often give to tax-exempt institutions to lower their own tax burdens.



Afghans Rally against Pakistan and Civilian Casualties

Afghans welcome soldiers in the Gurbuz district of Khost province. STR / AFP
Afghans welcome soldiers in the Gurbuz district of Khost province. STR / AFP
TT

Afghans Rally against Pakistan and Civilian Casualties

Afghans welcome soldiers in the Gurbuz district of Khost province. STR / AFP
Afghans welcome soldiers in the Gurbuz district of Khost province. STR / AFP

Decorating their soldiers with colorful garlands, hundreds of Afghans rallied in border provinces to decry Pakistan killing civilians and to show support for their troops battling at the frontier.

A week of border fighting between the two neighbors has killed dozens of Afghan civilians and displaced tens of thousands, according to UN figures.

In Gardez, the capital of eastern Paktia province, residents gathered while some waved the white flag of the Taliban government.

"Today we're out in central Paktia, Gardez, against the cruel attacks of Pakistan on Afghan civilians," said Ghamay, a demonstrator who only gave one name.

"We're out here to defend our land," he added.

At least 42 civilians have been killed and 104 wounded since February 26, including children, the UN mission in Afghanistan reported.

Islamabad is yet to comment on civilian casualties and said its troops have killed more than 430 Afghan soldiers, AFP reported.

Afghanistan estimated Pakistani fatalities among troops at around 150. Casualty claims from both sides are difficult to verify independently.

Fighting erupted with an Afghan border offensive in retaliation for earlier Pakistani air strikes, which Islamabad said were targeting militants.

A rally was also held in the Gurbuz district of Khost province, which has been hit by fighting.

"Today's protest is not just for a show, we're out for those 17 martyrs in Kunar including women, children and old people," said protester Obaidullah Gurbaz.

"You can see the soldiers standing behind us for the past seven, eight days. They are hungry and thirsty but defending the country strongly," the 70-year-old added.

Afghanistan's defense ministry said more than 25 soldiers have been killed.

- Fighting hits food aid -

Clashes at the border have also displaced nearly 66,000 Afghans, the International Organization for Migration (IOM) said.

At least one of the UN agency's centers in Nangarhar province "sustained significant collateral damage", the IOM said.

As well as putting a halt to humanitarian support for Afghans returning from Pakistan, the fighting has also suspended emergency food aid.

About 160,000 people have been affected by the stoppage, the World Food Program said, in a country already facing a hunger crisis.

One resident in Nangarhar said the UN agency "used to help us a lot", but now he has cut the amount of bread he eats.

"We search around, sometimes with a full stomach and sometimes with half," said Farhad, who only gave one name.

"Last night I went to my neighbors and relatives to borrow 1,000 Afghanis ($16) but nobody gave it to me."


China Boosts Military Spending with Eyes on US, Taiwan

China announced a seven percent increase in its military budget for 2026. Florence Lo / POOL/AFP
China announced a seven percent increase in its military budget for 2026. Florence Lo / POOL/AFP
TT

China Boosts Military Spending with Eyes on US, Taiwan

China announced a seven percent increase in its military budget for 2026. Florence Lo / POOL/AFP
China announced a seven percent increase in its military budget for 2026. Florence Lo / POOL/AFP

China announced a seven percent boost to its defense budget for 2026 on Thursday as it steadily increases spending to counter the United States and enforce its claims over Taiwan and the South China Sea.

The latest rise keeps China's spending at a third of that of the United States, but the Asian power is working to close the gap.

Beijing plans to spend 1.9096 trillion yuan ($276.8 billion) on defense, according to a report published at the opening of the annual "Two Sessions" parliamentary meeting.

Premier Li Qiang told delegates that China will aim to strengthen the military and "carry out major defense-related projects" over the next five years.

Analysts said the budget will finance military salary increases, training, maneuvers around Taiwan, cyberwarfare capabilities and advanced equipment purchases, among other things, according to the report.

The increase marks a degree of continuity as Beijing pursues a sweeping anti-graft purge of the People's Liberation Army (PLA), which included the ousting of top general Zhang Youxia in January.

"China pursues an independent and self-reliant foreign policy. However, without robust military capabilities and technological prowess, our diplomatic stance would inevitably be subject to coercion or even dictated by certain nations, including the United States," military commentator Song Zhongping, a former Chinese army instructor, told AFP.

"China is unwilling to be a vassal state," said Song, who maintained that, by comparison, Japan and South Korea "only submit to American dictates".

The PLA must also strengthen its capabilities, he said, to "fully restore" Chinese jurisdiction over the disputed Spratly Islands, a chain of reefs and atolls in the South China Sea that are also claimed by the Philippines and where there are believed to be vast natural resources.

The United States is the world's biggest military spender, shelling out $997 billion in 2024, according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI).

- 'Proportionate' -

China has maintained a steady increase in military spending of around seven to eight percent each year since 2016.

However, its military spending as a percentage of GDP remains modest.

China's defense budget stood at 1.7 percent of GDP in 2024, well behind the US figure of 3.4 percent and Russia's 7.1 percent, according to SIPRI.

"That is proportional to its economy and legitimate defense needs," said Niklas Swanstrom, director of the Stockholm-based Institute for Security and Development Policy.

China claims its defense policy is solely aimed at protecting its territory, which it says includes self-ruled Taiwan.

It has only one military base abroad, in Djibouti, in contrast to the several hundred held by the United States.

"However, the absolute spending level (second globally) and rapid capability development concern neighbors," Swanstrom told AFP.

China's military buildup is fuelling an arms race in Asia and prompting some countries, particularly those with territorial disputes with China, to draw closer to Washington.

In Taiwan, leader Lai Ching-te wants to increase military spending in response to Beijing, which does not rule out the use of force to take control of the island.

The Philippines has also granted US access to more of its military bases.

Japan has been shedding its strict pacifist stance, with a record defense budget worth $58 billion approved in December for the coming fiscal year to expand its military capabilities.

Beijing vs Washington

The question of whether China could win a conflict against the United States remains unanswered.

The Chinese navy is considered to have more ships than any other country, but it lags behind the US Navy in tonnage, nuclear-powered submarines and aircraft carriers.

"The US remains the world's first-class armed forces both in terms of its military hardware and the hard operational experience of its personnel," said James Char, a Chinese military specialist at Nanyang Technological University in Singapore.

Swanstrom noted that the United States benefits from its superior global logistics, more advanced submarines and stealth technology, a larger nuclear arsenal, combat-experienced personnel and extensive alliance networks.

However, the balance would be radically different closer to China's shores if the US Navy were to intervene militarily, for example, to support Taiwan against Beijing.

"Most critically, neither side could 'win' meaningfully," Swanstrom said.

"Economic devastation, casualties, and nuclear escalation risks would be catastrophic for all parties."


Canada PM Carney Says Can't Rule Out Military Participation in Iran War

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney speaks to the media during a joint press conference with Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese at Parliament House in Canberra, Australia, 05 March 2026. EPA/LUKAS COCH
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney speaks to the media during a joint press conference with Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese at Parliament House in Canberra, Australia, 05 March 2026. EPA/LUKAS COCH
TT

Canada PM Carney Says Can't Rule Out Military Participation in Iran War

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney speaks to the media during a joint press conference with Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese at Parliament House in Canberra, Australia, 05 March 2026. EPA/LUKAS COCH
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney speaks to the media during a joint press conference with Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese at Parliament House in Canberra, Australia, 05 March 2026. EPA/LUKAS COCH

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney said Thursday that he couldn't rule out his country's military participation in the escalating war in the Middle East.

Carney's visit to Australia this week has been overshadowed by expanding war in the Middle East, sparked by a massive US-Israeli strike on Iran that killed its supreme leader, Ali Khamenei.

Speaking alongside local counterpart Anthony Albanese in Canberra, Carney was asked whether there was a situation in which Canada would get involved.

"One can never categorically rule out participation," he said, while stressing the question was a "hypothetical" one.

"We will stand by our allies," said Carney, adding that "we will always defend Canadians."

Carney had said the US-Israeli strikes on Iran were "inconsistent with international law".

However, he supports the efforts to stop Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon -- a position that Canada takes "with regret" as it represented "another example of the failure of the international order".

The Canadian leader reiterated on Thursday his call for a "de-escalation" of the conflict.

Carney's trip is part of a multi-country tour of the Asia-Pacific aimed at reducing reliance on the United States -- a hedge against what he has described as a fading US-led global order.

The Australia leg of the tour is aimed at bringing in investment and deepening ties with a like-minded "middle power" partner.

- 'Middle power' rallying cry -

On Thursday morning he issued a rallying cry in Australia's parliament to "middle powers", urging them to work together in an increasingly hegemonic world order.

Nations like Australia and Canada faced a stark choice -- work together to help write the "new rules" of the global order or have great powers do it for them, he said.

"In this brave new world, middle powers cannot simply build higher walls and retreat behind them. We must work together," he said.

"Great powers can compel, but compulsion comes with costs, both reputational and financial," the former central banker added.

"Middle powers like Australia and Canada hold this rare convening power because others know we mean what we say and we will match our values with our actions."

The Canadian leader also said the two countries would together as "strategic collaborators" to pool their vast combined rare earth mineral resources.

And he detailed renewed cooperation in areas from defense to artificial intelligence.

"We know we must work with others who share our values to build solid capabilities," he told parliament.

Otherwise, he warned, they risked being "caught between the hyperscalers and the hegemons".

The Canadian leader has frequently clashed with US President Donald Trump, who has repeatedly threatened to annex Canada and slapped swingeing tariffs on the country.

In a speech to political and financial elites at the World Economic Forum in January, Carney warned the US led global system of governance was enduring "a rupture".