Iran Could Again Enrich Uranium 'in Matter of Months', Says IAEA Chief

Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Rafael Mariano Grossi, listens to the speech of President of the World Bank Group (WBG), Ajay Banga (not pictured), as they sign a partnership on new nuclear energy for development effort at the WBG headquarters in Paris, France, 26 June 2025. (EPA)
Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Rafael Mariano Grossi, listens to the speech of President of the World Bank Group (WBG), Ajay Banga (not pictured), as they sign a partnership on new nuclear energy for development effort at the WBG headquarters in Paris, France, 26 June 2025. (EPA)
TT

Iran Could Again Enrich Uranium 'in Matter of Months', Says IAEA Chief

Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Rafael Mariano Grossi, listens to the speech of President of the World Bank Group (WBG), Ajay Banga (not pictured), as they sign a partnership on new nuclear energy for development effort at the WBG headquarters in Paris, France, 26 June 2025. (EPA)
Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Rafael Mariano Grossi, listens to the speech of President of the World Bank Group (WBG), Ajay Banga (not pictured), as they sign a partnership on new nuclear energy for development effort at the WBG headquarters in Paris, France, 26 June 2025. (EPA)

UN nuclear watchdog chief Rafael Grossi says Iran likely will be able to begin to produce enriched uranium "in a matter of months," despite damage to several nuclear facilities from US and Israeli attacks, CBS News said Saturday.

Israel launched a bombing campaign on Iranian nuclear and military sites on June 13, saying it was aimed at keeping Iran from developing a nuclear weapon -- an ambition Tehran has consistently denied.

The United States subsequently bombed three key facilities used for Tehran's atomic program.

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi says the extent of the damage to the nuclear sites is "serious," but the details are unknown. US President Donald Trump insisted Iran's nuclear program had been set back "decades."

But Grossi, the director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency, said "some is still standing."

"They can have, you know, in a matter of months, I would say, a few cascades of centrifuges spinning and producing enriched uranium, or less than that," Grossi said Friday, according to a transcript of the interview released Saturday.

Another key question is whether Iran was able to relocate some or all of its estimated 408.6-kilo (900-pound) stockpile of highly enriched uranium before the attacks.

The uranium in question is enriched to 60 percent -- above levels for civilian usage but still below weapons grade. That material, if further refined, would theoretically be sufficient to produce more than nine nuclear bombs.

Grossi admitted to CBS: "We don't know where this material could be."

"So some could have been destroyed as part of the attack, but some could have been moved. So there has to be at some point a clarification," he said in the interview.

For now, Iranian lawmakers voted to suspend cooperation with the IAEA and Tehran rejected Grossi's request for a visit to the damaged sites, especially Fordo, the main uranium enrichment facility.

"We need to be in a position to ascertain, to confirm what is there, and where is it and what happened," Grossi said.

In a separate interview with Fox News's "Sunday Morning Futures" program, Trump said he did not think the stockpile had been moved.

"It's a very hard thing to do plus we didn't give much notice," he said, according to excerpts of the interview. "They didn't move anything."

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Saturday underscored Washington's support for "the IAEA's critical verification and monitoring efforts in Iran," commending Grossi and his agency for their "dedication and professionalism."

The full Grossi interview will air on "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan" on Sunday.



‘Surprise Strikes’ Loom If US–Iran Talks Collapse

A combined image of US President Donald Trump, Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (AFP). 
A combined image of US President Donald Trump, Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (AFP). 
TT

‘Surprise Strikes’ Loom If US–Iran Talks Collapse

A combined image of US President Donald Trump, Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (AFP). 
A combined image of US President Donald Trump, Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (AFP). 

As anticipation grows over the resumption of US–Iran negotiations in Oman, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu convened an emergency meeting of Israel’s security cabinet on Thursday to assess scenarios in the event the talks fail and to consider the possibility of renewed military escalation.

Ahead of the meeting, Netanyahu briefed a confidential subcommittee of the Knesset’s Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee, stressing that the Israeli military is prepared to launch a major strike against Iran—one he said could be harsher than the so-called Twelve-Day War.

Israeli media later reported that the discussions reflected growing concern in Jerusalem over the direction of diplomacy with Tehran.

Channel 12 quoted a source familiar with the security cabinet deliberations as saying there is “full coordination with the United States” on Iran-related matters.

At the same time, The Jerusalem Post reported that Israel’s Chief of Staff, Eyal Zamir, told US officials that Israel is ready to carry out “surprise strikes” against targets inside Iran should Tehran “choose the path of war.”

According to the report, Zamir emphasized that any US concessions on Iran’s ballistic missile program would cross a red line for Israel, alongside other red lines linked to Iran’s nuclear activities.

This stance, the newspaper said, helps explain US Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s insistence that the ballistic missile program be included in the agenda of upcoming talks with Tehran. Rubio reiterated earlier this week that negotiations should address both Iran’s nuclear and missile programs.

Iran, however, has pushed back firmly. Ebrahim Rezaei, spokesman for the Iranian parliament’s National Security Committee, said both uranium enrichment and the ballistic missile program are non-negotiable “red lines” for Tehran.

Netanyahu said he does not yet know what decision US President Donald Trump will take regarding a possible military strike on Iran, but expressed confidence that Washington will adopt a tougher approach in the current round of negotiations.

Channel 12 described Israeli satisfaction with the US position as having taken on a “deep strategic dimension,” noting a recent secret visit by Zamir to Washington that Israeli officials have portrayed as significant.

Former national security adviser Tzachi Hanegbi shed further light on the background in remarks at a policy seminar in Herzliya. He said Netanyahu had previously sought to persuade former President Joe Biden to authorize a strike on Iran, but Biden rejected the idea, preferring to exhaust diplomatic options.

Netanyahu later made similar appeals during Trump’s second term, warning of an approaching “zero hour,” yet Trump initially resisted military action, opting instead for sanctions and warnings.

Hanegbi said Trump’s position shifted in June after reviewing the results of Israeli strikes on Iran ahead of the Twelve-Day War and the successful interception of two large-scale Iranian attacks with US assistance, without American casualties or disruption to shipping in the Strait of Hormuz.

He added that Trump was impressed by Israel’s military performance and eventually gave the green light for war, agreeing to join its final phase.

Meanwhile, Israeli political sources told the news site Walla that there is a growing sense in Jerusalem that Washington entered the current negotiations at a poor moment and from a weak position.

They argued that Iran today is more confident and assertive than in 2015, believing its threats of regional escalation were enough to push the United States back to diplomacy.

 

 

 


Senior Russian Officer Hospitalized after Being Shot in Moscow

A person walks along an embankment of the Moskva River near the Kremlin wall in Moscow, Russia February 5, 2026. REUTERS/Anastasia Barashkova
A person walks along an embankment of the Moskva River near the Kremlin wall in Moscow, Russia February 5, 2026. REUTERS/Anastasia Barashkova
TT

Senior Russian Officer Hospitalized after Being Shot in Moscow

A person walks along an embankment of the Moskva River near the Kremlin wall in Moscow, Russia February 5, 2026. REUTERS/Anastasia Barashkova
A person walks along an embankment of the Moskva River near the Kremlin wall in Moscow, Russia February 5, 2026. REUTERS/Anastasia Barashkova

A senior Russian officer, Lieutenant General Vladimir Alexeyev, was rushed to hospital after being shot in Moscow on Friday, officials said.

Alexeyev is deputy chief of the Main Directorate of the General Staff at ‌the Defense ‌Ministry.

When mercenary ‌chief Yevgeny ⁠Prigozhin staged ‌a short-lived mutiny in June 2023, Alexeyev was one of the top officials who were sent to negotiate with him.

The Moscow prosecutor's office said Alexeyev ⁠had been shot several times at a ‌residential building in ‍northwest Moscow ‍by an unidentified assailant who fled ‍the scene.

Investigative Committee spokesperson Svetlana Petrenko didn’t say who could be behind the attack on Alekseyev.

Several senior Russian officers have been assassinated since the start of the war in Ukraine, with Moscow blaming the attacks on Kyiv. In some cases, ⁠Ukrainian military intelligence has claimed responsibility.

The most recent officer to be killed was the head of the General Staff's army training directorate, Lieutenant General Fanil Sarvarov, who was killed by a bomb under his car on December 22.

Friday’s attack came a day after Russian, Ukrainian and US negotiators wrapped up two days of talks in Abu Dhabi. The Russian delegation was led by the military intelligence chief, Adm. Igor Kostyukov.


In Show of Support, Canada, France Open Consulates in Greenland

A flag of Greenland hangs from a crane in the city of Nuuk, western Greenland, on January 28, 2026. (Photo by Ina FASSBENDER / AFP)
A flag of Greenland hangs from a crane in the city of Nuuk, western Greenland, on January 28, 2026. (Photo by Ina FASSBENDER / AFP)
TT

In Show of Support, Canada, France Open Consulates in Greenland

A flag of Greenland hangs from a crane in the city of Nuuk, western Greenland, on January 28, 2026. (Photo by Ina FASSBENDER / AFP)
A flag of Greenland hangs from a crane in the city of Nuuk, western Greenland, on January 28, 2026. (Photo by Ina FASSBENDER / AFP)

Canada and France, which both adamantly oppose Donald Trump's wish to control Greenland, will open consulates in the Danish autonomous territory's capital on Friday, in a strong show of support for the local government.

Since returning to the White House last year, Trump has repeatedly insisted that Washington needs to control the strategic, mineral-rich Arctic island for security reasons.

The US president last month backed off his threats to seize Greenland after saying he had struck a "framework" deal with NATO chief Mark Rutte to ensure greater American influence, reported AFP.

A US-Denmark-Greenland working group has been established to discuss ways to meet Washington's security concerns in the Arctic, but the details of the talks have not been made public.

While Denmark and Greenland have said they share Trump's security concerns, they have insisted that sovereignty and territorial integrity are a "red line" in the discussions.

"In a sense, it's a victory for Greenlanders to see two allies opening diplomatic representations in Nuuk," said Jeppe Strandsbjerg, a political scientist at the University of Greenland.

"There is great appreciation for the support against what Trump has said."

French President Emmanuel Macron announced Paris's plans to open a consulate during a visit to Nuuk in June, where he expressed Europe's "solidarity" with Greenland and criticized Trump's ambitions.

The newly-appointed French consul, Jean-Noel Poirier, has previously served as ambassador to Vietnam.

Canada meanwhile announced in late 2024 that it would open a consulate in Greenland to boost cooperation.

The opening of the consulates is "a way of telling Donald Trump that his aggression against Greenland and Denmark is not a question for Greenland and Denmark alone, it's also a question for European allies and also for Canada as an ally, as a friend of Greenland and the European allies also," Ulrik Pram Gad, Arctic expert at the Danish Institute of International Studies, told AFP.

"It's a small step, part of a strategy where we are making this problem European," said Christine Nissen, security and defense analyst at the Europa think tank.

"The consequences are obviously not just Danish. It's European and global."

- Recognition -

According to Strandsbjerg, the two consulates -- which will be attached to the French and Canadian embassies in Copenhagen -- will give Greenland an opportunity to "practice" at being independent, as the island has long dreamt of cutting its ties to Denmark one day.

The decision to open diplomatic missions is also a recognition of Greenland's growing autonomy, laid out in its 2009 Self-Government Act, Nissen said.

"In terms of their own quest for sovereignty, the Greenlandic people will think to have more direct contact with other European countries," she said.

That would make it possible to reduce Denmark's role "by diversifying Greenland's dependence on the outside world, so that it is not solely dependent on Denmark and can have more ties for its economy, trade, investments, politics and so on", echoed Pram Gad.

Greenland has had diplomatic ties with the European Union since 1992, with Washington since 2014 and with Iceland since 2017.

Iceland opened its consulate in Nuuk in 2013, while the United States, which had a consulate in the Greenlandic capital from 1940 to 1953, reopened its mission in 2020.

The European Commission opened its office in 2024.