UN Food Agency Says Israeli Tanks, Snipers Opened Fire on a Crowd Seeking Aid in Gaza

Mourners attend the funeral of their relatives killed in an Israeli bombardment, in Deir al-Balah, central Gaza Strip, Monday, July 21, 2025. (AP Photo/Abdel Kareem Hana)
Mourners attend the funeral of their relatives killed in an Israeli bombardment, in Deir al-Balah, central Gaza Strip, Monday, July 21, 2025. (AP Photo/Abdel Kareem Hana)
TT

UN Food Agency Says Israeli Tanks, Snipers Opened Fire on a Crowd Seeking Aid in Gaza

Mourners attend the funeral of their relatives killed in an Israeli bombardment, in Deir al-Balah, central Gaza Strip, Monday, July 21, 2025. (AP Photo/Abdel Kareem Hana)
Mourners attend the funeral of their relatives killed in an Israeli bombardment, in Deir al-Balah, central Gaza Strip, Monday, July 21, 2025. (AP Photo/Abdel Kareem Hana)

The UN food agency accused Israel of using tanks, snipers and other weapons to fire on a crowd of Palestinians seeking food aid, in what the territory's Health Ministry said was one of the deadliest days for aid-seekers in over 21 months of war.

The World Food Program in a statement Sunday condemned the violence that erupted in northern Gaza as Palestinians tried to reach a convoy of trucks carrying food. The Health Ministry in Gaza said at least 80 people were killed in the incident. The Israeli military has said it fired warning shots “to remove an immediate threat,” but has questioned the death toll reported by the Palestinians.

The accusation by a major aid agency that has had generally good working relations with Israel builds on descriptions by witnesses and others, who also said Israel opened fire on the crowd, The AP news reported.

The bloodshed surrounding aid access highlights the increasingly precarious situation for people in Gaza who have been desperately seeking out food and other assistance, as the war that has roiled the region shows no signs of ending. Israel and Hamas are still engaged in ceasefire talks, but there appears to be no breakthrough and it's not clear whether any truce would bring the war to a lasting halt.

As the talks proceed, the death toll in the war-ravaged territory has climbed to more than 59,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza’s Health Ministry. Its count doesn't distinguish between militants and civilians but the ministry says more than half of the dead are women and children. The ministry is part of the Hamas government, but the UN and other international organizations see it as the most reliable source of data on casualties.

WFP condemns violence at food distribution points In northern Gaza on Sunday, the Health Ministry, witnesses and a UN official said Israeli forces opened fire toward crowds who tried to get food from a 25-truck convoy that had entered the hard-hit area.

The WFP statement, which said the crowd surrounding its convoy “came under fire from Israeli tanks, snipers and other gunfire,” backs up those claims. The statement did not specify a death toll, saying only the incident resulted in the loss of “countless lives.”

“These people were simply trying to access food to feed themselves and their families on the brink of starvation,” it said, adding that the incident occurred despite assurances from Israeli authorities that aid delivery would improve. Part of those assurances, it said, was that armed forces would not be present nor engage along aid routes.

“Shootings near humanitarian missions, convoys and food distributions must stop immediately.”

Israel has not allowed international media to enter Gaza throughout the war, and the competing claims could not be independently verified.



Barrack Congratulates Syria on Week of ‘Historic Accomplishments’

US Special Envoy for Syria and Iraq Tom Barrack (AP) 
US Special Envoy for Syria and Iraq Tom Barrack (AP) 
TT

Barrack Congratulates Syria on Week of ‘Historic Accomplishments’

US Special Envoy for Syria and Iraq Tom Barrack (AP) 
US Special Envoy for Syria and Iraq Tom Barrack (AP) 

US Special Envoy for Syria and Iraq Tom Barrack congratulated Syria on a week of “historic accomplishments” after meeting Syrian Chargé d’Affaires in Washington Mohammad Qanatri.

“Great meeting with Syrian Chargé d’Affaires Mohammad Qanatri,” Barrack said on X Friday, adding: “Congratulations on a week of historic accomplishments for Syria.”

The United States removed Syria from its list of state sponsors of terrorism on Monday.

On Tuesday, Mazloum Abdi announced the dissolution of the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) as an independent military force following its integration into Syrian army brigades, describing the move as a transition toward peace, stability and building a new Syria.

 

 

 


Smotrich Announces Plan to 'Judaize the Galilee and Negev'

Far-right Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich reviews the 'E1' settlement map in the West Bank (Archival - AFP)
Far-right Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich reviews the 'E1' settlement map in the West Bank (Archival - AFP)
TT

Smotrich Announces Plan to 'Judaize the Galilee and Negev'

Far-right Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich reviews the 'E1' settlement map in the West Bank (Archival - AFP)
Far-right Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich reviews the 'E1' settlement map in the West Bank (Archival - AFP)

Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, head of the far-right Religious Zionism party, announced a broad plan to “Judaize” the Galilee and the Negev under the slogan “Yes. We Judaize!”

The plan targets the Arab presence in the north and south, the two regions with large Arab populations. It includes the establishment of dozens of Jewish communities and farms and the expansion of existing settlements.

It also calls for the cancellation of development plans for Arab communities, in what critics describe as an openly discriminatory policy targeting Israel’s Arab citizens.

Speaking at an election rally, Smotrich said that following what he described as initial results showing the success of his “Decisive Plan” for the West Bank, his party would demand, in the next government, control of the Planning Administration and the Israel Land Authority in order to impose sweeping changes on planning policy and land allocation.


Three Israeli Vetoes Complicate Progress in Southern Lebanon

Members of the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) in southern Lebanon (Reuters)
Members of the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) in southern Lebanon (Reuters)
TT

Three Israeli Vetoes Complicate Progress in Southern Lebanon

Members of the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) in southern Lebanon (Reuters)
Members of the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) in southern Lebanon (Reuters)

Israel has raised three objections that are blocking progress toward a political or military resolution in southern Lebanon: it has rejected a proposed Italian force to carry out verification in a pilot zone, opposed expanding the model zones and obstructed plans for the post-UNIFIL phase.

Those plans include proposals for a European force to replace the UN mission when its mandate expires at the end of this year.

Arrangements for the next phase in southern Lebanon are becoming increasingly tangled.

Disputes persist over the security mechanism that would accompany any Israeli withdrawal, who would verify compliance and how far that party’s authority would extend, as Israeli operations in the south continue.

Against that backdrop, President Joseph Aoun met Lebanese Army Commander General Rodolphe Haykal to review security conditions across the country, particularly in the south, amid continued Israeli attacks on southern villages and towns.

Haykal briefed Aoun on his visit to Italy and talks with Italian officials.

The presidential statement gave no details of those discussions or whether they directly addressed proposals for future security arrangements.

Israel accused of obstruction

Nearly two months after the Framework Agreement was signed, there has been no move to establish additional pilot zones.

Israeli media have meanwhile reported objections to a proposal for an Italian force to help monitor areas from which Israeli troops are expected to withdraw and where the Lebanese army would assume responsibility.

Lebanese ministerial sources told Asharq Al-Awsat that Israel’s shifting positions and objections were among the main reasons no decision had been reached on who would take part in the next phase of security arrangements in southern Lebanon, what duties and powers that party would have, or the rules governing its work.

“The Israelis previously had no objection to Italian participation, but they are now objecting to an Italian force, after objections to the French had also emerged,” the sources said.

“So far, there is no final decision on who will participate, what tasks will be assigned to them, the limits of those tasks, or how they will be carried out.”

Israeli positions keep changing, the sources said.

“Sometimes they object to the French and sometimes to the Italians. At every stage, new conditions or positions emerge. That is why the final arrangements have yet to take shape.”

Contacts are continuing as Lebanon explores possible alternatives, but no final formula has been agreed upon, the sources said.

“Otherwise, the outlines of the next phase would already be clearer.”

The terms of the arrangements themselves are a major source of the deadlock, the sources added.

“Israel is making demands about the force’s powers and operating mechanisms, including issues involving searches of homes and the nature of its participation in field operations. These matters raise several concerns and are obstructing an agreement.”

The sources said those demands were accompanied by Israeli claims that the Lebanese army was not fulfilling the role expected of it.

“Taken together, these signs point to an Israeli tendency to obstruct.”

Washington is at the center of talks

Asked what options Lebanon had in the face of the deadlock, the sources said Beirut was consulting Washington because the United States also bore responsibility for the process.

“When the negotiating framework was established, the American role was central to it. The process is therefore not limited to Lebanon and Israel.”

The sources said there was practically no alternative to engaging with Washington.

“The Americans are the party capable of communicating with the Israeli side and influencing the process. Contacts with them are therefore continuing.”

Israel’s account of the pilot zones

Israeli leaks suggest the dispute goes beyond the identity of any international party involved in future arrangements. It also covers the scope of that party’s powers and duties, its relationship with the Lebanese army and the mechanisms for verifying implementation.

Israeli news website Walla reported that Israel had told the United States it was dissatisfied with the results of the pilot zones project and had criticized the Lebanese army’s performance in those areas.

An Israeli security official said the Lebanese army was not carrying out the required measures from Israel’s perspective, according to the website. The official linked that assessment to Tel Aviv’s current refusal to move to additional zones.

Those statements remain part of Israel’s account of how the understandings are being implemented. Lebanese sources, for their part, say contacts are continuing, with neither the arrangements nor a final formula settled.

Israeli veto of Italian force

A separate dispute centers on who could help monitor the implementation of the arrangements.

Israel’s Yedioth Ahronoth newspaper reported that Israel opposed deploying an Italian military force in southern Lebanon to monitor the pilot zones.

It cited Israeli officials as saying they feared any new international presence could restrict the Israeli military’s ability to operate in Lebanon.

The newspaper also quoted Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz as rejecting the proposal and voicing concern that it could replicate the UNIFIL model.