Iraq Fears Expansion of US Sanctions List

Kataib Hezbollah fighters during a parade in Baghdad, September 2024 (File/Reuters)
Kataib Hezbollah fighters during a parade in Baghdad, September 2024 (File/Reuters)
TT

Iraq Fears Expansion of US Sanctions List

Kataib Hezbollah fighters during a parade in Baghdad, September 2024 (File/Reuters)
Kataib Hezbollah fighters during a parade in Baghdad, September 2024 (File/Reuters)

As Iraq’s government led by Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani works to deepen economic and investment cooperation with the United States, including opening the country’s market to major American firms, Washington announced a new round of sanctions targeting Iraqi officials, businessmen, and companies linked to the Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF).

An Iraqi politician described the move as “a negative shift and a strong point of pressure” in the US position toward Baghdad.

The US State Department said Thursday that Washington is sanctioning Kataib Hezbollah and Asaib Ahl al-Haq for assisting the Iranian regime in “evading US sanctions, smuggling weapons, and engaging in widespread corruption in Iraq.”

An Iraqi official told Asharq Al-Awsat that the sanctions “likely mark the beginning of a wider wave that may include additional figures and entities in the coming phase.”

The official, who requested anonymity, said the measures imposed by the US Treasury “clearly indicate a negative turn in the relationship between the Trump administration and the Iraqi government.”

He noted that this comes just as a new phase of cooperation has begun between Baghdad and Washington, following a US-backed oil and political agreement between Baghdad and Erbil.

“Through these sanctions, Washington is putting pressure on Baghdad to move against groups it sees as threats, which it continues to link to Iran,” the official added.

“What’s notable here is that Washington has started to differentiate between the Iraqi state and the parallel actors within its political and security landscape.”

He warned that “the timing of this escalation is particularly sensitive, as Iraqi political factions are busy preparing for next year’s parliamentary elections, where Shiite blocs are vying for the premiership.”

Sanctions Linked to Iran

In a statement Thursday, the US Treasury Department said: “Today, the US Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is taking action against individuals and companies that assist the Iranian regime in evading US sanctions, smuggling weapons, and engaging in widespread corruption in Iraq.”

“The Iranian regime relies on various Iraqi militia proxies, including US-sanctioned foreign terrorist organization Kataib Hezbollah, to penetrate Iraq’s security forces and economy.”

“These Iran-backed groups are not only responsible for the deaths of US personnel but also conduct attacks against US interests and those of our allies across the Middle East.”

“The militias actively undermine the Iraqi economy, monopolizing resources through graft and corruption, and hinder the formation of a functioning Iraqi government that would make the region safer.”

“The targets today include bankers abusing the Iraqi economy to launder money for Iran and a terrorist front company that provides support and services to Iraqi militia groups.”

The Treasury is also taking action against Iraq-based Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) assets that operate a source network that gathers information, including on US forces, it said.

Among those sanctioned were Iraqi Olympic Committee President Aqeel Meften and his brother, the first time a senior Iraqi government official of ministerial rank has been targeted.

The Treasury said they “own and manage an IRGC-QF-associated Iraqi commercial bank,” accusing it of laundering proceeds of corruption for political parties.

“For decades, the Meften brothers have laundered tens of millions of dollars for Iran, and smuggled oil and drugs and abused Aqeel Meften’s position as president of Iraq’s National Olympic Committee to engage in corruption,” the statement said.

Front Companies

The Treasury said Kataib Hezbollah, one of the most powerful PMF factions, established Muhandis General Company for Construction, Engineering, Mechanical, Agricultural, and Industrial Contracting as an economic front for its operations.

The company, led by Kataib Hezbollah commander Abd al-Aziz Malluh Mirjirash al Muhammadawi (Abu Fadak), allegedly used government contracts to transfer funds from state institutions to shell companies, including Baladna Agricultural Investments, to finance militia activity and weapons smuggling in coordination with the IRGC.

The sanctions also hit security figures running espionage networks for the IRGC inside Iraq. According to the statement, commanders from Kataib Hezbollah and the IRGC coordinated operations targeting US interests in Iraq earlier this year.

Those named included Kataib Hezbollah commander in Baghdad Hasan Qahtan Al-Sa’idi, accused of managing a network collecting intelligence on US troops in cooperation with IRGC officers. The network allegedly also involved his son, Muhammad Qahtan Al-Sa’idi, and Haytham Sabih Sa’id, both accused of gathering intelligence for Iran.

“The United States is pursuing maximum pressure on Iran. We are targeting the IRGC-Qods Force, which supports Iran’s regional terrorist partners and proxies, and two Iraq-based groups, Kataib Hezbollah and Asaib Ahl al-Haq. These militias actively undermine Iraq’s sovereignty, weaken Iraq’s economy, and conduct attacks against US personnel and interests across the Middle East,” Deputy State Department spokesman Tommy Pigott wrote on X.

In a related post on X, Republican Congressman Joe Wilson urged the Trump administration to also sanction the Badr Organization, its leader Hadi al-Amiri, and Iraq’s state-run Rafidain Bank, saying Iraq must be freed from Iran’s grip.

Mounting Pressure

The Iraqi Olympic Committee downplayed the sanctions, saying in a statement that “some television channels and social media platforms circulated false and fabricated reports about the committee’s president, Aqeel Meften, in an attempt to sow confusion and discredit the committee’s financial and sporting integrity.”

It said the allegations “have no basis in fact” and were part of “malicious campaigns aimed at undermining the committee’s transparent and balanced institutional work.”

Dr. Ihsan al-Shammari, head of the Iraqi Political Thinking Center in Baghdad, told Asharq Al-Awsat that “these sanctions reflect a policy adopted by the Trump administration to first weaken the financial networks of armed groups, and second, to send a clear message that Washington will not tolerate their growing influence within Iraq’s state institutions.”

He said the measures are based on an executive order issued by Trump reinstating the “maximum pressure” campaign against Iran, adding: “Iraq has effectively become part of that campaign.”

“What we’re seeing is a new approach in US-Iraq relations that may not stop at economic pressure, but could eventually include military options against armed factions,” al-Shammari warned. “The danger here lies in the fact that, for the first time, these sanctions have targeted government officials and state-linked companies, including the Muhandis Company affiliated with the Popular Mobilization Forces.”



Egypt Keeps Communication Channels Open Over Mediterranean Maritime Disputes

Egyptian Foreign Minister Badr Abdelatty and his Turkish counterpart Hakan Fidan during a previous meeting (Egyptian Foreign Ministry). 
Egyptian Foreign Minister Badr Abdelatty and his Turkish counterpart Hakan Fidan during a previous meeting (Egyptian Foreign Ministry). 
TT

Egypt Keeps Communication Channels Open Over Mediterranean Maritime Disputes

Egyptian Foreign Minister Badr Abdelatty and his Turkish counterpart Hakan Fidan during a previous meeting (Egyptian Foreign Ministry). 
Egyptian Foreign Minister Badr Abdelatty and his Turkish counterpart Hakan Fidan during a previous meeting (Egyptian Foreign Ministry). 

Egypt said it remains in contact with Türkiye, Libya, Cyprus and Greece to resolve maritime boundary disputes through dialogue and international law, despite its rejection of a disputed Turkish-Libyan maritime agreement.

Cairo’s remarks came after Ankara renewed its offer to negotiate a maritime boundary agreement with Egypt that would serve both countries’ interests. The proposal followed Egypt’s rejection of the Libyan parliament’s ratification last week of a maritime memorandum signed with Türkiye in late 2019.

Egyptian Foreign Ministry spokesman Ambassador Nader Zaki told Asharq Al-Awsat that Cairo believes maritime differences must be resolved through “serious dialogue, adherence to international law and mutual respect for sovereign rights.”

“Channels of communication remain open with all parties, including Cyprus, Greece, Türkiye and Libya,” he said, citing Egypt’s commitment to its longstanding ties with countries on both shores of the Mediterranean.

Zaki stressed that those relations must be built on respect for international law and sovereign rights that “cannot be compromised,” while avoiding disputes that could undermine stability and relations among Mediterranean states.

Cairo Reaffirms Rejection of Turkish-Libyan Agreement

Libya’s House of Representatives voted last week to approve two agreements with Türkiye covering maritime boundaries and security cooperation, prompting Cairo to reiterate its rejection of the maritime deal as “absolutely null and void.”

Zaki said Egypt’s latest objection was consistent with its position since 2019, arguing that the memorandum infringes on its sovereign rights in the exclusive economic zone and continental shelf.

“Egypt’s position on this invalid memorandum is based on national interests and the rejection of any infringement upon them,” he said.

The spokesman also challenged the agreement’s legal basis, saying it violates several binding principles of international law, including the principle that treaties do not create obligations for third parties.

“An agreement signed by two states is not binding on other states,” he explained.

Zaki also cited the prohibition against infringing on the rights of third countries and the principle of equitable maritime delimitation, arguing that the memorandum disregards these established legal rules.

“Egypt’s legal position is extremely strong and is shared by many countries,” he said.

Erdogan Calls for Regional Dialogue

The Turkish-Libyan memorandum has also drawn objections from Greece, Cyprus and the European Union.

Responding to criticism on Monday, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan said Ankara was not seeking political gains at the expense of any party in the Eastern Mediterranean.

He called for dialogue with all countries in the region and pledged to maintain Türkiye’s relations with all parties involved in Libya.


Türkiye, Egypt to Hold Naval Drills Amid Eastern Mediterranean Tensions

Egypt and Türkiye resumed the Sea of Friendship naval exercises in September 2025 after a 13-year suspension. (Turkish Defense Ministry)
Egypt and Türkiye resumed the Sea of Friendship naval exercises in September 2025 after a 13-year suspension. (Turkish Defense Ministry)
TT

Türkiye, Egypt to Hold Naval Drills Amid Eastern Mediterranean Tensions

Egypt and Türkiye resumed the Sea of Friendship naval exercises in September 2025 after a 13-year suspension. (Turkish Defense Ministry)
Egypt and Türkiye resumed the Sea of Friendship naval exercises in September 2025 after a 13-year suspension. (Turkish Defense Ministry)

Türkiye and Egypt will hold joint naval exercises in Alexandria from November 4 to 9, Ankara announced, amid renewed tensions over a disputed maritime boundary agreement between Türkiye and Libya.

The announcement follows the Libyan parliament’s ratification of the 2019 agreement, drawing objections from Egypt, Greece, Cyprus, the European Union and Israel.

The Turkish Defense Ministry said the Sea of Friendship 2026 exercises would involve naval units and personnel from both countries in surface warfare, anti-submarine operations, air defense and underwater assault training involving combat divers.

Defense Ministry spokesman Zeki Akturk said the Turkish warship TCG Burgazada would visit Alexandria from November 1 to 3, following a port call in Souda, Greece, from October 25 to 28.

Growing military cooperation

The exercises reflect expanding military cooperation between Cairo and Ankara, including defense industry agreements, technology transfers, high-level military exchanges and joint training.

Turkish Land Forces Commander Gen. Metin Tokel visited Egypt on October 26 and 27, although the ministry provided no details about his meetings or itinerary.

The two countries resumed the Sea of Friendship exercises in September 2025 at the Aksaz naval base in Mugla, southwestern Türkiye, following a 13-year suspension amid tensions over the ouster of Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood government. Cairo designates the Brotherhood a terrorist organization.

The drills had previously been held annually from 2009 to 2013.

Following the normalization of relations in 2024, Egypt and Türkiye signed a letter of intent on defense cooperation in July 2026 during Egyptian Defense Minister Ashraf Salem Zaher’s visit to Ankara.

Zaher held talks with his Turkish counterpart, Yasar Guler, on expanding military cooperation, particularly in joint training, defense manufacturing, technology transfer and exchanges of expertise.

The two countries have since conducted several joint exercises, including Golden Eagle, involving Egyptian paratroopers and commandos alongside Turkish special forces, as well as air force training.

Egyptian aircraft also participated in the annual Anatolian Eagle 2026 exercise in Konya, central Türkiye, in June, alongside Azerbaijan and a NATO airborne early warning aircraft.

Regional tensions

The exercises come against a backdrop of renewed tensions following the Libyan House of Representatives’ October 20 ratification of a maritime boundary memorandum signed on November 27, 2019, between Türkiye and Libya’s former Government of National Accord, led by Fayez al-Sarraj.

The agreement remains contested by neighboring countries and the European Union.

Ankara has renewed its offer to negotiate maritime boundaries with Egypt, saying that an agreement with Türkiye would give Cairo more than 15,000 additional square kilometers of maritime jurisdiction compared with a potential deal with Greece.

Greek Foreign Minister Giorgos Gerapetritis rejected the proposal’s underlying approach, telling the newspaper Kathimerini that maritime zones were “not up for auction.”

He reaffirmed Greece’s strategic ties with Egypt and their shared commitment to international law, warning that disregarding maritime rules could have repercussions for global trade, food and energy security, and ocean protection.

Gerapetritis also pointed to a joint statement issued Monday by the UN representatives of Egypt, Greece, Cyprus, Bahrain, the United Arab Emirates and the European Union opposing the Türkiye-Libya agreement.

He noted that Egypt’s permanent representative to the United Nations stood alongside him in New York as he delivered the statement.

Despite the maritime dispute, Türkiye and Greece are continuing military confidence-building efforts.

Akturk said the commander of Greece’s Tactical Air Force and an accompanying delegation would visit Türkiye’s Combat Air Force Command from November 3 to 5 under the two countries’ confidence-building plan.


Lebanese Forces Boycott Cabinet Meeting Over Hezbollah Explosives Case

Prime Minister Nawaf Salam chairs a cabinet meeting in the absence of Lebanese Forces ministers. (Prime Minister’s Office)
Prime Minister Nawaf Salam chairs a cabinet meeting in the absence of Lebanese Forces ministers. (Prime Minister’s Office)
TT

Lebanese Forces Boycott Cabinet Meeting Over Hezbollah Explosives Case

Prime Minister Nawaf Salam chairs a cabinet meeting in the absence of Lebanese Forces ministers. (Prime Minister’s Office)
Prime Minister Nawaf Salam chairs a cabinet meeting in the absence of Lebanese Forces ministers. (Prime Minister’s Office)

Ministers from the Lebanese Forces party boycotted a cabinet meeting on Thursday over the government’s failure to refer a case involving Hezbollah explosives seized in Dahr al-Baidar to Lebanon’s Judicial Council.

The boycott marked an escalation in the dispute after the case was left off the agenda of a meeting chaired by Prime Minister Nawaf Salam at the Grand Serail and devoted to waste management.

Lebanese Forces sources told Asharq Al-Awsat that the party could continue boycotting cabinet sessions as long as its demands remained unmet, although it might participate in meetings addressing matters of major strategic importance.

The standoff follows the cabinet’s decision at its previous meeting to postpone a ruling on whether to refer the case to the Judicial Council, pending further progress in the investigation.

Hezbollah has acknowledged responsibility for the explosives shipment, but the Lebanese Forces argue that the seriousness of the case warrants an immediate referral.

Ahead of Thursday’s meeting, Justice Minister Adel Nassar, who is affiliated with the Lebanese Forces, vowed to press the issue.

“I will raise the question of referring the Dahr al-Baidar explosives case to the Judicial Council. There will be no concessions or compromise,” he declared.

Nassar added that he would demand a date for discussing the referral if Salam refused to address it during the session.

Lebanese Forces sources accused the government of repeatedly avoiding a decision on the explosives case.

“The waste management issue is certainly important, but there are more pressing priorities today, foremost among them a case of the magnitude of the Dahr al-Baidar explosives,” they told Asharq Al-Awsat.

They criticized the repeated postponements, arguing that successive Cabinet meetings had failed to produce a decision on referring the case to the Judicial Council.

The party had taken a clear position against attending Cabinet sessions until the matter was resolved, the sources explained.

“A case of this magnitude cannot continue to be handled through repeated delays while meetings are held to discuss other issues, however important they may be,” they added.

The Lebanese Forces stepped up criticism of the judicial investigation, accusing authorities of overlooking public admissions by senior Hezbollah officials while pursuing lower-ranking operatives who lacked the authority to order the explosives shipment.

In a statement, the party’s media office noted that senior Hezbollah officials, including lawmakers and party leaders, had publicly acknowledged that the group was transporting the explosives and that they belonged to it.

The Lebanese Forces described the Dahr al-Baidar case as a matter of national security affecting all Lebanese citizens.

Whatever justification was offered for transporting the explosives, the shipment posed a serious danger even if Hezbollah’s claim that the materials were intended for use against Israel proved true, it added.

The explosives represented a grave threat to residents of South Lebanon in particular and to the Lebanese population as a whole, the statement warned.