Lavrov: ‘Snapback’ Is a Trap Set by Zarif for Iran

In this January 16, 2016 file photo, then-secretary of state John Kerry talks with Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif in Vienna, after the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) verified that Iran has met all conditions under the nuclear deal. (Kevin Lamarque/Pool via AP, File) 
In this January 16, 2016 file photo, then-secretary of state John Kerry talks with Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif in Vienna, after the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) verified that Iran has met all conditions under the nuclear deal. (Kevin Lamarque/Pool via AP, File) 
TT

Lavrov: ‘Snapback’ Is a Trap Set by Zarif for Iran

In this January 16, 2016 file photo, then-secretary of state John Kerry talks with Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif in Vienna, after the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) verified that Iran has met all conditions under the nuclear deal. (Kevin Lamarque/Pool via AP, File) 
In this January 16, 2016 file photo, then-secretary of state John Kerry talks with Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif in Vienna, after the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) verified that Iran has met all conditions under the nuclear deal. (Kevin Lamarque/Pool via AP, File) 

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov on Wednesday blamed former Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif for the inclusion of the ‘Snapback mechanism’ in the nuclear deal, describing it as a “legal trap” set ahead of the 2015 agreement.

Lavrov’s remarks constitute a direct accusation against Zarif and suggest tension in relations between Moscow and Tehran, observers said.

During an interview with Arab reporters in Moscow, Lavrov was asked to comment on statements attributed to Zarif, in which the former minister criticized Russia for undermining efforts to renew the nuclear deal during President Hassan Rouhani’s term.

“The final decision on JCPOA (Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action) was made directly by Zarif and then-US Secretary of State John Kerry. The other participants were essentially observers at that point, watching the US and Iran reach an agreement.”

Lavrov explained that the mechanism was in fact agreed to in the final stage of the negotiations directly between Zarif and Kerry.

“To be honest, we were surprised. But if our Iranian partners accepted this formulation – which, frankly, was a legal “trap” – we had no grounds to object. I can understand why Zarif supported such an unconventional formula,” the Russian FM said.

In an interview on April 2021 with a think tank associated with the Iranian presidency, Zarif described Russia as wanting to stop the nuclear deal, suggesting Moscow wanted to keep Iran at odds with the West. “The Russians didn’t think the JCPOA would reach a result and in the final weeks when they saw the JCPOA was being concluded they started new proposals,” Zarif had said.

Implicit Criticism

Although Lavrov affirmed that Russia worked closely together with Zarif for many years on the JCPOA, his tone carried implicit criticism, as he said, “I can understand why Zarif supported such an unconventional formula: Iran had no intention of violating the JCPOA and was confident that no one would accuse it of doing so.”

Also, Lavrov added, “What happened instead is that Iran did not breach the deal, yet the United States withdrew from it, and the Europeans failed to meet their commitments. After that, they began again demanding new concessions from Iran. Since you mentioned Zarif, this “creation” was largely his.”

Lavrov, who is normally keen to show solidarity with Russia’s allies, chose to criticize Zarif shortly after Russian President Vladimir Putin said that Russia has played an important role in easing tensions between Iran and Israel.

Meanwhile, Tehran is seeking to strengthen its military cooperation with Moscow, as Western countries reimposed last month the snapback mechanism to reinstate UN sanctions on Iran lifted under a 2015 nuclear deal.

Russia has rejected the UN reimposition of sanctions against Iran. However, Lavrov’s remarks, which suggested that Tehran had supported “the unconventional formula” of the snapback, could weaken Iran's position both at home and abroad, especially as Zarif's critics accuse him of offering concessions during negotiations with the West.

Different Agendas

Tehran hoped Moscow could provide political cover against mounting Western pressure. But Lavrov said Russia and other participants were essentially observers to the talks between Zarif and Kerry at the time of the signing.

Therefore, the Russian FM indirectly signaled that Moscow and Tehran has different agendas, despite sharing military cooperation.

Regarding this cooperation, Lavrov said Russia supplies the equipment that Iran needs. “All of this is carried out strictly within the framework of international law,” he noted.

The Russia minister, however, did not comment when asked if Russia supplied S-400 air defense missile systems to Iran.

Meanwhile, several officials in Tehran fear renewed international isolation, particularly at a time when the government is accused of making strategic concessions.

According to analysts, Lavrov’s statements are a reminder that Moscow does not intend to bear the consequences of its partners' mistakes, and that its support for Tehran is not final.

 

 



Israel Army Confirms Struck Two Nuclear Sites in Iran

Emergency responders inspect the site of a residential building damaged by a strike, amid the US-Israeli conflict with Iran, in Tehran, Iran, March 27, 2026. Majid Asgaripour/WANA (West Asia News Agency) via Reuters
Emergency responders inspect the site of a residential building damaged by a strike, amid the US-Israeli conflict with Iran, in Tehran, Iran, March 27, 2026. Majid Asgaripour/WANA (West Asia News Agency) via Reuters
TT

Israel Army Confirms Struck Two Nuclear Sites in Iran

Emergency responders inspect the site of a residential building damaged by a strike, amid the US-Israeli conflict with Iran, in Tehran, Iran, March 27, 2026. Majid Asgaripour/WANA (West Asia News Agency) via Reuters
Emergency responders inspect the site of a residential building damaged by a strike, amid the US-Israeli conflict with Iran, in Tehran, Iran, March 27, 2026. Majid Asgaripour/WANA (West Asia News Agency) via Reuters

The Israeli military confirmed it struck a heavy water reactor and a uranium processing plant in central Iran on Friday, as it targeted nuclear sites in the country.

"A short while ago, the Israeli Air Force... struck the heavy water plant in Arak, central Iran," the military said in a statement, describing the site as a "key plutonium production site for nuclear weapons".

Iranian media had earlier reported that US-Israeli strikes hit the Khondab heavy water complex, saying they caused no casualties or radiation leak from the site.

Work on the reactor on the outskirts of the village of Khondab began in the 2000s, but was halted under the terms of a now-abandoned 2015 nuclear deal struck between Iran and world powers.

The core of the reactor was removed and concrete was poured into it, rendering it inoperative.

The research reactor was officially intended to produce plutonium for medical research and the site includes a production plant for heavy water.

The Israeli military also confirmed it struck a uranium processing site in central Iran's Yazd on Friday, after the country’s atomic energy organization said US-Israeli strikes hit the facility.

"A short while ago, the Israeli Air Force... struck a uranium extraction plant located in Yazd, central Iran," the military said in a statement, describing the site as a "unique facility in Iran used for the production of raw materials required for the uranium enrichment process".

Iran's atomic energy organization said the strike on the plant "did not result in the release of any radioactive material."

Israel and the US accuse Iran of seeking to acquire nuclear weapons, while Tehran maintains that its program is for civilian purposes.

The heavy water plant in Arak was targeted by Israeli strikes during the 12-day war between Iran and Israel last June, during which the US also carried out bombings.

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) says the site was "damaged" during the attacks and "is assessed not to have been fully operational since that time."

But the agency said it has not had access to the site since May 2025.

The Middle East was plunged into war on February 28 when the US and Israel launched joint strikes on Iran, triggering retaliatory missile and drone attacks targeting Israel and several countries in the region.


US, Israel Unlikely to Achieve ‘Regime Change’ in Iran, Says Merz

 27 March 2026, Hesse, Frankfurt/Main: Germany's Chancellor Friedrich Merz speaks at the "FAZ" Congress. (dpa)
27 March 2026, Hesse, Frankfurt/Main: Germany's Chancellor Friedrich Merz speaks at the "FAZ" Congress. (dpa)
TT

US, Israel Unlikely to Achieve ‘Regime Change’ in Iran, Says Merz

 27 March 2026, Hesse, Frankfurt/Main: Germany's Chancellor Friedrich Merz speaks at the "FAZ" Congress. (dpa)
27 March 2026, Hesse, Frankfurt/Main: Germany's Chancellor Friedrich Merz speaks at the "FAZ" Congress. (dpa)

The US-Israeli war against Iran is unlikely to lead to "regime change", German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said Friday, as the month-long conflict showed no signs of abating.

"Is regime change really the goal?" he said at a forum in Frankfurt organized by the FAZ newspaper.

"If that's the goal, I don't think you'll achieve it. It's mostly gone wrong" in past conflicts, he said, pointing to the Afghanistan war.

"I have serious doubts as to whether there is a strategy and whether that strategy is being successfully implemented," he added. "In that respect, it could take even longer."

Germany has pushed back at US President Donald Trump's criticisms of NATO members for failing to join the attacks on Iran, insisting that it is not their war.

Merz however said Friday he believed that Trump had accepted this stance.

He also said Germany would be open to helping provide military protection in the Strait of Hormuz, a key route for oil and gas, which has been nearly totally blocked, in the event of a ceasefire.

"This requires an international mandate, it requires approval from the German parliament and, prior to that, a cabinet decision. And we are far from that."


More Than 300 US Troops Injured Since Start of Iran War

US Navy sailors taxi an F/A-18F Super Hornet on the flight deck aboard Nimitz-class aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln in support of the Operation Epic Fury attack on Iran from an undisclosed location March 17, 2026. (US Navy/Handout via Reuters)
US Navy sailors taxi an F/A-18F Super Hornet on the flight deck aboard Nimitz-class aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln in support of the Operation Epic Fury attack on Iran from an undisclosed location March 17, 2026. (US Navy/Handout via Reuters)
TT

More Than 300 US Troops Injured Since Start of Iran War

US Navy sailors taxi an F/A-18F Super Hornet on the flight deck aboard Nimitz-class aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln in support of the Operation Epic Fury attack on Iran from an undisclosed location March 17, 2026. (US Navy/Handout via Reuters)
US Navy sailors taxi an F/A-18F Super Hornet on the flight deck aboard Nimitz-class aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln in support of the Operation Epic Fury attack on Iran from an undisclosed location March 17, 2026. (US Navy/Handout via Reuters)

More than 300 US troops have been wounded since the start of the Iran war on February 28, US Central Command said on Friday.

"Since the start of Operation Epic Fury, approximately 303 US service members have been wounded. The vast majority of these injuries have been minor, and 273 troops have returned to duty," US Navy Captain Tim Hawkins said.

A US official who asked not to be identified told AFP that 10 troops remain seriously wounded.

A further 13 troops have been killed in the war, according to the latest figures, with seven killed in the Gulf and six in Iraq.

In a separate development Friday, Iran's military said that hotels housing US soldiers in the region would be considered targets.

"When all the Americans (forces) go into a hotel, then from our perspective that hotel becomes American," armed forces spokesman Abolfazl Shekarchi told state television on Thursday.

Iran's government has not released an updated casualty toll, but a US-based activist group said on March 23 that some 1,167 Iranian troops had been killed and 658 troops' status is unknown. AFP is not able to independently verify tolls in Iran due to reporting restrictions.

The war began on February 28 when the United States and Israel launched strikes on Iran, killing its supreme leader Ali Khamenei.

Since then, the conflict has spread across the Middle East. Iran has fired drone and missiles at Gulf states home to American military bases and other interests.

US President Donald Trump insisted on Thursday that talks to end the conflict were "ongoing" and "going very well".