Iraq Urges International Community to Help it Shoulder ISIS Burden

Members of the Iraqi border forces patrol along a concrete wall on the Iraqi-Syrian border, in the town of al-Baghuz in the Al-Qaim district of western Iraq, on January 21, 2026. (AFP)
Members of the Iraqi border forces patrol along a concrete wall on the Iraqi-Syrian border, in the town of al-Baghuz in the Al-Qaim district of western Iraq, on January 21, 2026. (AFP)
TT

Iraq Urges International Community to Help it Shoulder ISIS Burden

Members of the Iraqi border forces patrol along a concrete wall on the Iraqi-Syrian border, in the town of al-Baghuz in the Al-Qaim district of western Iraq, on January 21, 2026. (AFP)
Members of the Iraqi border forces patrol along a concrete wall on the Iraqi-Syrian border, in the town of al-Baghuz in the Al-Qaim district of western Iraq, on January 21, 2026. (AFP)

The transfer of ISIS detainees from northeastern Syria could saddle Iraq with annual costs of up to $25 million, an Iraqi government source said on Saturday.

The source said the number of detainees stands at around 7,000 members and that the cost of feeding them is estimated at roughly 33 billion Iraqi dinars a year, or about $25 million, according to Shafaq News.

The comments came as Foreign Minister Fuad Hussein said Iraq should not shoulder alone the security and financial burdens resulting from the transfer of ISIS prisoners from Syria to Iraq.

In a statement, the Foreign Ministry said Hussein made the remarks during a phone call with the European Union’s High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, Kaja Kallas, during which they discussed developments in Syria and the issue of prisons holding ISIS members.

The statement said the officials discussed security risks arising from the escape of several ISIS members from some prisons outside the control of the Syrian Democratic Forces, as well as the security situation in Syria’s Hasakah province.

They also stressed the importance of resolving disputes peacefully.

Hussein was quoted as saying that responsibility for dealing with the ISIS detainee file “must be borne by all concerned countries and should not fall on Iraq alone.”

Earlier this week, the US military’s US Central Command said its forces had transferred 150 ISIS detainees from a detention facility in Syria’s Hasakah to Iraq, adding that the move was intended to prevent their escape.

Reuters quoted a US official as saying Washington expects the transfer of up to 7,000 detainees from prisons in Syria to Iraq to be completed in the coming days, noting that hundreds of detainees could be moved daily across the border.

Political debate

Falih al-Fayyad, head of Iraq’s pro-Iran Popular Mobilization Forces, said Iraq had received the first batch of detainees, adding that the government would begin talks with the international coalition to shoulder the costs associated with transferring the rest.

Fayyad said most of the detainees are wanted by the Iraqi judiciary and will stand trial under Iraqi law, adding that their transfer to prisons inside Iraq “serves security interests” compared with keeping them in unstable detention facilities outside the country.

The transfer of the detainees has sparked political and media debate in Iraq, amid concerns over the financial and security burdens involved. At the same time, the government says the issue is being handled as a national security matter in coordination with the international coalition.

Separately, Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani discussed with US Central Command commander Brad Cooper the timeline for the transfer, stressing the importance of security coordination to prevent any potential threats to Iraq and the region.

Sabah al-Numan, spokesman for the commander-in-chief of the armed forces, said the government had ordered the completion of a concrete wall along the Syrian border, which is 80% complete.

Numan said the transferred detainees are wanted on terrorism charges and will be held in fortified prisons, adding that the transfer “will be carried out under a tightly coordinated plan prepared by the Joint Operations Command and the relevant security agencies, in coordination with the Ministry of Justice, which has prepared an integrated plan to accommodate them inside Iraqi prisons.”



Syria, Israel Hold US-Mediated Talks to Ease Tensions

 Syrian Foreign Minister Asaad al-Shaibani, speaks during an interview with Reuters in Damascus, Syria, August 22, 2026. (Reuters)
Syrian Foreign Minister Asaad al-Shaibani, speaks during an interview with Reuters in Damascus, Syria, August 22, 2026. (Reuters)
TT

Syria, Israel Hold US-Mediated Talks to Ease Tensions

 Syrian Foreign Minister Asaad al-Shaibani, speaks during an interview with Reuters in Damascus, Syria, August 22, 2026. (Reuters)
Syrian Foreign Minister Asaad al-Shaibani, speaks during an interview with Reuters in Damascus, Syria, August 22, 2026. (Reuters)

Syria and Israel held high-level, US-mediated talks in Jordan on Sunday aimed at easing tensions following recent Israeli strikes on Syrian territory, Syria's state news agency SANA reported, citing a diplomatic source at the foreign ministry.

The talks focused on practical mechanisms to halt Israeli strikes, arrests and targeted operations, and on reviving negotiations towards a security ‌agreement that could ‌lay the groundwork for a broader future accord, SANA ‌said.

The ⁠two sides also discussed ⁠efforts to ease tensions between Israel and Türkiye and to prevent their rivalry from spilling onto Syrian territory.

A diplomatic source and a Syrian government source told AFP that Foreign Minister Asaad al-Shaibani met the head of Israel's Mossad intelligence agency Roman Gofman.

Shaibani told Reuters on Saturday that Damascus expected security negotiations with Israel to resume soon, although he added that there was a lack of trust between them.

Talks had been suspended since the start of the Iran war, while Syria cut off contact entirely after Israeli strikes on Syria’s Abu al-Duhur airbase ⁠last week, according to Shaibani.

Washington has for more than a ‌year sought to broker a security agreement between ‌Israel and the government of Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa.

Shaibani said the two sides had agreed ‌on paper to “almost everything” around the beginning of the year, including arrangements for security ‌zones in southern Syria and a buffer zone where only United Nations forces would be present, but Damascus doubted Israel's willingness to implement the agreement.

The Israeli prime minister's office did not reply to a request for comment on Shaibani's remarks.

At Sunday’s meeting, SANA said, Syria indicated ‌that its immediate priorities remained an Israeli withdrawal to positions held before Bashar al-Assad's overthrow on December 8, 2024, and the full ⁠restoration of a ⁠1974 disengagement agreement.

Damascus also told the Israeli delegation it would not accept arrangements restricting its right to rebuild and develop its armed forces or determine its alliances and partnerships, SANA said.

Syria reiterated that the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights were Syrian territory but said discussions over the region's final status were premature, according to the SANA report.

Israel has carried out repeated strikes on Syrian military sites since Assad's fall, saying its actions were necessary to protect its security.

Syria has denied posing a threat to Israel and has demanded an end to Israeli strikes and incursions.

Syria and Israel have technically been at war since 1948. Israel captured the Golan Heights from Syria in the 1967 Six-Day War and later annexed it, a move recognized by the United States but not by most of the international community.

Security agreement

In his interview with Reuters on Saturday, Shaibani said Syria respected Israel's security concerns, but that Israel must respect those of Syria, including Israel's use of its airspace, Israeli raids and arrests in the south.

He said that around the ‌beginning of the year, the sides had "agreed on paper to almost everything" regarding a security deal that would require Israel to stop attacking Syria and was tied to its withdrawal from ⁠territory seized after Assad fell.

The ⁠deal would include several security zones in Syrian territory near the Israeli border, including a buffer zone where only the United Nations would be present, and others where Syrian forces would deploy in varying degrees of force.

But he said Israel had sought to evade implementation, adding: "We did not see they had the real will to reach an agreement."

The priority now is to "stop Israeli aggression even before reaching a security agreement", Shaibani said. "Then perhaps we can open the topics of peace and the Golan."

US special envoy for Syria Tom Barrack said on Tuesday that Washington was working to establish a mechanism to prevent conflict among Syria, Türkiye and Israel.

Shaibani said there was no agreement yet on the mechanism, which he said must stop attacks and pave the way for the security deal rather than "entrenching ... Israeli occupation."

Shaibani said negotiations over the security agreement had been frozen since the start of the Iran war, but he expected ‌them to restart. Contact ‌between Syria and Israel was cut after the airbase strike, he said.

"We believe there should be ‌contact, ⁠especially with a ⁠party that constantly threatens the security of Syria. But if this contact doesn’t bring results, then we don’t need it," Shaibani said. "We do not trust Israel currently."

"Israel has tried to maintain its security through brute force and it hasn’t succeeded" anywhere, ‌Shaibani said. "I believe negotiations will resume soon."

No date has been set.

"The US is trying ‌continuously to put pressure on Israel to return to the dialogue table," he added.

Asked how optimistic he was, Shaibani said: "It’s very hard to bet on ‌Israel." But Syria had "very great hope" of building stable relationships with its neighbors.

"Syria is extending its hand for understandings, for peace, for ‌diplomacy" and regional stability.


10 Convicted of Terrorism-Related Crimes Executed in Eastern Libya

Military Prosecutor General of the General Command of the Libyan National Army (LNA). Photo: General Command
Military Prosecutor General of the General Command of the Libyan National Army (LNA). Photo: General Command
TT

10 Convicted of Terrorism-Related Crimes Executed in Eastern Libya

Military Prosecutor General of the General Command of the Libyan National Army (LNA). Photo: General Command
Military Prosecutor General of the General Command of the Libyan National Army (LNA). Photo: General Command

Authorities in eastern Libya have carried out execution sentences by firing squad against 10 individuals convicted of “terrorist crimes” and assassinations targeting military personnel and civilians.

In a statement issued Sunday, the Office of the Military Prosecutor General of the General Command of the Libyan National Army (LNA) said the executions were carried out pursuant to rulings by the Supreme Military Court following deliberations that lasted several years.

The statement stressed that the trials had fulfilled all legal requirements, including prosecution and defense procedures.

According to the military prosecutor, the charges ranged from membership in banned terrorist organizations to carrying out assassinations against military personnel and civilians.

He said the executions were intended to achieve justice and deter anyone considering joining organizations designated as terrorist groups both locally and internationally.

The prosecutor’s office added that all legal and executive procedures necessary to enforce the final and binding court rulings had been completed in line with applicable Libyan legislation.

Human rights activists said those executed had been incarcerated at Al-Qarnada Military Prison in eastern Libya and raised questions regarding the status of other defendants and the methods used in their trials, particularly since the military prosecutor’s statement did not provide such details.

Local media, citing a security source, reported that the executions were carried out after the detainees had been tried before a military court and that their families had been informed to collect their bodies from 1200 Hospital in Benghazi.


Sudanese Powers Reject Burhan’s Call for National Dialogue

Nairobi Declaration forces meet in Addis Ababa on Sunday. (Nairobi Declaration forces)
Nairobi Declaration forces meet in Addis Ababa on Sunday. (Nairobi Declaration forces)
TT

Sudanese Powers Reject Burhan’s Call for National Dialogue

Nairobi Declaration forces meet in Addis Ababa on Sunday. (Nairobi Declaration forces)
Nairobi Declaration forces meet in Addis Ababa on Sunday. (Nairobi Declaration forces)

Sudanese political and civilian powers rejected on Sunday the call for dialogue by Chairman of the Transitional Sovereignty Council and Commander of the Sudanese Army Abdel Fattah al-Burhan.

After two days of discussions in the Ethiopian capital Addis Ababa, the powers said the dialogue consolidates division in Sudan.

Earlier this month, al-Burhan declared that he was agreeing to an initiative to form an independent national mechanism that would prepare “comprehensive dialogue”. He vowed to provide legal, security, political and logistic guarantees for the participants, saying no foreign powers would be involved.

While agreeing to the dialogue, al-Burhan also rejected peace that would return the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF) and its supporters to power.

Peace begins with the RSF laying down its weapons, otherwise the army will continue its operations against it, he warned.

In a statement on Sunday, the gatherers in Addis Ababa said that any political process run from areas controlled by one of the warring parties, and under its protection, seeks to grant political legitimacy to military rule and empower members of the ousted regime

The talks in Ethiopia included that Nairobi Declaration forces of the Somoud civilian alliance, led by former Prime Minister Abdalla Hamdok, Arab Socialist Baath Party, Sudan Liberation Movement faction, led by Abdul Wahid al-Nur, National Umma Party, led by Mubarak al-Fadil, and other independent national figures and civilian and youth organizations.

The gatherers agreed on a document that stresses the importance of humanitarian efforts, a ceasefire and political process, which should be based on negotiations under independent parties.

These parties must include civilian and political forces that are opposed to the war and the parties that are allied with the army and RSF.

They agreed that the role of the two warring parties should be limited to the humanitarian and security tracks, excluding the political one, and that the “National Congress” party and its front, the Islamic Movement”, must be completely barred from the peace process.

They considered the roadmap proposed in August 2025 by the Quad nations – Saudi Arabia, the United States, the United Arab Emirates, and Egypt - to be the best reference for the peace process.

They agreed to form a joint committee to develop understandings and coordinate positions among anti-war factions.