Sources to Asharq Al-Awsat: Hamas to Discuss Weapons Issue With Mediators in Coming Days

A Palestinian child picks flowers on Thursday from a field near destroyed buildings in the Nuseirat refugee camp, north of Deir al-Balah in central Gaza (AFP)
A Palestinian child picks flowers on Thursday from a field near destroyed buildings in the Nuseirat refugee camp, north of Deir al-Balah in central Gaza (AFP)
TT

Sources to Asharq Al-Awsat: Hamas to Discuss Weapons Issue With Mediators in Coming Days

A Palestinian child picks flowers on Thursday from a field near destroyed buildings in the Nuseirat refugee camp, north of Deir al-Balah in central Gaza (AFP)
A Palestinian child picks flowers on Thursday from a field near destroyed buildings in the Nuseirat refugee camp, north of Deir al-Balah in central Gaza (AFP)

As Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu intensifies pressure to disarm Hamas and other armed factions as part of the second phase of a ceasefire, the Palestinian movement is pushing back, saying the issue of weapons must be resolved through a broader “national consensus.”

Factional sources in Gaza told Asharq Al-Awsat that “general consultations” are underway with Hamas on the weapons issue alongside other matters.

One source said more serious talks with mediators are likely to begin in the coming days, particularly as preparations to hand over governmental responsibilities in the enclave to the Gaza Administration Committee begin.

Netanyahu said at a news conference on Tuesday that the disarmament process will happen either the easy way or the hard way, but it will happen in the end.

US President Donald Trump has also said Hamas must disarm as it had pledged to do, while his envoy to the United Nations, Mike Waltz, said the Board of Peace would put pressure on the movement to disarm.

Senior Hamas officials insist the weapons file is a purely Palestinian matter that does not concern the movement alone, and that any decision must be taken within a framework of “national consensus.”

No agreement yet

A Hamas source told Asharq Al-Awsat that the issue of the “weapons of resistance” remains at the stage of general consultations, whether among factions or with mediators.

The source said Hamas has again floated ideas and approaches, including placing the weapons under the custodianship of an agreed Palestinian body, or under guarantees from mediators, in a way that would prevent their disarmament by US or Israeli means or their transfer to either side.

The sources stressed that no agreement has been reached to date and that the issue has not yet been seriously discussed.

Israeli Channel 13 reported on Monday that the United States is expected in the coming days to present Israel and Hamas with a document setting a deadline to begin disarmament and comply with the conditions of the second phase.

The report said the document would allow the Israeli government to act independently to carry out the process if the Palestinian movement failed to comply.

Israeli military sources, cited by the public broadcaster on Sunday, expressed doubt that Hamas would accept disarmament. Channel 14 reported that a series of military plans had been approved to force Hamas to do so, including the possibility of reoccupying the Gaza Strip in full.

US envoy Steve Witkoff said days ago that a new meeting with Hamas might be needed if required, adding that he expected the movement to agree to disarm eventually.

Inclusive national framework

Hamas sources inside and outside Gaza said the movement wants any agreement on weapons to be reached within a comprehensive, inclusive national framework. They said consultations have taken place with Palestinian factions and that a proposal is being formulated to present to mediators during serious talks on the issue.

Sources said some mediators raised the issue of weapons during recent meetings, including a meeting in Istanbul days ago between Hamas leaders and Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan.

One source said mediators and some parties, which he did not specify, had shown acceptance of approaches put forward during the general consultations that affirm the right of Palestinian factions to retain what enables them to resist occupation.

On Hamas’s understanding of “national consensus,” sources, including a senior leader, told Asharq Al-Awsat that the weapons do not belong to Hamas alone, noting that other armed factions have taken part effectively in resisting the Israeli occupation.

“We cannot alone decide the fate of an important issue tied to the principles and future of the Palestinian cause,” one of the Hamas sources said.

While Hamas appears keen to avoid being seen as standing alone behind a decision to hand over or dismantle faction weapons in a way that would portray it as defeated, the sources rejected that interpretation.

They said several issues must be settled within a framework of Palestinian national consensus, as was done in the handover of governance in Gaza to a technocratic committee.

They added that a national committee of Gaza factions would work with the committee to ensure it receives all the tools needed for government work, to reach an inclusive national formulation on this “fateful issue.”

The sources said national consensus is not limited to weapons but extends to other “existential issues.”

What role for Fatah

Asked whether Fatah would take part in new factional consultations on the weapons issue, a senior Hamas source said: “Certainly, we are seeking that. But we do not know whether it will refuse, as it did in consultations on forming the technocratic committee, or agree. In any case, Hamas has no problem with decisions being taken in the same way.”

He said the goal of factional consultations due to be held soon in Cairo is to reach an explicit agreement on the fate of the weapons of resistance, without any unilateral decision by Hamas or any other faction on this and other critical issues related to the future of Gaza and the Palestinian cause.

These include moving toward a comprehensive Palestinian national dialogue to restore unity under Arab, Islamic, and international sponsorship.

Israeli and US threats

It remains unclear how Israel and the US will respond to Hamas’s steps, as Israel threatens a return to military action. Some Palestinians believe the Trump administration may be open to other options regarding the future of the weapons.

Trump said about Hamas members, roughly two weeks ago, that they were born with weapons in their hands, so giving them up is not a simple matter.

US Ambassador to the United Nations Mike Waltz said on Wednesday that all military, terrorist, and offensive infrastructure will be destroyed, including tunnels and weapons production facilities, and they will not be rebuilt.

He added that independent international monitors would oversee the disarmament process in Gaza, placing weapons permanently out of use through an agreed process to decommission them, supported by an internationally funded buyback and reintegration program.

Mousa Abu Marzook, a member of Hamas’s political bureau, said in televised remarks that any arrangements concerning Gaza must be reached in understanding with the movement, including the weapons issue. He said Hamas has never accepted handing over its weapons in any form.



UN: 53 Migrants Dead or Missing in Shipwreck Off Libya

(FILES) Migrants sit on board a RHIB (Rigid inflatable boat) after being evacuated by crew members of the “Ocean Viking” rescue ship from the oil tanker the 'Maridive 703' in the search-and-rescue zone of the international waters between Malta and Tunisia, on December 31, 2025. (Photo by Sameer Al-DOUMY / AFP)
(FILES) Migrants sit on board a RHIB (Rigid inflatable boat) after being evacuated by crew members of the “Ocean Viking” rescue ship from the oil tanker the 'Maridive 703' in the search-and-rescue zone of the international waters between Malta and Tunisia, on December 31, 2025. (Photo by Sameer Al-DOUMY / AFP)
TT

UN: 53 Migrants Dead or Missing in Shipwreck Off Libya

(FILES) Migrants sit on board a RHIB (Rigid inflatable boat) after being evacuated by crew members of the “Ocean Viking” rescue ship from the oil tanker the 'Maridive 703' in the search-and-rescue zone of the international waters between Malta and Tunisia, on December 31, 2025. (Photo by Sameer Al-DOUMY / AFP)
(FILES) Migrants sit on board a RHIB (Rigid inflatable boat) after being evacuated by crew members of the “Ocean Viking” rescue ship from the oil tanker the 'Maridive 703' in the search-and-rescue zone of the international waters between Malta and Tunisia, on December 31, 2025. (Photo by Sameer Al-DOUMY / AFP)

The UN migration agency on Monday said 53 people were dead or missing after a boat capsized in the Mediterranean Sea off the Libyan coast. Only two survivors were rescued.

The International Organization for Migration said the boat overturned north of Zuwara on Friday.

"Only two Nigerian women were rescued during a search-and-rescue operation by Libyan authorities," the IOM said in a statement, adding that one of the survivors said she lost her husband and the other said "she lost her two babies in the tragedy.”

According to AFP, the IOM said its teams provided the two survivors with emergency medical care upon disembarkation.

"According to survivor accounts, the boat -- carrying migrants and refugees of African nationalities departed from Al-Zawiya, Libya, at around 11:00 pm on February 5. Approximately six hours later, it capsized after taking on water," the agency said.

"IOM mourns the loss of life in yet another deadly incident along the Central Mediterranean route."

The Geneva-based agency said trafficking and smuggling networks were exploiting migrants along the route from north Africa to southern Europe, profiting from dangerous crossings in unseaworthy boats while exposing people to "severe abuse.”

It called for stronger international cooperation to tackle the networks, alongside safe and regular migration pathways to reduce risks and save lives.


Eight Muslim Countries Condemn Israel’s ‘Illegal’ West Bank Control Measures

 Israeli soldiers stand guard during a weekly settlers' tour in Hebron, in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, February 7, 2026. (Reuters)
Israeli soldiers stand guard during a weekly settlers' tour in Hebron, in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, February 7, 2026. (Reuters)
TT

Eight Muslim Countries Condemn Israel’s ‘Illegal’ West Bank Control Measures

 Israeli soldiers stand guard during a weekly settlers' tour in Hebron, in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, February 7, 2026. (Reuters)
Israeli soldiers stand guard during a weekly settlers' tour in Hebron, in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, February 7, 2026. (Reuters)

Saudi Arabia and seven other Muslim countries on Monday condemned new Israeli measures to tighten control of the West Bank and pave the way for more settlements on the occupied Palestinian territory.

Saudi Arabia, Jordan, the UAE, Qatar, Indonesia, Pakistan, Egypt and Türkiye "condemned in the strongest terms the illegal Israeli decisions and measures aimed at imposing unlawful Israeli sovereignty", a Saudi Foreign Ministry statement said.

Israel's security cabinet approved a series of steps on Sunday that would make it easier for settlers in the occupied West Bank to buy land while granting Israeli authorities more enforcement powers over Palestinians, Israeli media reported.

The West Bank is among the territories that the Palestinians seek for a future independent state. Much of it is under Israeli military control, with limited Palestinian self-rule in some areas run by the Palestinian Authority (PA).

Citing statements by Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich and Defense Minister Israel ‌Katz, Israeli ‌news sites Ynet and Haaretz said ‌the ⁠measures included scrapping ‌decades-old regulations that prevent Jewish private citizens buying land in the West Bank.

They were also reported to include allowing Israeli authorities to administer some religious sites, and expand supervision and enforcement in areas under PA administration in matters of environmental hazards, water offences and damage to archaeological sites.

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas said ⁠the new measures were dangerous, illegal and tantamount to de-facto annexation.

The Israeli ministers ‌did not immediately respond to requests for ‍comment.

The new measures come three ‍days before Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is scheduled to ‍meet in Washington with US President Donald Trump.

In his statement, Abbas urged Trump and the UN Security Council to intervene.

Jordan’s foreign ministry condemned the decision, which it said was “aimed at imposing illegal Israeli sovereignty” and entrenching settlements. The Hamas group called on Palestinians in the West Bank to “intensify the confrontation with the occupation and its settlers.”

Trump has ruled out Israeli annexation of the West Bank, but his administration has not sought to curb Israel's accelerated settlement building, which the Palestinians say denies them a potential state ⁠by eating away at its territory.

Netanyahu, who is facing an election later this year, deems the establishment of any Palestinian state a security threat.

His ruling coalition includes many pro-settler members who want Israel to annex the West Bank, land captured in the 1967 Middle East war to which Israel cites biblical and historical ties.

The United Nations' highest court said in a non-binding advisory opinion in 2024 that Israel's occupation of Palestinian territories and settlements there is illegal and should ‌be ended as soon as possible. Israel disputes this view.

The West Bank is divided between an Israeli-controlled section where settlements are located and sections equaling 40% of the territory where the Palestinian Authority has autonomy.

Palestinians are not permitted to sell land privately to Israelis. Settlers can buy homes on land controlled by Israel’s government.

More than 700,000 Israelis live in the occupied West Bank and east Jerusalem, territories captured by Israel in 1967 from Jordan and sought by the Palestinians for a future state. The international community overwhelmingly considers Israeli settlement construction in these areas to be illegal and an obstacle to peace.

Smotrich, previously a firebrand settler leader and now finance minister, has been granted cabinet-level authority over settlement policies and vowed to double the settler population in the West Bank.

In December, Israel’s Cabinet approved a proposal for 19 new Jewish settlements in the West Bank as the government pushes ahead with a construction binge that further threatens the possibility of a Palestinian state. And Israel has cleared the final hurdle before starting construction on a contentious settlement project near Jerusalem that would effectively cut the West Bank in two, according to a government tender reported in January.


Shibani Meets Barrack in Riyadh

Syrian Foreign Minister Asaad Hassan al-Shibani during his meeting with US Special Envoy to Syria Thomas Barrack in Riyadh (SANA)
Syrian Foreign Minister Asaad Hassan al-Shibani during his meeting with US Special Envoy to Syria Thomas Barrack in Riyadh (SANA)
TT

Shibani Meets Barrack in Riyadh

Syrian Foreign Minister Asaad Hassan al-Shibani during his meeting with US Special Envoy to Syria Thomas Barrack in Riyadh (SANA)
Syrian Foreign Minister Asaad Hassan al-Shibani during his meeting with US Special Envoy to Syria Thomas Barrack in Riyadh (SANA)

Syrian Foreign Minister, Asaad al-Shibani, met on Monday in Riyadh with US Special Envoy for Syria, Tom Barrack, the Syrian Foreign Ministry reported via its Telegram channel.

According to the Syrian Arab News Agency (SANA), the meeting took place on the sidelines of the meeting of political leaders of the International Coalition to Defeat ISIS.

Al-Mikdad, accompanied by General Intelligence Chief Hussein al-Salama, arrived in Riyadh on Sunday to participate in the Coalition’s discussions.

On February 4, the UN Security Council warned during a session on threats to international peace and security that the terrorist group remains adaptable and capable of expansion.

The council emphasized that confronting this evolving threat requires comprehensive international cooperation grounded in respect of international law and human rights.