Saving Siri: After Two Years of Stumbles, Is Apple’s AI Moment Here?

16 September 2023, US, New York: The Apple logo is seen on a building in Manhattan. (dpa)
16 September 2023, US, New York: The Apple logo is seen on a building in Manhattan. (dpa)
TT

Saving Siri: After Two Years of Stumbles, Is Apple’s AI Moment Here?

16 September 2023, US, New York: The Apple logo is seen on a building in Manhattan. (dpa)
16 September 2023, US, New York: The Apple logo is seen on a building in Manhattan. (dpa)

When Apple holds its developer conference at its Cupertino, California headquarters on Monday, the big draw will be a widely expected overhaul to Siri, the AI assistant the iPhone maker two years ago promised, but failed, to improve.

Siri debuted in 2011 and is accessible through the bulk of Apple's installed base of 2.5 billion devices, but hundreds of millions of consumers have been chatting with apps from OpenAI and Anthropic instead. In China and elsewhere, consumers are turning to AI agents - bots that can carry out complex tasks on behalf of human users - to manage daily schedules and take care of rote tasks.

But analysts say Apple is still sitting on an AI gold mine in the form of the personal data that lives on every iPhone -- emails, messages, calendar appointments and other information scattered across the operating system and apps. That data could make ‌Siri's answers more ‌useful and make the assistant more helpful and competent at carrying out tasks.

Apple's ‌challenge ⁠is that such ⁠data is locked down in its operating systems in the name of privacy and security. Third-party apps purposely cannot read data from one another, and even Apple cannot access much of it without a user's permission.

Its task will be unlocking the power of that data, both for itself and for developers. "They have to make Siri not suck, but Apple also has to put the framework together of how their developers can take advantage of AI themselves," said Patrick Moorhead, founder of tech consulting firm Moor Insights & Strategy. "It sounds kind of boring, but AI is all about data, because ⁠data is what creates context and what creates better results."

To be sure, Apple ‌has hardly been punished by Wall Street for its approach to ‌AI. Its shares are up about 50% over the past year, less than the roughly 120% gain of Google parent Alphabet, ‌which has benefited from the success of its Gemini model, but also better than Microsoft's 7% decline ‌in that time. That firm has suffered from being perceived as falling behind the capabilities of rivals such as Anthropic, in part due to Microsoft's close ties to OpenAI.

DEVELOPERS AWAIT SIRI TWEAKS

The most visible moves for Monday will likely be the introduction of a "chat" mode with Siri and a "personal context" option to share that data with the assistant, said Andrew Cornwall, a ‌senior analyst with tech research firm Forrester.

Cornwall expects Apple to let developers plug their apps into Siri using what Apple calls "extensions" and let those developers choose ⁠among AI models from ⁠OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google's Gemini in their apps.

Apple also might introduce a new method of tapping into the AI processing capabilities of its custom chips, Cornwall said.

The point on which analysts tend to agree is that Apple is likely to frame AI not as a technology but rather as experiences or features that its customers will find helpful.

Polls have found the US public uneasy about AI, and while Apple customers in other major markets such as China view AI more positively, Apple has historically never embraced technology for technology's sake.

While Nvidia and Microsoft this year have spent time trying to tame OpenClaw, a technology that can direct an army of AI agents on a personal computer to log into a user's online services and carry out tasks for business users, Ben Bajarin, CEO of tech consultancy Creative Strategies, does not expect Apple to follow suit just yet.

Bajarin said he does not expect Apple to put much emphasis on emerging technologies like OpenClaw, which still have potential security issues.

"It's way too early for the consumer," he said. "Honestly, I'm not even sure businesses are ready for this in an uncontrolled context."



EU Vows AI Rules Will Protect Europeans. Will They?

Humanoid and quadruped robots attend a demonstration calling for the regulation of AI development in Warsaw in September. Sergei GAPON / AFP/File
Humanoid and quadruped robots attend a demonstration calling for the regulation of AI development in Warsaw in September. Sergei GAPON / AFP/File
TT

EU Vows AI Rules Will Protect Europeans. Will They?

Humanoid and quadruped robots attend a demonstration calling for the regulation of AI development in Warsaw in September. Sergei GAPON / AFP/File
Humanoid and quadruped robots attend a demonstration calling for the regulation of AI development in Warsaw in September. Sergei GAPON / AFP/File

AI agents going rogue and ever-louder doomsday warnings have led many in Europe to wonder: are the EU's artificial intelligence rules enough to protect against the potential dangers?

The European Union insists that, yes, its law known as the AI Act is powerful enough since it forces companies to assess and mitigate risks, under threat of massive fines or even bans, AFP said.

EU lawmakers, officials and experts appear more skeptical, pointing to gaps in the rules and questioning whether Brussels has the stomach for a fight with AI labs.

The EU agreed its sweeping AI legislation in 2024 but delayed part of its implementation, and enforcement has only been possible since August this year.

Nonetheless, EU spokesman Thomas Regnier says the rules are "fully fit for purpose".

"You can feel safe at home in Europe, precisely because we have put all these safeguards in place," he said.

So far the EU has sent over 30 requests for information -- a preliminary step that can lead to investigations -- to companies on issues from copyright to cybersecurity and safety.

Brussels says its rules are working since they have already forced AI providers to cough up information to regulators, though Regnier declined to give details.

There are, however, questions about Europe getting access to the latest models: it took months for the EU to test Anthropic's Mythos following US export control orders.

Speaking on condition of anonymity, an EU official admitted such an issue could arise again.

- 'Dangerous experiments' -

EU chief Ursula von der Leyen has proposed talks with the main frontier labs to "pace" the technology's growth, arguing the AI Act puts Europe "in the position to shape global efforts" at regulation.

But that is a tall order without buy-in from the United States -- where President Donald Trump firmly opposes regulating the sector.

And not everyone is convinced the EU law has what it takes.

Four EU lawmakers including lead AI Act negotiator Brando Benifei warn of "legislative gaps" after the EU shelved plans for AI liability rules.

Such rules would have made it easier to hold AI providers accountable for harm caused by their tools.

The lawmakers argue current rules do "not apply to the research, testing or development phase" leaving Europeans "unprotected".

The European Commission rejects the claim.

The law can be "enforced against any provider, starting from the testing phase, if they experience a loss of control that affects the EU's internal market," including cyberattacks and biological or chemical misuse, Regnier said.

Researcher Harshvardhan Pandit echoed lawmaker concerns about liability in the bloc.

"We are missing these pieces of accountability, and if we don't fix this now and we get more of these incidents, this is only going to get worse," said Pandit, of AI Accountability Lab in Trinity College Dublin.

If a model ends up hacking a website, once AI providers have sold their tools, Pandit said "we don't know" who is ultimately responsible.

But he also said the AI Act requires developers "to have addressed" safety risks by the time a model reaches the market, noting that recent incidents including with OpenAI agents happened during testing.

And he noted the EU has other laws to counter risks, including on cybersecurity and data protection.

- US influence -

EU lawmaker Benifei said the AI Act correctly anticipated the threat of agents going rogue, but raised concerns about enforcement -- including that staffing levels at the EU's AI Office are nowhere near enough to match the risks.

"The European Commission must guarantee the office political backing, operational independence, resources, and technical staff to quickly deliver decisive enforcement," Benifei told AFP.

Analyst Pandit agreed the AI office needed "far more people and technical expertise".

The office currently employs around 125 staff.

And there is the question of whether the EU has the appetite for taking on AI providers, most of which are US-based.

Brussels has already drawn Washington's ire with probes under different laws, culminating in fines worth billions of dollars.

The EU official admitted the bloc may think twice before enforcing its full powers against American firms, considering Europe's dependence on US tech.

One way to have greater influence over AI safety, the official said, was to build its own technology.

"Europe must also build capabilities, from chips and cloud to a publicly funded CERN for AI," Benifei echoed, referring to the European physics lab in Switzerland that seeks to unravel the universe's composition.

He also said the EU, as von der Leyen pledged last month, should "work more closely with middle powers like Canada, which share an interest in rules that no power or company can dictate".


Nvidia-Backed Reflection Unveils First AI Model to Take on Chinese Open Models

An NVIDIA logo appears in this illustration taken August 25, 2025. (Reuters)
An NVIDIA logo appears in this illustration taken August 25, 2025. (Reuters)
TT

Nvidia-Backed Reflection Unveils First AI Model to Take on Chinese Open Models

An NVIDIA logo appears in this illustration taken August 25, 2025. (Reuters)
An NVIDIA logo appears in this illustration taken August 25, 2025. (Reuters)

Nvidia-backed Reflection ‌AI debuted its first open-weight model named Beam on Monday, as the startup aims to compete with lower-cost Chinese models such as DeepSeek and Kimi in coding and agentic tasks.

Reflection said Beam is competitive with Chinese AI startup Z.ai's GLM-5.2 and is closing in on Qwen3.8-Max on coding and agentic ‌tasks.

The startup ‌said ⁠that Beam contains ⁠501 billion total parameters, or variables that determine how an AI system processes information, but activates only 23 billion for each task to make the model faster and cheaper to ⁠run by using only part of ‌its network for ‌each task.

Comparatively, Z.ai's GLM-5.2 has ‌about 744 billion total parameters with 40 ‌billion active parameters.

The launch comes as US tech firms are trying to fend off competition from Chinese open-weight ‌models that are cheaper, more customizable and capable of generating code ⁠nearly ⁠as well as leading models from OpenAI and Anthropic.

Founded in 2024 by former DeepMind researchers Misha Laskin and Ioannis Antonoglou, Reflection develops tools that automate software development, a fast-growing use case for AI.

Earlier this year, Reflection signed a deal with SpaceX for additional computing capacity at the Elon Musk-led company's Colossus 2 data center.


Pinterest Taps Amazon Veteran James Dibbo as CFO

A display for image sharing and social media service Pinterest is seen at the Collision conference in Toronto, Ontario, Canada June 23, 2022. (Reuters)
A display for image sharing and social media service Pinterest is seen at the Collision conference in Toronto, Ontario, Canada June 23, 2022. (Reuters)
TT

Pinterest Taps Amazon Veteran James Dibbo as CFO

A display for image sharing and social media service Pinterest is seen at the Collision conference in Toronto, Ontario, Canada June 23, 2022. (Reuters)
A display for image sharing and social media service Pinterest is seen at the Collision conference in Toronto, Ontario, Canada June 23, 2022. (Reuters)

Pinterest ‌said on Monday it has appointed Amazon executive James Dibbo as its chief financial officer, effective October 26.

Dibbo, 56, who will succeed Julia Donnelly at Pinterest, has led finance for the e-commerce giant's Ads, Prime ‌Video and Amazon ‌MGM Studios businesses ‌among ⁠others.

Shares of Pinterest were down about 1% in extended trading.

"James has led complex global businesses at scale, helped build ⁠high-performing teams and ‌understands the ‌intersection of consumer experience, shopping, advertising ‌and technology," Pinterest CEO Bill ‌Ready said.

The company had said in August that Donnelly would depart on October ‌30.

Donnelly, who is leaving to pursue a ⁠new ⁠opportunity at a private, early-stage company, joined Pinterest in 2023.

The image-sharing platform had forecast slower third-quarter revenue growth as it navigates a highly competitive digital advertising market dominated by larger players such as Meta's Instagram and Facebook.