US House Republicans Push Forward on Trump Funding Plan for Iran War, Election Overhaul

 House Budget Committee Chairman Jodey Arrington, R-Texas, right, joined at left by Rep. Brendan Boyle, D-Pa., the ranking member, speaks during a markup on the Fiscal Year 2027 spending plan, at the Capitol in Washington, Thursday, July 16, 2026. (AP)
House Budget Committee Chairman Jodey Arrington, R-Texas, right, joined at left by Rep. Brendan Boyle, D-Pa., the ranking member, speaks during a markup on the Fiscal Year 2027 spending plan, at the Capitol in Washington, Thursday, July 16, 2026. (AP)
TT

US House Republicans Push Forward on Trump Funding Plan for Iran War, Election Overhaul

 House Budget Committee Chairman Jodey Arrington, R-Texas, right, joined at left by Rep. Brendan Boyle, D-Pa., the ranking member, speaks during a markup on the Fiscal Year 2027 spending plan, at the Capitol in Washington, Thursday, July 16, 2026. (AP)
House Budget Committee Chairman Jodey Arrington, R-Texas, right, joined at left by Rep. Brendan Boyle, D-Pa., the ranking member, speaks during a markup on the Fiscal Year 2027 spending plan, at the Capitol in Washington, Thursday, July 16, 2026. (AP)

Republicans in the US Congress forged ahead on Thursday with a $95 billion budget plan to meet President Donald Trump's demands for new defense funding for the Iran war, farm assistance and a sweeping overhaul of voting requirements ahead of the November midterm elections.

A Republican-controlled budget panel in the US House of Representatives approved the resolution on Thursday, clearing it for a full House vote as early as next week.

If passed, it would pave the way for a special budget reconciliation bill intended to clear the Senate with a simple majority rather than the 60 votes needed for most legislation in that chamber.

That could enable Republicans, who hold 53 of ‌the Senate's 100 seats, ‌to bypass Democratic opposition and advance legislation directing $60 billion for defense, $13 billion for ‌intelligence, $12 ⁠billion for agriculture, ⁠and $10 billion to enact Trump’s signature voter ID bill, the SAVE America Act, over the next decade.

But it was too early to say whether a House reconciliation bill would qualify under strict Senate rules or even garner a simple majority.

"We're not going to get any help from our Democrat colleagues to do what I believe are ... critical things," budget committee chair Jodey Arrington, a Texas Republican, told his fellow panel members, who approved the resolution for full House consideration in a 20-14 party-line vote.

Democrats criticized the measure for not addressing soaring prices for gasoline, food and other products ⁠that voters say is their top issue.

"The American people know that this is ‌a failed presidency, and this has been a failed Republican majority," said ‌Representative Brendan Boyle, the committee's top Democrat.

House Republican leaders hope to pass the blueprint as early as next week. But it ‌was not clear that the chamber's narrow Republican majority could advance the measure.

Earlier on Thursday, the House ‌was unable to pass a veterans benefits bill because of opposition from Republican hardliners.

In the Senate, the blueprint faces likely opposition from defense hawks who want more Pentagon spending, deficit hawks who want spending cuts to pay for the outlays and others who fear that Trump's partisan voter ID bill could hamper efforts to win the November midterm elections.

The SAVE America Act, ‌which Trump calls his No. 1 legislative priority, lacks the votes to pass the Senate as a standalone bill, given vehement opposition from Democrats who say it ⁠would disenfranchise millions of ⁠Americans.

Republicans intend to use reconciliation to offer states grant money as an incentive to require voters to show photo ID at polling places and proof of citizenship to register to vote, and to turn over state voter rolls to the Department of Homeland Security.

Republicans defeated 14 Democratic amendments to advance party priorities including reinstating healthcare, food assistance, educational funding cut by previous bills, curbing Trump's immigration crackdown, revoking Trump tariffs and eliminating spending on the Iran war.

The defense segment is intended to help fund the Iran war, replenish US military weapons stockpiles depleted by the Middle East conflict and boost military readiness, according to Republican lawmakers.

"This budget resolution is a poorly planned, poorly drafted backdoor deal to pay for President Trump's decision to start a war with Iran. It's irresponsible ... and we see it played out every single day on the news," said Democratic Representative Becca Balint of Vermont.

The resolution contains no offsets for the new $95 billion in spending. But Republican committee staff said it would reduce overall spending by capping discretionary spending. The resolution would authorize spending legislation to help US farmers facing higher fuel and fertilizer costs from the war.



US Considers Hitting Iran with 'Mother of All Bombs'

An undated handout photo of the “Mother of All Bombs” at Eglin Air Force Base in Florida, US (Reuters)
An undated handout photo of the “Mother of All Bombs” at Eglin Air Force Base in Florida, US (Reuters)
TT

US Considers Hitting Iran with 'Mother of All Bombs'

An undated handout photo of the “Mother of All Bombs” at Eglin Air Force Base in Florida, US (Reuters)
An undated handout photo of the “Mother of All Bombs” at Eglin Air Force Base in Florida, US (Reuters)

The United States is considering using its biggest non-nuclear bomb against Iran if President Donald Trump should decide to renew combat in the war that has hit a deadlock, CNN reported Thursday.

The military is planning for the potential use of the GBU-43/B Massive Ordnance Air Blast (MOAB) bomb -- better known by its nickname, the "Mother Of All Bombs" -- to target Iranian energy infrastructure and nuclear sites, according to the news outlet, which quoted officials familiar with the matter.

Trump is trying to boost his low approval ratings ahead of November's midterm elections, with polls showing the unpopular war in Iran and fuel and other price rises it has caused are hurting his Republican Party.

Diplomatic efforts to end the conflict, which erupted with US-Israeli strikes on Iran in February, have been at an impasse since the summer.

But officials have raised doubts over the efficacy of the bomb if it were deployed, particularly its ability to destroy suspected underground nuclear sites in Iran.

"The MOAB is a massive information operation type weapon that is great for huge area clearance but not much else," a source familiar with the plans told CNN.

"It is definitely not designed as a deep penetration warhead."

The United States and Israel have said the war was necessary to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons -- a goal Tehran has long denied pursuing.

There are also concerns over the possibility of civilian casualties from such a huge weapon, according to AFP.

Washington has in recent weeks dialled back military operations in favour of economic pressure.

In 2017, the US military in Afghanistan dropped the "MOAB" to target ISIS group hideouts in a complex of tunnels and bunkers, killing more than 90 militants.


Pezeshkian: Iran is Facing its Most Intense Blockade since 1979

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian visits an exhibition that showcases the defense ministry's latest advancements in defense and space in Tehran. Photo: -/Iranian Presidency/dpa
Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian visits an exhibition that showcases the defense ministry's latest advancements in defense and space in Tehran. Photo: -/Iranian Presidency/dpa
TT

Pezeshkian: Iran is Facing its Most Intense Blockade since 1979

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian visits an exhibition that showcases the defense ministry's latest advancements in defense and space in Tehran. Photo: -/Iranian Presidency/dpa
Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian visits an exhibition that showcases the defense ministry's latest advancements in defense and space in Tehran. Photo: -/Iranian Presidency/dpa

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian said Tuesday that the country was facing its most intense blockade since the 1979 Islamic Revolution, accusing the United States of seeking to provoke public protests.

Iran and the United States have been at war since February 28, when US and Israeli strikes killed Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

"Over the 48 years since the Revolution, we have never faced such intense blockade, war and difficulties as we are facing now," Pezeshkian said in a speech broadcast by state television.

He accused Washington of seeking to make life difficult for Iranians in order to fuel public anger and trigger unrest.

Pezeshkian said the US was focusing its efforts on making "the people become upset and face difficulties, and then for social protests to emerge so that they can achieve their sinister objectives".

The US imposed a blockade on Iranian ports in response to Tehran's closure of the strategic Strait of Hormuz, diverting or stopping vessels travelling to and from Iranian ports.

Iran has repeatedly accused the US and Israel of fomenting unrest inside the country, and in recent months has executed several Iranians accused of collaborating with its foes.

In late December last year, protests over the cost of living erupted in Iran, spreading nationwide and evolving into a wider anti-government movement.

Iran's rulers blamed the US and Israel for the unrest.


Why Are More Women Leaving Trump's Administration?

(FILES) Kimberly Guilfoyle, President Trump's nominee to be the US ambassador to Greece, speaks alongside US President Donald Trump, during a Greek Independence Day celebration in the East Room of the White House in Washington, DC, on March 24, 2025.  (Photo by Brendan SMIALOWSKI / AFP)
(FILES) Kimberly Guilfoyle, President Trump's nominee to be the US ambassador to Greece, speaks alongside US President Donald Trump, during a Greek Independence Day celebration in the East Room of the White House in Washington, DC, on March 24, 2025. (Photo by Brendan SMIALOWSKI / AFP)
TT

Why Are More Women Leaving Trump's Administration?

(FILES) Kimberly Guilfoyle, President Trump's nominee to be the US ambassador to Greece, speaks alongside US President Donald Trump, during a Greek Independence Day celebration in the East Room of the White House in Washington, DC, on March 24, 2025.  (Photo by Brendan SMIALOWSKI / AFP)
(FILES) Kimberly Guilfoyle, President Trump's nominee to be the US ambassador to Greece, speaks alongside US President Donald Trump, during a Greek Independence Day celebration in the East Room of the White House in Washington, DC, on March 24, 2025. (Photo by Brendan SMIALOWSKI / AFP)

A wave of departures by female officials from US President Donald Trump's second administration has raised questions about whether women and men are being treated equally. Four of the eight women holding Cabinet-level positions left within just three months, while several male officials remained in their posts despite facing criticism and allegations that sparked widespread controversy.

According to The New York Times, the latest development came with the forced resignation of Kimberly Guilfoyle, the US ambassador to Greece, after a news report alleged that she had asked a Trump donor to pay a $100,000 credit card bill shortly before her confirmation hearing, promising him access to administration officials in return.

Guilfoyle denied the allegations, while Trump said he was unhappy with what he had read about her, despite acknowledging that she had performed well in the role. He also downplayed any substantial personal connection to Guilfoyle, one of his most ardent supporters, who was once engaged to his eldest son, Donald Trump Jr.

Four Female Officials Leave Their Posts

The past three months have seen the departure of four prominent female officials: Attorney General Pam Bondi, Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard.

They left for different reasons, but all four were replaced by men.

Bondi's departure followed criticism of her handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files, her failure to meet Trump's demands to pursue his political adversaries, and his dissatisfaction with her performance during congressional hearings and television appearances.

Noem, meanwhile, was dismissed following her congressional testimony about government advertising campaigns worth millions of dollars in which she featured prominently. She said Trump had approved the spending, an account the president denied.

Gabbard announced her resignation to care for her ailing husband, but the decision came amid tensions with the White House after she declined to affirm that Iran had posed an imminent threat, a claim Trump had used to justify the war against the country. The president described her position as less hardline than his own.

Chavez-DeRemer left her post amid allegations of dysfunction and a toxic workplace environment within the Labor Department, as well as claims of abuse of power, an inappropriate relationship with a staff member and the use of public funds for personal purposes.

Male Officials Face Allegations but Remain in Office

While female officials departed, several male members of the administration faced criticism and allegations of their own.

FBI Director Kash Patel faced questions over allegations of excessive drinking, assigning an armed tactical team to protect his girlfriend and using a government aircraft for personal purposes. Patel denied the allegations.

Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick was named in files released by the Justice Department as having visited the private island owned by convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth also faced criticism after disclosing secret military plans in a conversation on a private messaging application to which Jeffrey Goldberg, editor-in-chief of The Atlantic, had been added by mistake.

Trump did penalize his former national security adviser, Mike Waltz, for adding the journalist to the conversation. However, Waltz was subsequently appointed US ambassador to the United Nations, a position Trump had previously promised to his Republican congressional ally Elise Stefanik.

Stefanik ultimately found herself politically sidelined before resigning from Congress.

Political Criticism Over Unequal Accountability

According to The New York Times report, the apparent disparity has drawn criticism from several Democrats, who argue that women are being dismissed more quickly than men when controversies or allegations emerge.

Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York questioned the pattern after Bondi and Noem left their posts. Asked by a reporter whom the president should fire next, she responded: "Is he out of women?" She suggested that Trump appeared capable of dismissing only female Cabinet secretaries.

Democratic Rep. Jasmine Crockett of Texas, a frequent target of Trump's mockery, wrote on social media that Hegseth should be the next to leave the administration.

"I see a theme," she wrote, arguing that Trump was much quicker to dismiss incompetent women than incompetent men.

During a congressional hearing in April, Rep. Madeleine Dean confronted Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick over what she described as a double standard, citing his previous ties to Epstein.

Dean asked whether Trump was concerned about Lutnick's past relationship with Epstein. Lutnick replied that he would not discuss his conversations with the president.

Dean pointed out that Trump had dismissed three Cabinet secretaries, all women. She argued that if the president were genuinely concerned about holding those who enabled Epstein accountable, he would dismiss Lutnick as well.

Kathryn Dunn Tenpas, a nonresident fellow at the Brookings Institution who has studied diversity in presidential administrations since the Reagan era, described the pattern as highly unusual.

She said she had never witnessed a situation in which the first wave of Cabinet departures involved only members of one gender, namely women.

White House Defends Trump's Appointments

The White House, meanwhile, defended Trump's approach to selecting members of his administration, insisting that the president based his appointments on their ability to deliver results for the American people.

White House spokesperson Taylor Rogers said Trump had assembled what she described as the greatest administration in history, choosing members of his team according to a single criterion: their ability to serve the American people effectively.

She contrasted that approach with what she characterized as the Democrats' obsession with identity politics, saying Trump judged individuals according to their qualifications and abilities rather than personal characteristics.

During a Women's History Month celebration last year, Trump expressed satisfaction that his Cabinet included more women than any previous Republican administration. The number of women remaining in Cabinet-level positions, however, subsequently fell to four.

Nevertheless, May Mailman, director of the Independent Women's Law Center and a former White House official in both Trump administrations, rejected the suggestion that the departures demonstrated the marginalization of women.

She pointed to women who continued to hold prominent leadership positions, including White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles, Erica Schwartz, who had been confirmed to lead the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and Harmeet Dhillon, head of the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division.

Mailman argued that conservative women were not isolated within the Trump administration but were empowered to exercise influence.

She maintained that women were essential members of the administration because of their competence and qualifications, rather than their gender.