Israel Kills, Detains Gaza Aid Truck Drivers and Guards

Trucks carrying food, after entering the Gaza Strip through the Kerem Shalom crossing, drive through Khan Younis, Sunday, Feb. 1, 2026. (AP Photo/Abdel Kareem Hana)
Trucks carrying food, after entering the Gaza Strip through the Kerem Shalom crossing, drive through Khan Younis, Sunday, Feb. 1, 2026. (AP Photo/Abdel Kareem Hana)
TT

Israel Kills, Detains Gaza Aid Truck Drivers and Guards

Trucks carrying food, after entering the Gaza Strip through the Kerem Shalom crossing, drive through Khan Younis, Sunday, Feb. 1, 2026. (AP Photo/Abdel Kareem Hana)
Trucks carrying food, after entering the Gaza Strip through the Kerem Shalom crossing, drive through Khan Younis, Sunday, Feb. 1, 2026. (AP Photo/Abdel Kareem Hana)

For hours, Sami Abu Moussa was unable to contact his older brother Bilal, who worked to secure the entry of aid into Gaza.

As his anxiety grew, Sami received a call from one of Bilal’s colleagues, who told him that Israeli forces had shot his brother in the al-Mawasi area northwest of Rafah in southern Gaza.

Aid security personnel at risk

Bilal Abu Moussa was brought dead to Nasser Medical Complex in Khan Younis, southern Gaza, on July 14 after being struck by several bullets fired by Israeli drones and military vehicles stationed near areas where aid security personnel employed by private companies were deployed.

Sami Abu Moussa told Asharq Al-Awsat that his brother helped secure aid for international organizations, including the United Nations Children’s Fund, UNICEF, and the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees, UNRWA.

He said Bilal had worked for several months with a private company securing the entry of aid for Gaza’s residents.

Trucks loaded with humanitarian aid on the Egyptian side of the Rafah crossing (AFP)

Sami said his brother had repeatedly complained that Israeli forces deliberately fired at the security personnel and truck drivers.

On July 20, an Israeli drone targeted a vehicle belonging to a private security company protecting aid allocated to the World Food Program, killing three Palestinian employees.

The company later denied Israeli accusations that its employees had attempted to smuggle weapons.

Rimal al-Sahra Security said the weapons carried by its personnel when they were targeted in al-Mawasi in Rafah belonged to the company and were intended to protect aid from theft.

It said this was standard practice carried out under protection protocols agreed between international organizations and Israel.

Summary executions

Aid security personnel were not the only workers targeted. Truck drivers transporting aid from the Kerem Shalom crossing into Gaza also faced danger under tight security conditions, with any wrong movement potentially putting their lives at risk.

Ahmed Nasser Isleem was the latest truck driver killed by Israeli forces in a border area in southern Gaza.

His family said he was deliberately shot without cause on July 8 in what it described as a “summary execution.”

FILE PHOTO: Security personnel guard trucks carrying aid as they arrive in Rafah, amid the ongoing conflict between Israel and Hamas, in the southern Gaza Strip January 17, 2024. REUTERS/Mohammed Salem/File Photo

Ahmed’s brother, Khader Isleem, said he had received the usual permit to drive his truck to the Philadelphi area and return carrying aid.

He said drivers underwent strict security checks before receiving permits and again upon arrival, but accused Israeli forces of deliberately targeting drivers, as they had done with his brother.

Khader told Asharq Al-Awsat that Ahmed had been traveling in a convoy of trucks carrying food supplies for World Central Kitchen when one of the vehicles broke down.

Ahmed got out to help the driver when a military jeep approached and soldiers ordered both men to raise their hands, Khader said.

One of the soldiers then shot Ahmed directly in the head at point-blank range and without warning, he said.

The Guardian cited other drivers traveling with Ahmed as saying the Israeli military jeep approached his truck and ordered him to get out.

The soldiers also ordered other drivers out of their vehicles after one of the trucks broke down and severely beat them after forcing them to remove their clothes, according to their accounts.

The drivers said one of the soldiers then killed Ahmed “in cold blood.”

Israeli forces also killed two truck drivers inside Rafah in southern Gaza at the end of May in what was described as a summary execution.

The drivers, Mahmoud Awad and Mohammed al-Hila, were inside their trucks when Israeli forces suddenly surrounded several vehicles and ordered them to get out.

The forces had previously instructed the drivers to travel towards Gaza along a designated route.

That was the initial account of the incident, but further details later emerged from drivers whose testimonies were relayed by Jihad Isleem, deputy head of the Private Transport Association in the Gaza Strip.

The drivers said one truck had broken down, and another had moved to tow it after coordination with Israeli soldiers.

The soldiers then opened fire directly at the drivers, killing both men in what Isleem described as a clear summary execution.

He said their families and the association received conflicting information about their fate for more than two days before learning that they had been killed rather than wounded.

The image reissued on 23 April 2026 shows the 2026 World Press Photo of the Year finalist by Mohammed Saber, EPA Images, depicting Palestinians climb onto an aid truck as it enters the Gaza Strip via the Zikim Crossing, 27 July 2025, in an attempt to get flour, during what the Israeli military called a ''tactical suspension'' in operations to allow humanitarian aid through. EPA/MOHAMMED SABER

After the incident, the Israeli army said it had opened an investigation and changed its instructions for opening fire inside Gaza.

The change, however, brought no tangible improvement.

Since then, Ahmed Isleem has been killed, four truck drivers have been wounded and at least 16 others have been arrested or detained. Some were later released.

On July 17, seven drivers were held at a military site in Rafah before being released.

Several days ago, drivers and transport company officials joined a protest organized by the Private Transport Association against the continued targeting of humanitarian aid truck drivers carrying supplies through the crossings.

Some drivers said they had been subjected to humiliating searches and beatings despite obtaining the required security permits in advance to travel to and from Gaza.

They said the repeated targeting had reduced their ability to transport aid.



Extensive Power Cuts Hamper Life in Sudan

A blacksmith attempts to operate a welding machine at his workshop in Omdurman, Sudan, August 20, 2026. (Reuters)
A blacksmith attempts to operate a welding machine at his workshop in Omdurman, Sudan, August 20, 2026. (Reuters)
TT

Extensive Power Cuts Hamper Life in Sudan

A blacksmith attempts to operate a welding machine at his workshop in Omdurman, Sudan, August 20, 2026. (Reuters)
A blacksmith attempts to operate a welding machine at his workshop in Omdurman, Sudan, August 20, 2026. (Reuters)

Sudanese welder Shannan Mohammed has been building furniture for a family in Omdurman little by little as constant blackouts interrupt his work.

Pointing to half-built doors, chairs, and tables in the courtyard of a home, he says, "All this is money that has been frozen because of lack of electricity stopping the work."

Army-controlled areas of Sudan have been plagued by blackouts that have worsened recently due to a combination of targeting of the power grid by the ‌rival Rapid Support ‌Forces (RSF) and meager government funding to carry out ‌repairs.

The ⁠blackouts have impeded ⁠the lives of hundreds of thousands who have returned to Khartoum since the army retook it last year and have undermined attempts to rebuild the devastated economy.

"They give you five hours [of power], and then it cuts. It comes back the next day. And it has no benefit for a working person because it comes at night," ⁠Mohammed said.

Even household tasks have become impossible, Mohammed's sister ‌Awatef told Reuters.

"Every time I ‌do the laundry, I don't get to finish it because the power cuts ‌off," she said. "We only eat take-out from the street, so ‌that nothing is left over for us to put in the refrigerator."

High gas prices put generators out of reach for many. Earlier this month, Sudan's prime minister exempted solar panels for personal use from customs and fees.

The conflict ‌in Sudan has increasingly turned into a drone war, with both sides targeting key civilian infrastructure ⁠in addition to ⁠military targets. The war has devastated livelihoods and spread famine in multiple parts of the country.

"The targeting of the electricity sector in particular was very significant," said a spokesperson for the Khartoum state government, Altayeb Saadeldin, listing looting of copper wires and fuel and other components, as well as drone attacks, as reasons for the outages.

Sudan's main power source, the Merowe dam, had been among targets hit, he said, adding that the delay of annual rains had also impacted power generation in other dams.

Asked for comment, an RSF source said allegations that the RSF had targeted the power grid were "incorrect and army propaganda".


US Ambassador: Hezbollah Ties to Iran Affect Lebanon and the Course of Talks

President Joseph Aoun presiding over a ceremony marking the 81st anniversary of General Security (Lebanese Presidency)
President Joseph Aoun presiding over a ceremony marking the 81st anniversary of General Security (Lebanese Presidency)
TT

US Ambassador: Hezbollah Ties to Iran Affect Lebanon and the Course of Talks

President Joseph Aoun presiding over a ceremony marking the 81st anniversary of General Security (Lebanese Presidency)
President Joseph Aoun presiding over a ceremony marking the 81st anniversary of General Security (Lebanese Presidency)

The stalled US-Iranian negotiations remain uncertain, and their direct or indirect impact on Lebanon continues to loom over efforts to achieve tangible results in talks with Israel, meanwhile President Joseph Aoun reaffirmed the state's commitment to its institutions and role.

US Ambassador to Lebanon Michel Issa made notable remarks, linking developments in southern Lebanon to events unfolding between Washington and Tehran. He also stressed that any engagement with Hezbollah would take place only through the Lebanese state.

Aoun: State moving forward

Aoun said the state was continuing to strengthen its presence and institutions, alongside the negotiations.

"We are engaged in an internal struggle between people who do not want state institutions, who are the antithesis of the state and live at its expense in its absence, and between us and you, who want the state and its institutions," Aoun said during a ceremony marking the 81st anniversary of the General Security.

He added: “We here tell them, whatever you do, we will continue. Not for your sake, but for the sake of citizens to whom we owe a duty."

Issa: Southern Lebanon talks tied to Washington-Tehran Tension

US Ambassador to Lebanon Michel Issa said negotiations over southern Lebanon cannot be separated from regional developments, particularly talks between Washington and Tehran.

He said Hezbollah must surrender its weapons to the state, adding that continued links between the group and Iranian decision-making are affecting Lebanon and the course of negotiations.

Ministerial sources said US-Lebanese-Israeli talks would continue, with a new round expected in Rome in September, but acknowledged that progress hinges partly on the outcome of US-Iranian negotiations and Tehran’s ties with Hezbollah.

Issa clarifies US position: Any Contact with Hezbollah to Go Through the State

US Ambassador Michel Issa clarified that any US engagement with Hezbollah would take place through the Lebanese state, saying Washington could help bridge differences through negotiations. He reiterated that Hezbollah must surrender its weapons and accused the group of taking orders from Iran.

Issa also said talks with Israel are between the Lebanese and Israeli states, with Washington seeking to narrow differences while pressing Israel to reduce strikes in southern Lebanon. He added that Hezbollah’s future would depend partly on whether Iran maintains its support for the group.


Arms Embargo: Can Washington Breach the Wall of Sudan’s War?

Massad Boulos, senior adviser to the US president for Arab and African affairs (AFP) 
Massad Boulos, senior adviser to the US president for Arab and African affairs (AFP) 
TT

Arms Embargo: Can Washington Breach the Wall of Sudan’s War?

Massad Boulos, senior adviser to the US president for Arab and African affairs (AFP) 
Massad Boulos, senior adviser to the US president for Arab and African affairs (AFP) 

The United States has stirred the stagnant waters of Sudan’s war by announcing plans to expand an arms embargo imposed on Darfur for more than two decades to cover the entire country.

The move appears aimed at shifting from limited sanctions to a direct attempt to reduce the warring parties’ ability to keep fighting and force them to reconsider the cost of seeking a military victory compared with returning to negotiations. It is a risky step, but one that also signals Washington’s determination to make a breakthrough in a war described as one of the world’s largest and most severe humanitarian crises.

Massad Boulos, senior advisor to the US president for Arab and African affairs, told the UN Security Council days ago that the US proposal would cover drones, related technologies and components, while strengthening the work of the sanctions panel of experts tasked with monitoring violations.

The current Darfur arms embargo expires Sept. 12, making the coming weeks a test of Washington’s ability to build consensus in the Security Council. Russia has voiced clear reservations, saying it would not accept measures affecting the Sudanese army’s capabilities, while China has taken a cautious position on expanding sanctions, leaving adoption of the proposal in its current form uncertain.

Washington views the proposed embargo as a pressure tool rather than merely a punitive measure. According to The Associated Press, the US administration believes restricting the flow of weapons to the belligerents could push them back to the negotiating table. UN political affairs chief Rosemary DiCarlo has meanwhile warned against the parties’ continued reliance on a military solution and the steady influx of sophisticated weapons.

Sudan’s Sovereignty Council chairman and army chief Gen. Abdel Fattah al-Burhan, however, has played down the possible impact of sanctions, saying they would neither affect Sudan nor weaken the armed forces’ resolve. He insisted the army would continue fighting until it retakes all areas controlled by the Rapid Support Forces.

The contrast shows the political struggle surrounding the US proposal. Washington wants to convince both sides that the flow of weapons cannot remain open-ended, while Sudan’s military leadership continues to speak in terms of retaking territory by force. The RSF is likewise reinforcing its positions and relying on supply networks, weapons and drones.

The US premise is that the ability to rearm prolongs the war: As long as each side believes it can replace its losses and obtain more drones, ammunition, fuel and financing, its incentive to compromise remains limited. If supplies become more difficult and costly, military calculations could gradually shift toward a settlement.

Drone use has expanded significantly in recent months, with attacks extending beyond front lines to cities, markets, electricity and water facilities and health infrastructure. Rosemary DiCarlo, the UN's under secretary-general for political and peacebuilding affairs, said sophisticated weapons, including drones, have become a major factor in increasing the war’s toll on civilians.

Restricting drones and their components, ammunition and heavy weapons could therefore yield an immediate humanitarian benefit by reducing long-range attacks, civilian casualties, displacement and disruption to hospitals and electricity and water networks, while improving humanitarian access.

But the plan’s success will depend on enforcement. The Darfur embargo, in place since 2005, failed to stop weapons from entering the region, exposing the limits of UN resolutions without effective monitoring and enforcement mechanisms.

Opposition Welcomes Proposal

Sudanese civilian opposition forces welcomed the US proposal while stressing that it should be linked to a comprehensive political process.

Khalid Omer Yousif, a leader in the Sumoud alliance, said pressure on both warring parties should be part of an “integrated package” to end the fighting and restore the civilian political process, rather than an isolated punitive measure.

Yasir Arman, head of the Sudan People’s Liberation Movement–Revolutionary Democratic Current, warned that piecemeal measures could lead to “managing the war rather than ending it,” calling for a joint African Union-UN roadmap to halt the fighting and preserve Sudan’s unity.

The real test of Washington’s seriousness will be whether it can move from a Security Council resolution to pursuing supply networks, including flights, land routes, brokers, companies and individuals facilitating the purchase and transfer of weapons to Sudan.

Washington does not appear to be relying on the embargo alone to end the war. Rather, the proposal is likely part of a broader effort to raise the cost of continued fighting while pushing for negotiations. US officials say the goal is not to hand victory to one side over the other, but to reduce both sides’ ability to wage an open-ended war.

Ultimately, the seriousness of the US effort will be measured by its willingness to pressure the parties’ backers, not only the Sudanese belligerents themselves. If weapons continue to flow, expanding the embargo will amount to little more than a legal framework with limited effect. But if combined with monitoring, sanctions and simultaneous diplomatic pressure to reopen negotiations, it could become one of the strongest international tools of pressure deployed since the war began.

At its core, the US proposal brings two opposing calculations into direct confrontation: Washington wants to make continuing the war harder and more costly, while both sides insist on fighting until they recover all territory. Between them, civilians stand to benefit most from any measure that genuinely reduces the flow of instruments of war, even before a comprehensive political settlement is reached.