ACE Robotics CEO: Robot Brains Will Have 'ChatGPT Moment' by End of 2027

Wang Xiaogang, co-founder of SenseTime and chairman of ACE Robotics, speaks during an interview with Reuters at the booth of ACE Robotics, during the 2026 World Robot Conference, in Beijing, China, August 21, 2026. REUTERS/Tingshu Wang
Wang Xiaogang, co-founder of SenseTime and chairman of ACE Robotics, speaks during an interview with Reuters at the booth of ACE Robotics, during the 2026 World Robot Conference, in Beijing, China, August 21, 2026. REUTERS/Tingshu Wang
TT

ACE Robotics CEO: Robot Brains Will Have 'ChatGPT Moment' by End of 2027

Wang Xiaogang, co-founder of SenseTime and chairman of ACE Robotics, speaks during an interview with Reuters at the booth of ACE Robotics, during the 2026 World Robot Conference, in Beijing, China, August 21, 2026. REUTERS/Tingshu Wang
Wang Xiaogang, co-founder of SenseTime and chairman of ACE Robotics, speaks during an interview with Reuters at the booth of ACE Robotics, during the 2026 World Robot Conference, in Beijing, China, August 21, 2026. REUTERS/Tingshu Wang

Humanoid robot brains could see a breakthrough by late next year similar to the dramatic impact ChatGPT had on AI ​usage, the CEO of Chinese embodied AI startup ACE Robotics said on Friday.

"We expect to reach the 'ChatGPT moment' for embodied intelligence by the end of next year, driven by world models and environmental data capture," Wang Xiaogang told Reuters.

"Even if we reach that inflection point by late 2027, it will likely take another four to five years to see broad commercial implementation of embodied world models across sectors," said Wang, who is also a co-founder of Chinese AI visual recognition pioneer SenseTime.

While large language models such as ChatGPT and DeepSeek have become a staple in workplaces and households globally, AI models that allow a robot ‌to smoothly complete ‌a wide range of tasks in unfamiliar physical environments remain distant.

And as ​more ‌companies ⁠in ​China's fledgling ⁠humanoid robot industry seek funding and high valuations, investors are placing more importance on real-world deployment over activities such as dance or athletics to demonstrate their economic value.

Embodied AI models determine the intelligence and autonomous operation abilities of robots.

Unlike large language models, these physical AI simulation systems are designed to help robots understand and navigate real-world environments in real time.

Wang Xingxing, the founder of China's Unitree, this week predicted that robot brains could see a dramatic breakthrough in two to three years at the earliest.

He and other Chinese robotics CEOs have acknowledged ⁠that acquiring high-quality real-life training data for these models remains a bottleneck.

ACE ‌Robotics, which was founded in July 2025 and is backed by ‌Ant Group and SenseTime, has raised more than $100 million in the ​first half of this year through several financing ‌rounds.

Wang said it aims to launch an initial public offering (IPO) "as early as permitted". Chinese listing ‌rules typically require companies to have at least three fiscal years of operation.

The company's open-source Kairos-4B model is ranked first globally by public benchmarks, outperforming world models such as Nvidia's Cosmos 3 and Ant Group's Lingbot despite having a much smaller 4 billion parameter count.

The world model integrates perception, multi-modal understanding, physical simulation and action planning. It can also generate ‌long-horizon video and action predictions over multi-minute sequences.

Many robot companies including Unitree and startup X Square are developing their own embodied AI foundation ⁠models.

"Over the past few ⁠years, the entire industry has accumulated data of roughly 100,000 hours, which is far from enough to train embodied foundation models," said ACE's Wang.

He said ACE is rapidly scaling data collection by using people on real production lines fitted with lightweight sensors.

"The collection efficiency is extremely high ... We expect to accumulate tens of millions of hours of data within two years," Wang added.

Many firms train humanoid robots using physical tele-operation, where workers wearing exoskeletons and controllers repeat simple physical movements hundreds of times a day.

ACE is deploying its embodied AI models in commercial settings such as unmanned retail stores, hotel services and instant-delivery warehouses staffed by humanoid robots from Chinese makers including Unitree, AgiBot and Fourier.

"We plan to deploy in at least 1,000 stores over the coming year, scaling to 10,000 stores in two years," said Wang.

For training its models, ACE uses ​AI chips from Nvidia as well as Chinese ​makers including Rhino Tech and Digua Robotics.

"This diversifies our supply chain, because in the future, we will definitely need comprehensive intelligent hardware solutions, and their costs need to be significantly reduced," said Wang.



OpenAI's Altman Says AI Benefits Warrant Accepting Some Risks

FILE PHOTO: OpenAI CEO Sam Altman attends an event in Tokyo, Japan February 3, 2025. REUTERS/Kim Kyung-Hoon/File Photo
FILE PHOTO: OpenAI CEO Sam Altman attends an event in Tokyo, Japan February 3, 2025. REUTERS/Kim Kyung-Hoon/File Photo
TT

OpenAI's Altman Says AI Benefits Warrant Accepting Some Risks

FILE PHOTO: OpenAI CEO Sam Altman attends an event in Tokyo, Japan February 3, 2025. REUTERS/Kim Kyung-Hoon/File Photo
FILE PHOTO: OpenAI CEO Sam Altman attends an event in Tokyo, Japan February 3, 2025. REUTERS/Kim Kyung-Hoon/File Photo

OpenAI Chief Executive Sam Altman ‌said the benefits of artificial intelligence justify accepting some risks and argued the technology should remain broadly accessible to the public

"We believe that the world should accept some bad things happening for the benefits of this technology and people having the agency," Altman said in an interview with Politico's technology-focused newsletter Decoded.

Altman said there remained a fundamental difference in worldview between OpenAI and rival Anthropic on AI regulation, adding: "I think there's a lot of daylight."

"I disagree, but I understand the perspective of people who are like, 'This technology is going ‌to get so ‌powerful, and it's so dangerous, that a ‌single ⁠lab in San ⁠Francisco should have it and make sure nothing bad happens, and kind of figure out how to dole out the benefits,'" Altman said.

He called that "a completely unacceptable trade-off" that runs counter to the "lighter-touch regulatory stance" backed by OpenAI.

"I wouldn't take a trade of saying, 'We'll make sure there's no major hacks, there's no misuse of this ⁠technology, there's zero scams, there's zero all the other ‌bad things that will happen,'" Altman ‌said. "Because I think people will do tremendously — orders of magnitude more — good ‌stuff than bad stuff."

Altman's remarks come amid a growing debate ‌within the AI industry over the pace of development and the risks posed by increasingly capable systems.

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei in September published an essay calling on the industry to slow down to "pace the frontier," a stance ‌that Altman publicly endorsed. Anthropic researcher Jacob Coxon resigned in September, saying the people building AI believe ⁠it "could kill ⁠us all by the end of the decade.

Reuters reported in September that Anthropic warned that, despite AI's potential benefits, the technology can sometimes act in ways that run counter to its makers' intentions and penetrate other companies' systems. The company said advanced models could exhibit "self-preserving behaviors," including attempts to "resist shutdown,conceal or manipulate information," or generate outputs that could be interpreted as "coercive, deceptive, or manipulative."

However, US President Donald Trump has largely dismissed calls for new restrictions, arguing they would make it harder for American companies to compete with Chinese rivals. He has repeatedly said existing law enforcement agencies, including the Justice Department, provide sufficient safeguards and that no new rules are needed.


OpenAI Says 3 Staffers Fired for Mishandling 'Sensitive' Info

FILE PHOTO: An OpenAI logo is displayed at Moscone Center during the Dreamforce 2026 technology summit in San Francisco, California, US, September 17, 2026. REUTERS/Carlos Barria///File Photo
FILE PHOTO: An OpenAI logo is displayed at Moscone Center during the Dreamforce 2026 technology summit in San Francisco, California, US, September 17, 2026. REUTERS/Carlos Barria///File Photo
TT

OpenAI Says 3 Staffers Fired for Mishandling 'Sensitive' Info

FILE PHOTO: An OpenAI logo is displayed at Moscone Center during the Dreamforce 2026 technology summit in San Francisco, California, US, September 17, 2026. REUTERS/Carlos Barria///File Photo
FILE PHOTO: An OpenAI logo is displayed at Moscone Center during the Dreamforce 2026 technology summit in San Francisco, California, US, September 17, 2026. REUTERS/Carlos Barria///File Photo

ChatGPT-maker OpenAI said Thursday that it has fired three researchers for allegedly mishandling "sensitive information" and violating company policies, including work that involved an external organization that evaluates artificial intelligence models.

The San Francisco-based AI lab did not confirm their identities, but at least two of the employees worked on safety and alignment, according to the Wall Street Journal and Bloomberg.

"We have parted ways with three individuals," OpenAI told AFP in a statement.

"Our investigation confirmed that these individuals mishandled sensitive information outside established company procedures, violating our policies and breaking the trust essential to our work."

The firings come amid a tense debate about AI safety and whether the technology presents an existential risk to humanity.

Last month, a 27-year-old researcher named Jacob Coxon resigned from Anthropic with a stark warning that the leading AI labs, including OpenAI, where he previously worked, were "gambling with our lives" by racing toward developing ever more powerful models.

The three researchers fired by OpenAI are Jasmine Wang, Tomek Korbak, and Mikita Balesni, according to the WSJ. The researchers did not immediately respond to AFP's request for comment.

All three have regularly posted about AI safety-related issues on X in recent weeks.

"i am at OpenAI and i think AI is >10% likely to kill all humans," Balesni posted on September 10, echoing statements made by other AI employees in recent weeks.

As speculation swirled about why employees at OpenAI and Anthropic were speaking so freely about their personal beliefs, Korbak jumped into the public discourse.

"I'm quite unhappy with much of what OpenAI does. I am very happy that Im allowed to say 'I'm quite unhappy with much of what OpenAI does,'" Korbak wrote on September 11.

"It's hard to overstate how dangerous speeding towards RSI is," Wang posted in response to Coxon's resignation, referring to recursive self-improvement, which is a technique where software is designed to continuously teach itself.

Leading US tech companies signed a voluntary pledge this week to regulate themselves on safety after meeting with President Donald Trump at the White House.

Trump called it a "morally binding" commitment to build adequate safeguards on the fast-moving technology.

Executives from Nvidia, Google, Meta, xAI, OpenAI and Anthropic signed the agreement.
Concerns about the safety of advanced AI models have escalated in recent months.

OpenAI canceled the release of a new model, Astra 6.1, because it deemed the model unreliable and found that it frequently ignored instructions.

Instead, the company launched GPT-6.1 Sol, an updated version of a different model, during its annual DevDay conference on Tuesday from San Francisco. OpenAI said Sol would cost one-fifth the price of Astra.

In July, AI agents developed by OpenAI attacked Hugging Face, an AI model and application library, during an incident where the autonomous software escaped its confined testing environment.

Since then, additional security incidents have been reported that involved models developed by OpenAI, Anthropic and Google.

On Thursday, cybersecurity firm Asymmetric Security said in a report that agents developed by OpenAI covered up their own tracks after gaining unauthorized access to government websites.

The Federal Trade Commission launched a broad investigation into artificial intelligence safety practices at Anthropic and OpenAI, the Washington Post reported on Wednesday, though the scope of the inquiry is unclear.


Effective Altruism: The Philosophy Behind Silicon Valley's AI Fears

Effective Altruism conspicuously connects a number of leaders in American tech and finance. ANDREJ IVANOV / AFP
Effective Altruism conspicuously connects a number of leaders in American tech and finance. ANDREJ IVANOV / AFP
TT

Effective Altruism: The Philosophy Behind Silicon Valley's AI Fears

Effective Altruism conspicuously connects a number of leaders in American tech and finance. ANDREJ IVANOV / AFP
Effective Altruism conspicuously connects a number of leaders in American tech and finance. ANDREJ IVANOV / AFP

Dario Amodei says he is not part of it. But the Anthropic chief's personal and professional circle is entwined with Effective Altruism (EA), a philanthropic movement that has become one of the most contested ideas in Washington and Silicon Valley.

To its proponents, EA is a rational, evidence-based way to do good. To many in the Trump administration, it fuels unfounded and exaggerated fears about artificial intelligence -- the kind of warnings Amodei has become known for.

Here are some facts about EA:

- Philosophical roots -

EA is a loosely defined movement that uses evidence and reason to work out how to do the most good with a person's money and time.

Its intellectual roots can be traced to Australian philosopher Peter Singer.

If reasonable people would agree it is morally right to ruin one's clothes to save a drowning child, he argued in 1972, they should also sacrifice greater resources and comforts to save lives in foreign lands -- because the distance should not matter.

The idea took hold among wealthy donors who felt a moral obligation to give, but wanted their money to do as much good as possible.

- Giving what you can -

EA took shape as a decentralized movement during the heady, techno-optimistic days of the late 2000s and early 2010s -- when many believed social media and smartphones would promote empathy and democracy.

In 2007, financial professionals Holden Karnofsky and Elie Hassenfeld quit their jobs to launch GiveWell, which produced data-driven analyses of charities' effectiveness.

Karnofsky was once Amodei's roommate, and is now married to his sister Daniela, who co-founded Anthropic with him.

Two years later, Oxford University philosophers William MacAskill and Toby Ord launched "Giving What We Can," encouraging people to donate at least 10 percent of their income to tackling global poverty.

"The critique of the status quo was that existing attempts to evaluate the work of charities and nonprofits focused on things like overhead and executive pay," Theodore Lechterman, a philosophy professor at IE University in Madrid, told AFP.

GiveWell and others wanted to ask, "How much good is this organization actually doing in the world?" Lechterman said.

EA's three big causes today are global poverty, factory-farmed animals and "the most controversial one -- global catastrophic risk," said Richard Chappell, a professor at University of Miami and an EA proponent.

That worry about the future is where AI comes in.

- Data-driven -

Over the last 15 years, EA has found eager followers in American tech and some corners of Wall Street.

"Since the movement is data driven, it's a relatively easier sell to people who...make decisions on the basis of data," Lechterman said.

That numbers-backed thinking means engineers, software developers or entrepreneurs might all find it more appealing than humanities graduates, Lechterman said.

Among them was Sam Bankman-Fried, the crypto-finance wunderkind sentenced in 2024 to 25 years in prison for fraud.

A vocal champion of the movement, Bankman-Fried said he went into finance to make a fortune he could give away.

He also was an early investor in Anthropic.

- EA and AI -

As AI worries grew, EA philosophers such as MacAskill were "kind of thinking about the future of humanity," said Brian Berkey of the University of Pennsylvania.

The result was long-termism, a philosophy that "came to play a very central role" in the movement.

MacAskill reportedly brokered contacts between Bankman-Fried and Elon Musk.

Musk was for years outspoken about the threat he believed AI posed to humanity, and in 2015 helped create OpenAI to guard against it.

EA's focus on AI also owes much to a neighboring movement, rationalism -- an online community that grew up around writer Eliezer Yudkowsky, who has warned since the 2000s that superintelligent AI could wipe out humanity.

The two movements overlap heavily in membership and ideas, sharing an emphasis on reasoning through evidence and probabilities, and a conviction that preventing human extinction should be a top priority.

Both converged last month on Jacob Coxon, a 27-year-old researcher who quit Anthropic warning that AI companies were "gambling with our lives." His post was viewed more than 100 million times.

Days later, Amodei published a lengthy essay arguing that AI's mounting risks warranted a slowdown.