Syria Cautiously Welcomes Abdi’s Integration Announcement, Awaits Implementation

SDF Commander Mazloum Abdi with his fighters wearing the military uniform of the Syrian army in February. (Social media)
SDF Commander Mazloum Abdi with his fighters wearing the military uniform of the Syrian army in February. (Social media)
TT

Syria Cautiously Welcomes Abdi’s Integration Announcement, Awaits Implementation

SDF Commander Mazloum Abdi with his fighters wearing the military uniform of the Syrian army in February. (Social media)
SDF Commander Mazloum Abdi with his fighters wearing the military uniform of the Syrian army in February. (Social media)

Ahmed al-Hilali, deputy governor of Syria’s Hasakah province and spokesperson for the presidential team tasked with overseeing integration with the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), welcomed SDF commander Mazloum Abdi’s announcement on integration, describing it as an acknowledgment of the SDF’s dissolution.

He cautioned, however, that “there is a difference between announcing an integration decision and completing its implementation on the ground.”

Syrian Kurdish writer and political researcher Ali Tami told Asharq Al-Awsat that integration was “complex and intertwined and cannot be concluded with a statement.”

He also challenged Abdi’s assertion that fighters who had come to support the SDF had left the region, noting that thousands of foreign fighters and remnants of the former regime remained in Hasakah.

Al-Hilali and Abdi attended celebrations Thursday marking the 100th anniversary of the founding of Qamishli. In a speech, Abdi announced the “completion of the military, security and administrative integration” of his forces into Syrian state institutions under the January 29 agreement.

Late Thursday, al-Hilali told Syria’s Al-Ikhbariya television that Abdi’s remarks were “an important and positive development,” viewing them as a clear transition from understandings to actual implementation of integration into state institutions.

He explained that the announcement would translate into practical measures, including unifying institutions and administrative authority and restoring the state’s full powers, ensuring unified decision-making and Syrian sovereignty.

Abdi's remarks were aimed at ending “dual structures and parallel entities” and establishing “one state, one army and unified institutions,” he added.

Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa and SDF Commander Mazloum Abdi meet in Damascus earlier in August. (SANA)

Implementation

Al-Hilali stressed that the issue could not be considered definitively resolved through statements alone.

“What was announced, together with earlier steps, such as removing partisan symbols and flags from institutions and public squares, confirms that the process is moving forward,” he noted.

While describing the announcement as a highly significant political step, he emphasized that it did not mean all stages of administrative, security and military implementation had been completed.

The objective now is to turn the decisions into a fully institutionalized reality in which Syrian state institutions become the sole authority, all institutions and bodies return to the state framework, and security, military and administrative decision-making is unified, he explained.

In separate remarks carried by Syria TV, al-Hilali said Abdi’s declaration that military and security integration had been completed as an acknowledgment of the SDF’s dissolution.

Integration declared complete

Abdi announced that the integration of military, service and administrative institutions into national state institutions had been completed and that “from now on, a new process begins.”

In areas formerly under the Kurdish Autonomous Administration, new institutions are being established in the name of the Syrian state while existing institutions will continue operating, he explained, urging residents to protect them.

Abdi also announced that forces from other “parts of Kurdistan” that had supported the SDF during Syria’s civil war had withdrawn under an agreement and at the SDF’s own request, an apparent reference to Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) fighters.

Tami remained skeptical, arguing that the SDF had not formally announced its dissolution and that integration was too complicated to be settled by statements alone.

He maintained that the PKK controls the SDF and regards it as one of its instruments in confronting Türkiye, making it unlikely that the group would surrender its weapons before the direction of the peace process in Türkiye becomes clearer.

“In principle, we all support sparing the region further bloodshed, and integration is possible, but unfortunately the chances of success are very slim,” Tami lamented.

He also dismissed Abdi’s assertion that Kurdish forces that previously assisted the SDF had left the region as “illogical,” pointing to thousands of foreign fighters and former regime remnants still in Hasakah.

With efforts underway to ease tensions, integration continues to face major difficulties and challenges, he remarked.

SDF fighters in Ain al-Arab. (Reuters file)

From Autonomous Administration to integration

The Autonomous Administration traces its origins to the Kurdish Supreme Committee, formed by Syria’s Democratic Union Party (PYD) and the Kurdish National Council following the July 12, 2012, Erbil agreement. Its armed structures included the People’s Protection Units (YPG), Women’s Protection Units (YPJ) and Asayish security forces, followed in 2015 by the Kurdish-dominated SDF.

The administration expanded between 2014 and 2023, accompanied by growth in its military, security and civilian institutions, which employ tens of thousands.

The SDF lost a significant portion of its territory during nearly two weeks of clashes with the Syrian army in late 2025 and early 2026, followed by the January 29 agreement.

The accord provides for a ceasefire and gradual integration of Kurdish-established military and civilian institutions into the Syrian state, the handover of border crossings and oil and gas fields, and the departure of foreign fighters.

In July, residents in Hasakah mobilized for several days to demand that the state extend its authority across the entire province, allow displaced people to return to their towns and villages, and end SDF dominance and its abuses against residents.



Jordan Stops Fighters Attempting to Enter from Syria, Armed Forces Say

Jordanian soldiers on the border with Syria. (AP file)
Jordanian soldiers on the border with Syria. (AP file)
TT

Jordan Stops Fighters Attempting to Enter from Syria, Armed Forces Say

Jordanian soldiers on the border with Syria. (AP file)
Jordanian soldiers on the border with Syria. (AP file)

Jordanian border guards stopped a group of 14 armed individuals attempting to cross ‌into ‌northern Jordan from ‌Syria, ⁠the armed forces ⁠said in a statement on Saturday.

The group ⁠tried to ‌infiltrate on ‌Friday under ‌heavy ‌fire and direct engagement, causing numerous casualties ‌among the armed group, while ⁠the remaining ⁠members fled back into Syria, the armed forces said.

Tensions between the neighbors are high after Jordanian strikes in southern Syria in retaliation for a deadly church attack in the kingdom last week that Amman linked to militants operating across the border.

Syria said the strikes killed seven ⁠people, including three children and a woman. Jordan said it regretted the civilian casualties.


Egypt Fears Escalation in Iran War Would Be More Destructive, Foreign Minister Says

26 October 2026, Egypt, New Administrative Capital: Egypt's Foreign Minister Badr Abdelatty attends a press conference at the Egyptian Ministry of Foreign Affairs in the New Administrative Capital near Cairo. Photo: Michael Brandt/dpa
26 October 2026, Egypt, New Administrative Capital: Egypt's Foreign Minister Badr Abdelatty attends a press conference at the Egyptian Ministry of Foreign Affairs in the New Administrative Capital near Cairo. Photo: Michael Brandt/dpa
TT

Egypt Fears Escalation in Iran War Would Be More Destructive, Foreign Minister Says

26 October 2026, Egypt, New Administrative Capital: Egypt's Foreign Minister Badr Abdelatty attends a press conference at the Egyptian Ministry of Foreign Affairs in the New Administrative Capital near Cairo. Photo: Michael Brandt/dpa
26 October 2026, Egypt, New Administrative Capital: Egypt's Foreign Minister Badr Abdelatty attends a press conference at the Egyptian Ministry of Foreign Affairs in the New Administrative Capital near Cairo. Photo: Michael Brandt/dpa

Egypt's Foreign Minister Badr Abdelatty said on Saturday he was "extremely worried" that a new escalation in the war between the United States and Iran would be more destructive and have a major ‌impact.

He was ‌speaking at the ‌IISS ⁠Manama Dialogue security ⁠summit in Bahrain.

"The second round will be more dangerous, more destructive, and it will lead to nowhere. We have to draw lessons from the past," ⁠he said.

An interim agreement ‌reached in ‌June failed to secure a lasting ‌ceasefire in the Iran war ‌or restore normal shipping through the Strait of Hormuz. Iran has since proposed that Washington lift its ‌blockade of Iranian ports in exchange for Tehran reopening the ⁠disrupted ⁠waterway within seven days.

Qatari mediators returned to Tehran on Friday in a renewed effort to broker a deal, but the sides remain divided over whether nuclear negotiations or relief from the blockade and oil sanctions should come first.


Lebanon Draws Up Plan to Govern 12 Palestinian Refugee Camps

The Shatila Palestinian refugee camp in southern Beirut. (AFP file)
The Shatila Palestinian refugee camp in southern Beirut. (AFP file)
TT

Lebanon Draws Up Plan to Govern 12 Palestinian Refugee Camps

The Shatila Palestinian refugee camp in southern Beirut. (AFP file)
The Shatila Palestinian refugee camp in southern Beirut. (AFP file)

Lebanon has begun addressing the governance of its Palestinian refugee camps, seeking to establish a framework for security, administration and services in a system where responsibilities overlap among Palestinian factions, popular committees, state institutions and the UN agency for Palestinian refugees (UNRWA).

Prime Minister Nawaf Salam on Friday launched consultations on a plan prepared by the Lebanese-Palestinian Dialogue Committee, headed by Ambassador Ramez Dimashkieh, before its final version is submitted to the Cabinet.

Salam stressed that Palestinian refugee camps fall under Lebanese sovereignty and are subject to Lebanese law.

“The presence of state institutions in the camps must become clear and consistent,” he declared.

He linked the governance initiative to the National Accord Document, the state’s exclusive control over weapons and its sole authority to decide on war and peace.

Salam also referred to the understanding reached between Lebanese President Joseph Aoun and Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas in May 2025, as well as steps already taken to address the issue of Palestinian weapons.

He stressed that the initiative would cover security, the rule of law, and social, economic and service-related conditions.

The prime minister revealed that a draft law was being prepared to regulate refugees’ rights and obligations, including employment and social security.

He reaffirmed Lebanon’s commitment to the Palestinian right of return and its rejection of permanent resettlement, stressing that UNRWA and the international community must continue to bear responsibility for refugee services, without the Lebanese state replacing the agency.

For his part, Dimashkieh described the launch of consultations on a national plan to govern Palestinian refugee camps as an unprecedented step toward establishing a unified Lebanese state vision for their management and administration.

The camps are located on Lebanese territory and fall under Lebanese sovereignty, and that any new arrangements would be developed through partnership and dialogue with all Palestinian groups, without exception, he stressed.

Speaking to Asharq Al-Awsat, Dimashkieh explained that the initiative could be the first of its kind in Lebanon’s history of dealing with Palestinian refugee camps.

“For the first time, consultations are being launched to develop a unified Lebanese state plan for managing and governing the camps, rather than having each institution continue to deal with the issue separately, according to its own area of responsibility,” he noted.

The main problem, according to Dimashkieh, has been the absence of coordination and a common vision among the institutions involved, including the security services and Lebanese Army, governorates and municipalities, the ministries of health and labor, and UNRWA.

“Each institution viewed conditions in the camps from its own perspective, without an overarching framework to organize responsibilities and mechanisms for addressing the various issues,” he explained.

Dimashkieh revealed that consultations would continue over the next six months, bringing together the relevant Lebanese and Palestinian parties to reach the best possible formula for governing the camps.

Discussions will cover security, administrative and legal matters, including the role of security forces, the possible adoption of community policing and issues falling within the jurisdiction of the Justice Ministry and other relevant institutions.

He stressed that Palestinians would be key partners throughout the process, with no group excluded.

“The aim is to listen to everyone and reach a formula that commands the broadest possible consensus.”

Dimashkieh further underscored the growing urgency of reorganizing camp administration, particularly as the demographic composition of some camps has changed considerably.

“In some camps, Palestinians now account for only around 30% of residents, compared with approximately 70% who are Syrians or people of other nationalities,” he pointed out.

These demographic shifts require both Lebanese and Palestinian authorities to reconsider how the camps are administered and how their circumstances are addressed, he explained.

As for the next steps, Dimashkieh said that the proposal agreed upon after consultations and the identification of mechanisms for addressing the issue would be submitted to the Lebanese Cabinet for a decision.

12 camps and a legacy dating back to the Cairo Agreement

Lebanon’s 12 official Palestinian refugee camps are spread across several regions.

Five are in the south: Ain al-Hilweh, Mieh Mieh, Rashidieh, Burj al-Shemali and Al-Buss.

Four are in Beirut and Mount Lebanon: Burj al-Barajneh, Shatila, Mar Elias and Dbayeh.

Two are in the north, Beddawi and Nahr al-Bared, while the Bekaa Valley hosts the Jalil camp in Baalbek.

The number of registered Palestinian refugees differs considerably from the number actually residing in Lebanon.

UNRWA had approximately 488,000 refugees registered as of June 2025, while a 2017 Lebanese-Palestinian census counted around 174,000 Palestinians living in camps and gatherings, using a different methodology.

The UN agency’s registration figures do not constitute a census of current residents.

The roots of the camps’ special security arrangements date to the 1969 Cairo Agreement, which the Lebanese parliament annulled in 1987.

Nevertheless, Palestinian popular committees and factions have continued to play roles in the camps.

In 2025, factions affiliated with the Palestine Liberation Organization handed over weapons to the Lebanese Army. However, the issue of arms held by all Palestinian organizations has yet to be fully resolved.