US Pounds Iran, Tehran Strikes Back at Bases in Biggest Exchange Since July

A screengrab from a video obtained from social media on September 1, 2026, shows a view shortly before what US Central Command (CENTCOM) says was a US strike on an Iranian military target. (US Central Command/Handout via Reuters)
A screengrab from a video obtained from social media on September 1, 2026, shows a view shortly before what US Central Command (CENTCOM) says was a US strike on an Iranian military target. (US Central Command/Handout via Reuters)
TT

US Pounds Iran, Tehran Strikes Back at Bases in Biggest Exchange Since July

A screengrab from a video obtained from social media on September 1, 2026, shows a view shortly before what US Central Command (CENTCOM) says was a US strike on an Iranian military target. (US Central Command/Handout via Reuters)
A screengrab from a video obtained from social media on September 1, 2026, shows a view shortly before what US Central Command (CENTCOM) says was a US strike on an Iranian military target. (US Central Command/Handout via Reuters)

Iran and the region were plunged back into war on Wednesday by the biggest exchange of fire between Tehran and Washington since July, with US forces striking Iran's southern coast and Iran firing at American bases across the region. 

The United States threatened more devastating strikes. Iran accused Washington of hitting a wedding party, killing five people and wounding dozens. 

Asian and European stocks fell after the renewed US airstrikes, which pushed oil prices back up to levels unseen since July, compounding the economic impact of a global sell-off in bonds as disrupted energy supplies fuel inflation worldwide. 

The US military's Central Command said it struck Revolutionary Guard Corps air defenses, radar systems, maritime assets, mine-laying capabilities and communications sites on Tuesday. Iranian media reported hits on multiple targets near the Strait of Hormuz — the narrow waterway where Tehran has threatened tankers attempting to pass without its permission. 

Iran responded by striking what it said were US assets in Bahrain, Jordan, Kuwait and Iraq, and said its aim was now to drive US forces out of the ‌region. 

Jordan's military said it dealt with 13 missiles, 10 of which were intercepted and three which fell in remote areas. The IRGC said it killed a large number of US forces in Jordan, but US officials told Reuters there had not been any casualties, according to initial assessments. 

Kuwait’s fire service said crews put out a blaze at a residential complex early on Wednesday that was struck by an Iranian drone causing damage but no casualties. 

Qatar said it "holds Iran fully legally responsible for these attacks and ⁠their repercussions and consequences." Bahrain said Iranian drones were intercepted and ‌destroyed. 

The IRGC said its ground forces carried out combined missile and drone attacks on US bases in ‌Erbil in northern Iraq, claiming to have killed several US personnel there. Neither Iraq nor the US confirmed the attack. 

Iran also said two tankers had been struck by mines while being ‌steered across the Strait of Hormuz by US operatives through a channel that Tehran says it has closed. 

IRAN SAYS WEDDING STRUCK 

Iran reported at least ‌12 deaths from the night of US strikes, with five people including a four-year-old said to have been killed while celebrating a wedding at a home in Sirik, a town along the coast of the strait. 

Iranian media said as many as 68 people were wounded there, and released images of several injured children in hospital. Iranian officials compared the incident to a strike on a girls' school that killed 160 people on the war's first night. 

Reuters was unable to independently verify the incident and US officials did not comment on it. Video ‌filmed by Iran's West Asia News Agency at the purported site showed rubble strewn across rooms and a courtyard of a home. A pair of strappy women's dress sandals lay abandoned on a blood-soaked carpet. 

"I am just glad ⁠the casualties weren't even worse," said ⁠Ali Molahi, identified as the father of the bride. 

CONFLICT DRAINING BOTH SIDES 

The exchange of fire was the worst since July, when US President Donald Trump abruptly halted two weeks of intense bombing of Iran after warnings from his military brass that they were using up munitions and running out of meaningful targets. 

Iran's war-battered economy and degraded conventional forces have left it stretched thin, while Washington has used up much of its stocks of air defense munitions and burned through its precision long-range missiles. 

Still, Trump, who has yet to achieve the aims he set when launching "Operation Epic Fury" in February — to end Iran's nuclear program, deprive it of the ability to strike its neighbors and create conditions for Iranians to topple their rulers — repeated his declarations that victory was at hand. 

"I like our position now much better, with almost total control of the Hormuz Strait, and their economy totally collapsing," he said on Tuesday. "They are just playing out the inevitable. When are the Iranian people going to rise up and fight?" 

Iran, for its part, is determined to humble US forces and emerge from the war stronger than before it, with sanctions lifted, billions in blocked funds released, and its newfound grip over the strait letting it collect fees from ships that carried a fifth of global oil before the war. 

Trump agreed to many of Tehran's demands in a June deal, but the ceasefire collapsed within weeks over control of the strait, and no talks between the foes have been held since. 



US Considers Hitting Iran with 'Mother of All Bombs'

An undated handout photo of the “Mother of All Bombs” at Eglin Air Force Base in Florida, US (Reuters)
An undated handout photo of the “Mother of All Bombs” at Eglin Air Force Base in Florida, US (Reuters)
TT

US Considers Hitting Iran with 'Mother of All Bombs'

An undated handout photo of the “Mother of All Bombs” at Eglin Air Force Base in Florida, US (Reuters)
An undated handout photo of the “Mother of All Bombs” at Eglin Air Force Base in Florida, US (Reuters)

The United States is considering using its biggest non-nuclear bomb against Iran if President Donald Trump should decide to renew combat in the war that has hit a deadlock, CNN reported Thursday.

The military is planning for the potential use of the GBU-43/B Massive Ordnance Air Blast (MOAB) bomb -- better known by its nickname, the "Mother Of All Bombs" -- to target Iranian energy infrastructure and nuclear sites, according to the news outlet, which quoted officials familiar with the matter.

Trump is trying to boost his low approval ratings ahead of November's midterm elections, with polls showing the unpopular war in Iran and fuel and other price rises it has caused are hurting his Republican Party.

Diplomatic efforts to end the conflict, which erupted with US-Israeli strikes on Iran in February, have been at an impasse since the summer.

But officials have raised doubts over the efficacy of the bomb if it were deployed, particularly its ability to destroy suspected underground nuclear sites in Iran.

"The MOAB is a massive information operation type weapon that is great for huge area clearance but not much else," a source familiar with the plans told CNN.

"It is definitely not designed as a deep penetration warhead."

The United States and Israel have said the war was necessary to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons -- a goal Tehran has long denied pursuing.

There are also concerns over the possibility of civilian casualties from such a huge weapon, according to AFP.

Washington has in recent weeks dialled back military operations in favour of economic pressure.

In 2017, the US military in Afghanistan dropped the "MOAB" to target ISIS group hideouts in a complex of tunnels and bunkers, killing more than 90 militants.


Pezeshkian: Iran is Facing its Most Intense Blockade since 1979

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian visits an exhibition that showcases the defense ministry's latest advancements in defense and space in Tehran. Photo: -/Iranian Presidency/dpa
Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian visits an exhibition that showcases the defense ministry's latest advancements in defense and space in Tehran. Photo: -/Iranian Presidency/dpa
TT

Pezeshkian: Iran is Facing its Most Intense Blockade since 1979

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian visits an exhibition that showcases the defense ministry's latest advancements in defense and space in Tehran. Photo: -/Iranian Presidency/dpa
Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian visits an exhibition that showcases the defense ministry's latest advancements in defense and space in Tehran. Photo: -/Iranian Presidency/dpa

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian said Tuesday that the country was facing its most intense blockade since the 1979 Islamic Revolution, accusing the United States of seeking to provoke public protests.

Iran and the United States have been at war since February 28, when US and Israeli strikes killed Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

"Over the 48 years since the Revolution, we have never faced such intense blockade, war and difficulties as we are facing now," Pezeshkian said in a speech broadcast by state television.

He accused Washington of seeking to make life difficult for Iranians in order to fuel public anger and trigger unrest.

Pezeshkian said the US was focusing its efforts on making "the people become upset and face difficulties, and then for social protests to emerge so that they can achieve their sinister objectives".

The US imposed a blockade on Iranian ports in response to Tehran's closure of the strategic Strait of Hormuz, diverting or stopping vessels travelling to and from Iranian ports.

Iran has repeatedly accused the US and Israel of fomenting unrest inside the country, and in recent months has executed several Iranians accused of collaborating with its foes.

In late December last year, protests over the cost of living erupted in Iran, spreading nationwide and evolving into a wider anti-government movement.

Iran's rulers blamed the US and Israel for the unrest.


Why Are More Women Leaving Trump's Administration?

(FILES) Kimberly Guilfoyle, President Trump's nominee to be the US ambassador to Greece, speaks alongside US President Donald Trump, during a Greek Independence Day celebration in the East Room of the White House in Washington, DC, on March 24, 2025.  (Photo by Brendan SMIALOWSKI / AFP)
(FILES) Kimberly Guilfoyle, President Trump's nominee to be the US ambassador to Greece, speaks alongside US President Donald Trump, during a Greek Independence Day celebration in the East Room of the White House in Washington, DC, on March 24, 2025. (Photo by Brendan SMIALOWSKI / AFP)
TT

Why Are More Women Leaving Trump's Administration?

(FILES) Kimberly Guilfoyle, President Trump's nominee to be the US ambassador to Greece, speaks alongside US President Donald Trump, during a Greek Independence Day celebration in the East Room of the White House in Washington, DC, on March 24, 2025.  (Photo by Brendan SMIALOWSKI / AFP)
(FILES) Kimberly Guilfoyle, President Trump's nominee to be the US ambassador to Greece, speaks alongside US President Donald Trump, during a Greek Independence Day celebration in the East Room of the White House in Washington, DC, on March 24, 2025. (Photo by Brendan SMIALOWSKI / AFP)

A wave of departures by female officials from US President Donald Trump's second administration has raised questions about whether women and men are being treated equally. Four of the eight women holding Cabinet-level positions left within just three months, while several male officials remained in their posts despite facing criticism and allegations that sparked widespread controversy.

According to The New York Times, the latest development came with the forced resignation of Kimberly Guilfoyle, the US ambassador to Greece, after a news report alleged that she had asked a Trump donor to pay a $100,000 credit card bill shortly before her confirmation hearing, promising him access to administration officials in return.

Guilfoyle denied the allegations, while Trump said he was unhappy with what he had read about her, despite acknowledging that she had performed well in the role. He also downplayed any substantial personal connection to Guilfoyle, one of his most ardent supporters, who was once engaged to his eldest son, Donald Trump Jr.

Four Female Officials Leave Their Posts

The past three months have seen the departure of four prominent female officials: Attorney General Pam Bondi, Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard.

They left for different reasons, but all four were replaced by men.

Bondi's departure followed criticism of her handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files, her failure to meet Trump's demands to pursue his political adversaries, and his dissatisfaction with her performance during congressional hearings and television appearances.

Noem, meanwhile, was dismissed following her congressional testimony about government advertising campaigns worth millions of dollars in which she featured prominently. She said Trump had approved the spending, an account the president denied.

Gabbard announced her resignation to care for her ailing husband, but the decision came amid tensions with the White House after she declined to affirm that Iran had posed an imminent threat, a claim Trump had used to justify the war against the country. The president described her position as less hardline than his own.

Chavez-DeRemer left her post amid allegations of dysfunction and a toxic workplace environment within the Labor Department, as well as claims of abuse of power, an inappropriate relationship with a staff member and the use of public funds for personal purposes.

Male Officials Face Allegations but Remain in Office

While female officials departed, several male members of the administration faced criticism and allegations of their own.

FBI Director Kash Patel faced questions over allegations of excessive drinking, assigning an armed tactical team to protect his girlfriend and using a government aircraft for personal purposes. Patel denied the allegations.

Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick was named in files released by the Justice Department as having visited the private island owned by convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth also faced criticism after disclosing secret military plans in a conversation on a private messaging application to which Jeffrey Goldberg, editor-in-chief of The Atlantic, had been added by mistake.

Trump did penalize his former national security adviser, Mike Waltz, for adding the journalist to the conversation. However, Waltz was subsequently appointed US ambassador to the United Nations, a position Trump had previously promised to his Republican congressional ally Elise Stefanik.

Stefanik ultimately found herself politically sidelined before resigning from Congress.

Political Criticism Over Unequal Accountability

According to The New York Times report, the apparent disparity has drawn criticism from several Democrats, who argue that women are being dismissed more quickly than men when controversies or allegations emerge.

Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York questioned the pattern after Bondi and Noem left their posts. Asked by a reporter whom the president should fire next, she responded: "Is he out of women?" She suggested that Trump appeared capable of dismissing only female Cabinet secretaries.

Democratic Rep. Jasmine Crockett of Texas, a frequent target of Trump's mockery, wrote on social media that Hegseth should be the next to leave the administration.

"I see a theme," she wrote, arguing that Trump was much quicker to dismiss incompetent women than incompetent men.

During a congressional hearing in April, Rep. Madeleine Dean confronted Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick over what she described as a double standard, citing his previous ties to Epstein.

Dean asked whether Trump was concerned about Lutnick's past relationship with Epstein. Lutnick replied that he would not discuss his conversations with the president.

Dean pointed out that Trump had dismissed three Cabinet secretaries, all women. She argued that if the president were genuinely concerned about holding those who enabled Epstein accountable, he would dismiss Lutnick as well.

Kathryn Dunn Tenpas, a nonresident fellow at the Brookings Institution who has studied diversity in presidential administrations since the Reagan era, described the pattern as highly unusual.

She said she had never witnessed a situation in which the first wave of Cabinet departures involved only members of one gender, namely women.

White House Defends Trump's Appointments

The White House, meanwhile, defended Trump's approach to selecting members of his administration, insisting that the president based his appointments on their ability to deliver results for the American people.

White House spokesperson Taylor Rogers said Trump had assembled what she described as the greatest administration in history, choosing members of his team according to a single criterion: their ability to serve the American people effectively.

She contrasted that approach with what she characterized as the Democrats' obsession with identity politics, saying Trump judged individuals according to their qualifications and abilities rather than personal characteristics.

During a Women's History Month celebration last year, Trump expressed satisfaction that his Cabinet included more women than any previous Republican administration. The number of women remaining in Cabinet-level positions, however, subsequently fell to four.

Nevertheless, May Mailman, director of the Independent Women's Law Center and a former White House official in both Trump administrations, rejected the suggestion that the departures demonstrated the marginalization of women.

She pointed to women who continued to hold prominent leadership positions, including White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles, Erica Schwartz, who had been confirmed to lead the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and Harmeet Dhillon, head of the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division.

Mailman argued that conservative women were not isolated within the Trump administration but were empowered to exercise influence.

She maintained that women were essential members of the administration because of their competence and qualifications, rather than their gender.