Trump-Xi Summit in Washington Features Great Fanfare but Low Expectations

 President Donald Trump and China's President Xi Jinping meet in the Oval Office of the White House, Thursday, Sept. 24, 2026, in Washington. (AP)
President Donald Trump and China's President Xi Jinping meet in the Oval Office of the White House, Thursday, Sept. 24, 2026, in Washington. (AP)
TT

Trump-Xi Summit in Washington Features Great Fanfare but Low Expectations

 President Donald Trump and China's President Xi Jinping meet in the Oval Office of the White House, Thursday, Sept. 24, 2026, in Washington. (AP)
President Donald Trump and China's President Xi Jinping meet in the Oval Office of the White House, Thursday, Sept. 24, 2026, in Washington. (AP)

US President Donald Trump welcomed Chinese President Xi Jinping to the White House on Thursday for a lavish state summit that was heavy on symbolism but light on substance, with no sign that a closed-door meeting yielded breakthroughs on thorny issues such as AI, trade, Taiwan and the war with Iran.

During a bilateral discussion in the afternoon, Xi urged the US to oppose "Taiwan independence," according to a readout from the official Chinese news agency Xinhua shortly after it concluded. The White House did not immediately provide its own summary of the talks.

Xi had been expected to press Trump this week to halt arms sales to Taiwan. Following his visit to China in May, Trump said he was holding in abeyance an arms package to Taiwan worth some $14 billion and called it a "very good negotiating chip."

That move left some US allies in Asia and even some of Trump's fellow Republicans concerned that he may be tempted to soften Washington's support for Taipei in exchange for economic wins. China claims democratically governed Taiwan as its own territory and has not ruled out using force to gain control over the island.

The summit between the two leaders came shortly after Trump forcefully defended his use of military power in a speech at the UN earlier this week, suggesting he could "annihilate" Iran. He took a strikingly different tone with Xi on Thursday, reflecting a power balance that has shifted toward the Chinese leader after a trade war that ended ‌with a US climbdown ‌on tariffs.

In remarks after Xi's arrival on Thursday, Trump emphasized his "truly great friendship" with Xi, rather than focusing on policy differences, and ‌said the ⁠two powers had ⁠made strides on trade since his trip to China in May.

"During this visit, we will also discuss pressing issues concerning security, technology, and 'super intelligence,'" Trump said, using his alternative name for artificial intelligence.

In somewhat more pointed remarks, Xi said the two countries' interests were deeply intertwined and that competition between them should be a "healthy one." US companies were welcome in China, he said, adding that he hopes "Chinese companies are treated fairly here in the United States."

Xi also said both militaries should maintain regular dialogue to improve crisis prevention.

Edgard Kagan, a former senior White House official for East Asia, said the contrasting rhetoric demonstrates the different strategy of each leader.

"The president is casting it very much as about his personal relationship with Xi," said Kagan, now with the Center for Strategic and International Studies. "What I found interesting was Xi is being much more cautious and suggesting that it's less about the personal relationship than the national relationship."

The summit, Xi's first visit to Washington in more than a decade, is the second meeting this year between the leaders ⁠of the world's two biggest economies.

POMP AND CIRCUMSTANCE

For Trump, who relishes ceremony and prizes his ties with powerful leaders, the visit is as ‌much a matter of national prestige as an opportunity for high-stakes diplomacy.

But Trump and Xi's remarks were not carried live ‌by any US television networks, which refused to provide footage in protest of the White House's ban of CNN, MS Now and Politico.

Trump greeted Xi on arrival on Wednesday evening with a red carpet on ‌the tarmac, the first time a US president has welcomed a foreign leader at Joint Base Andrews since President Barack Obama met Pope Francis in 2015, according to C-SPAN.

Following their ‌remarks on Thursday, the two leaders observed a military ceremony including a flyover at the Rose Garden. After their closed-door meeting, Trump gave Xi a tour of the new helipad he had recently constructed on the White House's South Lawn.

"He loves good granite," Trump told reporters, adding that the two men had a "great meeting" without elaborating.

Trump's embrace of Xi could complicate his campaign message at home ahead of November's midterm elections, when Republicans' narrow congressional majorities are at stake as voters fret about inflation and the war on Iran.

The president for months has labeled Democrats "communists" in an effort to paint them as too extreme, but he welcomed Xi, the head ‌of the Chinese Communist Party, as a dear personal friend, with Chinese flags adorning the roof above the Oval Office alongside US flags.

BREAKTHROUGHS UNLIKELY

Despite the fanfare, major breakthroughs appeared unlikely, analysts said.

US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told Fox News on Wednesday after talks with Chinese ⁠Vice Premier He Lifeng that they had agreed ⁠to extend until January 10 an agreement pausing their trade war.

Trump wrote in a Truth Social post on Thursday morning that the two leaders would discuss "super intelligence" but again indicated little interest in new regulations, despite concerns from industry leaders that AI could eventually pose a threat to humans.

"Super Intelligence (SI) will be a big topic of discussion, but I want to leave it exactly where it is," Trump wrote. "That is China's position also."

During his comments on Thursday, Xi said both countries must "ensure that the development of AI is always under human control."

Analysts say intense competition between the two powers in AI is likely to limit the scope for anything beyond symbolic agreements.

KEEPING TIES STABLE

People familiar with the plans say the talks could also yield deals to lower some tariffs, combat drug trafficking and expand military-to-military dialogue, while Trump is expected to seek the release of Americans and others detained in China.

Xi appears to be in a stronger position, having overseen a surge in China's trade and firmly in control of supplies of rare earth minerals that give him powerful leverage.

Both leaders see advantages in keeping relations stable, with Trump mired in the unpopular Iran war and Xi grappling with domestic economic challenges.

But beneath the surface are challenges that could reignite tensions, including disputes over Taiwan, export controls, AI and the war with Iran, a Chinese ally.

There has been little sign Beijing is willing to exert pressure on Iran to yield to US demands. During Thursday's meeting, Xi expressed support for the US and Iran to return to a ceasefire and eventually negotiate a peace deal, Xinhua reported.

The guest list for Thursday's state dinner includes CEOs like Apple's Tim Cook, Amazon's Jeff Bezos, Alphabet's Sundar Pichai, OpenAI's Sam Altman, Tesla's Elon Musk and Nvidia's Jensen Huang. Despite such an array, people familiar with US plans say Trump is likely to maintain firm export controls on US tech Xi wants loosened.



Iran Threatens to Expand War to Indian Ocean if US Attacks Again

People walk past a billboard about the Strait of Hormuz, on a building in Tehran, Iran, September 16, 2026. Majid Asgaripour/WANA (West Asia News Agency) via Reuters
People walk past a billboard about the Strait of Hormuz, on a building in Tehran, Iran, September 16, 2026. Majid Asgaripour/WANA (West Asia News Agency) via Reuters
TT

Iran Threatens to Expand War to Indian Ocean if US Attacks Again

People walk past a billboard about the Strait of Hormuz, on a building in Tehran, Iran, September 16, 2026. Majid Asgaripour/WANA (West Asia News Agency) via Reuters
People walk past a billboard about the Strait of Hormuz, on a building in Tehran, Iran, September 16, 2026. Majid Asgaripour/WANA (West Asia News Agency) via Reuters

An adviser to Iran's supreme leader Mojtaba Khamenei warned on Thursday that Tehran may expand the Middle East war to the Indian Ocean if the US attacks again.

"Since the conflict has spread from the Gulf and Strait of Hormuz to the Red Sea, it is possible that, in response to more war, the front will expand even further, reaching the Indian Ocean and perhaps beyond," said Yahya Rahim Safavi in a video released by Iran's Fars news agency.

Yemen's Houthis, fighting government forces, recently took control of the Red Sea coastline, tightening their grip on the strategic Bab al-Mandab Strait, which links Asia to Europe via the Suez Canal.

Iran has long provided military support to the Houthis but denies any involvement in the Yemen conflict.

Tehran has also locked down the Strait of Hormuz off the Iranian coast, in retaliation for US-Israeli strikes that triggered the Middle East war at the end of February.

Iran and the United States are now vying for control of Hormuz, through which much of the world's oil and gas passed before the war.

Iranian officials had already threatened to expand the geographic scope of the conflict if US strikes resume.

But Thursday's warning is the first time an adviser to Iran's supreme leader explicitly mentioned the Indian Ocean, home to a strategic US-British military base at Diego Garcia, nearly 4,000 kilometers from Iran.

Officials from both countries held talks in New York this week on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly in a further attempt to end the conflict.

Iran has put forward its conditions for ending the war, including the lifting of sanctions targeting its economy and the unconditional release of its frozen assets abroad.

In an exclusive interview with AFP on Tuesday, a spokesman for Iran's Revolutionary Guards, Hossein Mohebi, also mentioned ending the war in Yemen.


Rich Nations Should Foot Climate Bill, Says Nepal Minister

People hold onto a cage on a makeshift zip line as they cross the Trishuli River from Devighat following deadly flash floods that damaged bridges and temporarily stranded residents, in Nuwakot district, Nepal, September 21, 2026. (Reuters)
People hold onto a cage on a makeshift zip line as they cross the Trishuli River from Devighat following deadly flash floods that damaged bridges and temporarily stranded residents, in Nuwakot district, Nepal, September 21, 2026. (Reuters)
TT

Rich Nations Should Foot Climate Bill, Says Nepal Minister

People hold onto a cage on a makeshift zip line as they cross the Trishuli River from Devighat following deadly flash floods that damaged bridges and temporarily stranded residents, in Nuwakot district, Nepal, September 21, 2026. (Reuters)
People hold onto a cage on a makeshift zip line as they cross the Trishuli River from Devighat following deadly flash floods that damaged bridges and temporarily stranded residents, in Nuwakot district, Nepal, September 21, 2026. (Reuters)

Wealthy nations must pay for climate disasters that devastate countries that are least responsible for the crisis, yet bear its brunt, Nepal's foreign minister told AFP on Thursday.

The Himalayan nation suffered one of the worst catastrophes in its history late last month when a tsunami-like flood, triggered by a high-altitude glacial mountain collapse along the Nepal-China border, cut a swathe of destruction.

More than 1,400 people died, 6,000 are still missing, and the economic devastation runs in the billions of dollars.

"What we're trying to convey to the world is this: these issues of climate change are not theoretical anymore," Minister of Foreign Affairs Shisir Khanal said in an interview at Nepal's permanent mission, during the United Nation's high-level week.

"These are becoming real, and the frequency of such disasters are likely to happen more often over the next few years as the temperature rises, as the glaciers melt."

Scientists from the World Weather Attribution (WWA) have described the event as a "compound crisis" in which local geological instability combined with long-term warming that has led to glacier retreat and permafrost thaw.

Nepal has contributed negligibly to the breakdown of the global climate system, Khanal added.

More than 90 percent of its electricity comes from hydropower, over 70 percent of new cars sold are electric, and the nation contributes just 0.1 percent of global greenhouse gases.

"So why should we, who have not had any contribution to this issue, only bear the burden?"

- $5 billion disaster cost -

Khanal said his meetings in New York had been productive, with the United States announcing $31 million in new flood recovery support.

The G7 informally promised support at a meeting on Wednesday, he said, and Britain has also vowed to help.

Still, the scale of the challenges is enormous: preliminary estimates by his government put the cost of the disaster at $5 billion.

Nepal has asked the UN's Loss and Damage fund for $20 million, the maximum allowed, but a tiny fraction of what it needs.

The fund, established in 2022 in the aftermath of catastrophic floods in Pakistan, has yet to make even its first disbursement and is dramatically underfunded -- and observers see Nepal as a key test.

Khanal said, however, he had been encouraged by cash assistance and rescue teams sent by Nepal's neighbors, as well as the Nepalese diaspora who had sent money directly to the Prime Minister's Relief Fund.

Previously, he said, Nepalis preferred to donate to international organizations and local nonprofits -- but that has changed since the election of new Prime Minister Balendra Shah, a former rapper who won power on the back of a youth-led movement.

Jeremy Konyndyk, a former USAID official under Joe Biden, has criticized President Donald Trump's administration for sweeping aid cuts to Nepal after it took office, including for flood prediction and glacier inventories.

"There's no early warning system that probably exists in the world right now to imagine a compounded disaster of that nature," Khanal said. "But obviously what USAID and other institutions used to provide us is financial and technical assistance."

Nepal now needs more such assistance from the world to develop more complex systems involving satellites to monitor the rate of glacial melt and provide advance warnings, he said.


White House Reinstates Access to CNN, MS NOW and Politico Following Judge’s Order

Marine One lifts off from the South Lawn of the White House after President Donald Trump and China's President Xi Jinping toured the helicopter, Thursday, Sept. 24, 2026, in Washington, during a state visit. (AP)
Marine One lifts off from the South Lawn of the White House after President Donald Trump and China's President Xi Jinping toured the helicopter, Thursday, Sept. 24, 2026, in Washington, during a state visit. (AP)
TT

White House Reinstates Access to CNN, MS NOW and Politico Following Judge’s Order

Marine One lifts off from the South Lawn of the White House after President Donald Trump and China's President Xi Jinping toured the helicopter, Thursday, Sept. 24, 2026, in Washington, during a state visit. (AP)
Marine One lifts off from the South Lawn of the White House after President Donald Trump and China's President Xi Jinping toured the helicopter, Thursday, Sept. 24, 2026, in Washington, during a state visit. (AP)

The White House said on Thursday it has reinstated journalists from CNN, MS NOW and Politico after a federal judge deemed US President Donald Trump's ban of the three news outlets likely unconstitutional and ordered their access immediately restored.

The midday reinstatement came after a chaotic few hours earlier on Thursday when the journalists continued to be blocked from entering the White House grounds. That prompted the three news organizations to request an immediate hearing before US District Judge Tim Kelly, who issued his decision overnight.

Kelly, acting in a lawsuit brought by CNN, MS NOW and Politico on Monday, ordered a halt to Trump's ban for 14 days in a press freedom case that has played out over the past week in the courtroom and White House grounds.

Kelly found that the revocation of the White House credentials of the journalists "likely violated their constitutional due process rights."

The judge, who Trump appointed in 2017 during his first presidential term, also raised doubts about the US Justice Department's national security arguments for justifying the ban, noting that Trump himself had said the action was due to what the president alleged was false or negative coverage.

Hours after Kelly issued his order, CNN, MS NOW and Politico told the judge they remained ‌barred, and asked for ‌the emergency hearing. Politico said its reporter's credentials were confiscated. An MS NOW reporter said she was blocked from the White ‌House. CNN ⁠said some ⁠of its staff members were denied entry onto the grounds.

In response, Micah Stopperich, the director of press operations at the White House, said in a court filing that the White House began the process of reinstating press badges for affected reporters at 7:25 a.m., and that the "White House press team dropped badges at the entry gate for members of the press to pick up around 9:55 a.m."

After receiving Stopperich's declaration, the judge denied the request by the news organizations for an emergency hearing but gave them an opportunity to inform him of any factual developments later in the day.

The sharpest conflict yet between Trump and the press played out during a key diplomatic moment for the US president: his appearance at the United Nations General Assembly in New York and his hosting of Chinese President Xi Jinping on Thursday.

A source familiar with the White House television press pool said its members would not reinstate their coverage ⁠until the White House formally reinstates CNN to the pool. Earlier this week, they had suspended pooled coverage in solidarity with CNN.

There ‌were no TV pool cameras set up for Xi's arrival on the White House's South Lawn on Thursday ‌morning, and FOX News, MS NOW and CNN did not air the two leaders' arrival ceremony live.

During Trump's welcome of Xi to the White House, the president made a joke to ‌photographers in the Oval Office about the Chinese having the friendliest press corps.

CNN is one of the five news organizations – along with ABC, CBS, FOX News and ‌NBC – that make up the primary White House television pool. They share the costs of covering the president, take turns organizing coverage and provide footage to other outlets.

CNN had been scheduled to cover Trump's trip to New York for the General Assembly on Monday, but was not able to provide a pool feed.

NATIONAL SECURITY CONCERNS

Trump announced the ban on Friday on his social media platform, saying those news organizations "shouldn't be able to constantly write or report FICTION and LIES when they're covering the President of the United States." Trump framed their reporting as a threat to US national ‌security.

The three outlets sued Trump and other members of his administration, saying the ban violated the US Constitution's First Amendment protections for free speech and a free press, as well as their due process rights. A coalition of press freedom groups ⁠and dozens of news organizations, including Reuters, later ⁠filed a legal brief supporting the three news outlets.

Kelly ordered the Trump administration to immediately return the outlets' press passes and stop enforcing the ban for two weeks. The judge rejected the administration's stated national security concerns.

"The record lacks factual support for defendants' contention that the revocation of plaintiffs' hard passes will in fact protect national security or that national security will be endangered if the court orders their passes reinstated while this litigation proceeds," Kelly wrote.

In a filing on Tuesday, the Justice Department accused the outlets of threatening national security with their coverage, citing stories about US missile stockpiles, construction of Trump's White House ballroom and turnout at the recent Republican midterm convention.

Theodore Boutrous, an attorney for the three outlets, welcomed the judge's decision in a statement, saying: "This is a strong ruling vindicating freedom of the press, due process and the rule of law. We greatly appreciate the court's swift action."

TENSIONS WITH THE PRESS

Although other presidential administrations have battled with the press, Trump's campaign against the media has been unprecedented.

Upending decades of tradition, his White House had denied basic access to many major news organizations, launched personal attacks on journalists and filed multiple lawsuits against news organizations.

Kelly's ruling came a day after Trump experienced another legal setback.

On Wednesday, an Iowa judge dismissed Trump's 2024 lawsuit against the Des Moines Register newspaper and pollster J. Ann Selzer.

Trump sued the Register, its parent company Gannett and Selzer over a poll published ahead of the November 2024 US election that showed Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris leading him in Iowa. Trump accused the newspaper and its longtime pollster of fraudulently misleading readers.

In his ruling Wednesday, Iowa District Judge Scott Beattie said the poll was legally protected speech.