How AI Is Changing Event Discovery, Booking

Nadeem Bakhsh, chief executive and co-founder of webook.com (Company handout)
Nadeem Bakhsh, chief executive and co-founder of webook.com (Company handout)
TT

How AI Is Changing Event Discovery, Booking

Nadeem Bakhsh, chief executive and co-founder of webook.com (Company handout)
Nadeem Bakhsh, chief executive and co-founder of webook.com (Company handout)

A night out can start with a simple question: “What should we do tonight?”

That is where traditional search can struggle. It works best when users already know the event, date, or location they want. Booking platforms are now using artificial intelligence to tackle the opposite problem: first understanding vague intent, then turning it into options that can actually be booked.

Nadeem Bakhsh, chief executive and co-founder of webook.com, says the platform’s AI booking agent was not built because existing search tools were failing. It was designed to add another layer of discovery for users who do not yet know exactly what they want.

Speaking to Asharq Al-Awsat, Bakhsh said search and filters remain effective when users have a clear target. Open-ended questions, however, require the system to understand context before it can surface the right option.

From keywords to intent

In its first version, the agent uses natural language processing in Arabic and English and can handle informal requests that include location, preferences, group type or booking criteria.

Users do not need to know an event’s name or phrase their request like a search query, Bakhsh said. They can simply ask for a family activity, a nearby experience or something available in the evening.

The system then interprets the request, identifies the relevant details and matches them with options in the platform’s live catalog.

If key information is missing, the agent is designed to ask for clarification rather than produce a generic list that may not fit the user’s needs.

That makes accuracy central to the experience. The more discovery shifts from explicit search to conversation, the greater the risk that a question will be misunderstood or misinterpreted.

When the agent gets it wrong

Bakhsh acknowledges that mistakes are part of using AI systems.

The agent, he said, “should not pretend to know.” If a request is unclear or incomplete, it should ask for more information rather than force an unreliable recommendation.

The official booking page remains the final authority on availability, prices, fees and event terms. If information changes or tickets sell out before a purchase is completed, the details shown in the official booking flow take precedence over anything said earlier in the conversation.

When the agent cannot verify information, Bakhsh said, it should direct the user to official event details or human support.

A correction from the user may also help improve the next response, but Bakhsh does not present that as a guarantee that the same mistake will not happen again.

Recommendation or advertising?

Trust becomes a commercial issue when the agent is not only finding events, but ranking and recommending them.

Bakhsh said the system is meant to match user intent with options that are genuinely available to book, not present paid advertising as personal advice.

Recommendations are based on criteria supplied by the user, including location, timing, group type and activity preference, as well as live availability.

Any paid or sponsored placement, he said, should be clearly labeled so users can distinguish an organic recommendation from commercial content.

“Trust depends on making that distinction clear,” Bakhsh said.

One journey, several channels

The experience becomes more complicated when the conversation starts outside the booking platform itself, on services such as X, Instagram or WhatsApp.

Bakhsh said the agent uses information users choose to provide, such as location, timing, group type, interests and booking criteria, to make suggestions more relevant.

Public interactions remain limited to discovery. Once greater privacy is required, the conversation moves to a private channel and then into webook.com’s secure booking environment.

Card details and other sensitive personal information should not be requested through public posts, comments or direct messages on social media, he said.

Personal data remains subject to the platform’s privacy policy and to legal and regulatory retention requirements.

Bakhsh also said data is not treated as freely transferable from one channel to another. Any personalization depends on the permissions granted by the user and the purpose for which the data was collected.

What webook.com builds — and what it does not

The agent is not built entirely with in-house technology.

Bakhsh said webook.com develops and operates the core product layer and orchestration system. That includes understanding booking intent, linking it to the catalog, applying product logic, generating recommendations and directing users into the secure booking flow.

External infrastructure is used when needed for language-model processing, cloud services and access to channels such as X, Instagram and WhatsApp.

Those providers supply infrastructure or distribution channels, Bakhsh said, but they do not own the event inventory, booking logic or customer journey.

The company does not disclose vendor architecture or security-sensitive implementation details.

Bakhsh also stressed that the agent remains in beta and can make mistakes. Users should verify event details and final booking information on the official page before completing a transaction.

Discovery ends where the transaction begins

One of the main safeguards in the system is the separation between conversation and payment.

The agent may respond to a general request in a public space, but when privacy becomes necessary, it moves the interaction into a private channel and then directs the user to an official, identity-linked booking flow.

It does not request card details or sensitive information through social media posts, comments, or direct messages.

Bakhsh said this structure helps limit the impact of prompt manipulation, impersonation, fraudulent accounts, and fake booking links.

The conversational layer can help users find an event, but it cannot bypass the inventory, account, pricing, or payment controls on the official platform.

The agent does not set the price

Once a user moves from discovery to purchase, the agent’s role stops at a clear boundary.

Options come from the live catalog, but the official booking page remains the authoritative transaction interface.

Before confirming, users see current availability, the final price, booking fees and event-specific terms, including cancellation and refund policies.

The agent cannot change those terms or guarantee that a ticket will still be available while a user waits.

Age restrictions and accessibility requirements are shown only when they appear in the official event details. If the information is unclear, the system is not supposed to guess.

AI, in other words, changes how users reach an option. It does not change the contractual terms or controls governing the purchase.

Bakhsh also links the agent to a broader framework called TruFan, while drawing a distinction between the two.

The AI agent operates at the start of the journey, turning natural-language requests into bookable options.

TruFan addresses a different stage: integrity and access to high-demand events, by helping identify genuine, verified fans and giving them priority.



US House Speaker Warns Curbing AI Too Sharply Could Leave China Ahead

US Speaker of the House Mike Johnson speaks during the second day of the Republican National Committee midterm convention at the American Airlines Center in Dallas, Texas on September 10, 2026. (AFP)
US Speaker of the House Mike Johnson speaks during the second day of the Republican National Committee midterm convention at the American Airlines Center in Dallas, Texas on September 10, 2026. (AFP)
TT

US House Speaker Warns Curbing AI Too Sharply Could Leave China Ahead

US Speaker of the House Mike Johnson speaks during the second day of the Republican National Committee midterm convention at the American Airlines Center in Dallas, Texas on September 10, 2026. (AFP)
US Speaker of the House Mike Johnson speaks during the second day of the Republican National Committee midterm convention at the American Airlines Center in Dallas, Texas on September 10, 2026. (AFP)

House Speaker Mike Johnson on Sunday warned that moving too quickly to curb AI development could cost the United States the tech race to China.

Johnson's comments come amid a growing chorus of AI leaders and experts sounding the alarm that untamed AI growth could cause irreparable damage to humanity.

"If Congress just races in and does some sort of emergency session to try to regulate AI, we will lose the race to China, and that is a threat to every single American," Johnson said on CNN Sunday morning.

"But we don't need everybody to panic right now. We need to handle this new technology like we have others in the past, and make sure we're doing everything we can responsibly to also not smother American innovation," he added. "We have to do both things simultaneously."

Johnson, a Republican, called for a meeting in Congress with top AI executives to figure out how best to regulate the industry. He added that he had discussed the idea with President Donald Trump, and, when asked if such a meeting could take place this week, Johnson said: "Yeah, I'd do it tomorrow."

The remarks follow a call by Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei to slow down the development of the powerful technology, amid mounting worries over the risks of "superintelligent" computer systems.

His comments came a few days after AI researcher Jacob Coxon, who had previously worked at both OpenAI and Anthropic, decided to leave the industry, accusing both US companies of "gambling with our lives" in the race to develop models capable of self-improvement.

OpenAI boss Sam Altman and Elon Musk, who owns xAI, quickly chimed in to say they agreed with Amodei's assessment, as pressure builds for improved oversight.

Concerns have grown in recent weeks after OpenAI revealed that during testing, AI models broke out of their confined environment, connected to the internet and infiltrated Hugging Face, a site developers use to store and share code.

In that incident and others, the blame was placed on AI agents, which are software programs that can carry out tasks without constant supervision by humans.

In early August, the US government put in place a voluntary security review process for advanced AI models before their release, but the parameters of that program remain unclear.

Industry observers have questioned how effective it would be, as the Trump administration has thus far favored a light-touch, deregulatory approach to most industries, including tech.


Anthropic Boss Calls for Slowing Pace of AI Development

(FILES) Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei looks on as he takes part in a session on AI during the World Economic Forum (WEF) annual meeting in Davos on January 23, 2025. (Photo by FABRICE COFFRINI / AFP)
(FILES) Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei looks on as he takes part in a session on AI during the World Economic Forum (WEF) annual meeting in Davos on January 23, 2025. (Photo by FABRICE COFFRINI / AFP)
TT

Anthropic Boss Calls for Slowing Pace of AI Development

(FILES) Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei looks on as he takes part in a session on AI during the World Economic Forum (WEF) annual meeting in Davos on January 23, 2025. (Photo by FABRICE COFFRINI / AFP)
(FILES) Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei looks on as he takes part in a session on AI during the World Economic Forum (WEF) annual meeting in Davos on January 23, 2025. (Photo by FABRICE COFFRINI / AFP)

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei on Saturday called on artificial intelligence (AI) firms to slow down the development of the powerful technology, amid mounting worries over the risks of "superintelligent" computer systems.

His comments came a few days after AI researcher Jacob Coxon, who left OpenAI to join Anthropic, decided to leave the industry, accusing both US companies of "gambling with our lives" in the race to develop models capable of self-improvement.

"We must slow the pace at which we improve the capabilities of AI models. Progress will still seem fast, and we must make wise use of the time we gain," Amodei wrote in a post on his personal website.

"AI brings risks, and because it is such a powerful technology, these risks are serious."

"Not building the technology deprives humanity of benefits or simply places AI in the hands of authoritarian powers, while building it too fast is reckless. We have sought a middle way," said Amodei, who co-founded Anthropic with his sister Daniela in 2021.

"But over the last few months, I have become convinced that fully addressing the risks requires even more prudence."

According to AFP, Amodei's statement echoes another call by Anthropic in early June to slow or suspend development.

Then in late July, Sam Altman, the boss of Anthropic rival OpenAI, said developers might need to voluntarily pump the brakes on their rapid advances to give society a chance to catch up.

At roughly the same time, more than 1,000 employees at cutting-edge AI companies including Amodei signed a petition calling on the US government to help "deliberately pace the frontier of automated AI development."

OpenAI had revealed that during testing, the AI models broke out of their confined environment, connected to the internet and infiltrated Hugging Face, a site developers use to store and share code.

Earlier this week, Coxon, 27, sounded the alarm after spending the past three years pretraining AI models -- first at OpenAI and then, this year, at its rival Anthropic, which he considered more cautious in its approach.

Pretraining is the stage where AI models absorb vast quantities of data.

"Neither company is acting responsibly. They are racing straight to self-improving superintelligence and gambling with our lives," Coxon said Tuesday.

"The people building AI earnestly believe that it could kill us all by the end of the decade," he said in a post on X.
Superintelligence is the theoretical point when AI's capabilities exceed human intelligence.


Oracle Shares Rise as AI Cloud Backlog Beats Estimates

FILE PHOTO: A logo of cloud service provider Oracle is seen at the company's offices at Eastpoint Business Park, Dublin, Ireland October 18, 2021. REUTERS/Tom Bergin/File Photo
FILE PHOTO: A logo of cloud service provider Oracle is seen at the company's offices at Eastpoint Business Park, Dublin, Ireland October 18, 2021. REUTERS/Tom Bergin/File Photo
TT

Oracle Shares Rise as AI Cloud Backlog Beats Estimates

FILE PHOTO: A logo of cloud service provider Oracle is seen at the company's offices at Eastpoint Business Park, Dublin, Ireland October 18, 2021. REUTERS/Tom Bergin/File Photo
FILE PHOTO: A logo of cloud service provider Oracle is seen at the company's offices at Eastpoint Business Park, Dublin, Ireland October 18, 2021. REUTERS/Tom Bergin/File Photo

Oracle shares rose 5.5% premarket on Friday after the cloud computing and software company's stronger-than-expected quarterly results eased concerns around its massive debt-driven spending spree.

The Austin, Texas-based firm booked more than $30 billion of additional AI cloud contracts in the first fiscal quarter, boosting its revenue backlog to $664 billion, above analyst estimates of $639.89 billion, according to data from Visible Alpha.

Oracle's upbeat results follow a period of underperformance, as the company races ⁠to keep pace ⁠with hyperscale rivals, with mounting debt and squeezed cash flows raising doubts over when its massive AI spending will pay off.

The results should address key investor concerns including whether Oracle's backlog growth can be ⁠sustained, its conversion into revenue amid data center delays, and the need for further capital raises, Reuters quoted J.P. Morgan analysts as saying.

Its shares were down more than 21% so far this year, compared with a nearly 11% rise in the benchmark S&P 500 index.

"Oracle's problem has not been finding customers, but proving that its enormous data center build-out can eventually generate ⁠enough ⁠cash to justify the cost. The results should nevertheless ease fears that Oracle is building ahead of demand," said Lale Akoner, etoro market strategist.

Oracle is set to add about $24 billion in market value at the current share price of $161.3, if gains hold.

The stock trades at 16.86 times its forward earnings estimates, compared with Microsoft's 23.84 multiple and Amazon's 22.58, according to data compiled by LSEG.