Iranian FM: Leaked Document Slowed Prisoner Exchange with Washington

 Iranian Foreign Minister Hossein Amir-Abdollahian is seen before a meeting with Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida (not picture) at Kishida's official residence in Tokyo on August 7, 2023. (AFP)
Iranian Foreign Minister Hossein Amir-Abdollahian is seen before a meeting with Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida (not picture) at Kishida's official residence in Tokyo on August 7, 2023. (AFP)
TT

Iranian FM: Leaked Document Slowed Prisoner Exchange with Washington

 Iranian Foreign Minister Hossein Amir-Abdollahian is seen before a meeting with Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida (not picture) at Kishida's official residence in Tokyo on August 7, 2023. (AFP)
Iranian Foreign Minister Hossein Amir-Abdollahian is seen before a meeting with Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida (not picture) at Kishida's official residence in Tokyo on August 7, 2023. (AFP)

Iranian Foreign Minister Hossein Amir-Abdollahian stated that the leak of a confidential document resulted in a slowdown of the implementation of a prisoner exchange deal with Washington.

He emphasized that his country is not seeking a temporary or limited agreement in the nuclear deal negotiations and anticipates Tehran being deprived of conducting transactions in dollars even if the agreement is reinstated.

Abdollahian’s remarks were made during a meeting with a group of journalists, days after the announcement of an Iran-US deal.

The deal commenced with the release of Iranian funds in South Korea. This coincided with the transfer of five US dual nationals from cells in Tehran’s notorious Evin Prison to a hotel under house arrest, in preparation for their eventual release.

Abdollahian did not deviate from previous statements regarding Iran’s strategy in nuclear negotiations and its efforts to improve relations with countries in the region, aiming to break its regional and international isolation.

The minister revealed that the Iranian government, under President Ebrahim Raisi, has been pursuing two tracks from the outset: “Cancellation of unilateral US sanctions and the nullification of their effect,” alluding to the policy of “sanctions evasion” advocated by Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei as a strategy to confront Western sanctions, both presently and in the future.

“We must continue to mitigate the impact of sanctions by using local currencies,” said Abdollahian.

“One of the ongoing discussions, based on the ten-page agreement text, is that even if the agreement works well, it cannot access a single dollar. We should realize that the inability to access the dollar can be resolved by using national currencies and multi-party mechanisms,” he added.

The minister noted that Iranian assets, newly released from the banks in South Korea, have been transferred to a European bank.

Indirect talks between Washington and Tehran to revive the nuclear agreement have stalled since last September.

Having failed to revive the pact, Tehran and Washington said they had reached an understanding under which $6 billion in Iranian funds will be unfrozen from South Korea while five American nationals detained in Iran will be released.



Report: Airlines Fly Over Afghanistan as Mideast Becomes the Greater Risk

A wing of an Airbus A-320 aircraft of British Airways is pictured above northern France during a Geneva to London Heathrow flight, August 7, 2024.  REUTERS/Denis Balibouse
A wing of an Airbus A-320 aircraft of British Airways is pictured above northern France during a Geneva to London Heathrow flight, August 7, 2024. REUTERS/Denis Balibouse
TT

Report: Airlines Fly Over Afghanistan as Mideast Becomes the Greater Risk

A wing of an Airbus A-320 aircraft of British Airways is pictured above northern France during a Geneva to London Heathrow flight, August 7, 2024.  REUTERS/Denis Balibouse
A wing of an Airbus A-320 aircraft of British Airways is pictured above northern France during a Geneva to London Heathrow flight, August 7, 2024. REUTERS/Denis Balibouse

Singapore Airlines, British Airways and Lufthansa have increased their flights over Afghanistan after years of largely avoiding it now the Middle East conflict has made it seem a relatively safe option, Reuters reported.
The carriers mostly stopped transiting Afghanistan, which lies on major routes between Asia and Europe, three years ago when the Taliban took over and air traffic control services stopped.
Those services have yet to resume, but airlines increasingly consider the skies between Iran and Israel are riskier than Afghan airspace. Many had started routing through Iran and the Middle East after Russian skies were closed to most western carriers when the Ukraine war began in 2022.
"As conflicts have evolved, the calculus of which airspace to use has changed. Airlines are seeking to mitigate risk as much as possible and they see overflying Afghanistan as the safer option given the current tensions between Iran and Israel," Ian Petchenik, a spokesperson for flight tracking organization Flightradar24, said.
There were more than seven times the number of flights over Afghanistan in the second week of August than during the same period a year ago, according to a Reuters analysis of FlightRadar24 data.
The shift began in mid-April during reciprocal missile and drone attacks between Iran and Israel. Flight tracking data from the time shows Lufthansa, Singapore Airlines, British Airways and others began to send a few flights a day over Afghanistan.
But the main growth has been since the killing of senior members of Hamas and Hezbollah in late July raised concerns of a major escalation.
Some pilots are concerned.
"You're depending on the analysis of your airline. Every time I fly out there, I don't like the feeling of flying over a conflict area where you don't know, actually, what is happening," said Otjan de Bruin, a commercial pilot and head of the European Cockpit Association.
"It's always safe enough, until proven otherwise."
Lufthansa Group told Reuters it decided to resume overflying Afghan airspace from early July.
Other carriers that have increased overflights since April include Turkish Airlines, Thai Airways and the Air France-KLM group, data shows.
"Based on actual security information, KLM and other airlines currently safely overfly Afghanistan only on specific routes and only at high altitudes," KLM told Reuters.
British Airways, Thai Airways, Turkish Airlines and Singapore Airlines did not respond to requests for comment.
Taiwan's EVA Air began from late July, flight tracking data shows. EVA told Reuters it chooses routes based on safety, the current international situation and flight advisories.
REGULATION'S ROLE
The route changes have been facilitated by aviation regulators easing guidance on Afghanistan.
The US Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in early July said planes could fly at a lower altitude over a sliver of north-eastern Afghanistan, the Wakhan Corridor, which is used to cross from Tajikistan to Pakistan - opening that path to more types of flights.
A year earlier, the FAA lifted its ban on overflights for the entire country, but said planes must stay above 32,000 feet (9,753.6 m) where surface-to-air weapons are considered less effective.
But few started using Afghanistan until April.
Although more traffic has been using the airspace without incident, there is no guarantee of crew or passenger safety if a plane has to land, flight safety group OPSGROUP said in July.
In the absence of air traffic control, pilots crossing Afghanistan talk to nearby planes over radio according to a protocol drawn up by UN aviation body ICAO and Afghanistan's Civil Aviation Authority.
European aviation safety regulator EASA said in a conflict-zone information bulletin re-issued in July that "extremist non-state actor groups remain active and might sporadically target aviation facilities in multiple ways."
The industry is haunted by the memory of Malaysian Airlines Flight MH17 from Amsterdam to Kuala Lumpur, which was shot down over eastern Ukraine in 2014, as fighting raged between pro-Russian separatists and Ukrainian forces.
COST AND LIMITED CHOICE
Airlines are under pressure to save money after the loss since 2022 of many shorter paths through Russian airspace, and as they re-build from the pandemic.
There are few international rules that dictate which areas of airspace are safe and airline safety decisions are left largely to the discretion of individual carriers.
If an airline cannot fly through Russia, Ukraine or Iran, central Afghanistan offers a more direct route into southern Asia from Europe.
"This route saved us a fair chunk of time and fuel," OPSGROUP reported from a pilot in July who flew from Amsterdam to Kuala Lumpur across central Afghanistan.