G20 Leaders Praise the Results of New Delhi Summit

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi greeting the press after the G20 summit in New Delhi (AFP)
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi greeting the press after the G20 summit in New Delhi (AFP)
TT

G20 Leaders Praise the Results of New Delhi Summit

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi greeting the press after the G20 summit in New Delhi (AFP)
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi greeting the press after the G20 summit in New Delhi (AFP)

The G20 leaders participating in the New Delhi summit praised its success after Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi announced a joint declaration despite disagreements over the Ukraine war.

The US Principal Deputy National Security Adviser, Jon Finer, considered the declaration a "big potential step forward" regarding sovereignty and territorial integrity.

Finer explained in press statements that the declaration reflects the agreement of major economies required to uphold international law and Russia to respect international law.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov hailed the G20 summit, saying it was a "success for Moscow."

He said it was a sign that the global south would no longer blindly follow the Western powers.

"They don't want to be told to follow the Zelenskiy formula," Lavrov said, referring to the Ukrainian president.

Another indication of the summit's success included the meeting between US President Joe Biden and Chinese Prime Minister Li Qiang, who led his country's delegation to New Delhi.

During a press conference, Biden said: "My team, my staff still meets with President Xi's people and cabinet."

"I met with his No.2 person in India today."

He added: "We talked about stability," and the Southern Hemisphere. "It wasn't confrontational at all."

-Joint declaration

Modi told the leaders attending the summit in New Delhi that they reached a consensus on the declaration, which called on all states to abide by the principles of international law, including respecting territorial integrity and sovereignty, international humanitarian law, and the multilateral system that protects peace and stability.

The declaration emphasized that states must "refrain from the threat or use of force to seek territorial acquisition" and that "the use or threat of use of nuclear weapons is inadmissible."

The declaration called for implementing the Black Sea initiative to safely flow grain, food, and fertilizer from Ukraine and Russia.

Moscow pulled out of the agreement in July over a failure to meet its demands to implement a parallel agreement easing rules for its food and fertilizer exports.

The declaration said the group agreed to address debt vulnerabilities in low and middle-income countries "in an effective, comprehensive and systematic manner" but did not make any fresh action plan.

It said countries pledged to strengthen and reform multilateral development banks while it accepted the proposal for tighter regulation of cryptocurrencies.

Modi inaugurated the meeting by calling on members to end a "global trust deficit" and announced that the bloc was granting permanent membership to the African Union to make it more representative.

- Ukrainian disappointment

Meanwhile, Ukrainian Foreign Ministry spokesman Oleg Nikolenko took a screenshot of the relevant section of the joint declaration, with several pieces of the text crossed out in red and corrected with wording that reflects Ukraine's position.

"G20 adopted a final declaration. We are grateful to the partners who tried to include strong wording in the text. However, regarding Russia's aggression against Ukraine, the G20 has nothing to be proud of. This is how the main elements of the text could look to be closer to reality," he said.

"Ukraine is grateful to the partners who tried to include strong formulations in the text."

Furthermore, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz lauded the declaration for supporting Ukraine's territorial and sovereign integrity.

He noted that it was a success that Russia ultimately abandoned its objection to such a decision simply because all others moved in this direction.

In turn, French President Emmanuel Macron said on Sunday that the G20, founded to solve international economic issues, was not necessarily the place to expect diplomatic progress on the war in Ukraine.

However, he said the G20 declaration was not a diplomatic victory for Russia.

"This G20 confirms once again the isolation of Russia," Macron told a press conference after the summit's closing ceremony.

- 200 hours of negotiation

India's G20 Sherpa Amitabh Kant said it took over 200 hours of non-stop negotiations to deliver a consensus on the G20 declaration adopted at the Leaders' Summit.

He explained that the Indian diplomats held 300 bilateral meetings and circulated 15 drafts on the contentious Ukraine conflict with their counterparts.

Kant pointed out that Brazil was among the countries that helped reach a consensus on the paragraph allocated to Ukraine within the statement.

For his part, Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva described the summit as "successful," noting that "we cannot let geopolitical issues sequester the G20 agenda of discussions. We have no interest in a divided G20. We need peace and cooperation instead of conflict."

Modi handed over the presidency of the G20 to Lula, affirming his "support" to Brazil, which will host the upcoming summit scheduled for November 2024 in Rio de Janeiro.

- An invitation to Putin

Lula said Putin would be invited to next year's event, adding that he planned to attend a BRICS bloc of developing nations meeting due in Russia before the Rio meeting.

He announced that the Russian leader would not be arrested in Brazil if he attended the G20 meeting next year.

In March, the International Criminal Court issued an arrest warrant against Putin, accusing him of the war crime of illegally deporting hundreds of children from Ukraine.

Russia denied its forces have engaged in war crimes or forcibly taken Ukrainian children.



Iran Says Could Abandon Nuclear Weapons But Has Conditions

A sample of the surveillance cameras that monitor the Iranian nuclear facilities presented at a press conference in Vienna. (Reuters)
A sample of the surveillance cameras that monitor the Iranian nuclear facilities presented at a press conference in Vienna. (Reuters)
TT

Iran Says Could Abandon Nuclear Weapons But Has Conditions

A sample of the surveillance cameras that monitor the Iranian nuclear facilities presented at a press conference in Vienna. (Reuters)
A sample of the surveillance cameras that monitor the Iranian nuclear facilities presented at a press conference in Vienna. (Reuters)

Iran on Saturday hinted it would be willing to negotiate on a nuclear agreement with the upcoming administration of US President-elect Donald Trump, but that it has conditions.
Last Thursday, the UN atomic watchdog's 35-nation Board of Governors passed a resolution ordering Iran to urgently improve cooperation with the agency and requesting a “comprehensive” report aimed at pressuring Iran into fresh nuclear talks.
Ali Larijani, advisor to Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, said Iran and the US are now in a new position concerning the nuclear file.
In a post on X, he said, “If the current US administration say they are only against Iran’s nuclear weapons, they must accept Iran’s conditions and provide compensation for the damages caused.”

He added, “The US should accept the necessary conditions... so that a new agreement can be reached.”
Larijani stated that Washington withdrew from the JCPOA, thus causing damage to Iran, adding that his country started increasing its production of 60% enriched uranium.
The Iran nuclear accord, formally known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), was reached to limit the Iranian nuclear program in exchange for sanctions relief.
The deal began unraveling in 2018, when Washington, under Trump’s first administration, unilaterally withdrew from the accord and re-imposed a sanction regime of “maximum pressure” on Tehran.
In retaliation, Iran has rapidly ramped up its nuclear activities, including by increasing its stockpiles of enriched uranium to 60% — close to the 90% threshold required to develop a nuclear bomb.
It also began gradually rolling back some of its commitments by increasing its uranium stockpiles and enriching beyond the 3.67% purity -- enough for nuclear power stations -- permitted under the deal.
Since 2021, Tehran has significantly decreased its cooperation with the IAEA by deactivating surveillance devices to monitor the nuclear program and barring UN inspectors.
Most recently, Iran escalated its confrontations with the Agency by announcing it would launch a series of “new and advanced” centrifuges. Its move came in response to a resolution adopted by the United Nations nuclear watchdog that censures Tehran for what the agency called lack of cooperation.
Centrifuges are the machines that enrich uranium transformed into gas by rotating it at very high speed, increasing the proportion of fissile isotope material (U-235).
Shortly after the IAEA passed its resolution last Thursday, Tehran spoke about the “dual role” of IAEA’s chief, Raphael Grossi.
Chairman of the Iranian Parliamentary National Security and Foreign Policy Committee, Ebrahim Azizi said, “The statements made by Grossi in Tehran do not match his actions in Vienna.”
And contrary to the statements of Azizi, who denied his country’s plans to build nuclear weapons, Tehran did not originally want to freeze its uranium stockpile enriched to 60%
According to the IAEA’s definition, around 42 kg of uranium enriched to 60% is the amount at which creating one atomic weapon is theoretically possible. The 60% purity is just a short, technical step away from weapons-grade levels of 90%.
Spokesperson and deputy head of Iran’s Atomic Energy Organization, Behrouz Kamalvandi, said on Friday that IAEA inspectors were scheduled to come immediately after the meeting of the Board of Governors to evaluate Iran’s capacity, “with those capacities remaining for a month without any interruption in enrichment at 60% purity.”
Iran’s news agency, Tasnim, quoted Kamalvandi as saying that “the pressures resulting from the IAEA resolution are counterproductive, meaning that they increase our ability to enrich.”
He added: “Currently, not only have we not stopped enrichment, but we have orders to increase the speed, and we are gradually working on that."