Netanyahu is Intensifying His War Against His Army

Israeli Chief of Staff during his meeting with soldiers in Jabalia, north of Gaza (Israeli Army website)
Israeli Chief of Staff during his meeting with soldiers in Jabalia, north of Gaza (Israeli Army website)
TT

Netanyahu is Intensifying His War Against His Army

Israeli Chief of Staff during his meeting with soldiers in Jabalia, north of Gaza (Israeli Army website)
Israeli Chief of Staff during his meeting with soldiers in Jabalia, north of Gaza (Israeli Army website)

Israel has recently witnessed a new and intense escalation at the so-called eighth front that has emerged between Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his government against the leadership of the Israeli army and other security services.
The dispute between the two sides has reached a stage where the PM has requested the dismissal of the military's chief spokesman, Rear Admiral Daniel Hagari.
Hagari, known for his wartime propaganda and cold-bloodedness, is a beloved figure in Israel.
The vast majority of Israeli Jews, 87%, have confidence in the Army spokesperson, according to a poll conducted by the Israel Democracy Institute. This trust later dropped to 67% and again rose to 76%.
But the Israeli government wants to fire Hagari after the latter dared to criticize last Wednesday the so-called Feldstein law being advanced by the government. The law would shield members of the defense establishment from prosecution should they give classified intelligence to the prime minister or defense minister without authorization.
When asked about the law, Hagari said the legal amendment considered by lawmakers was “dangerous for the army and the country's security.”
During a press briefing, the spokesperson said the law aims to protect Eli Feldstein, a spokesman for Netanyahu, and an unnamed army reservist relating to their alleged involvement in the leak of stolen classified intelligence information to the foreign press.
“The army does not hide information from the political echelon. The army works in accordance with the political echelon for the defense of Israel,” Hagari said in response to a question at a press conference.
He said, “The document in question was accessible to the relevant authorities in the Prime Minister’s Office,” referring to the leaked classified intel.
“This law is very dangerous because it will create a situation where any junior official in the army can, based on his own personal judgment, steal documents or intelligence materials from the army,” he continued.
Angry Government
Hagari’s statements were met with criticism from government officials, including Defense Minister Israel Katz.
“The criticism by the army spokesman against the political echelon and against the legislative process in the Knesset is a grave incident and a complete deviation from his authority and what is allowed and expected of a uniformed person in a democratic regime,” Katz said.
Katz threatened that he would take “disciplinary action” against Hagari for his comments “as soon as possible.”
Hagari was also criticized by the government and several deputies, who said he had “exceeded the scope of his authority” by criticizing the law.
In a statement, Netanyahu said, “It is good that the army spokesman was put in his place to ensure that such a statement is not heard again.”
He added, “In a democratic country, the military is not supposed to interfere in political matters and certainly not criticize legislation.”
Knesset Speaker Amir Ohana said that in a democratic country, the military does not criticize the legislative process in parliament at a press conference.
“The army can express its position in the Knesset committee that prepares the law, as it has done countless times in the past, and as all state bodies that are monitored by the Knesset or are affected by legislation do,” Ohana said.
National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir linked Hagari’s criticism to Attorney General Gali Baharav-Miara’s initiation of investigations of police officials who carried out orders by Ben Gvir to distribute weapons in contradiction to existing regulations.
“The spirit of the attorney general is seeping into the army spokesperson,” Ben Gvir said. “When Hagari sees that the attorney general disregards the government, he also disregards the defense minister. Full deep state – except this time, it's already from the get-go.”
Interior Minister Moshe Arbel said Hagari’s statement was a very serious crossing of a red line.
“No one in uniform has any right to publicly express a political opinion on political issues, whatever their position may be, especially when it contradicts the position of the relevant minister,” Arbel said.
For his part, Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich said, “Israel has an army, not the other way around.”
In response to the criticisms, the Israeli army issued a statement, saying “Chief of Staff Herzi Halevi reprimanded the army spokesperson for his response to a question about the law on transferring classified information to the Prime Minister and ministers during a press briefing, in which he exceeded his authority.”
The statement added that the army “does not criticize the legislature but conveys its position to the political leadership through the appropriate mechanisms for that purpose.”
Later, Hagari issued a personal statement apologizing for his remarks.
“In my statement tonight in response to a question, I spoke in a way that exceeded my authority as the army spokesperson, and for this, I was reprimanded by the Chief of Staff. Israel is a democratic country, and the army is subordinate to the political leadership.”
He added, “In the hundreds of statements and questions I have answered since October 7, I have maintained professionalism.”
On Wednesday, the Knesset had approved the so-called Feldstein bill in a preliminary reading.
The proposed legislation was introduced by Knesset members Hanoch Milwidsky and Amit Halevi, both from Netanyahu's Likud Party.
It passed with 59 out of 120 votes in favor and 52 against.
The bill follows the “classified documents case,” which emerged months ago, implicating Eli Feldstein, Netanyahu's security spokesperson, and advisor Jonatan Urich in the alleged leak of military intelligence documents.

 



Trump Nominee Pete Hegseth Weathers Democrats’ Grilling to Emerge Largely Unscathed

US Secretary of Defense nominee Pete Hegseth during his confirmation hearing before the Senate Armed Services Committee in the Dirksen Senate Office Building in Washington, DC, USA, 14 January 2025. (EPA)
US Secretary of Defense nominee Pete Hegseth during his confirmation hearing before the Senate Armed Services Committee in the Dirksen Senate Office Building in Washington, DC, USA, 14 January 2025. (EPA)
TT

Trump Nominee Pete Hegseth Weathers Democrats’ Grilling to Emerge Largely Unscathed

US Secretary of Defense nominee Pete Hegseth during his confirmation hearing before the Senate Armed Services Committee in the Dirksen Senate Office Building in Washington, DC, USA, 14 January 2025. (EPA)
US Secretary of Defense nominee Pete Hegseth during his confirmation hearing before the Senate Armed Services Committee in the Dirksen Senate Office Building in Washington, DC, USA, 14 January 2025. (EPA)

President-elect Donald Trump's pick to lead the Pentagon, Pete Hegseth, endured fierce Democratic grilling over everything from his inexperience and his past opposition to women in combat to emerge largely unscathed among Republicans at his confirmation hearing on Tuesday.

Hegseth, a former Fox News host and decorated veteran, is one of the most controversial figures ever nominated to be Secretary of Defense and any vote to confirm him is expected to be very close.

But he weathered the four-hour hearing without making any major gaffe that might have alienated Republicans and even won critical backing from Republican Senator Joni Ernst, who holds sway in her party.

Several other committee Republicans, to laughter from a friendly audience packed with supporters wearing Hegseth hats, praised the 44-year-old, who has slammed diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives in the military, and, in his latest book, questioned whether the top US general has the job because he's Black.

Asked if he would fire the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General C.Q. Brown, if he takes over the military, a possibility first reported by Reuters, Hegseth declined to rule it out, saying he would be carrying out a broad review.

"Every single senior officer will be reviewed based on meritocracy, standards, lethality and commitment to lawful orders they will be given," Hegseth said.

Hegseth had strongly opposed women in combat roles but walked back that stance during the hearing.

"Mr. Hegseth, I do not believe that you are qualified to meet the overwhelming demands of this job," said Senator Jack Reed, ranking member of the Senate Armed Services Committee.

A number of episodes have sparked concern, including a 2017 sexual assault allegation against Hegseth that did not result in charges and which he denies. He has also been accused of excessive drinking and financial mismanagement at veterans' organizations. Hegseth has vowed to abstain from alcohol if confirmed and said he made financial errors but denied wrongdoing.

Democratic Senator Kirsten Gillibrand slammed Hegseth's past remarks about women, saying he would have to fundamentally change how he sees women who constitute 18% of the US military.

"We have hundreds - HUNDREDS - of women who serve in the infantry, lethal members of our military ... But you degrade them," Gillibrand said in a heated exchange.

"Please explain these types of statements because they're brutal, and they're mean."

Despite strong support from Trump's Republicans, Hegseth's confirmation will likely be by a narrow margin, compared with the 93-2 vote for President Joe Biden's defense secretary, Lloyd Austin, and 98-1 for Jim Mattis, Trump's first nominee for the position.

After the hearing, Ernst, who pundits speculated could vote against Hegseth and perhaps convince others to do the same, said she supported Hegseth.

"Our next commander in chief selected Pete Hegseth to serve in this role, and after our conversations, hearing from Iowans, and doing my job as a United States Senator, I will support President Trump’s pick for Secretary of Defense," Ernst said in a statement.

As Hegseth walked into the packed hearing room, he was greeted with cheers and a standing ovation, with chants of "USA, USA, USA" and a shout of "Get 'em, Petey."

Senator Roger Wicker, the Republican who leads the committee, endorsed Hegseth, calling him "unconventional," and adding, "Regarding his personal conduct, Mr. Hegseth has admitted to falling short, as we all do from time to time."

Republican senators, including Markwayne Mullin and Tim Sheehy, strongly backed Hegseth. Mullin dismissed concerns about him, particularly his personal life, as political theater.

"It's all for show," Mullin said.

ACCOUNTABILITY IS COMING

Hegseth's opening remarks, praising Trump, were repeatedly interrupted by protesters. He vowed to restore a "warrior culture" to the US military and said accountability was coming for those who fall short.

"Everyone from the top, from the most senior general to the most lowly private, (we) will ensure that they're treated fairly," Hegseth said.

When asked about remarks opposing women in combat, Hegseth cited the need to eliminate quotas for frontline roles. Gillibrand fired back that no such quotas exist.

During the hearing he told Ernst, herself a veteran, that he would support women in combat "given the standards remain high, and we will have a review to ensure the standards have not been eroded."

Democratic Senator Tammy Duckworth, a veteran who lost both legs during combat in Iraq, chided Hegseth over gaps in his knowledge of foreign policy and lack of management experience.

"You say you care about keeping our armed forces strong ... then let's not lower the standards for you. You sir, are a no-go at this station," Duckworth said.

In a 2021 incident first reported by Reuters, Hegseth was branded an "insider threat" by a fellow member of the Army National Guard over his tattoos. Hegseth noted the incident during the hearing, which led him to be pulled from Guard duty in Washington during Biden's inauguration.

In recent weeks, Trump's party has coalesced around his pick.

Still, the slim Republican Senate majority means that Hegseth can lose support from no more than three senators to be confirmed, if Democrats and independents unite against him.

Cabinet nominees almost never lose Senate votes. The last nominee who was defeated was former Senator John Tower, a nominee to be Secretary of Defense, in 1989. Tower was investigated over claims of drunkenness and inappropriate behavior with women.

If confirmed, Hegseth could make good on Trump's promises to rid the military of generals he accuses of pursuing progressive diversity policies.

The next secretary of defense faces huge challenges, including active conflicts in Ukraine and Gaza and the expansion of China's military, which received only glancing attention during a hearing focused far more on culture war issues.

The committee is expected to vote on Hegseth's nomination as soon as Monday, the day of Trump's inauguration, paving the way for his consideration by the full Senate.