US Waving a ‘Carrot and Stick’ Policy at Iran

US Secretary of State Antony Blinken during a conversation Wednesday with Michael Froman (AFP)
US Secretary of State Antony Blinken during a conversation Wednesday with Michael Froman (AFP)
TT
20

US Waving a ‘Carrot and Stick’ Policy at Iran

US Secretary of State Antony Blinken during a conversation Wednesday with Michael Froman (AFP)
US Secretary of State Antony Blinken during a conversation Wednesday with Michael Froman (AFP)

US Secretary of State Antony Blinken gave Iran a choice between focusing on itself and on trying to build a better country for its people, or bear the consequences of continuing its engagement in what he called “misadventures” throughout the region and beyond.
During a conversation Wednesday with Michael Froman, President of the Council on Foreign Relations, the outgoing Secretary of State reflected on the carrot-and-stick policy that the incoming administration of President-elect Donald Trump could adopt towards Iran.
He said there is a prospect of negotiations with Tehran to reach a new nuclear deal. However, he urged the policy of continued pressure on Iranian authorities to stop their nuclear policies in the Middle East.
Asked about the possibility of Iran accelerating its nuclear program in light of its failures in various parts of the Middle East, notably after Tehran lost its primary proxy Hezbollah in Lebanon and after the fall of the regime of its ally Assad, Blinken said “There’s no doubt this has not been a good year for Iran.”
He noted that Iran has to make some fundamental choices.
One choice, Blinken said, “is to focus on itself and focus on trying to build a better, more successful country that delivers for its people, which is clearly what most Iranians want, and to stop getting involved in these adventures – or misadventures – throughout the region and beyond.”
The outgoing Secretary of State also affirmed that Iran desperately needs to be focused on its economy, on growing the country, and delivering for people.
If they don’t make that choice, he said, “they have some hard decisions to make, yes, about where they’re going to go in the future to be able to sustain the kind of troublemaking that, unfortunately, they’ve been engaged in for many, many years.”
Blinken said he doesn’t think that a nuclear weapon is inevitable.
“I think this is something that may be more a question now because as they’ve lost different tools, as they’ve lost different lines of defense, sure, you’re going to see more thinking about that.”
He warned the costs and consequences to Iran for pursuing that route would be severe. “So I am hopeful that that remains in check,” he said.
Blinken then reiterated the position of President Joe Biden’s administration, saying that the so-called JCPOA, the Iran nuclear deal, was capable to take off the prospect of Iran getting to a nuclear weapon anytime soon by bottling up, tying up the fissile material, making sure their breakout time in producing enough fissile material for a bomb was pushed back beyond a year.
He said now that breakout time in terms of the production of fissile material is a matter of a week or two.
“They don’t have a weapon, and the weaponization piece would take them some time,” he added.
The Secretary of State then called on the next administration to find a way to engage this, because the production of 60 percent enriched uranium gives them the capacity, at least in terms of fissile material, to produce multiple weapons’ worth of material in very short order.
Asked about the prospect of a negotiation of a new nuclear deal with Iran, Blinken said there is the prospect of negotiations.
“Of course, it depends on what Iran chooses to do and whether it chooses to engage in meaningfully,” he said. “And of course, the incoming administration will have to make a decision.”
He recalled how President Trump last time around pulled out of the deal, and wanted, as he called it, a better, stronger deal. “Fine. Let’s see what’s possible,” Blinken said.
He then revealed that from administration to administration, whether it’s the Biden, the Trump or the Obama administration, there’s been a shared determination and a shared determination that remains to ensure that Iran does not get a nuclear weapon.
Huge Opportunity
Blinken’s comments came shortly after White House National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan said on Tuesday that Iran is at its “weakest point in decades,” after the fracturing of the Axis of Resistance.
The advisor also spoke about the huge opportunity” to advance regional integration.
At an event in New York, he said recent events in the Middle East — including the weakening of Hezbollah in Lebanon and the toppling of Bashar Assad in Syria — present a “huge opportunity” to advance regional integration.
When asked about efforts to normalize ties between Israel and Saudi Arabia, Sullivan affirmed that Saudi leaders have already said in recent months that a deal cannot move forward without a commitment by Israel to the creation of a Palestinian state.

 

 



Iran Downplays ‘Snapback’ Threat, Reserves Right to Respond

A photo released by the Iranian Parliament’s website of one of its meetings.
A photo released by the Iranian Parliament’s website of one of its meetings.
TT
20

Iran Downplays ‘Snapback’ Threat, Reserves Right to Respond

A photo released by the Iranian Parliament’s website of one of its meetings.
A photo released by the Iranian Parliament’s website of one of its meetings.

Iran sought on Friday to play down the potential impact of the so-called “snapback” mechanism, which allows for the automatic reimposition of United Nations sanctions on Tehran over its nuclear program, unless a diplomatic solution is reached by the end of August.

Hossein-Ali Haji Deligani, a member of the Iranian parliament’s Article 90 Committee, dismissed the measure as largely symbolic, describing it as “a weapon without bullets” that carries more psychological than practical weight.

Speaking to the Tasnim news agency, affiliated with the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps, Deligani argued that Britain, Germany, and France had already exhausted the tool in previous rounds of pressure, leaving it with “no new capacity to inflict damage” on Iran’s economy.

Under UN Security Council Resolution 2231, which enshrines the 2015 nuclear deal and expires in October, any signatory may reimpose sanctions. Neither China nor Russia would be able to block the step, which obliges all UN member states to enforce restrictions on uranium enrichment and ballistic missile development.

However, Deligani noted that many of these provisions had already been applied for years, and the snapback would not extend to Iranian oil or medicine exports.

China pushes back

Beijing, meanwhile, expressed firm opposition to the European move. Foreign Ministry spokesman Lin Jian reiterated China’s preference for a political and diplomatic solution, rejecting the use of sanctions as leverage.

The statement came in response to an AFP inquiry following remarks by Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, who said Tehran was working with both China and Russia to prevent the Europeans from restoring sanctions lifted under the 2015 accord.

European ultimatum

Earlier this week, the foreign ministers of Britain, France, and Germany sent a joint letter to UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres and the Security Council, warning that they would invoke the snapback unless Iran complies with its nuclear commitments by the end of August.

They stressed their determination to use “all available diplomatic tools” to ensure Iran does not develop nuclear weapons.

In an interview with Iranian state television, Araghchi called the threat “negative” and vowed to resist. “If they proceed, we have tools to respond, and we will reveal them in due time,” he said.

While acknowledging that renewed sanctions could complicate matters, he downplayed fears of significant economic fallout.

Last month, he wrote to the UN arguing that the European trio lacked the legitimacy to trigger the mechanism, a claim the three foreign ministers firmly rejected in their latest letter.