New US-Iran Agreement Stricter Than 2015 JCPOA

FILE - In this photo released by an official website of the office of the Iranian supreme leader, Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei speaks in a ceremony meeting a group of officials, in Tehran, Iran, March 8, 2025. (Office of the Iranian Supreme Leader via AP, File)
FILE - In this photo released by an official website of the office of the Iranian supreme leader, Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei speaks in a ceremony meeting a group of officials, in Tehran, Iran, March 8, 2025. (Office of the Iranian Supreme Leader via AP, File)
TT

New US-Iran Agreement Stricter Than 2015 JCPOA

FILE - In this photo released by an official website of the office of the Iranian supreme leader, Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei speaks in a ceremony meeting a group of officials, in Tehran, Iran, March 8, 2025. (Office of the Iranian Supreme Leader via AP, File)
FILE - In this photo released by an official website of the office of the Iranian supreme leader, Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei speaks in a ceremony meeting a group of officials, in Tehran, Iran, March 8, 2025. (Office of the Iranian Supreme Leader via AP, File)

The US is seeking to ink a new agreement with Iran similar to their 2015 JCPOA but with stricter conditions, including a permanent and structural change in Tehran’s nuclear capabilities.

The deal comes despite pressures imposed by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who seek a “zero enrichment” and a Libya-style deal that dismantles Iran's nuclear infrastructure.

Diplomats from all sides of the negotiations told Reuters on Friday that an initial framework under discussion preserves the core of the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) - scrapped by President Donlad Trump in 2018 during his first term.

Eight sources said a deal may not look radically different to the former pact, which Trump called the worst in history, but would extend duration to 25 years, tighten verification, and expand so-called sunset clauses that pause but don't completely dismantle aspects of Iran's nuclear program.

Stricter Deal

Under the terms being discussed, Iran would limit stockpile size and centrifuge types, and dilute, export or seal its 60% uranium stock under unprecedented International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) scrutiny - all in exchange for substantial sanctions relief, all the sources said.

Also, under proposals discussed in rounds of talks in April, Iran would cap enrichment at 3.67%, in line with the JCPOA, all the sources said, including three Iranian officials.

Tehran is also open to granting the IAEA expanded access to its nuclear sites, the Iranian sources said.

A senior regional source close to Tehran said the current debate over Iran's uranium stockpiles centers on whether Iran “will keep a portion of it - diluted - inside the country while sending another portion abroad, possibly to Russia.”

Meanwhile, the Reuters report mentioned several sticking points, mainly related to Washington’s demand to address the Iranian ballistic program, while Iranian officials say their missile development is not up for negotiation.

Another striking point is related to Iran’s refusal to dismantle its entire nuclear infrastructure.

Diplomats said Netanyahu sees a rare opening because last year’s military campaigns crippled Iran’s air defenses, and decimated Hezbollah’s missile arsenal - Tehran’s primary deterrent.

“This is a historic window for Israel to strike Iran's nuclear sites,” said an official in the Middle East.

The United States, he said, opposes such a move for several reasons - chief among them the concerns of Gulf Arab states, which Washington cannot ignore given its deep strategic and economic ties in the region.

Israel is demanding “zero enrichment” and a Libya-style deal that dismantles Iran's nuclear infrastructure.

One regional security official said Washington is pressing to include the ballistic missile program in the talks, but Tehran “continues to reject any discussion.”

He added that the problem is that without addressing the missile issue, Trump cannot claim that the new deal goes beyond the JCPOA.

One Iranian official previously told Reuters it would not go beyond the requirements of the 2015 deal, offering only to avoid building missiles capable of carrying nuclear warheads as a “gesture of goodwill.”

Trump Ups Pressure

While Trump further increased the pressure against Iranian oil, US expects new discussions with Iran “in the near future” on Tehran's nuclear program, despite the postponement of those planned for Saturday.

The talks between the two countries, enemies for four decades, aim to conclude a new agreement to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons - an ambition Tehran has always denied having - in exchange for lifting the sanctions that are crippling its economy.

Washington and Tehran were set to meet for a fourth round of negotiations on Saturday in Rome, after both parties reported progress in previous discussions. But Iran confirmed the postponement on Thursday after the Omani mediator cited “logistical reasons.”

Washington nevertheless indicated it "expects that new discussions will take place in the near future," stating that the date and location of those originally planned for this weekend were never confirmed.

Meanwhile, French Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot told AFP that other discussions scheduled for Friday, between Iran on one hand, and the United Kingdom, France, and Germany on the other, will also not occur.

Barrot is in Washington, where he met his US counterpart Marco Rubio.

Rubio told Fox News that Iran should not be afraid of nuclear inspections, including by Americans, amid diplomatic efforts between the two countries over Iran’s nuclear program.

Oil Purchases

Trump, who has revived his so-called “maximum pressure” policy on Iran by pressing it to negotiate while threatening to bomb it if diplomacy fails, promised Thursday to be uncompromising in the effective implementation of sanctions dating back to his first term. Specifically, radical measures against Iranian oil.

“All purchases of Iranian oil or petrochemical products must cease, NOW,” the American president emphasized on his Truth social network. “Any country or person buying any amount of Iranian oil or petrochemical products will be immediately subjected to indirect sanctions.”

Trump's warnings come a day after Washington announced new sanctions against seven companies accused of being involved in selling Iranian oil.

In response, Iran slammed a “US policymakers' contradictory approach, and their lack of good faith and seriousness to progress on the path of diplomacy.”

Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei said “these sanctions, designed within the framework of the criminal and failed ‘maximum pressure’ policy, expose Washington’s contradictory behavior and its lack of sincerity in advancing diplomacy.”

He said, “The sanctions announced in recent days under various pretexts—targeting Iranian and non-Iranian individuals and companies—are a blatant sign of the US ongoing violations of international norms and its efforts to disrupt legal relations between developing nations through economic terrorism.”



Iranian Attack Hits Israeli Oil Refinery in Haifa, Some Damage Reported

Excess gas is burned at the oil refinery in Israel's northern city of Haifa late on March 19, 2026. (AFP)
Excess gas is burned at the oil refinery in Israel's northern city of Haifa late on March 19, 2026. (AFP)
TT

Iranian Attack Hits Israeli Oil Refinery in Haifa, Some Damage Reported

Excess gas is burned at the oil refinery in Israel's northern city of Haifa late on March 19, 2026. (AFP)
Excess gas is burned at the oil refinery in Israel's northern city of Haifa late on March 19, 2026. (AFP)

An Iranian missile attack hit Israel's Oil Refineries in the northern port city of Haifa but did not cause "significant damage", Israel's Energy Ministry said on Thursday.

Energy Minister Eli Cohen said power was briefly disrupted, with electricity restored to most of those who were affected.

"The damage to the power grid in the north is localized and not significant," Cohen said. "Also, in the barrage towards the north, ‌there was ‌no significant damage to Israeli infrastructure sites."

Iran's ‌⁠Revolutionary Guard Corps ⁠said it had targeted refineries in Haifa, Israel's third-largest city, and in Ashdod, in the country's south, "along with a range of security targets and military support centers of the Zionist regime", which it said "were hit by pinpoint missiles".

There was no immediate ⁠word on whether the Ashdod refinery was ‌hit.

Israel's Ministry of Environmental ‌Protection said debris from a missile that was intercepted fell ‌in Haifa and was being examined as a ‌hazardous materials incident.

Israel Electric Corp said a power line in the Haifa area was hit by shrapnel, causing a brief outage, but that electricity was restored to ‌all customers within about 45 minutes.

Israel's Fire and Rescue Services said debris fell in ⁠two locations ⁠at Oil Refineries and caused a fire that disconnected supply sources but there were no casualties.

"Full control has been achieved over the impact incident at the Haifa refineries," it said after examining the site for hazardous materials. "Tests carried out by monitoring teams found no abnormal air values and there is no danger to the public."

Last June, Oil Refineries in Haifa was hit by an Iranian missile, which killed three people and halted operations.


Trump Says Not Putting US Troops in Region Amid Iran War

Plumes of smoke rise from the site of a strike in Tehran on March 16, 2026. (AFP)
Plumes of smoke rise from the site of a strike in Tehran on March 16, 2026. (AFP)
TT

Trump Says Not Putting US Troops in Region Amid Iran War

Plumes of smoke rise from the site of a strike in Tehran on March 16, 2026. (AFP)
Plumes of smoke rise from the site of a strike in Tehran on March 16, 2026. (AFP)

US President Donald Trump on Thursday suggested he was not looking at deploying soldiers to the Middle East with the Iran war heading toward a fourth week.   

"I'm not putting troops anywhere," Trump ‌said in ‌response to a reporter ‌who ⁠asked whether he ⁠was planning to send more service members to the region. "If I were, I certainly wouldn't tell you. But I'm not putting ⁠troops. We will do ‌whatever ‌is necessary."   

Trump spoke at the White House ‌during an Oval Office ‌meeting with Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi.

Reuters reported on Wednesday that the Trump administration is considering deploying thousands of US troops to reinforce its operation in the Middle East, as the US military prepares for possible next steps in its campaign against Iran, said a US official and three people familiar with the matter. 

The deployments could help provide Trump with additional options as he weighs expanding US operations, with the Iran war well into its third week. 

Those options include securing safe passage for oil tankers through the Strait of Hormuz, a mission that would be accomplished primarily through air and naval forces, the sources said. But securing the Strait could also mean deploying US troops to Iran's shoreline, said four sources, including two US officials. 

Reuters granted the sources anonymity to speak about military planning. 

The Trump administration has also discussed options to send ground forces to Iran's Kharg Island, the hub for 90% of Iran's oil exports, the three people familiar with the matter and three US officials said. One of the officials said such an operation would be very risky. Iran has the ability to reach the island with missiles and drones. 

The United States carried out strikes against military targets on the island on March 13 and Trump has threatened to also strike ‌its critical oil ‌infrastructure. However, given its vital role in Iran's economy, controlling the island would likely be viewed as a better ‌option ⁠than destroying it, ⁠military experts say. 

Any use of US ground troops - even for a limited mission - could pose significant political risks for Trump, given low support among the American public for the Iran campaign and Trump's own campaign promises to avoid entangling the US in new Middle East conflicts. 

Trump administration officials have also discussed the possibility of deploying US forces to secure Iran's stocks of highly enriched uranium, one of the people familiar with the matter said. 

The sources did not believe a deployment of ground forces anywhere in Iran was imminent but declined to discuss specifics of US operational planning. Experts say the task of securing Iran's uranium stockpiles would be highly complex and risky, even for US special operations forces. 

A White House official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said: "There has been no decision to send ground troops at this time, but President Trump wisely keeps all options ⁠at his disposal. 

"The president is focused on achieving all of the defined objectives of Operation Epic Fury: destroy Iran's ballistic missile ‌capacity, annihilate their navy, ensure their terrorist proxies cannot destabilize the region, and guarantee that Iran can ‌never possess a nuclear weapon." 

Asked on Thursday whether he intended to put more troops in the region, Trump told reporters that he was not putting troops "anywhere," but that ‌if he was going to, he would not tell journalists. 

The Pentagon declined to comment. 

The discussions come as the US military continues to attack Iran's navy, its ‌missile and drone stockpiles and its defense industry. 

The US has carried out more than 7,800 strikes since launching the war on February 28 and damaged or destroyed more than 120 Iranian vessels so far, according to a factsheet released on Wednesday by the US Central Command, which oversees the roughly 50,000 US troops in the Middle East. 

US CASUALTIES 

Trump has said his goals go beyond degrading Iran's military capabilities and could include securing safe passage through the Strait and preventing Iran from developing a nuclear weapon. 

Ground forces could help broaden ‌his options to address those goals, but carry significant risk. Even without any direct conflict in Iran, 13 US troops have been killed so far in the war and about 200 have been wounded, although the vast ⁠majority of the injuries have been minor, ⁠the US military says. 

For years, Trump has railed against his predecessors for getting involved in conflicts and has vowed to keep the United States out of foreign wars. But more recently he has refused to rule out the possibility of "boots on the ground" in Iran. 

A senior White House official told Reuters that Trump has various options for acquiring Iran's nuclear material but has not decided how to proceed. "Certainly there are ways in which it could be acquired," the official said, adding: "He hasn't made a decision yet." 

In written testimony to lawmakers on Wednesday, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard said Iran's nuclear enrichment program had been obliterated by strikes in June and the entrances to those underground facilities had been "buried and shuttered with cement." 

The sources said the discussions on US reinforcements go beyond the arrival of an Amphibious Ready Group next week in the Middle East, with an attached Marine Expeditionary Unit that includes more than 2,000 Marines. 

But one of the sources noted that the US military was losing a significant number of forces with the decision to send the USS Gerald R. Ford aircraft carrier to Greece for maintenance after a fire on board the vessel. 

Trump has also oscillated on whether the US should secure the Strait of Hormuz. 

After initially saying the US Navy could escort vessels, he called on other countries to help open the key water way. Trump on Wednesday also mused about simply leaving. 

"I wonder what would happen if we 'finished off' what's left of the Iranian Terror State, and let the Countries that use it, we don't, be responsible for the so called 'Strait?,'" Trump posted on Truth Social. 


Pentagon Seeks $200 Billion in Additional Funds for the Iran War

US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth holds a briefing with Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Dan Caine, amid the US-Israeli war on Iran, at the Pentagon in Washington, D.C., US, March 19, 2026. REUTERS/Evan Vucci
US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth holds a briefing with Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Dan Caine, amid the US-Israeli war on Iran, at the Pentagon in Washington, D.C., US, March 19, 2026. REUTERS/Evan Vucci
TT

Pentagon Seeks $200 Billion in Additional Funds for the Iran War

US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth holds a briefing with Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Dan Caine, amid the US-Israeli war on Iran, at the Pentagon in Washington, D.C., US, March 19, 2026. REUTERS/Evan Vucci
US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth holds a briefing with Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Dan Caine, amid the US-Israeli war on Iran, at the Pentagon in Washington, D.C., US, March 19, 2026. REUTERS/Evan Vucci

The Pentagon is seeking $200 billion in additional funds for the Iran war, a senior administration official says.

The department sent the request to the White House, according to the official, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss the private information.

It’s an extraordinarily high number and comes on top of extra funding the Defense Department already received last year in President Donald Trump’s big tax cuts bill, The AP news reported.

Congress is bracing for a new spending request but it is not clear the White House has transmitted the request for consideration. It is unclear the spending request would have support.

The new funding request was first reported by The Washington Post. Asked about the figure at a press conference Thursday, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth did not directly confirm the figure, saying it could change. But he said “we’re going back to Congress and our folks there to to ensure that we’re properly funded.”

“It takes money to kill bad guys,” Hegseth said.