Senate Republicans Again Block Bid to Limit Trump’s Iran War Powers

Senate Majority Leader John Thune speaks at a news conference at the Capitol on September 5, 2025 (AP)
 
Senate Majority Leader John Thune speaks at a news conference at the Capitol on September 5, 2025 (AP)  
TT

Senate Republicans Again Block Bid to Limit Trump’s Iran War Powers

Senate Majority Leader John Thune speaks at a news conference at the Capitol on September 5, 2025 (AP)
 
Senate Majority Leader John Thune speaks at a news conference at the Capitol on September 5, 2025 (AP)  

Washington: Robert Jimison, Megan Mineiro

Senate Republicans on Wednesday blocked the latest Democratic-led effort to curb President Trump’s authority to wage war on Iran, as a fragile ceasefire frays, dueling blockades choke traffic through the Strait of Hormuz and failed talks leave the next phase of the conflict uncertain.

The move to take up the measure failed on a vote of 52 to 47. It fell largely along party lines, with Republicans and a single Democrat, Senator John Fetterman of Pennsylvania, opposed and Democrats joined by a lone Republican, Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky, in favor.

Fourth Trial

It was the fourth time in recent weeks that Democrats have tried and failed to force Congress to reassert its war powers as the conflict, now stretching into its second month, continues. The repeated defeats underscore the durability of Republican backing for Trump, as his allies on Capitol Hill have foregone oversight of the war and repeatedly sought to avoid placing meaningful constraints on his authority.

Still, in the run-up to the vote, some GOP lawmakers suggested that their patience was wearing thin as the conflict drags on, its economic fallout reverberates among their constituents, and the president’s bellicose statements intensify.

“I hope that we are arriving at an exit strategy here to bring this to a close to preserve our security interests and bring down the cost of gasoline,” Senator Josh Hawley of Missouri said of the war, now in its seventh week.

Other Republicans said the administration should do more to lay out its objectives and plan for the conflict. They expressed a fervent desire to see it end promptly.

60-Day Mission

Senator Mike Rounds of South Dakota said that should the president expect Congress to support continuing the conflict beyond 60 days — the initial window that the law gives a president to deploy armed forces into hostilities without congressional approval — officials from the administration should “come in and give us a full description of it and sell the point and the plan.”

The statutory deadline for Trump to either pull out US troops or request a 30-day extension would fall on May 1. Senator Bill Hagerty, Republican of Tennessee, on Tuesday appeared to suggest that such an extension would not be necessary.

“This is going to be over soon,” he said.

While home during a two-week recess, some Republicans said they had heard concerns from their constituents about the conflict, which has sent oil prices above $100 per barrel, natural gas costs rising more than 80% and fertilizer prices surging, raising costs for farmers.

Wednesday’s vote was forced by Senator Tammy Duckworth, Democrat of Illinois, who argued that the war was the latest demonstration of the president reneging on promises he made during his 2024 campaign.

“It’s clear that none of this is making America safer, bringing prices down or ending wars like he promised,” Duckworth said in a statement ahead of the vote. “Americans are sick and tired of being lied to, and Republicans cannot continue to sit by and abdicate their responsibilities as Trump continues to spiral out of control at the expense of our national security.”

Democrats’ Bet

Democrats hope that mounting Republican frustration will eventually pull the party asunder, yielding enough defections for a handful to join them in delivering a rebuke of the president.

“I have not seen, in a long time, the level of frustration,” Senator Chuck Schumer, Democrat of New York and the minority leader, said in an interview last week. “There’s always been Republican frustration with Trump, but the frustration is sort of peaking.”

Senator Tommy Tuberville, Republican of Alabama, said he held events across his state in recent weeks and fielded questions from voters about the war. He said his response to concerned constituents was: “We just have to wait and see.”

Tuberville, who voted against the resolution, said: “I think we need to let the president of the United States handle this.”

In a recent address providing an update on the war, Trump said his administration was “on track to complete all of America’s military objectives shortly, very shortly.” He added that “we’re going to hit them extremely hard over the next two to three weeks.”

The United States and Iran have since agreed to a two-week ceasefire, while diplomatic talks between the two nations took place but ended with no resolution. Tensions have also risen as the United States has placed a blockade of vessels using Iran’s ports.

During that crucial period, Congress was out of session.

Now back in Washington, many Democrats and some Republicans have begun to press for additional information.

Hawley said that senators who do not sit on the Armed Services and Foreign Relations Committees — which have received a series of confidential briefings since the war began — have been kept in the dark, noting that he and others “have not been briefed since the first week of March.”

“I would welcome more,” Hawley added.

The New York Times



US Will Halt $4 Billion in Aid to Israel, Trump Says

US President Donald Trump points his finger towards Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as they shake hands during a press conference after meeting at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago club in Palm Beach, Florida, US, December 29, 2025. (Reuters)
US President Donald Trump points his finger towards Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as they shake hands during a press conference after meeting at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago club in Palm Beach, Florida, US, December 29, 2025. (Reuters)
TT

US Will Halt $4 Billion in Aid to Israel, Trump Says

US President Donald Trump points his finger towards Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as they shake hands during a press conference after meeting at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago club in Palm Beach, Florida, US, December 29, 2025. (Reuters)
US President Donald Trump points his finger towards Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as they shake hands during a press conference after meeting at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago club in Palm Beach, Florida, US, December 29, 2025. (Reuters)

The United States will stop providing $4 billion in aid each year to Israel in 2027 but will sell arms to its closest ally in the Middle East, President Donald Trump said on Tuesday.

The Republican president told Fox News Channel during a phone call on Election Day for the midterms that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had approached him about the idea and that they have been talking about it for a couple of years.

Trump said Israel doesn’t need the aid and it’s a lot of money for the US to spend. But Trump also said that US aid to Israel has become a Democratic talking point for candidates such as Michigan US Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed, a vocal critic of Israel.

Even far-right conservatives, who have supported Trump in the past, have taken issue with US support for Israel, with prominent commentators like Tucker Carlson openly questioning the value of the relationship.

“You can consider it barter. You can consider military aid or cash,” Trump said. “Look, we give them $4 billion of things and money, and they don’t need it. And I was approached by Bibi Netanyahu, and we’ve been talking about it for a couple of years because it’s a lot of money.”

There was no immediate comment from Netanyahu’s office. But at least some of his political opponents were cautious.

Opposition candidate Gadi Eisenkot said the announcement showed that Netanyahu must go.

"The fact that Israel's defense establishment is learning of a shift in our strategic relationship through the media, at the same time as the Israeli public, shows just how dangerous Benjamin Netanyahu's conduct is. He can no longer be trusted and must be replaced," Eisenkot said in a statement.

Yair Golan, a leader in Israel’s opposition bloc, said an end to US military aid would deal a “severe blow to Israel’s security” at a time when the country is fighting wars on multiple fronts.

“The burden of funding defense needs at such a critical juncture will fall entirely upon the Israeli public,” Golan, a former deputy military chief, said in a statement.

The United States has sent tens of billions of dollars in military aid to Israel over the last few years.

In 2016, President Barack Obama, a Democrat, signed an unprecedented security agreement with Israel to give its military $38 billion over 10 years, amounting to $3.8 billion a year. Under the agreement, Israel’s ability to spend part of the funds on Israeli military products was to be phased out and eventually all of the money would be spent on American military industries.

Netanyahu has talked about the need to wean Israel off the aid in the past and has said that the American aid would end at some point.

He told The Economist in January that he wanted to “taper off” US military aid in the next 10 years and that such a change was “in the works.”

But the optics of the aid had also become an issue, according to Trump, who singled out El-Sayed for using it as a talking point.

“The left uses the $4 billion payment — that everybody knows about, it’s no secret — as a signal of unfairness,” Trump said Tuesday on Fox. “And we can’t allow that to happen. I don’t like that, because it’s too easy. It’s almost too easy a target. And Bibi and I have been talking, and we’ve agreed. He was very understanding of it.”

Phasing out direct military and economic aid to Israel has long been a subject of debate in both countries and has gained traction in the last several years.

There are several issues that complicate it, though, not least of which are obligations the US has to Israel under the terms of the Camp David peace accords with Egypt, which require the United States to support Israel and Egypt with security assistance.

In addition, much of the assistance the US provides Israel comes in the form of foreign military financing, or FMF, that gives Israel the money but requires it to spend the money on American-produced weaponry, meaning the funds are plowed back into the US economy.

Unless Israel plans to spend the same amount on purchasing American materiel, US defense contractors may see an impact.

An academic study published last year showed the US under the administrations of President Joe Biden, a Democrat, and Trump provided at least $21.7 billion in military assistance to Israel after the start of the Gaza war in 2023. The study was published on the second anniversary of the Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas attacks in Israel that provoked the conflict.

Another study, also published last year by the Costs of War project at Brown University’s Watson School of International and Public Affairs, said the US had spent roughly $10 billion more on security aid and operations in the broader Middle East in the previous two years.

While the reports relied on open source material for most of their findings, they offered some of the most comprehensive accountings of US military aid to close ally Israel and estimated costs of direct American military involvement in the Middle East.


EU to Host Talks on Ukraine with United States and Others on Wednesday

 Ukrainian rescuers clear rubble from a destroyed residential building following an air attack in Dnipro on November 3, 2026, amid the Russian invasion of Ukraine. (AFP)
Ukrainian rescuers clear rubble from a destroyed residential building following an air attack in Dnipro on November 3, 2026, amid the Russian invasion of Ukraine. (AFP)
TT

EU to Host Talks on Ukraine with United States and Others on Wednesday

 Ukrainian rescuers clear rubble from a destroyed residential building following an air attack in Dnipro on November 3, 2026, amid the Russian invasion of Ukraine. (AFP)
Ukrainian rescuers clear rubble from a destroyed residential building following an air attack in Dnipro on November 3, 2026, amid the Russian invasion of Ukraine. (AFP)

The European Commission will host a meeting on Ukraine on Wednesday with representatives of the United States, Ukraine, NATO and European allies, the European Union's executive body said on Tuesday.

"So tomorrow the European Commission will host a meeting with representatives from Ukraine, from the United ‌States, France, Germany, the ‌UK, NATO and the ‌World ⁠Bank and this meeting ⁠will build on earlier talks that took place in Miami," Commission spokeswoman Paula Pinho told reporters in Brussels.

The delegations will discuss a "prosperity plan" and security guarantees for Ukraine, a ⁠source familiar with the plans told ‌Reuters.

US envoy ‌Steve Witkoff had said earlier that the ‌meeting would take place in Brussels.

NATO ‌will host further talks on Thursday, according to Allison Hart, a spokesperson for the military alliance.

She said representatives from France, ‌Germany, Britain and the United States would "discuss the way forward on ⁠bringing about ⁠a just and sustainable end to the war in Ukraine".

The United States will then bring together delegations from Ukraine and Russia in Abu Dhabi on November 10-11 to discuss ending Moscow's war in Ukraine, post-war security agreements and de-escalation, Witkoff said earlier in a post on social media platform X.


Israeli Opposition Bloc Gathers to See How to Oust Netanyahu

Former military chief Gadi Eisenkot, leader of the Yashar party, speaks following the exit poll at his party headquarters, on the evening of Israel's national election, in Tel Aviv, Israel October 28, 2026. (Reuters)
Former military chief Gadi Eisenkot, leader of the Yashar party, speaks following the exit poll at his party headquarters, on the evening of Israel's national election, in Tel Aviv, Israel October 28, 2026. (Reuters)
TT

Israeli Opposition Bloc Gathers to See How to Oust Netanyahu

Former military chief Gadi Eisenkot, leader of the Yashar party, speaks following the exit poll at his party headquarters, on the evening of Israel's national election, in Tel Aviv, Israel October 28, 2026. (Reuters)
Former military chief Gadi Eisenkot, leader of the Yashar party, speaks following the exit poll at his party headquarters, on the evening of Israel's national election, in Tel Aviv, Israel October 28, 2026. (Reuters)

The Israeli opposition bloc led by Gadi Eisenkot gathered on Tuesday for the first time since elections as they strategize how to oust Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, with divisions on whether to ally with Arab lawmakers.

Opposition party heads gathered in Herzliya, the tech industry hub north of Tel Aviv where former military chief Eisenkot lives, a week after the election produced an inconclusive result.

Yair Lapid, a centrist former prime minister who headed the opposition in the outgoing parliament, said as he entered that Netanyahu was backing an "extreme and dangerous attempt to invalidate the elections".

"What we need to do now is go and form a government, because the conduct of recent days is just a reminder that we must remove Netanyahu and his people from the Prime Minister's Office," Lapid told reporters.

"They have already caused enough damage to the State of Israel and to the people of Israel," he said.

Netanyahu and his allies have repeatedly alleged major fraud or malfeasance by Arab-majority parties which made historic gains last week, winning 19 seats in the 120-member parliament on the back of anger over the hard-right government's rhetoric towards Arab citizens of Israel.

No side won a majority. Eisenkot's diverse opposition bloc won 48 seats while Netanyahu's camp secured 53, of which 27 are from his Likud party.

The Arab parties could bring Eisenkot to a majority but the opposition is divided on whether to ally with them, and Arab politicians did not join the talks in Herzliya.

Despite their diverging views on various issues, including the role of Arab lawmakers, all the party leaders in Eisenkot's bloc have said they would back him to form the next government.

Public opinion polls conducted before the election showed that Jewish Israeli opposition supporters are divided over including Arab parties in government while right-wing Israelis are adamantly opposed.

- 'Political reality' -

Yousef Jabareen, the head of the largest Arab-majority party in the next parliament, told AFP that the opposition needed to accept "political reality" and team up to remove Netanyahu.

Arab-Israelis are descendants of Palestinians who remained after Israel's creation in 1948 and account for around 20 percent of the population today.

On the campaign trail, most of the main Jewish opposition parties rejected partnering with the Arab-majority lists citing a lack of common values, particularly around security and national identity.

The notable exception was Yair Golan, head of the left-wing party The Democrats, who said it was racist to exclude working with the Arab minority.

Netanyahu spent the campaign painting Arab parties as untrustworthy and stoking fears of a Palestinian state.

Avigdor Liberman, a right-wing member of Eisenkot's bloc who heads the Yisrael Beiteinu party, on Tuesday stressed that another election must be avoided but said that the Arab lists should not be included in the government.

"Given the political situation that has emerged, there is enough room to maneuver, and with proper navigation it is possible to quickly establish a functioning and stable government without Raam and the Joint List," he wrote on X, referring to the two Arab-majority lists.

On Monday, Netanyahu called for a "broad national government" without the Arab parties and said that as his Likud was the largest single party, he should lead the next coalition.

No opposition leader has voiced any openness to a unity government with Netanyahu, Israel's longest-serving prime minister, pointing to his divisiveness, the corruption charges against him and his failure to prevent the October 7, 2023 attack by Hamas.

"We seek to establish a broad government with our partners and with any party that wishes to join and does not support terrorism," Netanyahu said in a Telegram post.

He ruled out a coalition with Arab-majority lists, alleging that the parties "support terrorism and deny the existence of the Jewish state".

Leaders of Arab-Israeli parties have unanimously condemned the October 7 attack by Hamas without describing the Palestinian movement as a terror group.

Although the leader of the Raam party has recognized Israel as a "Jewish state", other leaders have rejected that definition.