Iran’s Guards in Lebanon: From War Rooms to Front Lines

Billboards showing Iranian Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei and his father, Ali Khamenei, with the slogan “Thank you, Iran,” are displayed on the airport road toward southern Lebanon. (Reuters)
Billboards showing Iranian Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei and his father, Ali Khamenei, with the slogan “Thank you, Iran,” are displayed on the airport road toward southern Lebanon. (Reuters)
TT

Iran’s Guards in Lebanon: From War Rooms to Front Lines

Billboards showing Iranian Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei and his father, Ali Khamenei, with the slogan “Thank you, Iran,” are displayed on the airport road toward southern Lebanon. (Reuters)
Billboards showing Iranian Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei and his father, Ali Khamenei, with the slogan “Thank you, Iran,” are displayed on the airport road toward southern Lebanon. (Reuters)

Since the latest war erupted in Lebanon, evidence has mounted of a direct role by Iran’s Revolutionary Guards in managing the fight alongside Hezbollah. But the scale and nature of that role, and the number of Iranians involved, remain unclear.

With no precise figures available, several accounts point to the presence of Iranian personnel and officers in Lebanon during the war, both in command roles and on the battlefield.

Revolutionary Guards officers in the battle

In March, Prime Minister Nawaf Salam moved to curb what was seen as the Revolutionary Guards’ chaotic access to Beirut.

He asked the authorities to take the necessary steps to prevent any military or security activity by members of the Revolutionary Guards in Lebanon ahead of their deportation. The Cabinet also decided to reinstate visa requirements for Iranians entering Lebanon.

One of the strongest signs of Revolutionary Guards' involvement was the killing of Guards officers in an Israeli strike on the Ramada Hotel in Beirut’s Raouche district on March 8.

Iran announced the deaths in a letter to the UN secretary-general. Iran’s permanent representative to the United Nations, Amir Saeid Iravani, said four Iranian diplomats had been killed in the attack. They were later mourned in Iran as Revolutionary Guards officers.

Information in Beirut indicated that the Iranians entered the capital using genuine Lebanese passports issued under different names. Additional passports belonging to others linked to the Revolutionary Guards were found inside the targeted room.

That prompted MP Ghada Ayoub to file a report with the Public Prosecutor’s Office at the Court of Cassation, requesting an investigation into information alleging that Lebanese passports had been issued under false names or in violation of legal procedures to people linked to armed groups.

The report also cited evidence that Lebanese travel documents were used to conceal the real identities of Revolutionary Guards personnel.

Other reports also pointed to a direct Iranian presence in the fighting.

During the battle over what is known as the Ali al-Taher Heights, media outlets quoted a senior Israeli security source as saying on Monday that several Iranian officers were in the area in southern Lebanon. The source said they held key positions in managing the battle and coordinating operations on the Lebanese front.

According to that information, one main reason behind Iran’s insistence on halting the Israeli ground operation there was concern for the lives of those officers, or fear they could be captured if the field advance continued.

At the same time, media outlets and online platforms in the past two days circulated posts attributed to the Revolutionary Guards offering salaries of up to $1,000 to those willing to fight alongside Hezbollah.

The posts were seen as another sign of the scale of Iranian involvement in the war in Lebanon.

“One front and a joint operations room”

Retired Brig. Gen. Hassan Jouni, a military expert, said the organic relationship between Hezbollah and Iran makes it difficult to separate the Lebanese and Iranian fronts.

“What happened in the war clearly showed that the two fronts were managed as one front, within a joint operations room and under a unified operational plan aimed at scattering and exhausting Israeli air-defense systems,” he told Asharq Al-Awsat.

He said that the pattern reflected unified battle management and decision-making. It showed, he added, that the confrontation was not two separate fronts, but one linked theater of operations coordinated directly by Iran and Hezbollah.

From operations rooms to the battlefield

While the presence of Iranian officers in operations rooms now appears settled, the number of Iranian fighters on the ground remains unclear.

Political analyst Kassem Kassir, who is close to Hezbollah, stirred controversy two days ago when he spoke of 50,000 Iranian fighters taking part in the war in Lebanon and 10,000 of them being killed. The remarks triggered surprise and questions in Lebanon.

Kassir later said his comments were made in response to accounts portraying the war as a direct Iranian-Israeli confrontation on Lebanese soil. He said the exaggerated figures were meant to show how unrealistic such claims were.

“The exaggeration in the figures I mentioned is proof that the matter is not true,” he told Asharq Al-Awsat.

Political analyst Ali al-Amine offered a different reading. He said the latest war had carried, from the start, the character of an Iranian-Israeli confrontation on Lebanese soil. He pointed first to the Revolutionary Guards officers killed in the Beirut hotel.

“After the assassination of Hezbollah’s first-tier leaders in 2024, foremost among them Hezbollah Secretary-General Hassan Nasrallah, along with a number of elite commanders and Radwan Force leaders, a major vacuum emerged inside the party’s command structure,” al-Amine told Asharq Al-Awsat.

“That required Revolutionary Guards leaders and officers to come to Lebanon to manage the battle and oversee operations. They were not ordinary fighters, but high-level specialized officers who took charge of command, coordination and field axes.”

He said the Revolutionary Guards and Hezbollah have an intertwined organizational and military structure, not merely an alliance between two separate partners.

Non-Lebanese bodies in the south

Al-Amine also spoke of a large number of non-Lebanese fighters in the south.

“After the ceasefire, operations began to recover bodies from southern villages, but in some areas, residents were initially asked not to go there,” he said.

“The scale of destruction was one main reason. But there was another reason: a large number of bodies under the rubble of homes. It emerged that some of the dead were not Lebanese, including Iranians and Palestinians from the camps, in addition to information about Iraqis who took part in the battles.”

He said the Iranians, as a core part of battle management, were not only in operations rooms but also present on some field axes.

At the same time, he said, there was a broad blackout on the scale of human losses. Hezbollah no longer publishes detailed death notices as it did in the past, he said, limiting itself to announcing the deaths of senior figures. That raised questions about the real number of dead and the identities of some of them.

He said body-recovery operations were being carried out only by Hezbollah and the Islamic Health Association, while the Red Cross was kept away.

“If that indicates anything, it is that there are people whose real identities or nationalities are not meant to be revealed, or who are not meant to be included on the official lists of Lebanese dead,” he said.

1,000 Hezbollah dead and 500 missing

Kassir, however, denied that Hezbollah faced a shortage of fighters. He said the nature of the current battle no longer required the same numbers as previous stages, and that Hezbollah had enough fighters to carry out its missions.

Hezbollah does not announce its death toll and has stopped issuing death notices since the start of this war. Kassir estimated that about 1,000 Hezbollah fighters had been killed in the latest war, with about 500 more missing.

He said the death of any Iranian fighters or officers in battle could not be hidden. The announcement of the deaths of the four Iranian officers at the Raouche hotel, he said, proved that any similar Iranian losses would have been officially announced.



Far-Right Israeli Minister Seeks Defense Post in Next Government

 Israel's far-right National Security Minister, Itamar Ben-Gvir, holds a press conference ahead of Israel's general elections in October, in Jerusalem, September 22, 2026. (Reuters)
Israel's far-right National Security Minister, Itamar Ben-Gvir, holds a press conference ahead of Israel's general elections in October, in Jerusalem, September 22, 2026. (Reuters)
TT

Far-Right Israeli Minister Seeks Defense Post in Next Government

 Israel's far-right National Security Minister, Itamar Ben-Gvir, holds a press conference ahead of Israel's general elections in October, in Jerusalem, September 22, 2026. (Reuters)
Israel's far-right National Security Minister, Itamar Ben-Gvir, holds a press conference ahead of Israel's general elections in October, in Jerusalem, September 22, 2026. (Reuters)

Israel's far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir said Tuesday he will seek the post of defense minister in the next government, as the country prepares for next month's elections.

Ben-Gvir, who is a key minister in the right-wing coalition of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, regularly sparks international outrage with his provocative statements and political stunts.

"The reason I am putting myself forward is that the time has come to change the mindset within the army," Ben Gvir said, at a press conference in Jerusalem.

"The time has come to transform the State of Israel's security doctrine with a single objective -- decisive victory on every front," he added.

The firebrand minister put forward a "security plan" that includes the "encouragement of voluntary emigration" of Palestinians from both Gaza and the occupied West Bank, disarming what he called the "terrorist" Palestinian Authority, and increased support for Israeli soldiers.

Earlier in September, Ben-Gvir presented a detailed plan to "encourage" Palestinians from the Gaza Strip to move abroad.

Although members of the ruling right-wing coalition have made multiple statements about transferring Palestinians out of Gaza, it is unclear to what extent their remarks will be followed by action.

Forced displacement of civilians in occupied territory is considered a war crime under the Geneva Conventions.

Ben-Gvir's announcement that he is seeking the defense post caused an uproar among Israeli opposition leaders.

Gadi Eisenkot, a key contender for the premiership, accused his main rival Netanyahu on X of having "lost it" by accepting "criminal Ben-Gvir" in his coalition.

In his youth, Ben-Gvir was charged more than 50 times for incitement to violence or hate speech, but boasts he was cleared in the vast majority of those cases.

According to Israeli media, he was not drafted into the military due to his involvement in extremist far-right groups.

The October 27 vote is expected to be close, and there is no guarantee that the parties currently in power will remain so after then.

According to a Channel 16 survey published Sunday, Ben-Gvir's Otzma Yehudit (Jewish Power) party is polling at seven percent, which would grant it eight out of 120 seats in Israel's parliament, the Knesset.


Trump Hails Burnham as ‘Natural Business Person’ After First Meeting

 President Donald Trump meets with Britain's Prime Minister Andy Burnham during the United Nations General Assembly, Tuesday, Sept. 22, 2026, at the UN headquarters. (AP)
President Donald Trump meets with Britain's Prime Minister Andy Burnham during the United Nations General Assembly, Tuesday, Sept. 22, 2026, at the UN headquarters. (AP)
TT

Trump Hails Burnham as ‘Natural Business Person’ After First Meeting

 President Donald Trump meets with Britain's Prime Minister Andy Burnham during the United Nations General Assembly, Tuesday, Sept. 22, 2026, at the UN headquarters. (AP)
President Donald Trump meets with Britain's Prime Minister Andy Burnham during the United Nations General Assembly, Tuesday, Sept. 22, 2026, at the UN headquarters. (AP)

US President Donald Trump hailed Andy Burnham on Tuesday as a "natural business person" at what the new British leader's team described as a smooth first face-to-face meeting.

After days of preparation for the Trump meeting, Burnham emerged relatively unscathed, with the US leader only taking issue with what he called a "terrible deal" to cede sovereignty of the Chagos Islands, home to a US-British air base.

Otherwise, Trump praised Burnham, saying Britain's seventh prime minister in a decade was someone with whom he could do business and a patriot who had put Britain on the up after replacing the former prime minister, Keir Starmer, in July.

"I think right now, based on my relationship with the prime minister, Andy, I think that ... we're doing very well," Trump said after they met on the sidelines of the United Nations General Assembly in New York for around 40 minutes.

"I think he's a natural business person. We've had a lot of discussions, even before this meeting we were talking with each other numerous times on the phone."

'ENCOURAGING MEETING'

Burnham, who travelled to New York on Monday to take part in the UN assembly, had ‌said little beforehand ‌about his expectations for the meeting with Trump, saying only that in their two phone calls he ‌had found "a ⁠connection" with the ⁠US president.

Afterwards, he repeated that earlier conversations had established that connection "and that very much came through today".

"(I) can certainly work with him. It was a very encouraging meeting," Burnham told reporters, saying the two leaders had found "common ground" on dealing with cost-of-living pressures, ending the conflict in the Middle East and reindustrializing nations to spur economic growth, among other issues.

"He was very upbeat about the country's (Britain's) prospects, which, to be honest, was great to hear."

Before arriving in New York, Burnham had sought common ground with Trump on AI, a focus of his comments to the UN on Monday in which he described the technology as having the ability to bring "huge benefits" to the British and global economy.

Trump has said he wants to cherish AI rather than stifle its growth, dismissing fears ⁠about it as a hoax and "sick conspiracy". The US leader has said concerns can be addressed through the ‌existing justice system without extra regulation — an issue that might cause some friction with Britain.

Yet, ‌while the two leaders seemed to find common ground on a number of issues, there were some pitfalls.

Trump again criticized Britain's move, under Starmer, to cede ‌sovereignty of the Chagos Islands while retaining control of Diego Garcia air base on a 99-year lease.

Trump called the agreement with Mauritius, ‌now on hold, a "terrible" deal. "It's amazing how strategic it is, and I think the prime minister is going to be looking at it," he said.

Burnham later told reporters he had inherited the problem and would work to find a resolution between the different sides. "It was clear that we need to come to that agreement, but I'm confident we can find it working with our US partners," he said.

Burnham also showed a willingness to disagree with Trump if it is ‌in his nation's interest, saying he would "stand firm in the face of any threats" to the right of Falkland Islanders to self-determination and to remain British.

In August, Trump said he was reviewing the ⁠United States' neutral position on the ⁠remote archipelago in the South Atlantic. Days later Argentine President Javier Milei — who will address the UN on Wednesday — said he would impose sanctions on oil companies drilling in the islands.

And the British leader navigated some other bilateral sticking points. Trump appeared unmoved over Britain's decision to block imports from Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank, while its decision not to back the US over the Iran war was also skated over.

OPENS WAY FOR BURNHAM TO FOCUS ON AI

With the meeting done, Burnham turns his focus for UNGA to AI and his support for the technology, which he hopes will help Britain assume a leading role globally.

At an earlier business roundtable, Burnham said he would make the case for Britain in a speech later on Tuesday to help establish "a single set of global principles and standards" to unlock the potential of AI.

Describing Britain as being stuck in 10 years of political turbulence since voting to leave the European Union in 2016, Burnham told business leaders he wanted to usher in a period of stability and embrace AI, while being clear-eyed on the risks.

"So outside Downing Street, on my first day, I said I want to be the circuit breaker," he told the roundtable, including Tim Cook, executive chairman of Apple, and Citigroup CEO Jane Fraser.

"(To) bring forward a very clear path that everyone can understand, a 10-year plan for Britain ... so that nobody's in any doubt at all about what we're trying to do."


Trump Renames AI ‘Super Intelligence’ as Leaders Jostle Over Dangers

US President Donald Trump speaks during the 81st session of the UN General Assembly at the UN Headquarters on September 22, 2026 in New York City. (Getty Images/AFP)
US President Donald Trump speaks during the 81st session of the UN General Assembly at the UN Headquarters on September 22, 2026 in New York City. (Getty Images/AFP)
TT

Trump Renames AI ‘Super Intelligence’ as Leaders Jostle Over Dangers

US President Donald Trump speaks during the 81st session of the UN General Assembly at the UN Headquarters on September 22, 2026 in New York City. (Getty Images/AFP)
US President Donald Trump speaks during the 81st session of the UN General Assembly at the UN Headquarters on September 22, 2026 in New York City. (Getty Images/AFP)

President Donald Trump on Tuesday announced that the US government would rename artificial intelligence "super intelligence" in official communications, as world leaders jostled over how to address the dangers of the fast-advancing technology.

AI has become a major topic at the UN General Assembly after incidents of the technology falling out of the control of humans and warnings by company insiders drew global alarm and calls for better government supervision of the industry.

Speaking to the assembly, Trump stood by his firm opposition to regulating AI, while arguing the word "artificial" undersold the technology and voicing hope the rest of the world would adopt the new term.

Super Intelligence "sounds much better" and "it's much more accurate," he said.

The rebrand is the latest in a series of renamings pursued by the Trump administration, which changed the Gulf of Mexico to the "Gulf of America" via executive order last year and, in August, renamed Lake Ontario "Lake America" amid a trade dispute with Canada.

The US leader also compared the warnings of AI safety advocates to warnings about climate change, whose human causes are affirmed by the overwhelming consensus of the scientific community.

"The United States totally rejects any attempt to construct a globalist scheme to control... artificial intelligence," he said.

"Every major new technology brings challenges, and superintelligence is no exception," he added.

"The very same people who said we'll all be dead in 12 years because of global warming... are now saying that AI is going to kill us all, that robots are going to attack us, and that everything is going to be a total disaster."

Ahead of the UN assembly, leaders of more than 20 mostly European countries urged binding safety measures for advanced AI, warning that the technology's development could outpace the ability to control it.

AI superpowers China and the United States did not endorse the idea.

- 'Vassals' -

Speaking on the sidelines of the UN meeting, Prime Minister Andy Burnham said he planned to use Britain's role as host of the Group of 20 next year to push for a "single set of global principles and standards" around AI, according to Bloomberg.

French President Emmanuel Macron proposed building AI technology independent from the great powers.

"I don't want anyone to become the vassal of one of the great powers," Macron told the UN General Assembly, apparently in reference to China and the US.

"Our investment capabilities must be pooled to build a cutting-edge open-source AI model, which we will share. We should not depend on somebody else."

The US-based AI giants themselves are increasingly asking for global coordination on AI safety, with OpenAI's Sam Altman set to address the UN Security Council on Wednesday.

Anthropic chief Dario Amodei and Hugging Face co-founder Clement Delangue will also participate remotely, a French official said Tuesday.

France, which holds the Security Council presidency this month, initiated the meeting and believes AI's threat to international peace and security has not been sufficiently discussed at the UN.

UN chief Antonio Guterres, meanwhile, called for the US and China to start a dialogue on the technology's future akin to US-Soviet engagement at the height of the Cold War.

"Governments with the greatest AI capabilities have the greatest responsibilities to humanity, to establish channels for dialogue," Guterres said in his address to the assembly.

"At a pivotal moment during the Cold War, strategic rivals came to recognize the need to manage shared existential risks."

China and the US are currently discussing creating a communication channel for AI concerns in anticipation of a Washington summit meeting between Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping on Thursday.