Armenian Genocide Row Fuels Türkiye-Israel Rift

Israel destroyed Hama military airport after reports Türkiye used it to transfer construction materials and equipment to the T4 air base in Homs. (AP)
Israel destroyed Hama military airport after reports Türkiye used it to transfer construction materials and equipment to the T4 air base in Homs. (AP)
TT

Armenian Genocide Row Fuels Türkiye-Israel Rift

Israel destroyed Hama military airport after reports Türkiye used it to transfer construction materials and equipment to the T4 air base in Homs. (AP)
Israel destroyed Hama military airport after reports Türkiye used it to transfer construction materials and equipment to the T4 air base in Homs. (AP)

An Israeli government decision two days ago to recognize what it called the “Armenian genocide” committed by the Ottoman Empire in 1915 has poured fuel on a Turkish-Israeli dispute that has been escalating for nearly three years.

The rift has reached unprecedented levels of mutual accusation between Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan.

The Israeli government decision still needs approval by parliament, the Knesset, to take effect. But Türkiye responded sharply, calling it an attempt to cover up the genocide of Palestinians in the Gaza Strip.

Türkiye’s Foreign Ministry said in a statement overnight Sunday to Monday that “the Israeli government, which systematically oppresses the Palestinian people before the eyes of the entire world, and is being tried before the International Court of Justice on charges of committing genocide against the people of Gaza, seeks to cover up its crimes through the political decision it has taken regarding the events of 1915.”

The events that befell Armenians under the Ottoman Empire remain a disputed, unresolved issue and a sensitive file for Türkiye, which strongly rejects the term “genocide.” Previous Israeli governments avoided formally recognizing what is known as the “Armenian genocide” in an effort to preserve ties with Türkiye, once one of Israel’s closest strategic partners in the region.

Regional shifts since Oct. 7, 2023, have pushed Tel Aviv and Ankara further apart, with their positions diverging and clashing in several arenas, most notably Syria and the Mediterranean.

The mounting dispute prompted US President Donald Trump to say about two weeks ago that “as long as I am president, there will be no deterioration in relations between Israel and Türkiye.”

Some Israeli analysts believe Netanyahu’s government is manufacturing a crisis in the hope that Trump will step in with a proposal that restores Israeli-Turkish ties, imposes security arrangements in Syria that serve Israel’s interests, and produces other understandings linked to gas projects between Asia and Europe, planned through Turkish territory and which Israel is seeking to pull away from Türkiye.

Thirty-one countries, according to official Armenian data, recognize the “genocide.” Israel has repeatedly hinted, whenever tensions with Türkiye rose, that it could take the same position.

Handshake in New York

Days before the war in Gaza erupted in October 2023, Erdogan and Netanyahu were photographed shaking hands in New York on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly. The image marked a historic moment in a diplomatic normalization track that began in 2021 and was followed by plans for mutual visits by the two leaders.

The handshake broke an 11-year public freeze caused by Israel’s attack on the Mavi Marmara, part of the “Freedom Flotilla” to Gaza, in late May 2010.

As the Gaza war unfolded, Türkiye announced it was cutting trade ties with Israel and described Hamas as a liberation and resistance movement. Erdogan sharply called Netanyahu “a killer who has surpassed what Hitler did to the Jews,” while Netanyahu called him an “antisemitic dictator.”

Türkiye also joined a case brought by South Africa at the International Court of Justice accusing Netanyahu’s government of committing genocide against Palestinians in Gaza. The escalation went as far as Israeli officials hinting that the next target after the war with Iran would be Türkiye, a NATO member. Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan dismissed the prospect, while military officials said Israel could not take such a step.

Crisis of trust

Ilkim Buke Okyar, a professor at Türkiye’s Yeditepe University, sees Türkiye’s relationship with Israel as tied to its relationship with the United States. She says that, “whether Türkiye wants it or not, it cannot take a position outside the US-Israeli axis, and Netanyahu understands that.”

Türkiye has become part of the main mediation group on the Gaza ceasefire agreement, alongside Egypt and Qatar, since the deal was announced in October 2025. It also frequently hosts Hamas delegations that meet Turkish security and political officials.

Serhat Erkmen, an advisor at Türkiye’s Center for Middle Eastern Studies, says “the military dimension is the most important reason for describing Turkish-Israeli relations as strategic,” noting “the stagnation in this file since 2010” and ruling out the prospect that it would be affected by tensions in relations.

But Fidan said in November 2024 that Türkiye had submitted a joint letter to the United Nations, signed by 52 countries and two organizations, demanding a halt to the supply and delivery of weapons to Israel.

Haydar Oruc, a Turkish academic specializing in Middle East affairs, concludes that “Türkiye and Israel have moved far away from the concept of strategic partnership that prevailed between them in the 1990s, and now suffer from a crisis of trust.” He rules out any improvement in relations “unless there is a change in leadership on one side, or perhaps on all sides.”

What about Jerusalem’s Armenians?

Jerusalem’s Armenians, who number about 5,000 and whose roots in the city date back to the fourth century, appear to know better than anyone that the Israeli government’s approval of a proposal for “official recognition of the Armenian genocide” has nothing to do with them.

Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar said the recognition was “not an act of revenge for the explicit hostility” shown by Türkiye toward Israel, but rather “a moral duty,” as he put it. But Armenians in Israeli-occupied Jerusalem face a plan of displacement and uprooting prepared by the same Israeli government.

About eight months ago, the Armenian Patriarchate warned in a statement that it was “facing the greatest existential threat in its history.” Two days later, all patriarchs and heads of churches in the city issued a statement supporting the Armenian Patriarchate and the Armenian community.

In the war between Armenia and Azerbaijan, which ended about a year ago, Israel backed Azerbaijan with weapons. Azerbaijan is an important security and strategic partner for Tel Aviv, and Israel paid no heed to Armenia’s requests that it remain neutral.

It is not only Armenians. Many Israelis also know well that their government’s decision was driven by spite and revenge against Türkiye, not by concern for Armenians or human rights.

Previous attempts to move toward recognition of the “Armenian genocide” show the maneuvering that has long surrounded the file.

The rebuttal of Israel’s stated purpose is strongly present even among longtime supporters of recognition, most notably Zehava Galon, the former leader of the left-wing Meretz party, who supports recognition in principle and led parliamentary campaigns from 2009 to make it official.

After the government announcement, Galon wrote: “I wish I could say that the government’s decision now is a great moral victory, but it is not. It is no different from the desperate attempts by previous governments to evade this recognition. Genocide, or crimes, are used by this government as a commodity whose value changes according to interest. We have a government of war criminals.”

She continued: “There is an open arrest warrant against the prime minister at the International Criminal Court in The Hague, and members of the government have used the authority given to them to call themselves for the commission of war crimes. This government is made up of people who said there is no neutral person in Gaza, asked that the idea of dropping a nuclear bomb on the Gaza Strip be considered, demanded the starvation of millions, and indeed starved them, and demanded the extermination of entire communities, and indeed did so. Now this ‘humanitarian’ suddenly remembers compassion for the victims of the Ottoman Empire. Those who quickly led us to the dock in The Hague are now preaching justice. Shame.”

The Israeli government majority in parliament thwarted recognition attempts in 2016 and 2018, after lawmakers tried to advance motions and soften their wording. The calculation was always based on the position toward Erdogan: whenever he takes a decision Israel dislikes, they pull out this card against him.

Azerbaijan and Armenia weigh in

The Turkish-Israeli dispute over the “Armenian genocide” has drawn in other parties, most notably Azerbaijan, whose Foreign Ministry on Monday called Israel’s decision “concerning,” despite the strong ties between Tel Aviv and Baku.

It said the Israeli decision, “turning complex historical processes into a subject for political decisions, far from legal and scientific foundations, is unacceptable, does not serve reconciliation and mutual understanding, and harms efforts to achieve sustainable peace and reconciliation in the region.”

Azerbaijan’s position stems from its close relationship with Türkiye, which cut ties and closed its borders with Armenia in 1993 in full solidarity with Azerbaijan after Armenia occupied Nagorno-Karabakh. Türkiye strongly supported Azerbaijan, a member of the Organization of Turkic States, in its 2020 war in Nagorno-Karabakh, when Azerbaijan regained control of it.

Since 2021, Türkiye and Armenia have held talks to normalize relations and resolve outstanding disputes. Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan visited Türkiye in 2023 and has met Erdogan more than once on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly.

Azerbaijan and Armenia reached agreement last year on the text of a peace treaty, helping push Armenian-Turkish relations forward.

In a striking reaction from Armenia, Pashinyan said “the issue is being exploited politically, and we see no need to respond, because we believe Armenia’s interest lies in not taking part in attempts to turn the Armenian genocide issue into a political weapon,” according to Armenia’s Armenpress news agency on Tuesday.

As part of the normalization track with Ankara, Armenia’s Foreign Ministry said in 2024 that international recognition of the “genocide” was no longer a priority in its foreign policy.



China Tells US Ready to Strengthen Cooperation

 Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi speaks during a press conference after the Lancang-Mekong Cooperation Foreign Ministers Meeting in Beijing Wednesday, Nov. 4, 2026. (AP)
Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi speaks during a press conference after the Lancang-Mekong Cooperation Foreign Ministers Meeting in Beijing Wednesday, Nov. 4, 2026. (AP)
TT

China Tells US Ready to Strengthen Cooperation

 Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi speaks during a press conference after the Lancang-Mekong Cooperation Foreign Ministers Meeting in Beijing Wednesday, Nov. 4, 2026. (AP)
Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi speaks during a press conference after the Lancang-Mekong Cooperation Foreign Ministers Meeting in Beijing Wednesday, Nov. 4, 2026. (AP)

China's top diplomat Wang Yi told US Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Wednesday Beijing was "willing to strengthen" cooperation with Washington, the Chinese foreign ministry said.

Wang and Rubio spoke by phone ahead of an expected meeting between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping at the November 18-19 Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) conference in China's Shenzhen.

The two countries reached an agreement to calm trade tensions during last year's APEC summit in South Korea after they had exchanged tariff escalations earlier in 2025.

"(China) is willing to strengthen communication and cooperation with the US," Wang told Rubio during a "constructive" call, the ministry said in a statement.

Wang added that the countries would support each other in hosting the 2026 APEC summit and G20 summit in the United States.

Beijing stands ready to "properly handle differences and sensitive issues" with Washington, Wang said, adding that "stability" in US-China ties had been "hard won".

Next week's APEC summit could also see a trilateral meeting with Trump, Xi and Russian President Vladimir Putin, after each country said they were in discussions about such talks.

Trump said Sunday he would likely be meeting Xi and Putin to discuss ending the Iran war.


Italy Evacuates Hundreds of Schools Due to Bomb Alert, with Threats in Scotland and Ireland

Policemen stand outside the "Virgilio" middle school after children have been evacuated due to a bomb alert, in Rome on November 11, 2026. (AFP)
Policemen stand outside the "Virgilio" middle school after children have been evacuated due to a bomb alert, in Rome on November 11, 2026. (AFP)
TT

Italy Evacuates Hundreds of Schools Due to Bomb Alert, with Threats in Scotland and Ireland

Policemen stand outside the "Virgilio" middle school after children have been evacuated due to a bomb alert, in Rome on November 11, 2026. (AFP)
Policemen stand outside the "Virgilio" middle school after children have been evacuated due to a bomb alert, in Rome on November 11, 2026. (AFP)

Italian authorities evacuated hundreds of schools Wednesday after an emailed bomb threat, the latest in a series of disruptions affecting European institutions following recent hoaxes aimed at airlines and broadcasters.

Schools in Ireland, Scotland and Northern Ireland received similar threats, but no evacuations were reported.

The Italian Education Ministry said the email threat was received by over 6,300 schools, but it was not immediately known how many had been evacuated.

Italian Premier Giorgia Meloni said there was no indication of any “concrete danger” to schools and that the threats appeared aimed at “generating alarm and concern.” She said investigations were underway and that she had called a meeting of ministers for later Wednesday.

The anonymous email also threatened Meloni, according to copies obtained by Italian media, including the LaPresse news agency. She did not address the personal threat in her statement, and her office had no immediate comment.

The email purported to come from the leader of an otherwise unknown group with an anti-woman name and contained particularly violent threats. It was signed with the same Russian name used in last week’s threats against European broadcasters.

Authorities have not attributed the threats to any group or state, and no evidence has emerged linking the hoaxes to a government.

Threats reported in other countries

Police in Northern Ireland said they were conducting “urgent inquiries” after a threatening email was sent to hundreds of schools. Police in Scotland said they were treating similar messages as hoaxes and were not requiring schools to evacuate.

“Our assessment remains that they do not represent a credible threat,” Police Scotland said.

Police in Ireland also said they were aware of a “generic communication” sent to several educational institutions.

Rome students learn of threat after evacuation

“These are very delicate considerations, because there is always the risk that there is someone else behind the madman,” Italian Education Minister Giuseppe Valditara told reporters. “Given that so many schools are involved, the real risk is almost non-existent.”

At Rome’s Mamiani high school, students poured into the streets, mistaking the alarm for the recess bell. They learned of the bomb threat only after they were outside.

“They are saying it was a bomb alert because an email arrived from Russian hackers in which they said they would have killed everyone. It was pretty violent,” said Anita Bartocci, an 18-year-old student.

Hoax pattern emerges

Bomb threats targeted dozens of flights across Europe last week, following a string of hoaxes that forced flight diversions and left airlines scrambling to keep passengers safe and minimize disruption.

False bomb threats are relatively common, but so many in such a short period are unusual. No suspicious items were found and no one was injured. Still, the threats raised concerns because they followed other disruptions across Europe, including attacks on supermarket refrigeration systems and drone incursions.

Defense Minister Guido Crosetto said the emailed threats were aimed at “sowing terror, or creating concern.”

“It’s too easy. Any one of us can use the available means and instruments to send an email to a school, a daycare, an airline, saying that there’s a bomb,” Crosetto told reporters at an event Wednesday.

Italian Foreign Minister Antonio Tajani said Saturday that his personal data had been leaked to the dark web, an encrypted part of the internet. PM Meloni blamed pro-Russian hackers.

The company overseeing construction of the Brenner Base Tunnel, which will connect Austria and Italy, also said over the weekend that it had been hacked last month.


World Leaders Urge Stronger and Faster Action at UN Climate Talks Over Inadequate Response

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan plants an olive sapling ahead of the World Leaders Climate Action Summit at the 31st United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP31) in Antalya, Türkiye. (Kiara Worth/UN Climate Change/dpa)
Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan plants an olive sapling ahead of the World Leaders Climate Action Summit at the 31st United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP31) in Antalya, Türkiye. (Kiara Worth/UN Climate Change/dpa)
TT

World Leaders Urge Stronger and Faster Action at UN Climate Talks Over Inadequate Response

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan plants an olive sapling ahead of the World Leaders Climate Action Summit at the 31st United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP31) in Antalya, Türkiye. (Kiara Worth/UN Climate Change/dpa)
Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan plants an olive sapling ahead of the World Leaders Climate Action Summit at the 31st United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP31) in Antalya, Türkiye. (Kiara Worth/UN Climate Change/dpa)

World leaders called for urgent and decisive action on global warming Wednesday as formal talks began at the United Nations climate conference in Türkiye, saying the crisis is disproportionately harming some of the world’s most vulnerable countries.

“You might as well bomb us. That might have been easier than watching climate change tear apart our homes piece by piece,” said Surangel Whipps Jr., president of the island nation of Palau. “We are at war with a crisis we did not create. A war no peace treaty can end, only urgent action can.”

The annual summit follows a year of deadly floods, heat waves and other disasters. Leaders said geopolitical conflicts had diverted attention from climate change.

Leaders of the world’s three biggest polluting nations — China, the United States and India, which together account for more than half of global carbon dioxide emissions — skipped the summit at COP31.

Their absence left a handful of national leaders and UN officials to press for action as a new report warned of a widening gap between countries’ climate pledges and actual emissions cuts.

Scientists say global warming is likely to exceed 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7 degrees Fahrenheit) above preindustrial levels. Limiting warming to that threshold was a goal of the 2015 Paris Agreement and remains a focus of international negotiations.

“We know the truth. Now we must act on it because climate action is more than a fight over a number or a thermometer,” UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said in an opening speech. “We are in the fight for our lives and our children’s future.”

'Every fraction of a degree counts'

Guterres outlined a framework for climate negotiations, saying they must prioritize ending fossil fuel reliance, adapting to a warmer world, increasing financial support for poorer countries bearing the brunt of climate change, and promoting cooperation over conflict.

“We do not need countries to agree on everything. But we do need them to cooperate on the things no country can solve alone,” he said.

But addressing climate change has been overshadowed by wars, inflation and geopolitical conflicts, Brazil's President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva said. He pledged to protect the Amazon, the world’s largest rainforest, and urged world leaders to work together for a just, sustainable future.

“Brazil is back to defend the continuity of a healthy planet,” he said.

Micronesian President Wesley Simina said his country is already suffering irreversible losses of coral reefs that “protect our shores, sustain our fisheries, feed our families and carry the stories and traditions of our communities.”

He called climate change the “single greatest threat to the security, livelihoods, and well-being of Pacific peoples, but perhaps worse than what we’ve already experienced is what has yet to come” as temperatures continue to rise.

“Every fraction of a degree counts. Every fraction avoided reduces risk. Every year in which we can slow the rate of warming provides more time for adaptation and reduces the pressure on ecosystems that are approaching their limits,” he said. “This is why the world must act not only deeply, but quickly.”

Amy Pope, director general of the International Organization for Migration, called for more funding to help communities adapt to climate change and build resilience.

Climate change displaced almost 30 million people in 2025, while hundreds of millions more live in places unprepared to withstand future risks, Pope told The Associated Press on the sidelines of the summit.

“The issue that policymakers fail to understand is that making these investments in building resilience to climate in these vulnerable communities will actually save millions of dollars, millions of lives in the end,” she said.

Leaders of some major polluting nations absent

More than 70 world leaders and senior government officials are speaking at the summit, though what can be accomplished remains uncertain in the absence of leaders from key nations.

“It really is a disgrace that just one of the seven G7 heads of state and only a handful of G20 leaders are attending this summit,” said Mohamed Adow, director of Power Shift Africa, a climate and energy think tank. “The world’s biggest economies should be leading the response to the climate crisis, not leaving it to others.”

The United States, the world’s second-largest polluter after China, is absent from the talks for the second consecutive year. President Donald Trump, who has called climate change a hoax, has targeted offshore wind projects and removed rules limiting power plant emissions.

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen attended, but many leaders of European countries stayed away.

“More than half of the top leaders of the EU countries are not showing up at the leaders’ summit,” Climate Action Network Europe Director Chiara Martinelli told The Associated Press. “If Europe wants to help steer the global transition, it needs to show up and be part of it.”

Conference colored by fears over speed of climate action

The gap between nations’ climate plans and action on the ground is widening, according to an annual climate change performance index published Wednesday by Germanwatch and the New Climate Institute.

“Overall, current collective efforts are not enough to prevent catastrophic climate change. But we see clear potential for improvement,” said Jan Burck of Germanwatch.

COP31 host Türkiye and Australia, which is leading the negotiations, ranked among the worst performers in curbing emissions.

The talks come as the war in Iran has driven up global prices for oil, gasoline and products such as fertilizers and pesticides, prompting governments to rethink energy policies and investment in renewable sources such as wind and solar.

Past talks have been criticized for producing promises that later went unfulfilled.

Delegates at the 2023 conference in Dubai agreed to transition away from fossil fuels such as coal, oil and gas, the main drivers of climate change. But subsequent conferences in Azerbaijan and Brazil yielded little agreement on how to reduce their use. Last year’s conference in Brazil produced a compromise deal pledging more money to help vulnerable nations adapt to climate change.