PKK Threatens to Halt Peace Process with Türkiye

PKK leaders in northern Iraq (Reuters)
PKK leaders in northern Iraq (Reuters)
TT

PKK Threatens to Halt Peace Process with Türkiye

PKK leaders in northern Iraq (Reuters)
PKK leaders in northern Iraq (Reuters)

PKK leaders in northern Iraq threatened to halt a peace process with Türkiye centered on the group’s dissolution and disarmament unless Ankara takes concrete steps toward democratic reform.

Cemil Bayik, a member of the Executive Council of the Kurdistan Communities Union (KCK), an umbrella organization that includes the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK), said the initiative, which the Turkish government calls the “terrorism-free Türkiye,” would come to a halt unless democratic measures were introduced.

Bayik discussed the disarmament of the PKK as a condition for moving into the democratic political arena and integrating its members into Turkish society.

He criticized the National Solidarity and Social Integration Law, passed by the Turkish parliament on Aug. 10 and known as the “framework law,” saying it represented a beginning but remained “incomplete.”

Criticism and warning

Bayik said the rationale for enacting the law had not been made clear and that merely stating that terrorism would end had weakened it. He said the law’s purpose would have been clearer had it specified that laying down arms was linked to democratic measures.

“The language used in the law is deeply flawed,” Bayik said in remarks to the PKK-linked Firat News Agency that were carried by Turkish media on Saturday.

“We have made clear on every occasion that this process is not limited to disarmament. It is important to spell out the democratic steps that disarmament requires, because arms will be laid down in order to enter a democratic political arena,” he said.

Bayik said another important issue was the status of PKK leader Abdullah Ocalan and the group’s senior cadres.

Excluding the leadership and a large number of cadres involved in the process from the framework law was a serious problem, he said, adding that the issue must also be resolved for those who would return to Türkiye.

The law, approved by Turkish President Tayyip Erdogan on Aug. 18, provides for deferred sentences, the suspension of prosecutions and the conditional return of PKK members who surrender their weapons.

However, according to information that has emerged, it excludes 230 senior figures who will not be allowed to return and may instead be housed in a safe zone in Sulaimaniya in northern Iraq.

In an explicit warning that the process could be halted, Bayik said: “If the process falters because democratic steps are absent, the responsibility will lie with the Turkish government.

Democracy can provide a solution to the Kurdish issue, and through this law the government implicitly acknowledges these matters.

“If this process does not advance through democratic steps, it will be obstructed, and the government will bear responsibility.”

Bayik said parliament would “undoubtedly” be the decisive institution in resolving the Kurdish issue.

He called for constitutional and legal amendments recognizing the existence of the Kurds, their language, culture and political will, as well as their rights to local self-government, saying lasting peace could not be achieved without them.

Implementation steps

Bayik’s remarks came as work continued to establish four subcommittees approved at the first meeting of the National Solidarity and Integration Monitoring and Coordination Council on Aug. 24.

The council is chaired by Turkish Vice President Cevdet Yilmaz and includes the ministers of justice, defense, interior and foreign affairs, as well as the intelligence chief, the secretary-general of the presidency and the secretary-general of the National Security Council.

Sources in the ruling Justice and Development Party (AK Party) said the four subcommittees — Judicial and Legal Coordination; Follow-up and Monitoring; Social Consensus and Integration; and Disarmament and Strategic Coordination — would be formed, and their working mechanisms would be determined during September.

The sources, however, ruled out granting Ocalan formal status or direct membership in any committee.

They said Ocalan could contribute in particular to the work of the Disarmament and Strategic Coordination Committee because of his important role in the disarmament phase.

The Kurdish side and the head of the Nationalist Movement Party, an ally of the ruling party, have repeatedly called for Ocalan to be appointed as general coordinator for political participation and integration.

At the same time, Turkish media reports said a security mechanism established among Ankara, Baghdad, Erbil and Sulaimaniya would work intensively until the Turkish parliament begins its new legislative session on Oct. 1.

The mechanism will seek to confirm whether the PKK has withdrawn from 72 positions along the Turkish-Iraqi border and whether the Kurdistan Regional Government has been notified about underground depots containing weapons and heavy ammunition.

Turkish intelligence will verify the information.

Under the plan, camps and caves extending to the Qandil Mountains, including those in the Metina, Zap, Avasin, Basyan and Haftanin areas, will be evacuated by Oct. 1.

About 3,800 PKK members at 18 camps will surrender their weapons. Iraqi border guards and Peshmerga forces will be deployed, particularly in areas near the Turkish border, with the Baghdad and Erbil administrations cooperating in those locations.

Türkiye’s Nefes newspaper, citing unidentified sources, said weapons would be surrendered in the towns of Amedi and Kani Masi in Duhok; at the foot of Mount Qandil and in the town of Koy Sanjaq in Erbil; and in the Ranya district and the town of Said Sadiq in Sulaimaniya.



Iran Says Received US Response to Its Proposal to End War

Vessels in the Strait of Hormuz near the beach of Bandar Abbas, Iran, September 28, 2026. Amirhosein Khorgooi/ISNA/via WANA (West Asia News Agency) via REUTERS
Vessels in the Strait of Hormuz near the beach of Bandar Abbas, Iran, September 28, 2026. Amirhosein Khorgooi/ISNA/via WANA (West Asia News Agency) via REUTERS
TT

Iran Says Received US Response to Its Proposal to End War

Vessels in the Strait of Hormuz near the beach of Bandar Abbas, Iran, September 28, 2026. Amirhosein Khorgooi/ISNA/via WANA (West Asia News Agency) via REUTERS
Vessels in the Strait of Hormuz near the beach of Bandar Abbas, Iran, September 28, 2026. Amirhosein Khorgooi/ISNA/via WANA (West Asia News Agency) via REUTERS

Iranian authorities said on Wednesday they received the official US response to their proposal to end the Middle East war, state media reported, days after US President Donald Trump rejected the plan. 

"At today's cabinet meeting, the American side's proposal was presented to President Masoud Pezeshkian by Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi," government spokeswoman Fatemeh Mohajerani told the official IRNA news agency, without specifying the content of the reply. 

After seven months of conflict, indirect talks between the United States and Iran resumed last week on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly, said AFP. 

Iran said it has put forward seven conditions for ending hostilities and reopening the strategic Strait of Hormuz, a vital route for oil and gas exports. 

The strait lies at the heart of the conflict between the United States and Iran, which began with US-Israeli strikes on Iran in late February. 

Tehran imposed a blockade on Hormuz after the war started, prompting Washington to respond with its own blockade on Iranian ports. 

While not all conditions have been made public, Iran is notably demanding a ceasefire across the Middle East, including in Lebanon, where its ally Hezbollah has been battling Israeli forces. 

It is also demanding the unfreezing of Iranian assets abroad, the lifting of sanctions on its oil sector and an end to the US naval blockade. 

Trump rejected the proposal when speaking to the press on Saturday, but Tehran had been awaiting an official response via Qatari mediators. 

Fighting has subsided in recent weeks, though Tehran has continued to target ships in the strait. 

Iran's Revolutionary Guards, the ideological arm of the country's military, said on Wednesday that they have been striking small vessels that try to pass through the strait. 

"We have been striking ships for quite some time now -- specifically the small vessels I mentioned that attempt to pass. We block their passage, yet the US has not retaliated for a while," Guards spokesperson Hossein Mohebi told state TV. 

The US, meanwhile, has stepped up its economic warfare against Iran, imposing sanctions on Iranian airlines and vowing to take a hard stance against foreign companies that provide them with assistance. 

 

 


US Supreme Court Lifts Limits on Third-country Deportations

The United States has deported thousands of migrants to so-called third-countries, including Liberia, as part of US President Donald Trump's immigration crackdown. Matthew Jacobs / AFP
The United States has deported thousands of migrants to so-called third-countries, including Liberia, as part of US President Donald Trump's immigration crackdown. Matthew Jacobs / AFP
TT

US Supreme Court Lifts Limits on Third-country Deportations

The United States has deported thousands of migrants to so-called third-countries, including Liberia, as part of US President Donald Trump's immigration crackdown. Matthew Jacobs / AFP
The United States has deported thousands of migrants to so-called third-countries, including Liberia, as part of US President Donald Trump's immigration crackdown. Matthew Jacobs / AFP

The US Supreme Court on Tuesday lifted restrictions on the deportations of immigrants to countries that are not their own, while agreeing to hear the issue on its merits in December.

The conservative-dominated high court granted an emergency request by the Trump administration to suspend a lower court ruling that restricted, but did not outright ban, so-called "third-country removals."

The lower court had said people targeted with deportation must be given effective notice ahead of time about where they are being sent to allow them to raise concerns about potential persecution, said AFP.

The three liberal justices on the nine-member bench said they would not have granted the administration's request.

President Donald Trump campaigned on promises to expel millions of undocumented migrants from the United States and has taken several actions aimed at speeding up deportations since returning to the White House in 2025.

The Trump administration has defended third-country deportations as necessary since the home nations of some of those who are targeted for removal sometimes refuse to accept them.

In a brief to the Supreme Court, opponents of lifting the restrictions argued that the lower court ruling did not fully block all third-country deportations, "it simply requires them to do so lawfully."

Trump's solicitor general, John Sauer, meanwhile told the court that the rapid deportation to third countries was "an essential tool to remove certain aliens, including some of the worst criminal aliens."

The lower court ruling "created substantial logistical problems" with removals, he said.

- 'Indefensible' -

An AFP investigation found that the US has offered multimillion-dollar deals and threatened visa restrictions in a bid to get "third countries," especially in Africa, to take such deportees.

Once in these countries -- and outside US jurisdiction -- deportees have been subject to abuse by local guards, indefinite detention, or quickly re-deported to their home countries.

According to an investigation published last week, the United States has deported more than 25,000 people under secretive agreements with 35 countries to take migrants with no ties to those nations.

The investigation by Forbidden Stories found the administration has earmarked $410 million to be paid directly to the receiving countries, or to United Nations agencies to facilitate the returns.

The vast majority of the deportees -- around 20,000 -- were sent to Mexico, but the rest were dispersed to 27 other countries across Latin America, Africa, and the Pacific, and agreements have been finalized with seven more.

Congress has made it US policy not to deport people to countries where their lives would be in danger or they could be subject to torture.

After the high court's ruling, some Democratic lawmakers were calling for more formalized steps to prevent such deportations and uphold due process.

"Congress must step in. No one should be shipped off to a country that is not their own without basic due process and a meaningful opportunity to raise legitimate fears for their safety," House Democrat Lois Frankel said on X.

Rob Menendez, another congressional Democrat, called the Supreme Court's decision "indefensible."

"Taxpayers shouldn't fund tearing people from the only home they've ever known, nor should our legal system fast-track these unilateral deportations."


US Withdraws from European Anti-Corruption Panel

FILE PHOTO: A general view of a US State Department sign outside the US State Department building in Washington, DC, US, July 11, 2025. REUTERS/Annabelle Gordon/File Photo
FILE PHOTO: A general view of a US State Department sign outside the US State Department building in Washington, DC, US, July 11, 2025. REUTERS/Annabelle Gordon/File Photo
TT

US Withdraws from European Anti-Corruption Panel

FILE PHOTO: A general view of a US State Department sign outside the US State Department building in Washington, DC, US, July 11, 2025. REUTERS/Annabelle Gordon/File Photo
FILE PHOTO: A general view of a US State Department sign outside the US State Department building in Washington, DC, US, July 11, 2025. REUTERS/Annabelle Gordon/File Photo

The Trump administration has withdrawn the United States from a top European anti-corruption watchdog as it forges ahead with plans to disengage from international and multilateral organizations that it accuses of exceeding their mandates, being inefficient or not adapting to US policies.

The Council of Europe said Tuesday that the US formally notified it a day earlier that it would leave the Group of States against Corruption, or GRECO. Only two other countries have left GRECO before — Russia and Belarus.

The State Department confirmed the move, saying that US participation, which requires an annual monetary contribution, “does not provide tangible benefits to US national security.”

“The era of writing blank checks to international bureaucracies is over,” it said. “The department is instead prioritizing higher-impact tools to combat corruption, such as visa restrictions, sanctions, and targeted foreign assistance to strengthen foreign criminal investigations into corruption directly threatening US security and prosperity.”

The Strasbourg-based Council of Europe said the US had been “a valuable contributor” to GRECO "and to the exchange of experience and good practice in preventing and combating corruption.”

“GRECO remains open to resuming cooperation with the United States in the future in support of shared efforts to prevent corruption, strengthen integrity and uphold the rule of law,” it said in a statement.

The decision was announced a week after the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe said the US had declined to invite its members to observe November’s congressional midterm elections, a sharp break from past practice.

The US has already withdrawn from a number of European-based UN and multilateral agencies, including the World Health Organization and the UN Human Rights Council, and is weighing further such steps.

The US withdrew in January from another Council of Europe panel — the Venice Commission, which is an advisory body on constitutional law.

GRECO was created in 1999 by the Council of Europe to monitor compliance with the organization’s anti-corruption standards. Membership is not limited to European Union members, and the United States joined a year after its founding.