Blinken Reveals US Strategy to Face 'Gravest Danger' in Middle East

US Secretary of State Antony Blinken at the annual conference of the American-Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) in Washington (AP)
US Secretary of State Antony Blinken at the annual conference of the American-Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) in Washington (AP)
TT

Blinken Reveals US Strategy to Face 'Gravest Danger' in Middle East

US Secretary of State Antony Blinken at the annual conference of the American-Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) in Washington (AP)
US Secretary of State Antony Blinken at the annual conference of the American-Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) in Washington (AP)

US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken laid out a US administration's strategy towards the Middle East region, announcing a three-pronged approach to address the Iranian nuclear threat.

Blinken said that the US has a genuine national security interest in promoting the Abraham Accords, recognizing that there are illusions that this can be done "quickly or easily."

He asserted that a two-state solution, based on the 1967 lines, remains the best way to achieve the goal of Israelis and Palestinians living side by side in peace.

The top diplomat was speaking at the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) Policy Summit, markings the 75th anniversary of the US-Israeli "indispensable" partnership, which extends to developing the clean energy technologies of the future, producing vaccines, and charting the future of space exploration.

Blinken recalled part of the historical milestones in the relationship between the two parties and confirmed that Biden's administration is working to strengthen these ties.

Blinken said that the world is "genuinely living through an inflection point, a point that comes around every six or seven generations," where the changes are "so profound," stressing that the US-Israel relationship is underwritten by Washington's commitment to Israel's security.

"That commitment is non-negotiable; it is ironclad," he asserted.

He recalled that his country provides $3.3 billion in foreign military financing to Israel each year, an additional $500 million in funding for missile defense, and tens of millions more for new counter-drone and anti-tunneling technologies.

The fund comes with the 2016 memorandum of understanding negotiated by the Obama-Biden administration, said Blinken, adding that Washington also delivered an additional $1 billion in funding to replenish supplies for Israel's Iron Dome.

Blinken touched on expanding the joint military exercises and conducting collaborative research and development on advanced military capabilities, working together on cutting-edge defense systems, including Israel's new laser-focused Iron Beam, noting that "America is more secure when Israel is strong."

- Iranian danger

Blinken rejected "constant efforts to delegitimize Israel" aimed at "undermining or isolating Israel's rightful place on the international stage," including "anti-Israel efforts to exclude and target it at the UN Security Council, the Human Rights Council, and other forums around the world."

"There is no danger that Israel faces that is graver than the one posed by the Iranian regime," which "routinely threatens to wipe Israel off the map" and continues to provide weapons to terrorists and proxies like Hezbollah and Hamas, who reject Israel's right to exist."

He also indicated that Iran is arming Russian forces with drones to kill Ukrainian civilians and destroy their infrastructure in exchange for sophisticated Russian weaponry.

Blinken firmly stressed that Washington would continue its "economic pressure and deterrence reinforce our diplomacy. "

"If Iran rejects the path of diplomacy, then – as President Biden has repeatedly made clear – all options are on the table to ensure that Iran does not obtain a nuclear weapon."

He explained the three-pronged approach based on "diplomacy, economic pressure, deterrence," including "strengthening Israel's military capabilities – has bipartisan support, and it puts us in the strongest possible position to address the Iranian nuclear threat."

- Abraham Accords

The US official stated that Biden's administration is advancing Israel's security by deepening "Israel's relationships with its neighbors to advance our goal of regional integration and de-escalation," describing it as a "cornerstone of his Middle East policy."

He revealed that the State Department will soon create a "new position to further our diplomacy and engagement with governments, the private sector, nongovernmental organizations, all working toward a more peaceful and a more connected region."

"We are now working hard behind the scenes, leading with diplomacy to continue the momentum," after Saudi Arabia and Oman unlocked their airspace to civilian flights to and from Tel Aviv.

Lebanon and Israel completed "a historic agreement last fall to establish their permanent maritime boundary."

He said he will visit Jeddah and Riyadh this week to talk with "our Saudi and Gulf counterparts about a more integrated, prosperous, and stable region."

- Two-state solution

Blinken acknowledged that "integration and normalization efforts are not a substitute for progress between Israelis and Palestinians," considering that Israel's relations with its partners should "advance the well-being of the Palestinian people and the prospects for a two-state solution."

He asserted that a two-state solution, based on the 1967 lines, with "mutually agreed swaps – remains the best way to achieve our goal of Israelis and Palestinians living side by side in peace, with equal measures of security, freedom, justice, opportunity, and dignity."

Blinken believed a "two-state solution is vital to preserving Israel's identity as a Jewish and democratic state," reiterating de-escalation and "refraining from unilateral measures that increase tensions."

He addressed the recent attack at the border with Egypt, which resulted in the deaths of three Israeli soldiers, saying it is "another tragic reminder of these daily dangers."

"Settlement expansion clearly presents an obstacle," said Blinken warning against any "move toward annexation of the West Bank" or "disruption of the historic status quo at the holy sites, the continuing demolitions of homes, and the evictions of families."



Syria: SDF’s Mazloum Abdi Says Implementation of Integration Deal May Take Time

People sit outdoors surrounded by nature, with the Tigris river flowing in the background, following a long atmospheric depression, near the Syrian-Turkish border in Derik, Syria, February 16, 2026 REUTERS/Orhan Qereman
People sit outdoors surrounded by nature, with the Tigris river flowing in the background, following a long atmospheric depression, near the Syrian-Turkish border in Derik, Syria, February 16, 2026 REUTERS/Orhan Qereman
TT

Syria: SDF’s Mazloum Abdi Says Implementation of Integration Deal May Take Time

People sit outdoors surrounded by nature, with the Tigris river flowing in the background, following a long atmospheric depression, near the Syrian-Turkish border in Derik, Syria, February 16, 2026 REUTERS/Orhan Qereman
People sit outdoors surrounded by nature, with the Tigris river flowing in the background, following a long atmospheric depression, near the Syrian-Turkish border in Derik, Syria, February 16, 2026 REUTERS/Orhan Qereman

Mazloum Abdi, commander of the Syrian Democratic Forces, said the process of merging the SDF with Syrian government forces “may take some time,” despite expressing confidence in the eventual success of the agreement.

His remarks came after earlier comments in which he acknowledged differences with Damascus over the concept of “decentralization.”

Speaking at a tribal conference in the northeastern city of Hasakah on Tuesday, Abdi said the issue of integration would not be resolved quickly, but stressed that the agreement remains on track.

He said the deal reached last month stipulates that three Syrian army brigades will be created out of the SDF.

Abdi added that all SDF military units have withdrawn to their barracks in an effort to preserve stability and continue implementing the announced integration agreement with the Syrian state.

He also emphasized the need for armed forces to withdraw from the vicinity of the city of Ayn al-Arab (Kobani), to be replaced by security forces tasked with maintaining order.


Israeli Far-Right Minister to Push for ‘Migration’ of West Bank, Gaza Palestinians 

A Palestinian man checks leather belts as people prepare for Ramadan, in the old city of Hebron in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, February 17,2026. (Reuters)
A Palestinian man checks leather belts as people prepare for Ramadan, in the old city of Hebron in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, February 17,2026. (Reuters)
TT

Israeli Far-Right Minister to Push for ‘Migration’ of West Bank, Gaza Palestinians 

A Palestinian man checks leather belts as people prepare for Ramadan, in the old city of Hebron in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, February 17,2026. (Reuters)
A Palestinian man checks leather belts as people prepare for Ramadan, in the old city of Hebron in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, February 17,2026. (Reuters)

Israel's far-right Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich said he would pursue a policy of "encouraging the migration" of Palestinians from the occupied West Bank and Gaza Strip, Israeli media reported Wednesday.

"We will eliminate the idea of an Arab terror state," said Smotrich, speaking at an event organized by his Religious Zionism Party late on Tuesday.

"We will finally, formally, and in practical terms nullify the cursed Oslo Accords and embark on a path toward sovereignty, while encouraging emigration from both Gaza and Judea and Samaria.

"There is no other long-term solution," added Smotrich, who himself lives in a settlement in the West Bank.

Since last week, Israel has approved a series of measures backed by far-right ministers to tighten control over the West Bank, including in areas administered by the Palestinian Authority under the Oslo Accords, in place since the 1990s.

The measures include a process to register land in the West Bank as "state property" and facilitate direct purchases of land by Jewish Israelis.

The measures have triggered widespread international outrage.

On Tuesday, the UN missions of 85 countries condemned the measures, which critics say amount to de facto annexation of the Palestinian territory.

"We strongly condemn unilateral Israeli decisions and measures aimed at expanding Israel's unlawful presence in the West Bank," they said in a statement.

"Such decisions are contrary to Israel's obligations under international law and must be immediately reversed.

"We underline in this regard our strong opposition to any form of annexation."

UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres on Monday called on Israel to reverse its land registration policy, calling it "destabilizing" and "unlawful".

The West Bank would form the largest part of any future Palestinian state. Many on Israel's religious right view it as Israeli land.

Israeli NGOs have also raised the alarm over a settlement plan signed by the government which they say would mark the first expansion of Jerusalem's borders into the occupied West Bank since 1967.

The planned development, announced by Israel's Ministry of Construction and Housing, is formally a westward expansion of the Geva Binyamin, or Adam, settlement situated northeast of Jerusalem in the West Bank.

The current Israeli government has fast-tracked settlement expansion, approving a record 52 settlements in 2025.

Excluding Israeli-annexed east Jerusalem, more than 500,000 Israelis live in West Bank settlements and outposts, which are illegal under international law.


Maliki Can Withdraw as Candidacy as Iraq PM the Easy or Hard Way

Members of the Coordination Framework hold a meeting. (Iraqi News Agency)
Members of the Coordination Framework hold a meeting. (Iraqi News Agency)
TT

Maliki Can Withdraw as Candidacy as Iraq PM the Easy or Hard Way

Members of the Coordination Framework hold a meeting. (Iraqi News Agency)
Members of the Coordination Framework hold a meeting. (Iraqi News Agency)

Iraqi Former Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki declined at the last minute to attend a meeting of the pro-Iran Coordination Framework on Monday night that was aimed at settling the crisis over his nomination as prime minister.

Instead of declaring that he was pulling out as candidate, as had been expected, Maliki informed his close circle that he is “following through with his nomination to the end,” trusted sources told Asharq Al-Awsat.

Iraq has come under intense pressure from the US to withdraw the nomination. In January, President Donald Trump warned Baghdad against picking Maliki as its PM, saying the United States would no longer help the country.

“Last time Maliki was in power, the Country descended into poverty and total chaos. That should not be allowed to happen again. Because of his insane policies and ideologies, if elected, the United States of America will no longer help Iraq,” Trump wrote on Truth Social.

Maliki also dismissed as “extortion and intimidation” talks of renewed US sanctions on Iraq, added the sources.

However, circles within the Coordination Framework have started to “despair” with the impasse over naming a new prime minister and are weighing the possibility of taking “difficult” choices, they revealed. Maliki has become a prisoner of his own nomination.

The Sunni Progress Party (Takadum) had voiced its reservations over Maliki’s nomination before Trump made his position clear and which has since weighed heavily on Iraq.

‘Indefinitely’

Maliki’s decision to skip the Framework’s meeting on Monday forced the coalition to postpone it “indefinitely”, exposing more differences inside the alliance that have been festering for months. The dispute over the post of prime minister is threatening to evolve into one that threatens the unity of the coalition itself.

Several sources told Asharq Al-Awsat that Maliki had sent the Framework a written message on Monday night informing them that he will not attend the meeting because “he was aware that discussions will seek to pressure him to withdraw his candidacy.”

Maliki was the one to call for the meeting to convene in the first place, they revealed.

Reports have been rife in Iraq that Shiite, Sunni and Kurdish political leaderships have all received warnings that the US would take measure against Iraq if Maliki continued to insist on his nomination.

Former Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari told Dijlah TV that “Shiite parties” had received two new American messages reiterating the rejection of Maliki’s nomination.

Necessary choice

Maliki and the Framework are now at an impasse, with the latter hoping the former PM would take it upon himself to withdraw his candidacy in what a leading Shiite figure said would help protect the unity of the coalition.

Leading members of the coalition were hoping to give Maliki enough time to decide himself to withdraw, but as time stretches on, the coalition may take matters into its own hands and take “necessary” choices, said the figure.

Other sources revealed, however, that Maliki refuses to voluntarily withdraw from the race believing that this is a responsibility that should be shouldered by the Framework. This has effectively left the alliance with complex and limited choices to end the crisis.

Sources close to Maliki said he has made light of US threats to impose sanctions, saying that if they were to happen, Iraq will emerge on the other side stronger, citing other countries that came out stronger after enduring years of pressure.

Moreover, he is banking on an American change in position, saying mediators have volunteered to “polish his image before Trump and his team.” Members of Maliki’s State of Law coalition declined to comment on this information.

Sources inside the Framework said the coalition may “ultimately withdraw Maliki’s nomination if he becomes too much of a burden on an already weary alliance.”

Doing so may cost them a strong ally in Maliki and force the Framework to yield to Washington’s will, said the Shiite figure. “Maliki may come off as stubborn and strong, but he is wasting his realistic options at this critical political juncture,” it added.

The Framework is divided between a team that is banking on waiting to see how the US-Iran tensions will play out to resolve the crisis and on Maliki voluntarily withdrawing his nomination. The other team is calling for the coalition to resolve the crisis through an internal vote.

Leading Shiite figures told Asharq Al-Awsat that opponents of Maliki’s nomination in the coalition have no choice but to apply internal pressure inside the Framework, which is on the verge of collapse.