Capturing Foreign Hostages Puts Hamas in Trouble, Israel in Crisis

Palestinians and militants from the Ezzedine al-Qassam Brigades run towards the Erez crossing between Israel and north Gaza Strip (AFP)
Palestinians and militants from the Ezzedine al-Qassam Brigades run towards the Erez crossing between Israel and north Gaza Strip (AFP)
TT
20

Capturing Foreign Hostages Puts Hamas in Trouble, Israel in Crisis

Palestinians and militants from the Ezzedine al-Qassam Brigades run towards the Erez crossing between Israel and north Gaza Strip (AFP)
Palestinians and militants from the Ezzedine al-Qassam Brigades run towards the Erez crossing between Israel and north Gaza Strip (AFP)

The about 150 Israeli and foreign hostages held currently in Gaza remain a pivotal tool in determining the fate of the Israeli-Hamas war at a time when both sides have used the matter to raise the ceiling of their goals.

Israel refused to negotiate on the release of the hostages, and says it will continue the war until the captives are released unconditionally and without price.

In return, Hamas said it will not free the hostages until the release of all Palestinian prisoners in Israeli jails – about 5,500 detainees.

At present, the number and identity of Israeli hostages in Gaza remain unclear.

Estimates say there are 150 hostages, 30 of them held by the Islamic Jihad, others held by Palestinian factions and the overwhelming majority by Hamas.

Eyewitnesses say the list of hostages include 10 Americans, several tourists from Britain, Russia and Germany and some workers from Thailand.

Their presence in Gaza certainly affects the decisions of war on both sides.

On the one hand, the governments of the hostages seek to secure their safe return back home, while the US administration is exerting pressure on both sides for their release.

Reports published in Washington said negotiations were underway with Hamas to secure a humanitarian exchange deal under which women, children and the sick would be freed in exchange for Israel releasing Palestinian prisoners of war.

But Israeli officials prefer to use force and not negotiations to release the hostages. They do not want Hamas to register any victory or political achievement.

The Israelis are still in shock from Saturday’s attack by Hamas. The Israeli army is suffering from a serious crisis of confidence not only among local citizens and Palestinians, but in the world.

By using force instead of negotiations, Israeli leaders hope to erase the image of a weak army that was unable last Saturday to prevent the death of 800 Israelis by a small armed organization like Hamas and to protect 22 towns and a barrier that has cost $800 million.

Meanwhile, Hamas has already warned that the captured Israeli and foreign hostages are being held across the Gaza strip so it becomes harder for the Israelis to reach them and free them.

Hamas is seeking to benefit from the hostage file at the foreign level. It hopes that the governments of the captives would stop the Israeli attacks on Gaza and speed up a prisoner swap deal.

But at the same time, the Movement has failed to reveal any proper human treatment of the hostages that could attract foreign sympathy.

The photos and videos posted on social networks showed Hamas members beating prisoners, boasting that they had captured an elderly woman in a wheelchair and several children.

Although Israel is also killing and capturing Palestinians, Israeli authorities are using Hamas photos and videos with well-lubricated media campaigns against the group and the Palestinians.

The images caused outrage in the world against Hamas. But at the same time, they raised concerns for the lives of the foreign hostages, pushing several countries to start negotiations on a prisoner swap deal.

These countries, led by the United States, Britain and Germany and which have stood with Israel against Hamas from the very beginning of the war, expect the Israelis to return the favor and not to block any swap deal.

A military spokesman for the Qassam Brigades said that the Israeli bombing of the Gaza Strip on Monday night and Tuesday led to the death of four Israeli hostages. The reports jeopardize the lives of the rest of hostages and aggravate the relations of these countries not only with Hamas, but also with Israel.

Finally, if the Israelis decide to utilize the “Hannibal protocol”, an order that compels army units to do everything they can to recover an abducted comrade, its use with foreign hostages will lead Israel into a crisis.



Demarcating the Lebanese–Syrian Border Tops Agenda of Trump’s Envoy in Beirut

Talks between Lebanese President Joseph Aoun and US envoy Thomas Barrack two weeks ago in Beirut (AP). 
Talks between Lebanese President Joseph Aoun and US envoy Thomas Barrack two weeks ago in Beirut (AP). 
TT
20

Demarcating the Lebanese–Syrian Border Tops Agenda of Trump’s Envoy in Beirut

Talks between Lebanese President Joseph Aoun and US envoy Thomas Barrack two weeks ago in Beirut (AP). 
Talks between Lebanese President Joseph Aoun and US envoy Thomas Barrack two weeks ago in Beirut (AP). 

US Ambassador to Türkiye Tom Barrack, President Donald Trump’s special envoy to Syria, is prioritizing the demarcation of the Lebanese–Syrian border during his meetings in Beirut this week with Lebanese President Joseph Aoun, Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri, Prime Minister Nawaf Salam, and Army leadership.

The border issue is expected to feature prominently in Lebanon’s response to proposals Barrack presented, as he considers it essential for establishing a mechanism to implement the ceasefire agreement with Israel and asserting Lebanese sovereignty under UN Resolution 1701.

According to Lebanese ministerial sources speaking to Asharq Al-Awsat, Saudi Arabia recently hosted a Lebanese–Syrian meeting that defused tensions and ended clashes across the overlapping areas between the two countries in northern Bekaa. Riyadh’s mediation created a favorable climate to advance border demarcation along the roughly 375-kilometer frontier from north to east.

Saudi sponsorship of this process, along with measures by the joint Lebanese–Syrian committee to prevent further clashes, strengthened Washington’s interest in supporting these efforts. Much of the violence has stemmed from rival smuggling networks once protected by the former Syrian regime and used for trafficking Captagon into Lebanon and beyond.

Calls to demarcate the border date back to the National Dialogue Committee’s first session in 2006, convened by Berri. At Hezbollah’s request, the term “demarcation” was replaced with “delineation,” arguing it was more appropriate for relations between “brotherly nations.” Nevertheless, the issue remained unresolved as Syria refused to engage in formal negotiations, especially before the assassination of Prime Minister Rafik Hariri, when Damascus consistently blocked references to completing the Taif Agreement or withdrawing Syrian troops from Beirut.

Later attempts during Saad Hariri’s premiership under President Michel Sleiman also stalled when President Bashar al-Assad declined to cooperate, citing other priorities. Illegal crossings continued to proliferate, justified as necessary for Hezbollah’s movement to avoid Israeli monitoring and to maintain unregulated “military routes” for arms smuggling.

Sources revealed that in a Damascus meeting co-chaired by Hariri and Assad, Lebanon requested not only border demarcation but also a review of bilateral agreements under the Treaty of Brotherhood to address their pro-Syrian bias. While the status of the occupied Shebaa Farms was briefly raised, it was withdrawn to avoid jeopardizing talks. Though an agreement was reached to start demarcation from the northern border, Syrian officials later backed out, citing preoccupation with the Jordanian border.

Lebanon has since prepared a detailed file with maps and coordinates, ready to support renewed negotiations under President Ahmad al-Sharaa. Officials believe the time is now ripe to demarcate the border and end agreements that once facilitated Syria’s dominance over Lebanon.