Al-Mahdi to Asharq Al-Awsat: Bashir’s Supporters Ignited the War in Sudan

Member of the central council of Sudan’s Forces of Freedom and Change (FFC) alliance and aide to Chairman of the National Umma Party Al-Siddiq Sadiq al-Mahdi. (Asharq Al-Awsat)
Member of the central council of Sudan’s Forces of Freedom and Change (FFC) alliance and aide to Chairman of the National Umma Party Al-Siddiq Sadiq al-Mahdi. (Asharq Al-Awsat)
TT

Al-Mahdi to Asharq Al-Awsat: Bashir’s Supporters Ignited the War in Sudan

Member of the central council of Sudan’s Forces of Freedom and Change (FFC) alliance and aide to Chairman of the National Umma Party Al-Siddiq Sadiq al-Mahdi. (Asharq Al-Awsat)
Member of the central council of Sudan’s Forces of Freedom and Change (FFC) alliance and aide to Chairman of the National Umma Party Al-Siddiq Sadiq al-Mahdi. (Asharq Al-Awsat)

Member of the central council of Sudan’s Forces of Freedom and Change (FFC) alliance and aide to Chairman of the National Umma Party Al-Siddiq Sadiq al-Mahdi accused the critics of those who advocate ending the war of continuously holding onto it “out of fear of jeopardizing their interests.”

He said these critics are also looking to absolve themselves of responsibility for the war by attributing it to “the civil forces working on instituting structural reforms in the state.”

In an interview with Asharq Al-Awsat, al-Mahdi revealed that the Sudanese civil forces are nearing the formation of a broad civil front working to end the war, composed of civil and political forces, resistance committees, professionals, and independent figures.

An agreement has been reached to establish a communication committee to carry out necessary talks for announcing the convening of a conference in the Ethiopian capital, Addis Ababa.

Al-Mahdi explained that the ousted regime and its supporters “ignited the war and are working to perpetuate it, standing against any cessation of hostilities, all in an effort to return to power and open new avenues for corruption.”

“This is why they engineered and supported the October 25, 2021, coup and, subsequently, brought about the catastrophic event of the mid-April war, to obstruct any civil democratic transformation that goes against their interests,” added al-Mahdi.

He described the accusations leveled by the supporters of ousted former President Omar al-Bashir's regime against the civil forces as “treachery” and “illogical”.

He emphasized that those advocating for the continuation of the war are individuals whose interests have been harmed by its cessation, adding that “the supporters of the National Congress Party, and Islamists in general, along with the former figures in power are the ones who ignited the war and hope it continues.”

Al-Mahdi denied the existence of a major problem between the National Congress Party (the ruling party during Bashir’s era) and the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), saying instead that their real issue lies with the political forces advocating for reform.

They aim to preserve their questionable interests, maintain their empowerment, and continue the plundering of the country’s resources, he charged.

According to al-Mahdi, they intend to continue with their corrupt ways and that is why they ignited the war and insist on its continuation. This is why the remnants of the regime have attacked the civilian forces.

Moreover, he emphasized that the primary battle of the National Congress Party and its supporters “is not with the RSF.”

He accused the supporters of the ousted regime and their loyal military forces of “wasting vast sums of money, ranging from $6 billion - $9 billion annually.”

“Sudan produces between 120 and 200 tons of gold annually, but the state only receives about 20 to 30 tons from it, with the rest being lost through smuggling,” revealed al-Mahdi.

He explained that elements from the ousted regime want to preserve these interests. Their involvement in the October 25 coup aimed to obstruct the path to reforming the economic and military state institutions.

“They exacerbated the situation by igniting the senseless war and working to perpetuate it, all driven by their hostility toward the civil forces advocating for a civil democratic transition and institutional reform in the state,” he further explained.

Al-Mahdi firmly stated that “the possibility of establishing a new partnership between civilians and the military in the upcoming phase is unattainable.”

“They have acknowledged that they will not be a part of the political scene,” he commented.

He believed that the continuation of the war “threatens to push the country towards the abyss of a civil war, turning Sudan into a hotspot and a source of disasters in the world and the region.”

He emphasized that “the right path to end the war lies in amplifying the voice of Sudan's interests and isolating the claims of those who sparked the war and are benefiting from its continuation.”

He noted that the war “has caused immense suffering for civilians in Darfur, especially in its western regions, forcing many to seek refuge in neighboring countries under extremely tragic circumstances.”

“Those who remained in Khartoum also endure the harsh realities of life, with scarce means for survival,” he added.

Al-Mahdi further described the decision of the Human Rights Council to establish a fact-finding committee regarding violations in Sudan as “a commendable decision.”

At the same time, he emphasized that the consequences of the war are borne by civilians, and the military leaders continue their conflict without regard for the destruction of the country, the killing of civilians, and humanitarian workers.

This has resulted in Sudan being classified as the second most dangerous country for humanitarian workers, with 19 aid workers killed in a single year, according to a United Nations official.



Netanyahu ‘Takes Revenge’ on Macron in Lebanon

 A photo of Netanyahu and Macron during their meeting in Jerusalem in October 2023 (AFP)
 A photo of Netanyahu and Macron during their meeting in Jerusalem in October 2023 (AFP)
TT

Netanyahu ‘Takes Revenge’ on Macron in Lebanon

 A photo of Netanyahu and Macron during their meeting in Jerusalem in October 2023 (AFP)
 A photo of Netanyahu and Macron during their meeting in Jerusalem in October 2023 (AFP)

Israel’s insistence that France can not be a member of the international committee that will monitor a ceasefire agreement in Lebanon is due to a series of French practices that have disturbed Israel recently, political sources in Tel Aviv revealed.
These practices are most notably attributed to the French judge at the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague, who has joined other judges to unanimously issue arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, the sources revealed.
“The Israeli government is following with concern the French role at The Hague,” they said, noting that veteran French lawyer Gilles Devers led a team of 300 international lawyers of various nationalities who volunteered to accuse Israel of “committing war crimes and crimes against humanity.”
According to the Israeli Maariv newspaper, Israeli officials believe that Devers, who signed the arrest warrant against Netanyahu and Galant, would not have dared to do so without having received a green light from French President Emmanuel Macron.
Israeli sources also mentioned other reasons for Israel’s anger at France, such as the government’s decision to bar Israeli firms from exhibiting at the Euronaval arms show near Paris earlier this month.
French officials have repeatedly said that Paris is committed to Israel's security and point out that its military helped defend Israel after Iranian attacks in April and earlier this month.
Paris has so far also refused to recognize the Palestinian state. But the Israeli government is not satisfied. It wants France to follow the United States and blindly support its war in Gaza and Lebanon.
Tel Aviv also feels incredibly confident that France should be punished, and therefore, decided that Paris could not participate in the Lebanese ceasefire agreement, knowing that the Israeli government itself has traveled to Paris several times begging for its intervention, especially during the war on Lebanon.
Meanwhile, an air of optimism has emerged in Israel around the chances for an end to the fighting between Israel and Hezbollah in Lebanon following negotiations led by US envoy Amos Hochstein.
But any optimism relies on Netanyahu’s final decision. The PM is still conducting talks with his friends and allies of the far right who reject the ceasefire agreement and instead, demand that Lebanese citizens not be allowed to return to their villages on the border with Israel. They also request that a security belt be turned into a permanently depopulated and mined zone.
Hochstein Talks
Meanwhile, political sources in Israel claim that what is holding up a ceasefire deal so far is Lebanon. According to Israel's Channel 12, Hochstein expressed a “firm stance” during his talks with the Lebanese side. The envoy delivered clear terms that were passed on to Hezbollah, which the channel said “led to significant progress” in the talks.
Israeli officials said that Tel Aviv is moving towards a ceasefire agreement in Lebanon with Hezbollah in the coming days.
The channel said that during his late visit to Tel Aviv, coming from Beirut after talks with Speaker Nabih Barri, Hochstein said, “I placed before them (Lebanese officials) a final warning, and it seems to have been effective.”
Iran Obstacle
Despite the “positive atmosphere,” informed diplomatic sources pointed to a major obstacle: Iran.
Channel 12 quoted the sources as saying that Lebanon has not yet received the final approval required from Iran, which has significant influence over Hezbollah.

According to the draft proposal, the Lebanese Army must be redeployed to the south and carry out a comprehensive operation to remove weapons from villages. The US Central Command (CENTCOM) forces will “supervise and monitor the implementation of the operation.”
Channel 12 said Israel believes that such details could still derail the agreement. It also said that Hezbollah could violate the truce.
“In such cases, Israel would have to conduct military operations inside the Lebanese territory,” the channel reported, adding that “one of the unsettled issues is related to the committee that will oversee the implementation of the agreement between Israel and Lebanon.”
The sources said Tel Aviv “insists that France is not part of the agreement, nor part of the committee that will oversee its implementation.”