High Civilian Toll in Gaza Is Cost of Crushing Hamas, Israeli Military Officials Say

 Palestinians gather at the site of an Israeli strike on a house, as the conflict between Israel and the Palestinian group Hamas continues, in Rafah in the southern Gaza Strip, December 19, 2023. (Reuters)
Palestinians gather at the site of an Israeli strike on a house, as the conflict between Israel and the Palestinian group Hamas continues, in Rafah in the southern Gaza Strip, December 19, 2023. (Reuters)
TT

High Civilian Toll in Gaza Is Cost of Crushing Hamas, Israeli Military Officials Say

 Palestinians gather at the site of an Israeli strike on a house, as the conflict between Israel and the Palestinian group Hamas continues, in Rafah in the southern Gaza Strip, December 19, 2023. (Reuters)
Palestinians gather at the site of an Israeli strike on a house, as the conflict between Israel and the Palestinian group Hamas continues, in Rafah in the southern Gaza Strip, December 19, 2023. (Reuters)

Heavy civilian casualties are the cost of Israel's intense campaign to destroy Hamas in Gaza and the militants' urban warfare strategy, Israeli military officials said, in the face of global alarm at the staggering toll from the bombing.

Israel has dropped thousands of tons of munitions over the past 10 weeks, leaving the narrow Mediterranean strip in ruins and killing nearly 20,000, many under collapsed buildings, Gazan officials say. Another 50,000 are injured, with almost no healthcare facilities working.

Speaking with reporters at the Palmachim Air Force Base, 45 km from Gaza on Monday, two officials said Israel acknowledged that the cost in civilian lives of each strike was balanced against an evaluation of the military advantage.

Israel's top war aim is to dismantle Hamas's military capabilities to prevent further attacks after the militants' Oct. 7 killings of 1,200 mainly civilian people and mass hostage-taking shook the Jewish state to its core.

But the loss of life in the Palestinian enclave has eroded global support after 10 weeks of bloodshed and Israel faces escalating pressure to scale-back the offensive. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin on Monday urged his Israeli counterpart Israel to reduce harm to civilians.

Protecting civilians in Gaza was both "a moral duty and a strategic imperative", Austin said, warning excessive violence bred resentment that would benefit Hamas and make peaceful coexistence even harder in the long-term.

France, Britain and Germany on Sunday added their voices to calls for a ceasefire, while US President Joe Biden last week called the bombing "indiscriminate".

In an example of the civilian toll in Gaza, a strike killed 19 people from two local families as they slept at home in the town of Rafah in southern Gaza on Tuesday, including women, children and two babies, Gazan health authorities said. The bomb left a deep crater and rubble where a large building had stood.

"We have never seen such weapons. I was born in 1950, I have never seen anything like this," said Mohammed Zarab, whose family lost 11 people in the strike. He called it "a barbarian act".

Asked for comment on the strike, the IDF said it took feasible precautions to mitigate civilian harm under international law.

Senior Hamas official Ghazi Hamad on Sunday said Israel was "indiscriminately bombing schools and tents that house hundreds of thousands of displaced people and hospitals protected by international humanitarian law".

One of the officials, a legal advisor to the Israeli Defense Forces said hospitals can become a legitimate military target when they are being used by combatants. Hamas denies operating from civilian infrastructure like hospitals or schools.

Drone base

Speaking alongside Austin at a news conference, Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant said Israeli forces operated legally and "to minimize the harm to the civilian population".

The legal advisor said the air force was carrying out "thousands and thousands of attacks and often attacks that require heavy firepower" to break through tunnels.

"Really tragically that results in a large number of civilian casualties," said the official, in a briefing with journalists at the coastal base, from where grey military drones depart on bombing runs.

The Israeli military asked that the officials not be named for security reasons. Military spokesperson Daniel Hagari blamed Hamas' tactics for civilian suffering.

"Our intent is to defeat Hamas and secure the release of our hostages. The tragic suffering of civilians in Gaza — is not our intent."

Yagil Levy, an expert in civil military relations at the Israel Open University, calculated the civilian casualty rate in the war was around 61% in October, almost double that in previous conflicts in Gaza. He said that could indicate rules of engagement being interpreted more flexibly to minimize the risk to Israeli ground forces "by inflicting more death on the other side".

The officials said the government's war goal of destroying Hamas meant the campaign was more intense than in previous conflicts where the goal was to deter the group from attacks.

Whatever the reason, Israel was "not winning hearts and minds", Levy said, arguing that a political alternative was the only long-term solution.

Because of the sheer number of bombs, Israel could not always warn before a strike, which was why it had turned to mass evacuations of conflict zones, the legal advisor said.

Many of Gaza's 2.3 million people have left their homes multiple times under Israeli instructions to avoid strikes, broadcast by leaflets, on radio and social media.

Another senior Israeli military official said Israel pre-plans 90% of its daily bombing raids over Gaza. The officials said pre-planning involved a 10-step process to assess whether a target had military value, and the proportionality of the response, among other things.

Hagari said the military aborted attacks when it saw an unexpected civilian presence and chose which munition to use for each target to avoid unnecessary damage. Gazan authorities estimate 60% of houses have been damaged by the offensive.

"We know this is hard, but we are trying to save lives," Hagari said.



Detainee Imad Amhaz Case Highlights Hezbollah’s Maritime Activities

Detainee Imad Amhaz Case Highlights Hezbollah’s Maritime Activities
TT

Detainee Imad Amhaz Case Highlights Hezbollah’s Maritime Activities

Detainee Imad Amhaz Case Highlights Hezbollah’s Maritime Activities

Israel’s disclosure of a naval commando operation in the northern Lebanese town of Batroun has thrust back into focus a case that straddles security, political, and legal fault lines.

The announcement, accompanied by Israeli claims surrounding Imad Amhaz, comes at a delicate moment, coinciding with ceasefire arrangements, meetings of the monitoring mechanism committee, and ongoing efforts to resolve the files of detainees and missing persons.

The Israeli announcement and security narrative

Israeli army spokesman Avichay Adraee said Israeli forces carried out an operation around a year ago in Batroun, far from the Lebanese Israeli border, during which Imad Amhaz was transferred to Israel for interrogation.

According to the Israeli account, Amhaz is linked to Hezbollah’s secret maritime file and its coastal missile unit, received military training inside and outside Lebanon, and acquired maritime expertise related to operational missions.

Adraee said the interrogation of Amhaz enabled, according to his statement, the acquisition of information related to organized maritime activities run under a secret framework and using civilian fronts.

He said this information helped obstruct the progress of this file at what he described as a sensitive stage, adding that Iran provided support for these activities.

A broader political and security context

In an analytical reading, security and defense researcher Riad Kahwaji told Asharq Al-Awsat that the case of Imad Amhaz and the timing of its disclosure could not be separated from the broader political and security context, particularly the meeting of the ceasefire monitoring mechanism committee and the ongoing negotiations.

He said Israel was trying through this timing to justify its refusal to withdraw from five points by arguing that Hezbollah remained present and continued to conduct military activity.

Kahwaji said the Israeli messages also aimed to show that Hezbollah’s role was far greater than perceived inside Lebanon, arguing that the group was no longer merely a local organization but part of a broad regional project led by Iran.

He said the issue was not related to a trench or one or two military positions, but rather to an integrated structure that included maritime capabilities, infrastructure, and strategic preparations.

He added that Iran had invested tens of millions of dollars in this project, saying Israel was seeking to highlight the scale of military investment in a country whose population was suffering severe internal pressures.

Kahwaji said the file went beyond the area south of the Litani River, noting that the issue was not limited to that region but included the maritime dimension and other areas, particularly since Amhaz was in Batroun in northern Lebanon at the time of the operation.

He said Israel was speaking about tunnels, weapons depots, and equipment in an attempt to show a contradiction between what the Lebanese state declared regarding the disarmament track and what Israel considered a continuation of Hezbollah’s military activity and armament.

He said attempts to strip Imad Amhaz of his civilian status fell within this context, explaining that Israel had from the outset sought to present him as linked to what it called Hezbollah’s naval weapons.

He added that the Lebanese state, in contrast, said the core problem lay in Israel’s continued occupation of the five points, while Israel responded that the main reason was that Hezbollah had not stopped arming itself and that the threat remained.

The Lebanese position and legal dimension

For his part, Nabih Awada, a member of the committee representing detainees and former prisoners in Israeli jails, told Asharq Al-Awsat that the case of Imad Amhaz was, from a legal perspective, that of a civilian abducted from a Lebanese area far from the border. He said his detention did not fall under military arrest.

Awada said this also applied to other documented cases, stressing that the file was being followed up with official Lebanese authorities and with the International Committee of the Red Cross.

He said the Lebanese state was dealing with Imad Amhaz on the basis that he was a civilian and considered that the location of his detention, its circumstances, and its nature did not fall within any military engagement or combat activity. He said this description was what the state relied on in addressing the file before international bodies.

Presidential stance regarding the detainees

Awada said the full details of the file were raised during a meeting with the president of the republic, who he said was fully convinced that the priority of the current stage was the release of Lebanese detainees.

He said the president stressed the need to start at least with civilians detained after the war, given that hostilities had stopped and there was no longer any legal justification for holding them.

He said the president had acted on this basis by communicating with the International Committee of the Red Cross, as well as international and US parties.

The Amhaz family’s stance

Alongside official positions, sources close to the family of Imad Amhaz told Asharq Al-Awsat they denied any knowledge of military activity attributed to him, saying Amhaz had been leading a normal civilian life and that the family had never been informed of any link between him and any military or security activity.

They said the information published did not reflect the family’s account.

Detainees and missing persons figures

On figures, Awada said the file submitted to the president included 20 Lebanese detainees whose presence in Israeli prisons had been confirmed, half of whom were arrested during the war and half afterward.

He said among those detained during the war were seven fighters and three civilians, including Imad Amhaz, who was considered a civilian.

Those detained after the ceasefire were all civilians, in addition to three people missing before the war and around 40 missing since it began.


Baghdad Pushes for Deeper Partnership with Washington against ISIS

Iraqi security says it carried out raid in Syria, arrested ISIS leaders (Government Media)
Iraqi security says it carried out raid in Syria, arrested ISIS leaders (Government Media)
TT

Baghdad Pushes for Deeper Partnership with Washington against ISIS

Iraqi security says it carried out raid in Syria, arrested ISIS leaders (Government Media)
Iraqi security says it carried out raid in Syria, arrested ISIS leaders (Government Media)

An Iraqi official said security cooperation with the United States is intensifying in the fight against terrorism, following a rare joint helicopter raid by Iraqi special forces inside Syrian territory.

An Iraqi intelligence unit, coordinating with Syrian security forces and the US-led international coalition, arrested two high value targets wanted by the Iraqi judiciary in a helicopter raid in northeastern Syria, according to a statement from the Security Media Cell.

A new phase

Hussein Allawi, adviser to the Iraqi prime minister, told Asharq Al-Awsat that Iraq is entering a new phase of strategic commitment to the Strategic Framework Agreement with the United States, which is moving toward broader political, economic, security and military dimensions, as well as technology transfer and infrastructure development.

He said recent operations in Syria and elsewhere reflect efforts to build a stronger partnership.

Allawi added that developing the relationship includes cooperation on building the capacities of the armed forces, sustaining counterterrorism efforts, enhancing cooperation to track and dry up financial assets, combating online propaganda by terrorist organizations including al-Qaeda and ISIS, and addressing the issue of al Hol camp.

He said both sides are serious about raising the level of security and intelligence cooperation in counterterrorism, in light of the completion of the first phase of ending the international coalition’s presence in Iraq under an agreement reached in September 2024, as well as targeting terrorist cells in Syria through cooperation between Iraq, the coalition and its member states.

The military operation came a day after the US Congress voted to repeal the authorization for the use of military force against Iraq. Iraq’s foreign ministry described the decision as historic and said it reinforces respect for sovereignty, while a government adviser said relations between the two countries have shifted from conflict to partnership.

State monopoly on arms

Politically, Ammar al-Hakim, leader of the National Wisdom Movement (Hikma) Movement, stressed that weapons should be held exclusively by the state, calling for an expedited formation of the Iraqi government.

In a speech on Friday, al-Hakim said weapons must be in the hands of the state in line with the constitution and the calls of the religious authority, so that the law stands above all by the will of Iraqis and their national political forces, not through external dictates.

In this context, Fahd al-Jabouri, a senior figure in the Hikma Movement, said the United States had raised concerns related to armed factions and individuals subject to sanctions or terrorism lists, and had conveyed these concerns clearly.

He said the Coordination Framework understood these messages and balanced them against the domestic reality, agreeing that some sovereign ministries would be assigned to figures not affiliated with any armed groups.

Al-Jabouri said dialogue is the best option and that the framework is always seeking to balance its external relations with internal requirements, correct misinformation reaching abroad, and strengthen the role of the state as the most powerful authority.

Kataib al-Imam Ali, a Shiite armed faction that recently won several seats in the new parliament, called for confining weapons to the state and strengthening the Popular Mobilization Forces.

In a statement, its secretary general Shibl al-Zaydi said ratifying the election results and the strong showing by factions aligned with the PMF placed these forces before an important national test.

He said the test lies in improving economic, security and service conditions, consolidating the authority and sovereignty of the state, and strictly confining weapons to the state in line with the constitution and the law, while reinforcing the Popular Mobilization Forces.

Diplomats and political observers say US pressure, particularly calls to limit weapons to the state, could complicate efforts to reach a settlement within the Coordination Framework over the next government lineup, as some forces remain committed to a political role for armed factions and their influence over the choice of prime minister.


Miami Talks Aim to Bridge Gaps in Gaza Deal’s Second Phase

Displaced Palestinians gather to receive food rations at a charity kitchen in Khan Younis, southern Gaza (AFP)
Displaced Palestinians gather to receive food rations at a charity kitchen in Khan Younis, southern Gaza (AFP)
TT

Miami Talks Aim to Bridge Gaps in Gaza Deal’s Second Phase

Displaced Palestinians gather to receive food rations at a charity kitchen in Khan Younis, southern Gaza (AFP)
Displaced Palestinians gather to receive food rations at a charity kitchen in Khan Younis, southern Gaza (AFP)

Mediators are convening for fresh talks in Miami, Florida, as efforts to advance the second phase of the Gaza ceasefire agreement remain stalled, months after the truce came into effect on Oct. 10.

The meeting, which mediators say will focus on outlining a framework for the next phase, comes amid attempts to narrow gaps over key issues, including how Israel’s withdrawal would be carried out, how stabilization forces would be deployed, and the question of Hamas’ disarmament.

An analyst said the momentum could translate into concrete steps as early as next month.

Miami is hosting a meeting between US President’s Special Envoy Steve Witkoff and senior officials from the mediating countries, Qatar, Egypt and Türkiye, aimed at pushing forward the second phase of the ceasefire agreement, a White House official told AFP on Thursday.

Qatari Prime Minister Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al Thani said during a visit to Washington on Wednesday that preparations were under way for a mediators’ meeting on Friday to discuss a framework for advancing the second phase of the Gaza agreement.

Ahead of the Miami talks, Hamas political bureau member Bassem Naim said in remarks that Palestinians expected the talks to result in an agreement to halt all Israeli violations and breaches, and to compel Israel to comply with the provisions of the Sharm el-Sheikh agreement.

Palestinian political analyst Ayman Al-Raqab said the Miami meeting fell within efforts to bridge gaps related to the implementation of Israel’s withdrawal, the deployment of stabilization forces and Hamas’ disarmament. If the momentum continued, he said, concrete steps could be seen next month.

He told Asharq Al-Awsat that Washington’s approach at the Miami meeting should focus on implementing the agreement rather than rebuilding Rafah in a new form or dividing the Gaza Strip.

He said the gaps in the second phase were linked to Israel’s withdrawal, the deployment of stabilization forces and Hamas’ disarmament, adding that discussions should center on practical implementation solutions, not US proposals that serve Israeli ideas.

Egyptian Foreign Minister Badr Abdelatty stressed on Friday, during talks with his Russian counterpart Sergei Lavrov in Cairo, the need to implement UN Security Council Resolution 2803 on the Gaza agreement and to operate the Rafah crossing from both directions.

Lavrov said diplomatic efforts must continue to ensure the sustainability of the Gaza ceasefire.

Abdelatty also discussed the situation with Algerian Foreign Minister Ahmed Attaf in Cairo on Friday, reviewing ongoing Egyptian efforts to solidify and sustain the ceasefire and to implement the requirements of the second phase.

They stressed the need for unimpeded humanitarian aid access, preparing conditions for early recovery and reconstruction, and rejecting any measures that could undermine the unity of Palestinian territory or liquidate the Palestinian cause, according to a statement by Egypt’s Foreign Ministry.

The European Council welcomed, at the conclusion of a summit of leaders from the European Union’s 27 member states in Brussels, UN Security Council Resolution 2803, which calls for the establishment of a Board of Peace and a temporary international stabilization force as part of a plan to end the conflict in Gaza.

European leaders stressed the need to fully implement the resolution and ensure lasting security stability in Gaza, reiterating the EU’s commitment to a two-state solution and international law.

Al-Raqab said Egyptian efforts were banking on achieving a breakthrough alongside Qatar and Türkiye, reaching concrete mechanisms to implement the agreement amid European support for this path.

He added that any arrangements were awaiting a meeting between Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and US President Donald Trump later this month, describing it as decisive.